This frozen chicken “had a rich, emotional life.”

[awesome31312]

We as a society will not respect the rights of animals because we don't recognize human rights properly yet.

True. But what are animal rights? Aren't animal rights in the wild simply the way animals instinctively act under whatever circumstances they find themselves in, according to their nature? And in captivity, aren't animal rights completely subservient to their owners' authority in every way?

A merciful owner has mercy on his animals, and even love for them. If he eats them, he kills them swiftly so that they feel little pain.

If a society restricts its members from eating animals or treating their animal property how they want, it is a society of slavery among people. In a land of freedom, people have right to do with their animal property and other property as they desire. It is when people do NOT have freedom to do with their animal property what they want, that people are like animals before their society or government.

Since society and government are made up of people, what gives them the right to decide how other people should treat their own property?

That's exactly what I go by. Kill animals swiftly so you can eat them.

Disclaimer: Human beings are animals.

[BADecker]

We as a society will not respect the rights of animals because we don't recognize human rights properly yet.

True. But what are animal rights? Aren't animal rights in the wild simply the way animals instinctively act under whatever circumstances they find themselves in, according to their nature? And in captivity, aren't animal rights completely subservient to their owners' authority in every way?

A merciful owner has mercy on his animals, and even love for them. If he eats them, he kills them swiftly so that they feel little pain.

If a society restricts its members from eating animals or treating their animal property how they want, it is a society of slavery among people. In a land of freedom, people have right to do with their animal property and other property as they desire. It is when people do NOT have freedom to do with their animal property what they want, that people are like animals before their society or government.

Since society and government are made up of people, what gives them the right to decide how other people should treat their own property?

That's exactly what I go by. Kill animals swiftly so you can eat them.

Disclaimer: Human beings are animals.

Humans are not animals. When you look in Genesis, you find that God created the animals, but that He made man in His own image, including breathing the breath of life into man. Man and animals, though similar in may ways so that they can inhabit the same planet, are different.

[awesome31312]

We as a society will not respect the rights of animals because we don't recognize human rights properly yet.

True. But what are animal rights? Aren't animal rights in the wild simply the way animals instinctively act under whatever circumstances they find themselves in, according to their nature? And in captivity, aren't animal rights completely subservient to their owners' authority in every way?

A merciful owner has mercy on his animals, and even love for them. If he eats them, he kills them swiftly so that they feel little pain.

If a society restricts its members from eating animals or treating their animal property how they want, it is a society of slavery among people. In a land of freedom, people have right to do with their animal property and other property as they desire. It is when people do NOT have freedom to do with their animal property what they want, that people are like animals before their society or government.

Since society and government are made up of people, what gives them the right to decide how other people should treat their own property?

That's exactly what I go by. Kill animals swiftly so you can eat them.

Disclaimer: Human beings are animals.

Humans are not animals. When you look in Genesis, you find that God created the animals, but that He made man in His own image, including breathing the breath of life into man. Man and animals, though similar in may ways so that they can inhabit the same planet, are different.

I was giving a biological definition

[BADecker]

We as a society will not respect the rights of animals because we don't recognize human rights properly yet.

True. But what are animal rights? Aren't animal rights in the wild simply the way animals instinctively act under whatever circumstances they find themselves in, according to their nature? And in captivity, aren't animal rights completely subservient to their owners' authority in every way?

A merciful owner has mercy on his animals, and even love for them. If he eats them, he kills them swiftly so that they feel little pain.

If a society restricts its members from eating animals or treating their animal property how they want, it is a society of slavery among people. In a land of freedom, people have right to do with their animal property and other property as they desire. It is when people do NOT have freedom to do with their animal property what they want, that people are like animals before their society or government.

Since society and government are made up of people, what gives them the right to decide how other people should treat their own property?

That's exactly what I go by. Kill animals swiftly so you can eat them.

Disclaimer: Human beings are animals.

Humans are not animals. When you look in Genesis, you find that God created the animals, but that He made man in His own image, including breathing the breath of life into man. Man and animals, though similar in may ways so that they can inhabit the same planet, are different.

I was giving a biological definition

If that's all there was to people, it might work.   

[awesome31312]

We as a society will not respect the rights of animals because we don't recognize human rights properly yet.

True. But what are animal rights? Aren't animal rights in the wild simply the way animals instinctively act under whatever circumstances they find themselves in, according to their nature? And in captivity, aren't animal rights completely subservient to their owners' authority in every way?

A merciful owner has mercy on his animals, and even love for them. If he eats them, he kills them swiftly so that they feel little pain.

If a society restricts its members from eating animals or treating their animal property how they want, it is a society of slavery among people. In a land of freedom, people have right to do with their animal property and other property as they desire. It is when people do NOT have freedom to do with their animal property what they want, that people are like animals before their society or government.

Since society and government are made up of people, what gives them the right to decide how other people should treat their own property?

That's exactly what I go by. Kill animals swiftly so you can eat them.

Disclaimer: Human beings are animals.

Humans are not animals. When you look in Genesis, you find that God created the animals, but that He made man in His own image, including breathing the breath of life into man. Man and animals, though similar in may ways so that they can inhabit the same planet, are different.

I was giving a biological definition

If that's all there was to people, it might work.  

What are you even talking about. What does Genesis have to do with all this

[BADecker]

We as a society will not respect the rights of animals because we don't recognize human rights properly yet.

True. But what are animal rights? Aren't animal rights in the wild simply the way animals instinctively act under whatever circumstances they find themselves in, according to their nature? And in captivity, aren't animal rights completely subservient to their owners' authority in every way?

A merciful owner has mercy on his animals, and even love for them. If he eats them, he kills them swiftly so that they feel little pain.

If a society restricts its members from eating animals or treating their animal property how they want, it is a society of slavery among people. In a land of freedom, people have right to do with their animal property and other property as they desire. It is when people do NOT have freedom to do with their animal property what they want, that people are like animals before their society or government.

Since society and government are made up of people, what gives them the right to decide how other people should treat their own property?

That's exactly what I go by. Kill animals swiftly so you can eat them.

Disclaimer: Human beings are animals.

Humans are not animals. When you look in Genesis, you find that God created the animals, but that He made man in His own image, including breathing the breath of life into man. Man and animals, though similar in may ways so that they can inhabit the same planet, are different.

I was giving a biological definition

If that's all there was to people, it might work.  

What are you even talking about. What does Genesis have to do with all this

People are not animals! Thus, you can't use the same logic on people that you might use on animals.

[awesome31312]

We as a society will not respect the rights of animals because we don't recognize human rights properly yet.

True. But what are animal rights? Aren't animal rights in the wild simply the way animals instinctively act under whatever circumstances they find themselves in, according to their nature? And in captivity, aren't animal rights completely subservient to their owners' authority in every way?

A merciful owner has mercy on his animals, and even love for them. If he eats them, he kills them swiftly so that they feel little pain.

If a society restricts its members from eating animals or treating their animal property how they want, it is a society of slavery among people. In a land of freedom, people have right to do with their animal property and other property as they desire. It is when people do NOT have freedom to do with their animal property what they want, that people are like animals before their society or government.

Since society and government are made up of people, what gives them the right to decide how other people should treat their own property?

That's exactly what I go by. Kill animals swiftly so you can eat them.

Disclaimer: Human beings are animals.

Humans are not animals. When you look in Genesis, you find that God created the animals, but that He made man in His own image, including breathing the breath of life into man. Man and animals, though similar in may ways so that they can inhabit the same planet, are different.

I was giving a biological definition

If that's all there was to people, it might work.  

What are you even talking about. What does Genesis have to do with all this

People are not animals! Thus, you can't use the same logic on people that you might use on animals.

Then what are they? Plants? Bacteria? Fungi?

[BADecker]

People are not animals! Thus, you can't use the same logic on people that you might use on animals.

Then what are they? Plants? Bacteria? Fungi?

Was I really supposed to answer?

People are people a.k.a. human beings. They are greater than the animals, not as powerful as the angels, creatures that God made, and creatures, the only kind of which God came to as one of... in His form as Jesus, the Christ.

[awesome31312]

People are not animals! Thus, you can't use the same logic on people that you might use on animals.

Then what are they? Plants? Bacteria? Fungi?

Was I really supposed to answer?

People are people a.k.a. human beings. They are greater than the animals, not as powerful as the angels, creatures that God made, and creatures, the only kind of which God came to as one of... in His form as Jesus, the Christ.

Biologically, an animal is defined as an organism with animal cells. Like humans.

[BADecker]

People are not animals! Thus, you can't use the same logic on people that you might use on animals.

Then what are they? Plants? Bacteria? Fungi?

Was I really supposed to answer?

People are people a.k.a. human beings. They are greater than the animals, not as powerful as the angels, creatures that God made, and creatures, the only kind of which God came to as one of... in His form as Jesus, the Christ.

Biologically, an animal is defined as an organism with animal cells. Like humans.

Is a checker board a chess board? Is a chess board a checker board? If it is set up for checkers, isn't it a checker board? If it is set up for chess, isn't it a chess board? If it is set up for neither, it isn't an animal or a person. It is just some biology.

[awesome31312]

People are not animals! Thus, you can't use the same logic on people that you might use on animals.

Then what are they? Plants? Bacteria? Fungi?

Was I really supposed to answer?

People are people a.k.a. human beings. They are greater than the animals, not as powerful as the angels, creatures that God made, and creatures, the only kind of which God came to as one of... in His form as Jesus, the Christ.

Biologically, an animal is defined as an organism with animal cells. Like humans.

Is a checker board a chess board? Is a chess board a checker board? If it is set up for checkers, isn't it a checker board? If it is set up for chess, isn't it a chess board? If it is set up for neither, it isn't an animal or a person. It is just some biology.

Was that a legitimate statement? Or are you trying to mess with me?

[BADecker]

People are not animals! Thus, you can't use the same logic on people that you might use on animals.

Then what are they? Plants? Bacteria? Fungi?

Was I really supposed to answer?

People are people a.k.a. human beings. They are greater than the animals, not as powerful as the angels, creatures that God made, and creatures, the only kind of which God came to as one of... in His form as Jesus, the Christ.

Biologically, an animal is defined as an organism with animal cells. Like humans.

Is a checker board a chess board? Is a chess board a checker board? If it is set up for checkers, isn't it a checker board? If it is set up for chess, isn't it a chess board? If it is set up for neither, it isn't an animal or a person. It is just some biology.

Was that a legitimate statement? Or are you trying to mess with me?

Well, I was trying to be legit. What did you mean by, "Biologically, an animal is defined as an organism with animal cells. Like humans."?

[Wilikon]

People are not animals! Thus, you can't use the same logic on people that you might use on animals.

Then what are they? Plants? Bacteria? Fungi?

Was I really supposed to answer?

People are people a.k.a. human beings. They are greater than the animals, not as powerful as the angels, creatures that God made, and creatures, the only kind of which God came to as one of... in His form as Jesus, the Christ.

Biologically, an animal is defined as an organism with animal cells. Like humans.

Is a checker board a chess board? Is a chess board a checker board? If it is set up for checkers, isn't it a checker board? If it is set up for chess, isn't it a chess board? If it is set up for neither, it isn't an animal or a person. It is just some biology.

So... The organic blueprint does not make us humans. Our spirit, soul does.. Is this what you are trying to say?

[BADecker]

People are not animals! Thus, you can't use the same logic on people that you might use on animals.

Then what are they? Plants? Bacteria? Fungi?

Was I really supposed to answer?

People are people a.k.a. human beings. They are greater than the animals, not as powerful as the angels, creatures that God made, and creatures, the only kind of which God came to as one of... in His form as Jesus, the Christ.

Biologically, an animal is defined as an organism with animal cells. Like humans.

Is a checker board a chess board? Is a chess board a checker board? If it is set up for checkers, isn't it a checker board? If it is set up for chess, isn't it a chess board? If it is set up for neither, it isn't an animal or a person. It is just some biology.

So... The organic blueprint does not make us humans. Our spirit, soul does.. Is this what you are trying to say?

Call it what you want. I have heard it said that if you give a monkey a typewriter, he's liable to type a word sometime.

[BADecker]

Look. The only people who can't think are the ones who have been damaged somehow, either in birth defects, or by some physical damage from an accident. The thinking of all humans is far above the animals, if indeed the animals really think at all.

People are not animals, and animals are not people. They share some similarities. But they are not of the same classification.

[Wilikon]

Look. The only people who can't think are the ones who have been damaged somehow, either in birth defects, or by some physical damage from an accident. The thinking of all humans is far above the animals, if indeed the animals really think at all.

People are not animals, and animals are not people. They share some similarities. But they are not of the same classification.

We give names to animals, animals can't. Lots of animals use tools to feed themselves. None can start a fire...

 

[BADecker]

Look. The only people who can't think are the ones who have been damaged somehow, either in birth defects, or by some physical damage from an accident. The thinking of all humans is far above the animals, if indeed the animals really think at all.

People are not animals, and animals are not people. They share some similarities. But they are not of the same classification.

We give names to animals, animals can't. Lots of animals use tools to feed themselves. None can start a fire...

 

Yes! And when you think of all the greater things that people can do - greater than the simple ones mentioned - animals fall far behind. The fact is that mankind is like gods with regard to the animals.

[Wilikon]

Look. The only people who can't think are the ones who have been damaged somehow, either in birth defects, or by some physical damage from an accident. The thinking of all humans is far above the animals, if indeed the animals really think at all.

People are not animals, and animals are not people. They share some similarities. But they are not of the same classification.

We give names to animals, animals can't. Lots of animals use tools to feed themselves. None can start a fire...

 

Yes! And when you think of all the greater things that people can do - greater than the simple ones mentioned - animals fall far behind. The fact is that mankind is like gods with regard to the animals.

But are animals "aware" of us?

[BADecker]

Look. The only people who can't think are the ones who have been damaged somehow, either in birth defects, or by some physical damage from an accident. The thinking of all humans is far above the animals, if indeed the animals really think at all.

People are not animals, and animals are not people. They share some similarities. But they are not of the same classification.

We give names to animals, animals can't. Lots of animals use tools to feed themselves. None can start a fire...

 

Yes! And when you think of all the greater things that people can do - greater than the simple ones mentioned - animals fall far behind. The fact is that mankind is like gods with regard to the animals.

But are animals "aware" of us?

Personally, I don't believe that they are in the same way that we are aware of each other. Science hasn't gone very far along these lines... deep awareness.

Obviously they are aware of us to some extent. But it might simply be the same way that a robot might be aware of things, because it has been built to receive stimuli in certain ways and programmed to act on it in certain other ways.

[Hippie Tech]

Look. The only people who can't think are the ones who have been damaged somehow, either in birth defects, or by some physical damage from an accident. The thinking of all humans is far above the animals, if indeed the animals really think at all.

People are not animals, and animals are not people. They share some similarities. But they are not of the same classification.

We give names to animals, animals can't. Lots of animals use tools to feed themselves. None can start a fire...

 

Yes! And when you think of all the greater things that people can do - greater than the simple ones mentioned - animals fall far behind. The fact is that mankind is like gods with regard to the animals.

But are animals "aware" of us?

Personally, I don't believe that they are in the same way that we are aware of each other. Science hasn't gone very far along these lines... deep awareness.

Obviously they are aware of us to some extent. But it might simply be the same way that a robot might be aware of things, because it has been built to receive stimuli in certain ways and programmed to act on it in certain other ways.

+1

You were programmed / indoctrinated into accepting this violent, disfunctional, disease ridden, alcohol junkie lifestyle, just like the rest of us savages... Mr. Roboto.

You, like the robot, will continue to run your blood thirsty app until you are updated with new set of instructions.