|
whiteorg72
|
 |
February 12, 2016, 07:42:41 AM |
|
I can not understand, why no one pays attention on Factom on exchanges? All coins (Ethereum, Expanse, MaidSafeCoin, Bitshares, Siacoin) are now quickly climb up. FCT does not want to go up. We have a lot of time standing in one place, even China does not want to up trade FCT, trading volumes fell. It is a pity that so far no one wants FCT  In general, if you want to know the Factom developer is not profitable to coin was expensive, they have already said before, on the contrary it is better if the FCT will be cheap, since it will be more convenient and profitable for the project. Unlike Ethereum developers that help and put their money in the manipulation and movement of the value of their coins, the Factom developers of does not want to influence the course of the FCT that I think is bad for the promotion of the project, if the FCT will be stable such as example 1 or 2 dollars, then on the exchanges it is simply unnecessary to anyone, since it would be impossible to make will not be no interest to the FCT. The Factom developers do not want someone manipulated the course of the FCT and not to those who want to put their money on the IPO and through which they were able to run your project, so that these people were able to earn in the future on a FCT rate volatility. They are only interested in their own profit, so from the beginning created the Entry Credits (EC) and FCT coins were only required to raise money for the IPO. It is my personal opinion, but I believe that this is indeed so. Even if the this project is super great, but developers will not support course FCT coin, the expensive cost of this coin will not. I think much of this is worth considering. Just look for example, if Vitalik Buterin team at Ethereum not have supported the course of their coins, Ethereum could not rise so high. Etherum rise is a clear pump, nothing else. Which means it ll be dumped. One of clear advantages of ether is that it is still mineable which means there s larger base of small users who are fueling this pump. Also, this PoS ability they plan to introduce later during the years helps out a bit. Still, I think both Ether and Factom can coexist cause they target different markets. Just be patient, it might take a few years but Factom will get where it should be. I agree with you that you need to wait a few years. It's clear. On Bitcoin too it was once a great pump, but he is still number 1 in capitalization. It would be great if at the FCT, too, was just a pump for example, up to $100 / FCT coin and then would like to reset the $50 / FCT coin, I think it would be normal and the FCT would take its normal place in the ranking on coinmarket. |
|
|
|
|
Mrboot
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 12, 2016, 07:53:05 AM |
|
I can not understand, why no one pays attention on Factom on exchanges? All coins (Ethereum, Expanse, MaidSafeCoin, Bitshares, Siacoin) are now quickly climb up. FCT does not want to go up. We have a lot of time standing in one place, even China does not want to up trade FCT, trading volumes fell. It is a pity that so far no one wants FCT In general, if you want to know the Factom developer is not profitable to coin was expensive, they have already said before, on the contrary it is better if the FCT will be cheap, since it will be more convenient and profitable for the project. Unlike Ethereum developers that help and put their money in the manipulation and movement of the value of their coins, the Factom developers of does not want to influence the course of the FCT that I think is bad for the promotion of the project, if the FCT will be stable such as example 1 or 2 dollars, then on the exchanges it is simply unnecessary to anyone, since it would be impossible to make will not be no interest to the FCT. The Factom developers do not want someone manipulated the course of the FCT and not to those who want to put their money on the IPO and through which they were able to run your project, so that these people were able to earn in the future on a FCT rate volatility. They are only interested in their own profit, so from the beginning created the Entry Credits (EC) and FCT coins were only required to raise money for the IPO. It is my personal opinion, but I believe that this is indeed so. Even if the this project is super great, but developers will not support course FCT coin, the expensive cost of this coin will not. I think much of this is worth considering. Just look for example, if Vitalik Buterin team at Ethereum not have supported the course of their coins, Ethereum could not rise so high. Etherum rise is a clear pump, nothing else. Which means it ll be dumped. One of clear advantages of ether is that it is still mineable which means there s larger base of small users who are fueling this pump. Also, this PoS ability they plan to introduce later during the years helps out a bit. Still, I think both Ether and Factom can coexist cause they target different markets. Just be patient, it might take a few years but Factom will get where it should be. I agree with you that you need to wait a few years. It's clear. On Bitcoin too it was once a great pump, but he is still number 1 in capitalization. It would be great if at the FCT, too, was just a pump for example, up to $100 / FCT coin and then would like to reset the $50 / FCT coin, I think it would be normal and the FCT would take its normal place in the ranking on coinmarket. Lol to $100 a coin let be serieus , not going to happen soon maybe 5 is a good start |
|
|
|
|
|
whiteorg72
|
|
February 12, 2016, 08:08:41 AM
Last edit: February 12, 2016, 12:59:48 PM by whiteorg72 |
|
Poloniex Exchange does not withstand the influx of traders and hangs:
Error 504 Ray ID: 2736c8b32b1b2774 • 2016-02-12 08:05:47 UTC
Gateway time-out
"We are under heavy loads at this time. We are addressing the issue and working on resolving this as soon as possible. Thank you for your understanding and apologies for the inconvenience."
|
|
|
|
|
|
whiteorg72
|
|
February 12, 2016, 08:10:59 AM
Last edit: February 12, 2016, 08:23:40 AM by whiteorg72 |
|
"Lol to $100 a coin let be serieus , not going to happen soon maybe 5 is a good start."
I just gave an example $100, for comparison. Of course, $100 maybe we can see only at the end of 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
Mrboot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 12, 2016, 10:11:14 AM
Last edit: February 12, 2016, 10:41:06 AM by Mrboot |
|
"Lol to $100 a coin let be serieus , not going to happen soon maybe 5 is a good start."
I just gave an example $100, for comparison. Of course, $100 maybe we can see only at the end of 2017.
It might be cause if i get Fct right the price each factom will be the same as the datacost a month / 73000 coins a month So if 10 mill cost is made on data a month the coin price should be around approx. 137 dollar a coin but for that to happen a lot of usage need to be comming. But we see already a slow growth in ebtry's Ofc it takes a while to get to the same lvl , but eventually they will level out |
|
|
|
|
tempus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1128
|
|
February 12, 2016, 01:02:08 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
tempus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1128
|
|
February 12, 2016, 01:54:12 PM |
|
I can not understand, why no one pays attention on Factom on exchanges? All coins (Ethereum, Expanse, MaidSafeCoin, Bitshares, Siacoin) are now quickly climb up. FCT does not want to go up. We have a lot of time standing in one place, even China does not want to up trade FCT, trading volumes fell. It is a pity that so far no one wants FCT In general, if you want to know the Factom developer is not profitable to coin was expensive, they have already said before, on the contrary it is better if the FCT will be cheap, since it will be more convenient and profitable for the project. Unlike Ethereum developers that help and put their money in the manipulation and movement of the value of their coins, the Factom developers of does not want to influence the course of the FCT that I think is bad for the promotion of the project, if the FCT will be stable such as example 1 or 2 dollars, then on the exchanges it is simply unnecessary to anyone, since it would be impossible to make will not be no interest to the FCT. The Factom developers do not want someone manipulated the course of the FCT and not to those who want to put their money on the IPO and through which they were able to run your project, so that these people were able to earn in the future on a FCT rate volatility. They are only interested in their own profit, so from the beginning created the Entry Credits (EC) and FCT coins were only required to raise money for the IPO. It is my personal opinion, but I believe that this is indeed so. Even if the this project is super great, but developers will not support course FCT coin, the expensive cost of this coin will not. I think much of this is worth considering. Just look for example, if Vitalik Buterin team at Ethereum not have supported the course of their coins, Ethereum could not rise so high. Etherum rise is a clear pump, nothing else. Which means it ll be dumped. One of clear advantages of ether is that it is still mineable which means there s larger base of small users who are fueling this pump. Also, this PoS ability they plan to introduce later during the years helps out a bit. Still, I think both Ether and Factom can coexist cause they target different markets. Just be patient, it might take a few years but Factom will get where it should be. I'm not that sure that their PoS-Solution will be helpful. I don't know of any project that was successful with PoS. The ETH-system will be modified but it will be still PoS. And in longterm I don't know of any scenario that PoS would not lead into economically centralization which would lead into a weakening of the system as a whole. This is an interesting analyzation. I'm not sure that it's totally correct and the guy who wrote it is from Bitshares so we can assume he is kind of biased, but he could be right: http://bytemaster.github.io/2015/08/08/Review-of-Casper-Ethereums-proposed-Proof-of-Stake-Algorithm/ |
|
|
|
|
|
whiteorg72
|
|
February 13, 2016, 01:49:24 AM |
|
Today put the record! Less than 6 hours removed from the system 205 factoids.
Someone started to use the project.
Total Factoids: 8753502 (today)
|
|
|
|
|
tempus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1128
|
|
February 13, 2016, 02:56:32 AM |
|
Today put the record! Less than 6 hours removed from the system 205 factoids.
Someone started to use the project.
Total Factoids: 8753502 (today)
Yes, I recognized that, too! It's a good sign. |
|
|
|
|
|
whiteorg72
|
|
February 13, 2016, 04:05:57 AM |
|
What a pleasure to watch as it is now by the every hour quickly factoids go out of system, it can say that soon we will see the launch of Milestone2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
whiteorg72
|
|
February 13, 2016, 04:07:58 AM |
|
Today put the record! Less than 6 hours removed from the system 205 factoids.
Someone started to use the project.
Total Factoids: 8753502 (today)
Yes, I recognized that, too! It's a good sign. Where do you see this? I still see on coinmarketcap - 8,753,712? Coinmarketcap does not have time to update the total amount factoids, I already informed them that they change the total amount factoids at. See this, example - http://explorer.factom.org/dblock/4ca6777cdc6be7e22a5b4dc7fa840d57c64954e308a50d8cc56a75087a9a7505Just open the Factom Explorer and click on the last block, and it will opened detailed information including the exact amount of the remaining factoids. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crazyivan
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1007
DMD Diamond Making Money 4+ years! Join us!
|
|
February 13, 2016, 12:11:55 PM |
|
200 or 500 factoids on almost 9 million s nothing. It does show the system works but in terms of supply reduction, it s nothing. Let us hope this speeds up soon. |
|
|
|
tempus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1128
|
|
February 13, 2016, 12:29:22 PM |
|
200 or 500 factoids on almost 9 million s nothing. It does show the system works but in terms of supply reduction, it s nothing. Let us hope this speeds up soon. I agree, but it shows a very good tendency. Factom is on the right direction and if you compare it to some other projects, Ethereum for example: At the moment it needs > 1000 BTC just to catch the new created ETH at the current price - per day! In Factom, until Milestone 3, it's the opposite. Plus: Factom can already be used. Plus: If it all goes well we will see a network-effect. What I mean with that is: Those who will use the system won't simply change their minds and abandon it, because they build their history in Factom (a little bit like the Facebook-Effect). And even more important: The more the system works for a few the more it will get the attention of others. That's why iSoftStone is underrated in my eyes. It's just a memorandum of understanding and it will need some time until we will see real results, but it clearly shows the potential. Big companies (iSoftstone is really big!) are obviously interested. And, it's possible to view that dynamic because it's transparent. I don't know of any project with such a potential. |
|
|
|
|
|
whiteorg72
|
|
February 13, 2016, 12:55:49 PM |
|
200 or 500 factoids on almost 9 million s nothing. It does show the system works but in terms of supply reduction, it s nothing. Let us hope this speeds up soon. I agree, but it shows a very good tendency. Factom is on the right direction and if you compare it to some other projects, Ethereum for example: At the moment it needs > 1000 BTC just to catch the new created ETH at the current price - per day! In Factom, until Milestone 3, it's the opposite. Plus: Factom can already be used. Plus: If it all goes well we will see a network-effect. What I mean with that is: Those who will use the system won't simply change their minds and abandon it, because they build their history in Factom (a little bit like the Facebook-Effect). And even more important: The more the system works for a few the more it will get the attention of others. That's why iSoftStone is underrated in my eyes. It's just a memorandum of understanding and it will need some time until we will see real results, but it clearly shows the potential. Big companies (iSoftstone is really big!) are obviously interested. And, it's possible to view that dynamic because it's transparent. I don't know of any project with such a potential. MR. Tempus very rightly said about the great potential Factom project, is very accessible for many of those who still does not see this great potential. This year we will see the grandiose accomplishments of my most beloved Factom project  |
|
|
|
|
|
DrPaid
|
|
February 13, 2016, 02:22:32 PM |
|
Comparing factom and ETH isn't as clear cut. There are very different motivations and objectives for each. I've followed factom for a while and it's been a long time coming. Let's see where it heads.
|
|
|
|
|
crazyivan
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1007
DMD Diamond Making Money 4+ years! Join us!
|
|
February 13, 2016, 09:43:17 PM |
|
Comparing factom and ETH isn't as clear cut. There are very different motivations and objectives for each. I've followed factom for a while and it's been a long time coming. Let's see where it heads.
It seems it s the only one of these innovative coins which has not been pumped yet. Ether s been, NEM s been, Dash s been, Expanse s been. |
|
|
|
MaGNeT
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
|
|
February 13, 2016, 10:23:16 PM |
|
Comparing factom and ETH isn't as clear cut. There are very different motivations and objectives for each. I've followed factom for a while and it's been a long time coming. Let's see where it heads.
It seems it s the only one of these innovative coins which has not been pumped yet. Ether s been, NEM s been, Dash s been, Expanse s been. That's what I like about it. Heard Paul Snow in an interview, he only tells about the project and their goals. Nobody trying to pump it, just bringing the news when there is news or another milestone. |
|
|
|
|
|
