Bitcoin Forum
May 07, 2024, 06:33:42 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 [811] 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 ... 1348 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It  (Read 3916346 times)
Entropy-uc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 501


View Profile
December 27, 2013, 08:35:41 PM
 #16201

40 nm power efficiency will be completely un-marketable against 28 nm.

It will be a while before that is the case. By the time power consumption will become the major factor, prices and margins will have tumbled enormously. I have no doubt that will happen, but not in Q1 and not before the network is over ~100PH.

Besides, current 28nm designs dont seem to pay particular attention to power efficiency. Its clear the focus was on time to market. Testatement to that is that 55nm bitfury's are in the same ball park as 28nm chips.  A similarly well optimized 40nm chip should be competitive with existing and upcoming 28nm chips.  I seem to remember Friedcat estimating 0.2J/GH ? If he manages that, he is better than any announced 28nm chip and probably better than KnC's future 20nm chip, which Im not expecting anytime soon.

TL;DR. The clock is ticking rapidly, but there is still time to extract a nice profit.
 

I expect the network to be 100 Ph/s by the end of march.  It could happen sooner if the rumors I hear about silicon valley stealth operations turn out to be true.

What bitfury did was a herculean task.  He hand designed every transistor for the bitcoin proof of work.  And it is buggy as hell with 20% invalids due to design errors as I understand things.  It sets a standard for everyone else to aim for though.  And you can count on it that every design coming to market has benchmarked against that standard.  Even if ASICMINER matches that design in 40 nm, he's going to be overwhelmed by the sheer volume of 28 nm devices.  And on the retail side, you have customers that were ripped off (by their own choice) at prices that would never break even, and a lousy reputation because of the very high rate of failures being reported now.

Friedcat is a smart guy.  But it appears to me that his team has made more money than they ever dreamed of already, and don't particularly care about being the best any longer.
Every time a block is mined, a certain amount of BTC (called the subsidy) is created out of thin air and given to the miner. The subsidy halves every four years and will reach 0 in about 130 years.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
Puppet
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1040


View Profile
December 27, 2013, 09:06:57 PM
 #16202

I expect the network to be 100 Ph/s by the end of march.  It could happen sooner if the rumors I hear about silicon valley stealth operations turn out to be true.

Quite a bold prediction. I thought I was the resident pessimist lol.

Quote
What bitfury did was a herculean task.  He hand designed every transistor for the bitcoin proof of work. 

I understood friedcat (or whomever he hired) were doing similar hand optimizations. Now I happen to agree with you that was a strategic blunder. The time wasted doing that will cost far more than it will ever return. Paying a higher NRE for a smaller process node to get similar performance to market faster, KnC style, would have been my obvious choice. But thats water under the bridge, and now tape out is close, if not already behind us now? If they can indeed come up with a chip that uses on the order of 0.2W/J in the next 2 or 3 months, it doesnt really matter if thats achieved on 40 or 20nm. They will have a design thats going to be more than competitive for the foreseeable future (granted,  in bitcoin world, that isnt very long Smiley ).
jimmothy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 509



View Profile
December 27, 2013, 09:29:23 PM
 #16203

Friedcat is a smart guy.  But it appears to me that his team has made more money than they ever dreamed of already, and don't particularly care about being the best any longer.

I disagree. Why would FC not want to be the best and make more money? He is going down what he feels is the most profitable path.

Side question: Having worked for intel maybe you could explain why intel is seemingly so slow at adopting new manufacturing tech? Why is  Intel just now adopting 22nm when 14nm tech is possible?
Puppet
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1040


View Profile
December 27, 2013, 09:39:36 PM
 #16204

maybe you could explain why intel is seemingly so slow at adopting new manufacturing tech?

Lol? Intel is miles ahead of everyone else. While TSMC is still busy ordering 20nm production equipment (good luck KnC Neptune customers), Globalfoundries apparently stuck at 28nm,  intel has been producing 14nm chips for some time. Not sure they started selling these chips, they did have yield issues, but that doesnt mean they are somehow behind.

/OT
jimmothy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 509



View Profile
December 27, 2013, 09:44:20 PM
 #16205

maybe you could explain why intel is seemingly so slow at adopting new manufacturing tech?

Lol? Intel is miles ahead of everyone else. While TSMC is still busy ordering 20nm production equipment (good luck KnC Neptune customers), Globalfoundries apparently stuck at 28nm,  intel has been producing 14nm chips for some time. Not sure they started selling these chips, they did have yield issues, but that doesnt mean they are somehow behind.

/OT

Thought I read somewhere that some mobile cpus were using 14nm but I realize that is not the case. Question answered thanks.
Puppet
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1040


View Profile
December 27, 2013, 09:48:36 PM
 #16206

Thought I read somewhere that some mobile cpus were using 14nm but I realize that is not the case. Question answered thanks.

You probably read the deal Apple made with Samsung and TSMC for 14nm chips. But you missed the date, that process is not expected to be online before mid 2015.
glendall
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1018


Sugars.zone | DatingFi - Earn for Posting


View Profile
December 27, 2013, 10:40:07 PM
 #16207

How's asicminer doing these days?

I was an investor from around 4 btc a share down to .8 a share, haven't been keeping on the news.

Any eta on the next gen chips?


.SUGAR.
██   ██

██   ██

██   ██

██   ██

██   ██

██   ██
▄▄████████████████████▄▄
▄████████████████████████▄
███████▀▀▀██████▀▀▀███████
█████▀██████▀▀██████▀█████
██████████████████████████
██████████████████████████
█████████████████████▄████
██████████████████████████
████████▄████████▄████████
██████████████████████████
▀████████████████████████▀
▀▀████████████████████▀▀

██   ██

██   ██

██   ██

██   ██

██   ██

██   ██
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
██████               ██████
██████   ▄████▀      ██████
██████▄▄▄███▀   ▄█   ██████
██████████▀   ▄███   ██████
████████▀   ▄█████▄▄▄██████
██████▀   ▄███████▀▀▀██████
██████   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀   ██████
██████               ██████
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
.
Backed By
ZetaChain

██   ██

██   ██

██   ██

██   ██

██   ██

██   ██

██   ██

██   ██

██   ██

██   ██

██   ██

██   ██
▄▄████████████████████▄▄
██████████████████████████
████████████████████████████
█████████████████▀▀  ███████
█████████████▀▀      ███████
█████████▀▀   ▄▄     ███████
█████▀▀    ▄█▀▀     ████████
█████████ █▀        ████████
█████████ █ ▄███▄   ████████
██████████████████▄▄████████
██████████████████████████
▀▀████████████████████▀▀
▄▄████████████████████▄▄
██████████████████████████
██████ ▄▀██████████  ███████
███████▄▀▄▀██████  █████████
█████████▄▀▄▀██  ███████████
███████████▄▀▄ █████████████
███████████  ▄▀▄▀███████████
█████████  ████▄▀▄▀█████████
███████  ████████▄▀ ████████
████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████
▀▀████████████████████▀▀
jimmothy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 509



View Profile
December 27, 2013, 10:47:16 PM
 #16208

How's asicminer doing these days?

I was an investor from around 4 btc a share down to .8 a share, haven't been keeping on the news.

Any eta on the next gen chips?



The current status of AM is debatable. But I think we can all agree you bought at the worst possible time. 4btc/piece would require like 40% network hashrate which will probably never happen.

Eta for next gen tape-out is jan 20th
explorer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2016
Merit: 1259



View Profile
December 27, 2013, 11:01:17 PM
 #16209


The current status of AM is debatable. But I think we can all agree you bought at the worst possible time. 4btc/piece would require like 40% network hashrate which will probably never happen.

Assuming zero profits from sales.  It reached  4+ on the back of sales. Granted, that window is only open by a crack compared to last summer, but still counts for something.  4+ is a dream, perhaps, but 10% network + some sales shouldn't be unmanageable.  Another point would be newer investors, happy with less than 33% APR - that could raise the price as well.
Mabsark
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1004


View Profile
December 27, 2013, 11:07:08 PM
 #16210

Eta for next gen tape-out is jan 20th

Which does not mean next gen chips will be available then, in case that's what some of you were thinking. Sample chips will arrive about 2-3 months after tape out. For example, HashFast taped-out on 2013-09-05, the first wafers were completed on 2013-11-08, and sample chips were received on 2013-12-01.

So, next gen AM chips will likely be ready in March/April.
jimmothy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 509



View Profile
December 27, 2013, 11:19:00 PM
 #16211

Eta for next gen tape-out is jan 20th

Which does not mean next gen chips will be available then, in case that's what some of you were thinking. Sample chips will arrive about 2-3 months after tape out. For example, HashFast taped-out on 2013-09-05, the first wafers were completed on 2013-11-08, and sample chips were received on 2013-12-01.

So, next gen AM chips will likely be ready in March/April.

It is not really fair to compare asicminer to hashfast. However march/april does seem like a reasonable estimate for gen3 deployment.
Mabsark
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1004


View Profile
December 27, 2013, 11:28:58 PM
 #16212

Eta for next gen tape-out is jan 20th

Which does not mean next gen chips will be available then, in case that's what some of you were thinking. Sample chips will arrive about 2-3 months after tape out. For example, HashFast taped-out on 2013-09-05, the first wafers were completed on 2013-11-08, and sample chips were received on 2013-12-01.

So, next gen AM chips will likely be ready in March/April.

It is not really fair to compare asicminer to hashfast. However march/april does seem like a reasonable estimate for gen3 deployment.

I'm not comparing AM to HashFast, I'm just showing how long it typically takes for foundries to produce the wafers and for those wafers to be packaged into chips. The process is pretty much out of AM's or HashFast's hands until they get the samples back.
Equilux
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 353
Merit: 251


View Profile
December 27, 2013, 11:35:06 PM
 #16213

Eta for next gen tape-out is jan 20th

Which does not mean next gen chips will be available then, in case that's what some of you were thinking. Sample chips will arrive about 2-3 months after tape out. For example, HashFast taped-out on 2013-09-05, the first wafers were completed on 2013-11-08, and sample chips were received on 2013-12-01.

So, next gen AM chips will likely be ready in March/April.

It is not really fair to compare asicminer to hashfast. However march/april does seem like a reasonable estimate for gen3 deployment.

I'm not comparing AM to HashFast, I'm just showing how long it typically takes for foundries to produce the wafers and for those wafers to be packaged into chips. The process is pretty much out of AM's or HashFast's hands until they get the samples back.


Wans't the tape-out from KnC 3 weeks before they delivered a working product? Or am I misremembering?

Entropy-uc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 501


View Profile
December 27, 2013, 11:45:42 PM
 #16214

Tapeout to finished silicon is ~45 days with a hot lot.  After that you have bumping and packaging, board assembly and test, etc.
Mabsark
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1004


View Profile
December 28, 2013, 12:59:08 AM
 #16215

Eta for next gen tape-out is jan 20th

Which does not mean next gen chips will be available then, in case that's what some of you were thinking. Sample chips will arrive about 2-3 months after tape out. For example, HashFast taped-out on 2013-09-05, the first wafers were completed on 2013-11-08, and sample chips were received on 2013-12-01.

So, next gen AM chips will likely be ready in March/April.

It is not really fair to compare asicminer to hashfast. However march/april does seem like a reasonable estimate for gen3 deployment.

I'm not comparing AM to HashFast, I'm just showing how long it typically takes for foundries to produce the wafers and for those wafers to be packaged into chips. The process is pretty much out of AM's or HashFast's hands until they get the samples back.


Wans't the tape-out from KnC 3 weeks before they delivered a working product? Or am I misremembering?

I couldn't find a date for KnC's tape out, but there is the following:

All,

I would like to say that EVERYTHING that needs to be done at this point in time for a September delivery has indeed been done.
We are on track for delivery and we know of nothing currently to the contrary.

There is not a single part in our systems that has a longer delivery time than the time we still have available.

Yes that does imply that things that don’t need to be ordered yet have not been ordered. The reason behind that is we simply don’t need to order them yet, We do  have contracts with all suppliers we need to have contracts with Those contracts contain delivery times and the associated order dates by which we must confirm the amounts (and of course pay).

I hope this removes confusion

KnCMiner

and

Hi Guys

We would like to say that. Yes....we did tape-out of the ASIC some time ago. The exact details of the ASIC schedule, volumes, vendor etc. is kept internal since it's very sensitive information towards competitors. The product development tasks are on-track."

We are still on schedule to begin shipping in September.

Thanks
KnCMiner Team

So, tape out was likely around 2013-06-26 and 2013-07-30 at the latest.

From the KNC website:

Quote
Chip News
9/17/2013 6:29:00 AM

You have all been waiting for an update on our chips and we can today announce that the Fabrication process has finished and the wafers are on their way to the packing assembly house right now. They will be in the assembly house for a few days before they make their way to us in Sweden  and of course via the fastest method possible.

and

Quote
Production News
9/30/2013 7:51:00 AM

We have relocated most of our operation to the factory over the weekend. The first delivery of the chips have arrived and have been populated on the boards. We have begun testing and initial results are good, we will have more updates throughout the day. We know many of you are calling and we are sorry if we cannot answer your call. This is a very busy time for us but we are all hands on deck we can assure you of that.

So, wafers were completed around 9/17/2013 and sample chips arrived on 9/30/2013. That's around 3 months between tape out and getting sample chips back.
Equilux
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 353
Merit: 251


View Profile
December 28, 2013, 01:58:11 AM
 #16216

Eta for next gen tape-out is jan 20th

Which does not mean next gen chips will be available then, in case that's what some of you were thinking. Sample chips will arrive about 2-3 months after tape out. For example, HashFast taped-out on 2013-09-05, the first wafers were completed on 2013-11-08, and sample chips were received on 2013-12-01.

So, next gen AM chips will likely be ready in March/April.

It is not really fair to compare asicminer to hashfast. However march/april does seem like a reasonable estimate for gen3 deployment.

I'm not comparing AM to HashFast, I'm just showing how long it typically takes for foundries to produce the wafers and for those wafers to be packaged into chips. The process is pretty much out of AM's or HashFast's hands until they get the samples back.


Wans't the tape-out from KnC 3 weeks before they delivered a working product? Or am I misremembering?

I couldn't find a date for KnC's tape out, but there is the following:

All,

I would like to say that EVERYTHING that needs to be done at this point in time for a September delivery has indeed been done.
We are on track for delivery and we know of nothing currently to the contrary.

There is not a single part in our systems that has a longer delivery time than the time we still have available.

Yes that does imply that things that don’t need to be ordered yet have not been ordered. The reason behind that is we simply don’t need to order them yet, We do  have contracts with all suppliers we need to have contracts with Those contracts contain delivery times and the associated order dates by which we must confirm the amounts (and of course pay).

I hope this removes confusion

KnCMiner

and

Hi Guys

We would like to say that. Yes....we did tape-out of the ASIC some time ago. The exact details of the ASIC schedule, volumes, vendor etc. is kept internal since it's very sensitive information towards competitors. The product development tasks are on-track."

We are still on schedule to begin shipping in September.

Thanks
KnCMiner Team

So, tape out was likely around 2013-06-26 and 2013-07-30 at the latest.

From the KNC website:

Quote
Chip News
9/17/2013 6:29:00 AM

You have all been waiting for an update on our chips and we can today announce that the Fabrication process has finished and the wafers are on their way to the packing assembly house right now. They will be in the assembly house for a few days before they make their way to us in Sweden  and of course via the fastest method possible.

and

Quote
Production News
9/30/2013 7:51:00 AM

We have relocated most of our operation to the factory over the weekend. The first delivery of the chips have arrived and have been populated on the boards. We have begun testing and initial results are good, we will have more updates throughout the day. We know many of you are calling and we are sorry if we cannot answer your call. This is a very busy time for us but we are all hands on deck we can assure you of that.

So, wafers were completed around 9/17/2013 and sample chips arrived on 9/30/2013. That's around 3 months between tape out and getting sample chips back.

Great digging there, thanks for the solid reply!

empoweoqwj
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 28, 2013, 02:22:22 AM
 #16217

Friedcat definitely missed a huge opportunity on the sales side.  It was obvious in March that the demand for hardware would persist into the 10s of Ph/s.  ASICMINER could have supplied a very large chunk of that.

I'm sure it was amusing selling hardware at >$500 / Gh/s to fools that would never see BTC breakeven on the gear.  But he could have just as easily sold several Ph/s at $50 to smart investors who stood on the sidelines and kept their money in hand.  That would have been >$100M in sales. 

I actually contacted Friedcat regarding this direction as my family had resources in China and the US to support distribution at this scale.  Even though I was a large shareholder at the time, he never bothered to respond.

Now he's planning to come to market with a 40 nm product when at least 5 groups will have a 28 nm device available before him.  Talk about bringing a knife to a gun fight!

Not sure how FC could have supplied huge amounts of hash rate with their old hardware? We all wish they could have waved a magic wand and supplied all demand but business doesn't work like that. Where was he going to get several Ph/s from Huh
jimmothy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 509



View Profile
December 28, 2013, 05:59:58 AM
 #16218

Friedcat definitely missed a huge opportunity on the sales side.  It was obvious in March that the demand for hardware would persist into the 10s of Ph/s.  ASICMINER could have supplied a very large chunk of that.

I'm sure it was amusing selling hardware at >$500 / Gh/s to fools that would never see BTC breakeven on the gear.  But he could have just as easily sold several Ph/s at $50 to smart investors who stood on the sidelines and kept their money in hand.  That would have been >$100M in sales. 

I actually contacted Friedcat regarding this direction as my family had resources in China and the US to support distribution at this scale.  Even though I was a large shareholder at the time, he never bothered to respond.

Now he's planning to come to market with a 40 nm product when at least 5 groups will have a 28 nm device available before him.  Talk about bringing a knife to a gun fight!

Not sure how FC could have supplied huge amounts of hash rate with their old hardware? We all wish they could have waved a magic wand and supplied all demand but business doesn't work like that. Where was he going to get several Ph/s from Huh

From the same fab that built his wafers for him.  SMIC I suspect.  130 nm fabs run just about empty these days.  He could have built as much as he wanted.

There are already 3 datacenters filled with gen1 chips and that seems to be pulling around 100th/s.
empoweoqwj
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 28, 2013, 07:08:14 AM
 #16219

Friedcat definitely missed a huge opportunity on the sales side.  It was obvious in March that the demand for hardware would persist into the 10s of Ph/s.  ASICMINER could have supplied a very large chunk of that.

I'm sure it was amusing selling hardware at >$500 / Gh/s to fools that would never see BTC breakeven on the gear.  But he could have just as easily sold several Ph/s at $50 to smart investors who stood on the sidelines and kept their money in hand.  That would have been >$100M in sales. 

I actually contacted Friedcat regarding this direction as my family had resources in China and the US to support distribution at this scale.  Even though I was a large shareholder at the time, he never bothered to respond.

Now he's planning to come to market with a 40 nm product when at least 5 groups will have a 28 nm device available before him.  Talk about bringing a knife to a gun fight!

Not sure how FC could have supplied huge amounts of hash rate with their old hardware? We all wish they could have waved a magic wand and supplied all demand but business doesn't work like that. Where was he going to get several Ph/s from Huh

From the same fab that built his wafers for him.  SMIC I suspect.  130 nm fabs run just about empty these days.  He could have built as much as he wanted.

"Built as much as he wanted" - everything is that simple right ..... do you really think if would have ignored you if he thought your idea would generate $100M of sales?
Lohoris
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


Bitgoblin


View Profile
December 28, 2013, 05:30:34 PM
 #16220

Hi guys very new to the board but reading up Bitcoin a lot over last few months.  Ive read White Paper still overwhelmed by potential I see in this disruptive tech.  Posted quite a lot today have noticed there seems to be disingenuous tl:dr attitude which I may have unwittingly been fuelling which explains the reason Im now conscious of having to keep my posts short as poss.  Heres my contribution.  I have set a goal of making 100 Bitcoin during 2014.  I have some inheritance money and will buy and hold the majority (btc quantity will not rise but value might) but want to invest in a high risk:reward venture such as Bitcoin securities yeah.  My Uni room mate basically sent me here so here I am.  Is Asic Miner something you would recommend to me Ive been told will go back up in price again soon?  Last question is it just scare mongering when people talk about companies getting shut down by the Americans when Bitcoin is a global phenomenon?
I found entertaining and ironic that you notice this thread is cluttered with lengthy post, then half of your post itself is just a preface.
And not formatted.
Formatting helps A LOT.

1LohorisJie8bGGG7X4dCS9MAVsTEbzrhu
DefaultTrust is very BAD.
Pages: « 1 ... 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 [811] 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 ... 1348 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!