-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2012, 03:52:40 PM |
|
worksize 256: ~180 kh/s worksize 128: ~190 kh/s worksize 64: ~192.5 kh/s
Yea, I changed my post. How many threads is that? Still the 6144? yes, using 6144, cant find something that do better then that on my cards How many stales are you getting with that though? Whenever I use 6144, I get about 10% stales. If the rejects start to shoot up, dropping intensity by 1 usually cures it. Of course the hashrate drops but you'll probably end up submitting more valid shares. The whole relationship between the different variables, the different hardware, and the drivers seems quite a mess...
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
Greedi
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2012, 03:57:55 PM |
|
worksize 256: ~180 kh/s worksize 128: ~190 kh/s worksize 64: ~192.5 kh/s
Yea, I changed my post. How many threads is that? Still the 6144? yes, using 6144, cant find something that do better then that on my cards How many stales are you getting with that though? Whenever I use 6144, I get about 10% stales. i'm only getting a stale on LP, 0 else.. rbut i'm also using http://notroll.in, the share target is a bit higher ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
xurious
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2012, 04:00:54 PM |
|
worksize 256: ~180 kh/s worksize 128: ~190 kh/s worksize 64: ~192.5 kh/s
Yea, I changed my post. How many threads is that? Still the 6144? yes, using 6144, cant find something that do better then that on my cards How many stales are you getting with that though? Whenever I use 6144, I get about 10% stales. i'm only getting a stale on LP, 0 else.. rbut i'm also using http://notroll.in, the share target is a bit higher ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Higher than oz? And ckolivas, usually the drop in intensity is more detrimental than change in threads. It's why I was curious.
|
SiaMining.com -- First PPS SiaMining Pool! 3%, VarDiff, Stratum Support
|
|
|
Gladamas
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Bitcoin today is what the internet was in 1998.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2012, 04:03:09 PM |
|
ckolivas, could you also set a user-definable parameter to adjust the difficulty needed for submitting a share?
|
|
|
|
Greedi
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2012, 04:03:48 PM |
|
worksize 256: ~180 kh/s worksize 128: ~190 kh/s worksize 64: ~192.5 kh/s
Yea, I changed my post. How many threads is that? Still the 6144? yes, using 6144, cant find something that do better then that on my cards How many stales are you getting with that though? Whenever I use 6144, I get about 10% stales. i'm only getting a stale on LP, 0 else.. rbut i'm also using http://notroll.in, the share target is a bit higher ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Higher than oz? And ckolivas, usually the drop in intensity is more detrimental than change in threads. It's why I was curious. idk what oz use, but notroll use 2^20 hashes/share
|
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2012, 04:04:20 PM |
|
And ckolivas, usually the drop in intensity is more detrimental than change in threads. It's why I was curious.
There's a tipping point and it's very much dependent on hardware. What works on one gpu/sdk/driver combo may be meaningless on another. I fought with it for a while to find the sweet spot for my 7970s with my drivers...
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
foggyb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2012, 04:04:28 PM |
|
headroom left? your comparing to reaper? Oh yah, your the guy that wanted his btc back. might have to use the ignore button...
can't wait.
|
Hey everyone! 🎉 Dive into the excitement with the Gamble Games Eggdrop game! Not only is it a fun and easy-to-play mobile experience, you can now stake your winnings and accumulate $WinG token, which has a finite supply of 200 million tokens. Sign up now using this exclusive referral link! Start staking, playing, and winning today! 🎲🐣
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2012, 04:05:07 PM |
|
ckolivas, could you also set a user-definable parameter to adjust the difficulty needed for submitting a share?
Instead of reading off the difficulty from the pool? I guess so... but not right now.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
|
Greedi
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2012, 04:20:34 PM |
|
yah thats weird if i set mine to 14 it gets tons of rejects what card and settings were you using??
i use 2*6770, but only testing on 1, i use cgminer --scrypt -o http://****:**** -u ** -p ** --worksize 256 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 6144 -I 14 -g 1
and O/C is set to 950/1300 ok, getting 10+ kh/s more with worksize 128 instead of 256 worksize 64 doesn't seem to increase speed under any combo, so thats a no go. Must.... tinker.... MOAWR. It should also note that I'm basing my speeds off AVG after about 20 seconds. I'm just trying to get the settings into a close ballpark before I do long term stability. i have just trying worksize 64, and i got more speed now worksize 256: ~180 kh/s worksize 128: ~190 kh/s worksize 64: ~192.5 kh/s with the new, i have set the -I to 16, and i get 210, with almost 0 stales, reaper could get 210 MAX, with 10% stales, this is soo goood!
|
|
|
|
xurious
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2012, 04:23:44 PM |
|
with the new, i have set the -I to 16, and i get 210, with almost 0 stales, reaper could get 210 MAX, with 10% stales, this is soo goood!
Yup, increase in intensity certainly helped. Now at 338 at 16 and 340 at 17. At 18, kh/s jumps around a lot.
|
SiaMining.com -- First PPS SiaMining Pool! 3%, VarDiff, Stratum Support
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2012, 04:27:27 PM |
|
with the new, i have set the -I to 16, and i get 210, with almost 0 stales, reaper could get 210 MAX, with 10% stales, this is soo goood!
Yup, increase in intensity certainly helped. Now at 338 at 16 and 340 at 17. At 18, kh/s jumps around a lot. Time is averaged over 5 seconds, and at those high intensities the threads wont report in for over 5 seconds potentially so you'll get serious aliasing artefacts.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
Tittiez
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2012, 04:30:20 PM |
|
Holy shit my 6850 pulled 207kh/s without an overclock with just intensity 14. I'll add a document with my settings for my 6850 and 5770 in a few.
Also catalyst 12.6 & sdk 2.6 are working fine for me now, weird but I'll take it.
I tried concurrency 3200 and 6144(better), any others I should try?
|
|
|
|
dishwara
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1855
Merit: 1016
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2012, 04:47:08 PM |
|
I am getting 369 average on 5870 (only one card in system) with clock 850/1200 on Windows 7, 64 bit, aero enabled. cgminer.exe --scrypt --worksize 256 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 6144 -g 1 -I 16 --url http://notroll.in:6332 --userpass xxx:xxxx
with accepted = 150+ & Rejected= 0
|
|
|
|
Graet (OP)
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2012, 04:48:13 PM Last edit: July 22, 2012, 03:56:08 AM by Graet |
|
Holy shit my 6850 pulled 207kh/s without an overclock with just intensity 14. I'll add a document with my settings for my 6850 and 5770 in a few.
Also catalyst 12.6 & sdk 2.6 are working fine for me now, weird but I'll take it.
I tried concurrency 3200 and 6144(better), any others I should try?
after a bit of messing round 427Khash/card over 4 x 6950s A:367 R:1 cgminer.exe --scrypt -o http://lc.ozco.in:9332 -u Graet.7 -p p --worksize 256 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 6144 -I 16 -g 1 --auto-fan --auto-gpu --gpu-engine 810-900 --gpu-vddc 1.05
|
|
|
|
Gladamas
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Bitcoin today is what the internet was in 1998.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2012, 04:51:54 PM |
|
ckolivas, could you also set a user-definable parameter to adjust the difficulty needed for submitting a share?
Instead of reading off the difficulty from the pool? I guess so... but not right now. Oh, sorry, I didn't realize that each pool sends its difficulty requirement to the miner. Just when I was mining with P2Pool (Bitcoin), it would send difficulty 1 shares to my local P2Pool node even though the P2Pool share difficulty is much higher.
|
|
|
|
Tittiez
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2012, 05:12:35 PM |
|
Changed my 6850s core to 800 and now its pulling 220kh/s. Saddly I had to go leave so I left it at that. I'm gonna see how far I can go when I get back, that's already more then what I got with reaper at only a 50mhz overclock.
Sorry typos on my phone
|
|
|
|
Graet (OP)
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2012, 05:33:22 PM |
|
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o http://lc.ozco.in:9332 -u Graet.7 -p p --worksize 256 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 6144 -I 18 -g 1 --auto-fan --auto-gpu --gpu-engine 810-910 --gpu-vddc 1.05 --temp-target 85 --temp-overheat 95 on my 6950s is getting 449Khash /card across 4 card rig A:582 R:23 is a bit high tho might try -I 17 ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) and 450Khash on single card A:169 R:2 is ok tho I'm rather pleased with this ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
|
Greedi
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2012, 05:35:31 PM |
|
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o http://lc.ozco.in:9332 -u Graet.7 -p p --worksize 256 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 6144 -I 18 -g 1 --auto-fan --auto-gpu --gpu-engine 810-910 --gpu-vddc 1.05 --temp-target 85 --temp-overheat 95 on my 6950s is getting 449Khash /card across 4 card rig A:582 R:23 is a bit high tho might try -I 17 ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) and 450Khash on single card A:169 R:2 is ok tho I'm rather pleased with this ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) how much did reaper do?
|
|
|
|
Graet (OP)
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2012, 05:40:10 PM |
|
never got over 292khash on single card, never got 4 card rig to run on reaper decided to go back to -I 16 lose some hashes but rejects under 1% is where its at imo ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
|
|