|
spartan82
|
 |
June 16, 2014, 11:29:24 AM |
|
Well whoever that was I want to deeply thank you for filling my buy orders! God bless  Feel free to put up some more!  I think it may be potentially stupid to sell now for about 0.2. If this was an attempt to short AM by the person selling their shares to you, it may well have backfired or remain unsuccessful. But we'll see. If I had more I'd be placing some more buy walls but fortunately for me they've all been chewed up already. So I'm currently buying more BTC via Paypal and western union for all interested, just PM me lol. |
|
|
|
|
|
aahzmundus
|
|
June 16, 2014, 11:42:15 AM |
|
Dammit, the storage container miner is not directly under AM ownership, I was really still holding on to hope. At least the chip provider will be AM. I suppose it is good to have the operation as split up as possible, decentralized operations with each player working on his specific goal. Things are looking good, how long before some large bank buys a container farm as a way to buy into bitcoin AND secure their investment Now I have to decide If i want to invest in the offshoot... Hrum... |
|
|
|
|
minerpumpkin
|
|
June 16, 2014, 11:52:02 AM |
|
What did just happen on Havelock? That doesn't make any sense! Why has the 0.25 bid been nibbled, but there's no trade? Yes, i refreshed. (apart form the fact that there's been quite a dump tonight and we're now flashed back to 0.25. And I thought I knew BTC world...)  |
I should have gotten into Bitcoin back in 1992...
|
|
|
|
spartan82
|
|
June 16, 2014, 12:07:32 PM |
|
Well now that was fun! Lol
|
|
|
|
|
🏰 TradeFortress 🏰
Bitcoin Veteran
VIP
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
|
|
June 16, 2014, 12:16:29 PM |
|
What did just happen on Havelock? That doesn't make any sense! Why has the 0.25 bid been nibbled, but there's no trade? Yes, i refreshed.
(apart form the fact that there's been quite a dump tonight and we're now flashed back to 0.25. And I thought I knew BTC world...)
I'm going to guess the bidder cancelled their bid  |
|
|
|
|
|
jimmothy
|
|
June 16, 2014, 12:20:35 PM |
|
What did just happen on Havelock? That doesn't make any sense! Why has the 0.25 bid been nibbled, but there's no trade? Yes, i refreshed. It's because the person bought all orders below 0.25. |
|
|
|
|
|
minerpumpkin
|
|
June 16, 2014, 12:52:18 PM |
|
What did just happen on Havelock? That doesn't make any sense! Why has the 0.25 bid been nibbled, but there's no trade? Yes, i refreshed. It's because the person bought all orders below 0.25. Right, that makes sense. Unfulfilled bids are a rare thing these days. |
I should have gotten into Bitcoin back in 1992...
|
|
|
|
|
|
rudi
|
|
June 16, 2014, 01:01:55 PM |
|
Dammit, the storage container miner is not directly under AM ownership, I was really still holding on to hope. At least the chip provider will be AM. I suppose it is good to have the operation as split up as possible, decentralized operations with each player working on his specific goal. Things are looking good, how long before some large bank buys a container farm as a way to buy into bitcoin AND secure their investment AM could still own containers of their own, no? I agree on the second point though. |
|
|
|
|
|
spartan82
|
|
June 16, 2014, 01:03:33 PM |
|
Looks very promising. Can't wait for this to kick on everywhere! |
|
|
|
|
|
necro_nemesis
|
|
June 16, 2014, 01:27:48 PM |
|
Dammit, the storage container miner is not directly under AM ownership, I was really still holding on to hope. At least the chip provider will be AM. I suppose it is good to have the operation as split up as possible, decentralized operations with each player working on his specific goal. Things are looking good, how long before some large bank buys a container farm as a way to buy into bitcoin AND secure their investment AM could still own containers of their own, no? I agree on the second point though. I wouldn't see why not. This also may play a role in franchising. |
|
|
|
|
|
aahzmundus
|
|
June 16, 2014, 01:40:40 PM |
|
Are you running this new operation? And or where is the source for this information? DETAILS!!! |
|
|
|
|
necro_nemesis
|
|
June 16, 2014, 02:31:32 PM |
|
Your use of "home" in this statement infers an existing system. Please elaborate. |
|
|
|
|
binaryFate
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
Still wild and free
|
|
June 16, 2014, 03:05:06 PM |
|
Your use of "home" in this statement infers an existing system. Please elaborate.
Remember that not everyone here is a native speaker. Hopefully you're right and there is actually something to elaborate on... |
Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
|
|
|
|
minerpumpkin
|
|
June 16, 2014, 03:15:37 PM |
|
Your use of "home" in this statement infers an existing system. Please elaborate.
Remember that not everyone here is a native speaker. Hopefully you're right and there is actually something to elaborate on... I always imagine antirack being such a immersion cooling enthusiast, it wouldn't surprise me if he indeed had those things at home. Maybe his basement looks something like this:  |
I should have gotten into Bitcoin back in 1992...
|
|
|
|
Lohoris
|
|
June 16, 2014, 03:27:42 PM |
|
Not upon a late bid, but this: Failure to provide the USMS with a copy of the wire transmittal receipt by the deadline will result in disqualification, forfeiture of the deposit, and award to another bidder. Is this common on expensive auctions, or are they just plain insane? NO RANTS, please do not answer if you do not know the real answer to the actual question. |
|
|
|
runam0k
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1001
Touchdown
|
|
June 16, 2014, 04:32:58 PM |
|
Your use of "home" in this statement infers an existing system. Please elaborate.
Or at least an existing design. |
|
|
|
|
|
necro_nemesis
|
|
June 16, 2014, 05:00:10 PM |
|
Your use of "home" in this statement infers an existing system. Please elaborate.
Remember that not everyone here is a native speaker. Hopefully you're right and there is actually something to elaborate on... Understood but to go further and mention a quantity of 6 such units seems rather specific. One may assume the "immersionist" has some insight into AM plans. |
|
|
|
|
|
arousedrhino
|
|
June 16, 2014, 07:03:11 PM |
|
Not upon a late bid, but this: Failure to provide the USMS with a copy of the wire transmittal receipt by the deadline will result in disqualification, forfeiture of the deposit, and award to another bidder. Is this common on expensive auctions, or are they just plain insane? NO RANTS, please do not answer if you do not know the real answer to the actual question.How does that relate to asic miner, go make your own thread. |
|
|
|
|
ThunderSheep
Member
Offline
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
The sheep who walks through walls.
|
|
June 16, 2014, 07:48:41 PM |
|
Your use of "home" in this statement infers an existing system. Please elaborate.
Remember that not everyone here is a native speaker. Hopefully you're right and there is actually something to elaborate on... Understood but to go further and mention a quantity of 6 such units seems rather specific. One may assume the "immersionist" has some insight into AM plans. Six is the number of individual baths that Allied-Control fits into a single shipping container. See here: http://www.allied-control.com/datatankI feel like we've rehashed this a couple of times already. |
|
|
|
|
|
