|
|
verycoinsuchlist
Member
 Offline
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
|
 |
November 27, 2015, 04:32:34 PM
Last edit: November 27, 2015, 04:53:29 PM by verycoinsuchlist |
|
cryptsy should be fine by now as well... my transaction from the twilight zone has landed a few moments ago  ---- however, yet no response from cryptopia as of now. their blockexplorer (which I suspect is getting his data from the same client which is utilized for tx'es) shows 'ok' but obviously still is clinging to the odd chain and lagging thousands of blocks behind. I again dropped them the info when the explorer from blockexperts went back online just a few minutes ago... now it's up to them... so, for the moment I'd realy suggest to wait and don't do any amber transaction to and from cryptopia until someone at least has confirmed being committed to the problem on their side. |
Believe In Crypto Currency? Try To Actually Use It
|
|
|
twn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1011
|
|
November 27, 2015, 04:44:20 PM |
|
Dev i have still 0 amber on here im thinking to send all my coins back to my adress do you think its safe to do it now? |
|
|
|
|
verycoinsuchlist
Member
Offline
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
|
|
November 27, 2015, 05:32:23 PM
Last edit: November 27, 2015, 05:43:30 PM by verycoinsuchlist |
|
Yesterday i udload database them i lost my ambers then i use repairwallet command and i receive it back and since yesterday night my wallet working fine, i got 1 stake and accepted. İ have 16 connections
İt looks like after doing everythinng dev said wallets are fine
Dev i have still 0 amber on here im thinking to send all my coins back to my adress do you think its safe to do it now? now I'm confused... does your wallet balance reflect what is shown in our transaction history or does it show 0... did you perform a repairwallet after resyncing with the bootstrap blockchain (that'd actually help if you've got trouble displaying the correct amount according to your tx history)? and if your wallet displays 0 coins, could you clue me in on how or what to send from 0 coins being available? --- just in case you've pointed your miners onto a wallet which happened to be on the wrong chain during that time, it's save to say that those blocks could be considered orphans and lost, there's no way to transfer anything from a forked branch as none of those transaction will be eventually accepted by any client in the main net. so, if that's the case, those coins never really existed in the first place regarding the viewpoint of the main blockchain. I had a silent fork myself a couple hours ago which can happen easily if the network is a little shaky (in that case I went offline for a minute or so which was too short for the wallet to realize yet short enough for it to happily fork away  ) without me even getting aware of it immediately... and I needed to perform a little rollback to get it back on the current chain... i had to send a rather impressive amount of coins down to oblivion, but mining in a post fork situation always implies it will be a rather high stakes gambling mission... |
Believe In Crypto Currency? Try To Actually Use It
|
|
|
|
devega
|
|
November 27, 2015, 05:32:44 PM |
|
Has anything been mentioned by the dev about a possible payout date? We are now 2 months late and I know many of us would be happy even with an approximate guesstimate at this point....
over one month to be accurate... it should have been done till 25.10 |
|
|
|
|
Mig-23
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 27, 2015, 08:01:43 PM |
|
Update:
While BlockExplorers are down to make sure that you are on a correct chain do the following:
1. Type "getblockbynumber 594177" command in console (Help->Debug->Console)
2. Find line "proofhash":
{
"proofhash" : "00000000215b5309e034ccf4a4b4091a0d874d52980b5cc867c554f7e7c4e1a9"
}
3. Make sure your hash of block No594177 is the same.
not helpfull still out of sync ,block number out of range when i type like above |
|
|
|
|
|
AmberCoinDev (OP)
|
|
November 27, 2015, 08:22:17 PM |
|
Update:
While BlockExplorers are down to make sure that you are on a correct chain do the following:
1. Type "getblockbynumber 594177" command in console (Help->Debug->Console)
2. Find line "proofhash":
{
"proofhash" : "00000000215b5309e034ccf4a4b4091a0d874d52980b5cc867c554f7e7c4e1a9"
}
3. Make sure your hash of block No594177 is the same.
not helpfull still out of sync ,block number out of range when i type like above That means you are still on wrong chain. This explorer works fine now and shows correct information https://www.blockexperts.com/amberTo help those who are not on a main chain - here is fresh (some hours ago) correct blockchain: https://www.dropbox.com/s/94hqeihkupmqjkn/BlockChain2711.rar?dl=0P.S. Use "repairwallet" command after you synced. |
|
|
|
verycoinsuchlist
Member
Offline
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
|
|
November 27, 2015, 09:01:07 PM |
|
trying to connect a client with only the node at ambercoin01.mooo.com (108.61.173.201)
for me turned out to come up with no connections at all atm... however there seem to be some nodes
available that are all at the current height, this should be a good starting point for a while to get one up and running
so I suggest to add this to your amber.conf if you have problem connecting or only get connections to other clients who are not able to catch up
-----8<----- snip -----------
connect=ambercoin01.mooo.com
addnode=[2001:0:5ef5:79fb:6:a75:af78:fd36]
addnode=[2001:0:9d38:6abd:3f:2ca2:93c2:5236]
addnode=[2001:0:9d38:6abd:89e:1ddb:b7d5:9b72]
addnode=[2001:0:9d38:6ab8:3844:32a7:b8c4:9761]
addnode=104.158.205.135
addnode=46.185.22.181
|
Believe In Crypto Currency? Try To Actually Use It
|
|
|
Griffith
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 27, 2015, 09:07:10 PM |
|
i dont wanna be that guy buttttt. it looks like you dont have a lmit on the max number of coins for this coin...
|
|
|
|
|
|
crzybilly
|
|
November 27, 2015, 09:08:01 PM |
|
Looks like C-Cex is back. I have a bunch of Amber waiting there, so I'm going to test it out with some small transfers.  works... just got mine |
|
|
|
|
|
crzybilly
|
|
November 27, 2015, 09:08:26 PM |
|
i dont wanna be that guy buttttt. it looks like you dont have a lmit on the max number of coins for this coin...
they do... let me pull up the source and show you |
|
|
|
|
Griffith
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 27, 2015, 09:09:44 PM |
|
i dont wanna be that guy buttttt. it looks like you dont have a lmit on the max number of coins for this coin...
they do... let me pull up the source and show you this should be interesting... |
|
|
|
|
|
crzybilly
|
|
November 27, 2015, 09:10:48 PM |
|
i dont wanna be that guy buttttt. it looks like you dont have a lmit on the max number of coins for this coin...
they do... let me pull up the source and show you this should be interesting... +static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 50000000 * COIN; |
|
|
|
|
Griffith
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 27, 2015, 09:11:20 PM |
|
i dont wanna be that guy buttttt. it looks like you dont have a lmit on the max number of coins for this coin...
they do... let me pull up the source and show you this should be interesting... +static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 50000000 * COIN; max_money defines the max amount of coins for a fee and that is sendable in a block. not the max amount of coins for the coin... |
|
|
|
|
|
AmberCoinDev (OP)
|
|
November 27, 2015, 09:15:42 PM |
|
i dont wanna be that guy buttttt. it looks like you dont have a lmit on the max number of coins for this coin...
they do... let me pull up the source and show you this should be interesting... +static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 50000000 * COIN; max_money defines the max amount of coins for a fee and that is sendable in a block. not the max amount of coins for the coin... Max amount is 50,000,000. 49,000,000 will be reached not earlier than in 10 years. |
|
|
|
|
OVRGRO
|
|
November 27, 2015, 09:16:20 PM |
|
I don't feel like doing the math again, but I have done it... Amber trade would have to sell millions of coins really quickly to get closer to the 49 million figure with pos and .5 amber blocks. Feel free to check the math yourself, and I'll gladly redo figures if you come up with over 50 million possible.
|
|
|
|
|
Griffith
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 27, 2015, 09:19:28 PM |
|
ill show you...
the last time the PoS reward changes is... static const int64_t BLOCK_HEIGHT_END_YEAR7 = 7358400; // year 7 end estimated block height
in the GetProofOfStakeReward the function defines...
else if (pindexBest->nHeight > BLOCK_HEIGHT_END_YEAR7){
nSubsidy = nCoinAge * POS_REWARD_YEAR_STD / 365; //0.25%
}
if (fDebug && GetBoolArg("-printcreation"))
printf("GetProofOfStakeReward(): create=%s nCoinAge=%"PRId64"\n", FormatMoney(nSubsidy).c_str(), nCoinAge);
return nSubsidy + nFees;
meaning that for every block higher than block 7358400 will give a reward of nCoinAge * POS_REWARD_YEAR_STD / 365; //0.25%
even at block 10000000 it will still give this reward
your dev forgot to put the function
if the money supply is >= MAX_Money then the nSubsidy = 0;
which would cut off the minting at max money, but that code isnt in this coin. its also why 42 coin has 52 coins atm. dev forgot to put it in. ive done a lotttt of dev work for coins so i know that when people clone older or bad coins they forget to fix that part. and this coin looks nice. so i figured id point it out
|
|
|
|
|
Mig-23
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 27, 2015, 09:21:20 PM |
|
Update:
While BlockExplorers are down to make sure that you are on a correct chain do the following:
1. Type "getblockbynumber 594177" command in console (Help->Debug->Console)
2. Find line "proofhash":
{
"proofhash" : "00000000215b5309e034ccf4a4b4091a0d874d52980b5cc867c554f7e7c4e1a9"
}
3. Make sure your hash of block No594177 is the same.
not helpfull still out of sync ,block number out of range when i type like above That means you are still on wrong chain. This explorer works fine now and shows correct information https://www.blockexperts.com/amberTo help those who are not on a main chain - here is fresh (some hours ago) correct blockchain: https://www.dropbox.com/s/94hqeihkupmqjkn/BlockChain2711.rar?dl=0P.S. Use "repairwallet" command after you synced. still confused how to do it twn said he lost the coin after upload the database,but he got the amber back to wallet i'm worry how if i/we lost the coin because we don't know how to do it hope this is the last time and never update wallet again in future,..this is make me like crazy ,..lol |
|
|
|
|
|
AmberCoinDev (OP)
|
|
November 27, 2015, 09:24:06 PM |
|
ill show you...
the last time the PoS reward changes is... static const int64_t BLOCK_HEIGHT_END_YEAR7 = 7358400; // year 7 end estimated block height
in the GetProofOfStakeReward the function defines...
else if (pindexBest->nHeight > BLOCK_HEIGHT_END_YEAR7){
nSubsidy = nCoinAge * POS_REWARD_YEAR_STD / 365; //0.25%
}
if (fDebug && GetBoolArg("-printcreation"))
printf("GetProofOfStakeReward(): create=%s nCoinAge=%"PRId64"\n", FormatMoney(nSubsidy).c_str(), nCoinAge);
return nSubsidy + nFees;
meaning that for every block higher than block 7358400 will give a reward of nCoinAge * POS_REWARD_YEAR_STD / 365; //0.25%
even at block 10000000 it will still give this reward
your dev forgot to put the function
if the money supply is >= MAX_Money then the nSubsidy = 0;
which would cut off the minting at max money, but that code isnt in this coin. its also why 42 coin has 52 coins atm. dev forgot to put it in. ive done a lotttt of dev work for coins so i know that when people clone older or bad coins they forget to fix that part. and this coin looks nice. so i figured id point it out
Thank you for a tip.  That means that in 10 years we maybe should do one more hardfork. |
|
|
|
Griffith
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 27, 2015, 09:25:24 PM |
|
ill show you...
the last time the PoS reward changes is... static const int64_t BLOCK_HEIGHT_END_YEAR7 = 7358400; // year 7 end estimated block height
in the GetProofOfStakeReward the function defines...
else if (pindexBest->nHeight > BLOCK_HEIGHT_END_YEAR7){
nSubsidy = nCoinAge * POS_REWARD_YEAR_STD / 365; //0.25%
}
if (fDebug && GetBoolArg("-printcreation"))
printf("GetProofOfStakeReward(): create=%s nCoinAge=%"PRId64"\n", FormatMoney(nSubsidy).c_str(), nCoinAge);
return nSubsidy + nFees;
meaning that for every block higher than block 7358400 will give a reward of nCoinAge * POS_REWARD_YEAR_STD / 365; //0.25%
even at block 10000000 it will still give this reward
your dev forgot to put the function
if the money supply is >= MAX_Money then the nSubsidy = 0;
which would cut off the minting at max money, but that code isnt in this coin. its also why 42 coin has 52 coins atm. dev forgot to put it in. ive done a lotttt of dev work for coins so i know that when people clone older or bad coins they forget to fix that part. and this coin looks nice. so i figured id point it out
Thank you for a tip. That means that in 10 years we maybe should do one more hardfork. to be honest you can put it in at any time. and then it will just be there for future updates. just make sure you do it before the 10 years is up =p |
|
|
|
|
|
