Bitcoin Forum
November 12, 2024, 11:34:12 AM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ATTN Litecoin GPU Miners - Scrypt support for cgminer  (Read 175855 times)
QiVX
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 81
Merit: 10



View Profile
July 20, 2012, 11:35:38 PM
 #121

This thread seems interesting.
Going to sub to this.
Because I need a place to put all my GPUs after ASIC.
foggyb
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006


View Profile
July 20, 2012, 11:41:37 PM
Last edit: July 21, 2012, 04:20:54 AM by foggyb
 #122

Thanks. Alas I cannot seem to get anywhere near these values with my 7970s. I remain very very sceptical. I can easily push the values up to those hashrates, but the amount of useful shares drops to 10%.





Hey everyone! 🎉 Dive into the excitement with the Gamble Games Eggdrop game! Not only is it a fun and easy-to-play mobile experience, you can now stake your winnings and accumulate $WinG token, which has a finite supply of 200 million tokens. Sign up now using this exclusive referral link! Start staking, playing, and winning today! 🎲🐣
-ck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4284
Merit: 1645


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
July 20, 2012, 11:41:57 PM
 #123

have you tried just using reaper with those setting? and not just its kernel, although it shouldn't make a difference.
Same results.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
The Koolio
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500


Minds are like parachutes they work best when open


View Profile WWW
July 20, 2012, 11:42:19 PM
 #124

Im interested in this... with my 5870 cards will i expect any speed jump over reaper?

1. Litecoin 2. Bitcoin 3. Any of the Anon coins
-ck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4284
Merit: 1645


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
July 20, 2012, 11:44:46 PM
 #125

Thanks. Alas I cannot seem to get anywhere near these values with my 7970s. I remain very very sceptical. I can easily push the values up to those hashrates, but the amount of useful shares drops to 10%.

I'm going to ask for my bounty back if CGminer doesn't beat this score:
What were your settings?

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
abbeytim
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 438
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 20, 2012, 11:46:02 PM
 #126

not all of us have 7000 series cards so plz test with 5000 and 6000 series cards also can this be released for us to test and can you make it for windows

were not all linux buffs
foggyb
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006


View Profile
July 20, 2012, 11:47:02 PM
Last edit: July 21, 2012, 04:21:22 AM by foggyb
 #127


What were your settings?

litecoin.conf:
Code:
worksize 256 
aggression 13
threads_per_gpu 5
cpu_mining_threads 0
sharethreads 18
lookup_gap 2
gpu_thread_concurrency 10240

reaper.conf:

Code:
kernel reaper.cl
save_binaries yes
enable_graceful_shutdown yes
long_polling yes

platform 1
device 0

mine litecoin

Hey everyone! 🎉 Dive into the excitement with the Gamble Games Eggdrop game! Not only is it a fun and easy-to-play mobile experience, you can now stake your winnings and accumulate $WinG token, which has a finite supply of 200 million tokens. Sign up now using this exclusive referral link! Start staking, playing, and winning today! 🎲🐣
-ck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4284
Merit: 1645


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
July 20, 2012, 11:47:19 PM
 #128

not all of us have 7000 series cards so plz test with 5000 and 6000 series cards also can this be released for us to test and can you make it for windows

were not all linux buffs
Hang on a sec while I pull all that hardware out of my arse....

Oh wait, I don't have any of those in there.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
-ck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4284
Merit: 1645


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
July 21, 2012, 12:01:08 AM
 #129

I'm going to ask for my bounty back
Considering the bounty only just got reached and I was generous enough to even start working on it before it was reached, some patience would be appreciated since I never guaranteed it would be available yesterday. If not, you can have you money back, as can everyone else.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
The Koolio
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500


Minds are like parachutes they work best when open


View Profile WWW
July 21, 2012, 12:01:55 AM
 #130

I have 13 5870 cards, is there a possibility of getting a copy of cgminer for litecoin to test on my rigs?

1. Litecoin 2. Bitcoin 3. Any of the Anon coins
tacotime
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1005



View Profile
July 21, 2012, 12:08:41 AM
 #131

Are you running the cards all on the same rig?  LTC mining is GPU memory bandwidth intensive, if all 4 cards are running at only 1x or 4x or even 8x you'll probably be bottlenecked.

Try using only one GPU in running at 16x.

Code:
XMR: 44GBHzv6ZyQdJkjqZje6KLZ3xSyN1hBSFAnLP6EAqJtCRVzMzZmeXTC2AHKDS9aEDTRKmo6a6o9r9j86pYfhCWDkKjbtcns
abbeytim
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 438
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 21, 2012, 12:08:59 AM
 #132

yah koolio i agree 7900 cards arent the only ones out there
-ck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4284
Merit: 1645


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
July 21, 2012, 12:12:44 AM
 #133

Are you running the cards all on the same rig?  LTC mining is GPU memory bandwidth intensive, if all 4 cards are running at only 1x or 4x or even 8x you'll probably be bottlenecked.

Try using only one GPU in running at 16x.
Indeed it was using quite a bit of memory... investigating further.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
bitlane
Internet detective
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


I heart thebaron


View Profile
July 21, 2012, 12:15:05 AM
 #134

Perhaps CGMiner reports different than what is expected at the pool ? ...in terms of shares submitted ?

Obviously my hash rates seem OK, but my share count in Reaper is NO where near what CGMiner is able to produce.

As a reference, I am using the same Reaper settings as stated above.
I have a 5 card 7970 rig running with a 1800 Shares + 24 Stales in 1520 seconds of runtime...2.6 MH/s

Con, what does the POOL REPORT you as submitting ? (kh/s ?)

-ck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4284
Merit: 1645


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
July 21, 2012, 12:18:10 AM
 #135

Perhaps CGMiner reports different than what is expected at the pool ? ...in terms of shares submitted ?

Obviously my hash rates seem OK, but my share count in Reaper is NO where near what CGMiner is able to produce.

As a reference, I am using the same Reaper settings as stated above.
I have a 5 card 7970 rig running with a 1800 Shares + 24 Stales in 1520 seconds of runtime...2.6 MH/s

Con, what does the POOL REPORT you as submitting ? (kh/s ?)
1800 shares in 1520 seconds of runtime is a utility of 71 shares per minute TOTAL. However, you don't specify where you're mining as the difficulty target will affect that.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
foggyb
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006


View Profile
July 21, 2012, 12:18:45 AM
 #136

Are you running the cards all on the same rig?  LTC mining is GPU memory bandwidth intensive, if all 4 cards are running at only 1x or 4x or even 8x you'll probably be bottlenecked.

Try using only one GPU in running at 16x.

In my experience, that isn't a factor. My memory is at default, and I'm cross-fired with 8x PCI-E bandwidth.

Considering the bounty only just got reached and I was generous enough to even start working on it before it was reached, some patience would be appreciated since I never guaranteed it would be available yesterday. If not, you can have you money back, as can everyone else.


Sorry if that came across as confrontational or impatient. I just wanted to point out that reaper is ahead of the game.

Hey everyone! 🎉 Dive into the excitement with the Gamble Games Eggdrop game! Not only is it a fun and easy-to-play mobile experience, you can now stake your winnings and accumulate $WinG token, which has a finite supply of 200 million tokens. Sign up now using this exclusive referral link! Start staking, playing, and winning today! 🎲🐣
bitlane
Internet detective
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


I heart thebaron


View Profile
July 21, 2012, 12:19:51 AM
 #137

Perhaps CGMiner reports different than what is expected at the pool ? ...in terms of shares submitted ?

Obviously my hash rates seem OK, but my share count in Reaper is NO where near what CGMiner is able to produce.

As a reference, I am using the same Reaper settings as stated above.
I have a 5 card 7970 rig running with a 1800 Shares + 24 Stales in 1520 seconds of runtime...2.6 MH/s

Con, what does the POOL REPORT you as submitting ? (kh/s ?)
1800 shares in 1520 seconds of runtime is a utility of 71 shares per minute TOTAL. However, you don't specify where you're mining as the difficulty target will affect that.

That's exactly what I meant.... your utility rate blew me away.

I am currently mining @ litecoincash.com

-ck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4284
Merit: 1645


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
July 21, 2012, 12:21:20 AM
 #138

Perhaps CGMiner reports different than what is expected at the pool ? ...in terms of shares submitted ?

Obviously my hash rates seem OK, but my share count in Reaper is NO where near what CGMiner is able to produce.

As a reference, I am using the same Reaper settings as stated above.
I have a 5 card 7970 rig running with a 1800 Shares + 24 Stales in 1520 seconds of runtime...2.6 MH/s

Con, what does the POOL REPORT you as submitting ? (kh/s ?)
1800 shares in 1520 seconds of runtime is a utility of 71 shares per minute TOTAL. However, you don't specify where you're mining as the difficulty target will affect that.

That's exactly what I meant.... your utility rate blew me away.

I am currently mining @ litecoincash.com

The pool reported almost exactly the same hashrate I was getting locally at 1500 khash.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
bitlane
Internet detective
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


I heart thebaron


View Profile
July 21, 2012, 12:22:35 AM
 #139

Here is info from the Litecoincash pool thread...

Speeds are now back to something more usual staying a bit higher as we setup 21 target

Test period is over and pool running smotly now, with a BIG luck for now

-ck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4284
Merit: 1645


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
July 21, 2012, 12:24:39 AM
 #140

Here is info from the Litecoincash pool thread...

Speeds are now back to something more usual staying a bit higher as we setup 21 target

Test period is over and pool running smotly now, with a BIG luck for now
So 21 * 71 = 1491 shares per minute. 1491 divided by 5 cards is 298 utility. That's almost exactly what I'm getting.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!