velacreations
|
|
May 21, 2013, 06:59:47 PM |
|
if the shares keep rising like this, we're gonna need a 1/1000th pass through...
|
|
|
|
ThickAsThieves
|
|
May 21, 2013, 07:02:31 PM |
|
if the shares keep rising like this, we're gonna need a 1/1000th pass through...
lol!
|
|
|
|
aahzmundus
|
|
May 21, 2013, 07:29:28 PM |
|
Wait guys... Soon more than 10,000 shiny little stones will be distributed international and quietly erupt blocks. 10k units... is 0.05 per share. MORE THEN 10k?!?!?!?!?
|
|
|
|
wtfvanity
|
|
May 21, 2013, 07:35:47 PM |
|
Soon more than 10,000 shiny little stones will be distributed international and quietly erupt blocks. 3 T hash in sexy usb drives. Awesome. It's crazy to say that all of that addition is less than 5% of the network! Think of it this way though, 5% of the network, cost at retail four million bucks. That's shallow cash for a government.
|
WTF! Don't Click Here . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
|
lophie
|
|
May 21, 2013, 07:46:07 PM |
|
Think of it this way though, 5% of the network, cost at retail four million bucks. That's shallow cash for a government.
Exactly..... little by little ASICMINER is making it... "Not too shallow"... and soon...... Dude let those Bitcoin guys do what they want... we simply can't compete.... (Gov face palm)
|
Will take me a while to climb up again, But where is a will, there is a way...
|
|
|
bitman442
|
|
May 21, 2013, 08:00:16 PM |
|
Soon more than 10,000 shiny little stones will be distributed international and quietly erupt blocks. 3 T hash in sexy usb drives. Awesome. It's crazy to say that all of that addition is less than 5% of the network! Think of it this way though, 5% of the network, cost at retail four million bucks. That's shallow cash for a government. Plus the more they sell, the more they can mine and stay at a safe %.
|
|
|
|
velacreations
|
|
May 21, 2013, 08:08:45 PM |
|
do we know how many USB miners have sold? some people have mentioned that all 10,000 have sold. Is this correct?
|
|
|
|
HTML5 Gordon
|
|
May 21, 2013, 08:13:12 PM |
|
do we know how many USB miners have sold? some people have mentioned that all 10,000 have sold. Is this correct?
Based on the group buy activity I've seen here, I'd doubt it, unless there were a lot of direct bulk "reseller" sales (which there very well may have been).
|
|
|
|
aahzmundus
|
|
May 21, 2013, 08:25:57 PM |
|
do we know how many USB miners have sold? some people have mentioned that all 10,000 have sold. Is this correct?
Friedcat previously said he would make "Up to" 10k based on demand... in this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=212085.0 he is making more then the 10k, for release "Soon". So I assume all 10k were sold.
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
May 21, 2013, 08:50:15 PM |
|
Is there a place where you can get info about obtaining ASICminer shares?
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
|
TiuraZ
Member
Offline
Activity: 101
Merit: 10
|
|
May 21, 2013, 08:58:51 PM |
|
do we know how many USB miners have sold? some people have mentioned that all 10,000 have sold. Is this correct?
Friedcat previously said he would make "Up to" 10k based on demand... in this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=212085.0 he is making more then the 10k, for release "Soon". So I assume all 10k were sold. AFAIK there are two group buys that got over 300 pcs in paid orders.
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
May 21, 2013, 09:08:01 PM |
|
Thank you sir a lot, you just won a cookie. :gives cookie: How much does 1 share cost now?
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
May 21, 2013, 09:16:43 PM |
|
What's the difference here?
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
CMMPro
|
|
May 21, 2013, 09:17:13 PM |
|
Fee's mostly.
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
May 21, 2013, 09:18:41 PM |
|
Fee's mostly.
Yeah helpfull answer.. Someone care to explain, pros and cons from buying from one or the other?
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
aahzmundus
|
|
May 21, 2013, 09:26:54 PM |
|
Fee's mostly.
Yeah helpfull answer.. Someone care to explain, pros and cons from buying from one or the other? One sells whole shares, one sells partial shares. Burnside's has been operational longer... and takes less in fees. TAT is newer, but the smaller units let you take advantage of compounding interest in a way with dividend reinvestment, although TAT has higher fees. Personally I have holdings in DIRECT shares, Burnside, and TAT. I avoided Bitfunder because I do not like their system...
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
May 21, 2013, 09:29:01 PM |
|
Fee's mostly.
Yeah helpfull answer.. Someone care to explain, pros and cons from buying from one or the other? One sells whole shares, one sells partial shares. Burnside's has been operational longer... and takes less in fees. TAT is newer, but the smaller units let you take advantage of compounding interest in a way with dividend reinvestment, although TAT has higher fees. Personally I have holdings in DIRECT shares, Burnside, and TAT. I avoided Bitfunder because I do not like their system... How does one get hold of direct shares? So which has proven to pay out more?
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
fredtrader
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
May 21, 2013, 09:35:49 PM |
|
Fee's mostly.
Yeah helpfull answer.. Someone care to explain, pros and cons from buying from one or the other? One sells whole shares, one sells partial shares. Burnside's has been operational longer... and takes less in fees. TAT is newer, but the smaller units let you take advantage of compounding interest in a way with dividend reinvestment, although TAT has higher fees. Personally I have holdings in DIRECT shares, Burnside, and TAT. I avoided Bitfunder because I do not like their system... How does one get hold of direct shares? So which has proven to pay out more? They all pay the same except TAT which charges a 5% fee.
|
|
|
|
ThickAsThieves
|
|
May 21, 2013, 09:38:08 PM Last edit: May 21, 2013, 09:49:02 PM by ThickAsThieves |
|
Fee's mostly.
Yeah helpfull answer.. Someone care to explain, pros and cons from buying from one or the other? One sells whole shares, one sells partial shares. Burnside's has been operational longer... and takes less in fees. TAT is newer, but the smaller units let you take advantage of compounding interest in a way with dividend reinvestment, although TAT has higher fees. Personally I have holdings in DIRECT shares, Burnside, and TAT. I avoided Bitfunder because I do not like their system... How does one get hold of direct shares? So which has proven to pay out more? They all pay relatively the same dividends. The TAT ones withhold 5% of dividends as a management fee. However, please note that this is 5% of divs, not 5% of share value. It would take like a year in 5% div fees to get to 5% of share value, possibly longer. That is a math detail I've been meaning to clear up. Please take the time to actually figure out how much 5% div fees might cost before ignoring TAT shares. Sometimes getting a TAT share 1% cheaper than elsewhere can erase the worry of 5% div fees for the short term. I know it's a little complicated, but do the math and you'll see what I mean!
|
|
|
|
|