It's OFFICIAL!
CRAIG STEVEN WRIGHT IS NOT SATOSHI !!!
He's just the scamming conman we've always known him to be.
|
|
|
|
For clarification to any newbies reading posts in this thread, this man has been proven to have committed multi-million-dollar rebate fraud in Australia before he fled to the UK and set up nChain with the man he conned into believing he owned a vast wealth in bitcoin he "just couldn't access right now" AND the guy who helped con him. Here his former tax lawyer is dropping him as a client for having passed him forged emails that were meant to look like they'd come from the ATO. And before the OP jumps in claiming Craig was being hacked by [insert evil cabal here], this was all long before Craig ever publicly tried to claim he was Satoshi, so this was all down to him having already been under investigation by the authorities for his massive rebate scam where he tried claiming he'd spent millions doing business transactions with bitcoins that were not his or anything to do with him.Here is Craig having drawn Calvin Ayre in with the classic 'advance fee fraud' where he's claiming to own a vast wealth of bitcoin he just can't access currently but will sell them to Calvin for pennies on the dollar now, on the proviso that he'll pay him with them in 5 years time.^^^^ This is classic scammer tactics. You first claim that you're already fabulously wealthy so as to show you're clearly not a scammer and that you've just got a 'financial difficulty' you need to overcome WITH THEIR HELP. You then ask them for a comparatively small loan now, but assure them of a massive payout 'later'. You show them the 'paperwork' (bitcoin addresses plucked from the 'richlist' along with fake paper wallets you claim hold the privkey to large amounts of bitcoin) and promise them that your difficulties will easily be able to be overcome once your've just been able to [insert the reason how their 'loan' is going to help quickly resolve your problem here]. This is why Craig has perpetually moved the goalposts as each deadline came and went without him ever moving or spending any of the coins he'd pretended he owned. Hey dork. Who is scam now?  Recently reached up to 120$ LOL, really? You think a brief pump in price disproves the facts I posted which show that Craig Wright is a criminal? He's about to get utterly wrecked in court and then he's going to end up being dragged back to Australia to face justice for his crimes and spend many years in prison as a result. But sure, you keep partying about how his scamcoin had a brief pump in price for a few few days. |
|
|
|
For clarification to any newbies reading posts in this thread, this man has been proven to have committed multi-million-dollar rebate fraud in Australia before he fled to the UK and set up nChain with the man he conned into believing he owned a vast wealth in bitcoin he "just couldn't access right now" AND the guy who helped con him. Here his former tax lawyer is dropping him as a client for having passed him forged emails that were meant to look like they'd come from the ATO. And before the OP jumps in claiming Craig was being hacked by [insert evil cabal here], this was all long before Craig ever publicly tried to claim he was Satoshi, so this was all down to him having already been under investigation by the authorities for his massive rebate scam where he tried claiming he'd spent millions doing business transactions with bitcoins that were not his or anything to do with him.Here is Craig having drawn Calvin Ayre in with the classic 'advance fee fraud' where he's claiming to own a vast wealth of bitcoin he just can't access currently but will sell them to Calvin for pennies on the dollar now, on the proviso that he'll pay him with them in 5 years time.^^^^ This is classic scammer tactics. You first claim that you're already fabulously wealthy so as to show you're clearly not a scammer and that you've just got a 'financial difficulty' you need to overcome WITH THEIR HELP. You then ask them for a comparatively small loan now, but assure them of a massive payout 'later'. You show them the 'paperwork' (bitcoin addresses plucked from the 'richlist' along with fake paper wallets you claim hold the privkey to large amounts of bitcoin) and promise them that your difficulties will easily be able to be overcome once your've just been able to [insert the reason how their 'loan' is going to help quickly resolve your problem here]. This is why Craig has perpetually moved the goalposts as each deadline came and went without him ever moving or spending any of the coins he'd pretended he owned. |
|
|
|
I'll explain it to you. If the project team wants to split into those who support the opinion you described or do not support the opinion you described, then a fork will take place Do you believe that people should be expected to trust a coin which was created by a criminal conman?
Do you believe that people should be expected to trust a BTC which using for money is laundering, murders, pedophilia and drugs-dealing? What are you talking about? Look at your BTC first - and then blame others This conversation isn't about Bitcoin, it's about BSV and regardless of any allegations you might want to make about how Bitcoin might be being used by nefarious types it is irrelevant to its design and creation. Satoshi created Bitcoin to be how it is and Craig Wright created BSV on the proviso that he claimed to be Satoshi and you believe him to be a genius. I've proven to you that Craig Wright is in fact a criminal conman and you are choosing to wave that off and talk about other people and other coins. It is insanity to continue to insist that Craig Wright being a criminal conman doesn't matter. BSV is HIS altcoin. HE is a criminal conman. That is a fact you cannot excuse or explain away. |
|
|
|
How do you explain that?
We are an honest community of BSV. And if a serious disagreements begin in our team, we will fork the project. Again, you're avoiding the question. How do you explain the fact that I've just shown you IRREFUTABLE PROOF that Craig Wright is both a criminal rebate fraudster AND a lying conman? How can you excuse this when your entire project has been predicated on Calvin funding it because he thought he was funding Satoshi and it turned out he's been funding a criminal conman this entire time? Do you believe that people should be expected to trust a coin which was created by a criminal conman? |
|
|
|
~
No matter what happens to him, we will always consider CSW a genius. Don't worry about managing our project. Our project has two creators. If something happens to CSW, then we have Calvin Ayre LOL. Calvin's a fucking moron who was taken for the greedy idiot he is by the criminal conman and fraudster Craig Wright. Every single piece of evidence Craig used to con Calvin into believing he was Satoshi has been proven to be fake, you do know that, right? Every single thing.This is evidence Craig submitted to the court himself, including the infamous 'Coffee Stained Whitepaper' And let's not forget the hand-written 'Meeting Minutes' notepad 'from August 2007' which turned out to be a lie because the notepade design wasn't created by the Chinese manufacturer until 2009! How do you explain that? |
|
|
|
Dude, he literally claimed millions in cash rebates on the basis that he lied and said he'd funded business transactions with bitcoins that have been proven to have been other people's.
So how do you explain this? It's literally irrefutable evidence of Craig Wright committing criminal rebate fraud by claiming to have funded business transactions with millions of dollars of bitcoin that were not his or anything to do with him.
Go verify it yourself if you don't want to believe me. It's all there for you to see.
Everyone makes mistakes. We are sorry about what happened What do you mean "Everyone makes mistakes"? Craig Wright is a criminal and he is going to be hauled back to Australia to face justice for his litany of criminal acts, no matter how in denial he clearly is about the inevitable outcome of his actions. What do you even mean by 'mistakes'? |
|
|
|
Dude, he literally claimed millions in cash rebates on the basis that he lied and said he'd funded business transactions with bitcoins that have been proven to have been other people's.
So how do you explain this? It's literally irrefutable evidence of Craig Wright committing criminal rebate fraud by claiming to have funded business transactions with millions of dollars of bitcoin that were not his or anything to do with him.
Go verify it yourself if you don't want to believe me. It's all there for you to see.
You know, just recently your beloved Changpeng Zhao admitted that he laundered money. So who's the fraudser now?
Remember how you are all idolized CZ. The same applied to Sam Bankman Fried in past. Justin Sun?
Why you all love all these scammers?No, I don't remember, because it never happened. Do please point out anywhere I have ever written lovingly about CZ, SBF or any of the other people you're trying to deflect the conversation to be about instead of Craig's proven criminal rebate fraud. Seriously, how do you think that is even anything close to a reasonable response to the question I asked you? Again, please explain the evidence which IRREFUTABLY PROVES that Craig Wright committed serious criminal rebate fraud before he fled Australia with the Feds looking for him? |
|
|
|
So you just gonna keep ignoring the fact that ALL of Craig Wright's "I am Satoshi" proof has been exposed, once again, as forgeries?
Are you just gonna keep ignoring the fact that he is proven to have stolen MILLIONS from the ATO cash rebate system?
These are all fabricated accusations from BTC-lobbyists. Dude, he literally claimed millions in cash rebates on the basis that he lied and said he'd funded business transactions with bitcoins that have been proven to have been other people's. You can check for yourself: 1. Here Craig claimed he owned these addresses:   You can check on the bitcoin blockchain itself and verify that these addresses I highlighted for you actually belonged to MtGox https://www.reuters.com/article/us-bitcoin-mtgox-wallet-idUSBREA2K05N20140321/https://btc.tokenview.io/en/address/1KecDYadohxk8MCDqKF8SBEMhCUNveAsCjSo how do you explain this? It's literally irrefutable evidence of Craig Wright committing criminal rebate fraud by claiming to have funded business transactions with millions of dollars of bitcoin that were not his or anything to do with him. Go verify it yourself if you don't want to believe me. It's all there for you to see. |
|
|
|
[snipped]
So you just gonna keep ignoring the fact that ALL of Craig Wright's "I am Satoshi" proof has been exposed, once again, as forgeries? Are you just gonna keep ignoring the fact that he is proven to have stolen MILLIONS from the ATO cash rebate system? What on earth makes you believe ANYBODY is going to want to use an altcoin with a centralised mechanism for seizing coins, which was created by a proven criminal fraudster? |
|
|
|
...various BSV related scams..
Wake up toddlers. BSV and BSV-related things - are not scam So how come EVERY SINGLE PROOF that the criminal rebate fraudster and conman Craig Wright has produced in court as his "I am Satoshi" evidence is exposed as having been fabricated? https://bitcoindefense.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/AmendedPOCandSchedule.pdfAll of it. Not one thing is legit. It's all forgeries, even his infamous 'coffee-stained pre-release whitepaper' contained fonts that didn't exist at that time and that infamous '2007' hand-written meeting minute Craig claimed showed irrefutable proof of him discussing bitcoin's development with Alan Grainger? The manufacturer of that notepad was contacted and confirmed that it wasn't created until November 2009!BSV was created by a criminal conman who has been running a long-con ever since he fled Australia from the Federal Police in 2015. He's been assisted all this time by people like you and Kurt Wuckert Jr who spread propaganda to deny the proven irrefutable facts for personal gain. Craig tried to initiate a defamation claim against me earlier this year for posting about him being a criminal rebate fraudster and fugitive. (see my pinned tweet) and do you know what happened? I sent his legal team a fully-detailed rebuttal by email as they had demanded, laying out the evidence proving that he was exactly the very things I was calling him out to be. He then had to get himself new lawyers and a change of underwear. |
|
|
|
Breaking...
Did you address how we might know that those are authentic communications? Well Ager-Hanssen has now posted the full email itself, but the proof that it is legit, that Calvin has cut Craig Wright loose is the fact that Calvin has now confirmed the email contents are true.  Calvin is desperate to believe that Craig's repeated failure to ever sign legitimately as Satoshi is just him wanting to hide his assets, even though the simple truth is that Craig is a conman who never had them in the first place. He literally tried passing off fake bitcoin wallets to the ATO as though they were his when he could have simply signed those, too, and they weren't him being Satoshi back in 2013/14 they were him just pretending he owned a vast trove of coins he'd claimed had funded hundreds of millions of dollars worth of business transactions he'd claimed CASH rebates for. Criminal fraud. Serious criminal fraud. Craig is going to jail. |
|
|
|
Breaking... nChain CEO quits and calls Craig out for being a liar and a fraud and most definitely not Satoshi https://twitter.com/CryptoDevil/status/1707906429661651437Calvin Ayre emails Craig and tells him he is out and is pulling the plug on funding the hopeless legal cases Craig has been dragging innocent people into: https://twitter.com/CryptoDevil/status/1708085903451652335Full text part 1
wonder who sent this email
and who it was sent to. It was forwarded to me by someone Headline was as follows;
“My last direct communication on this issue. Please read carefully.” Dated 23 September. Judge by yourself please:
As I sit here I am on a beach in Southern Spain. I have a good life. I have every intention of keeping it this way. Right now the only negative in my life is your litigation disaster (and getting old but that one I cannot fix). I will accept your explanation that you did not actually threaten me so the following is the situation we find ourselves in.
I have been operating under the assumption that you and Ramona have the keys and that you were simply pretending not to have them as part of some strategy that you have trapped yourself in. But now that we are looking at a situation where continuing to deny you have them ruins your life and damages your supporters, I am forced to make a tough decision. It no longer matters if you have the keys or not as it is my opinion based on advice from Zafar and others that you cannot win the COPA trial if you do not sign at Harvard so I have no choice in what I have to do.
This of course will also mean that you lose all the other cases (other than maybe the token theft case…but to me losing COPA even puts this at risk) as COPA will set precedent that you are not Satoshi in law. All IP other than nChain patents will disappear. This means that you are not going to be able to get a court to declare that you own any tokens either. We have also verified that there is no complete paper trail evidencing the trust owning any tokens. This after nearly a year of Zurich reviewing all the evidence you have. This means you cannot repay me the money you owe me for all the litigation to date. This means every cent spent on your cases is me pissing away my kids inheritance. If you have the keys, your best play is to now use them. Going to jail for perjury but having the entire world accept you are a flawed Satoshi is infinitely better than losing this case and only being considered likely to be a flawed Satoshi after your death by historians as no other realistic person is ever found. However, its my opinion that once the world accepts you are a flawed Satoshi, everything changes and all of this just goes away. I can make it all go away in fact. There is zero reason to continue to pretend you do not have the keys if you really have them. Side bonus is that using the keys in this way, combined with verdict in Florida will likely be a accepted replacement for proper paper work for financial institutions.
So either you are a moron for intentionally losing this case, or you are a moron for actually not having the keys…either way, I am not following you over the cliff…and I actually have concerns with Stefan even being a witness as I know what they will do to him for this. My opinion in having watched this play out over the years is that its clear you are hopelessly bad at litigation. The ONLY reason you won in Florida is the other side got greedy and tried to both steal your shit and ruin your reputation and this was conflicting agendas and so confused the jury. The other side will not be making this mistake in London.
To me I am doing you and your supporters a favor…. I will cover this in CG as us still being sure you are Satoshi even as its clear that you were run over by the combined forces of Silicon Valley, US payments companies and the entire Crypto world. We will say that we believe you did forge some documents to replace ones you destroyed earlier to try to pretend you were not Satoshi. We will say this is because your Asperger’s makes you not think and act like an adult. You are like a super smart Teenager. This is not how this would play out in the media if we spend toe to toe with COPA and they still win which is what is most likely…in addition to the massive waste of my kids wealth…
(To be continued below)
----------------
Full text part 2
Its clear that once you lose you will need me more than ever. I will be the only one standing between your family and the soup kitchen. At least at the moment, depending on how self-destructive you get, I am not stopping my funding of the Association, the ecosystem or nChain and you, in fact this decision makes funding them a lot easier for me. From my perspective this decision improves everything now. Your continuing to accept this funding is your acceptance that our existing deal is still valid and that you agree with me that my stopping funding a lost cause is not a violation on my side. You are further agreeing that you personally will pay me back for all the money I have spent on your project even if the trust never gets any tokens.
I do not believe this case is fundable in any other way, I do not believe you will even be able to get a competent law firm to work with you on this as I expect all the lawyers to bail once they know I am out. The analysis above will be done by everyone and they are coming to the same conclusion. However, I will support any new funding options you can find if this is your wish just send the plan to Alain and I. I do not expect this to happen however as you have made yourself just to toxic for this and your enemies have piled on in branding you as such…they are ever so gleeful with every round you pinch off into your own feet. As I said above…I believe what I am doing is actually tough love, its definitely not meant to hurt you and it will actually help you looking at this from where I am sitting. The lawyers all dropping you because you ran out of funding is the best case scenario that I can see if you cannot do a Harvard signing.
By the way…you lost both contempt of court cases. Christen was the one that saved you and you are acting like you are too selfish and ignorant to even understand this. I don’t believe you have even thanked anyone. Both of these contempt’s would have been used against you in all other cases.
C…… So the only question remains... Will Craig flee the UK before he's nabbed by law enforcement for extradition back to Australia to face justice for the millions he stole from the taxpayer in his fake-bitcoins-to-real-dollars cash rebate scam? |
|
|
|
What's even more remarkable is that he actually has got the right tools to make a go of a real business. If he applied his skill set to a genuine business he would do very well. His marketing is exceptional, people go on Shark Tank for such help and give away equity for such talent. That is his flooding of social media about his profile, his flooding of news organizations with his PR's his stories and news articles and self promotion etc etc. All that is quite impressive and if used for a real company or product would produce a winner. Alas he has a screw loose and applies it to cheating and stealing instead.
I said during the GAW Miners 'Cloud mining'/Paycoin scam that he was one of the few people in this space to have access to a legit blue-chip Wall St firm via the actual 'Uncle Stu' who could probably have been able to devise a legit business opportunity to invest in and grow with him. Had he been willing to resist his compulsion to scam he'd likely have been on a path to genuine and sustainable wealth creation. But perhaps his innate skill for self-promotion and marketing is only as a result of his dysfunctional psyche, which is part and parcel of his need to scam now and deal with the consequences later. He doesn't enjoy the trappings of his illicit wealth unless he knows that other people see him on social media enjoying the trappings of his illicit wealth, which leads to him getting caught for his illicit wealth. |
|
|
|
He was out October 2021 sometime.
Just in time to cash in his stashed bitcoin for the $60k+ bull run. The crime clearly paid off in this case. Lived large during his scam and then spent 18 months with room and board courtesy of the US taxpayer and left prison a free man who clearly has significant funds from some 'mysterious' source allowing him to continue living large. |
|
|
|
Nice, thanks for the links Plastick. It'll be interesting to see what he gets at the end of all this and whether any of the illicit funds can be recovered. Hilarious about the fake degrees though! What a fraud. |
|
|
|
Boom. Justice being served.
Nice, what's he actually facing, something substantial I hope? |
|
|
|
BSV IS A WAY FOR CRAIG WRIGHT TO PAY BAIL? LAWYER PLS
Actually, Craig tried arguing that the intended 'recovery' of 'his' coins from the BitcoincashSV chain would be sufficient for him to prove he has enough assets to cover a potential loss in the COPA case, but that was rejected as the Master Clark pointed out that such an action could only properly be used if he was able to verify ownership of those coins independently of the private keys. Something we know he cannot do because all his "I am Satoshi" supposed proof was exposed as mere fakes and forgeries during the Kleiman case. Thing is, we know that nChain is in majority control of the BSV network so they could potentially just force it through, but it is good to see that the legal process has already pointed out that it would not be proper for them to do so without there being suitable proof that the person trying to 'recover' said coins actually owns them. This is what is going to fuck Craig up in the coming cases. Where the Kleiman action was a ridiculous sham where neither side contested his "I am Satoshi" claim because it suited their purposes, neither Hodlonaut nor COPA cases are based on that same premise and Craig's claim to be Satoshi has even been raised as a particular reason for why a number of damning pieces of evidence from the Kleiman case were accepted for the COPA case, "In my judgement, these questions are exactly the kind of debate which will need to be had in order to test the defendant’s claim that he is indeed Satoshi Nakamoto.".So not only does Craig have to come up with a not-insignificant security deposit for the COPA case, he will also have to explain away his forgeries AND proffer up actual proof that he is Satoshi, something he has utterly failed to do and, in fact, something which directly led to him fleeing Australia when he repeatedly failed to do so for the ATO which, had he simply performed a legitimate signing or moved a coin, would have exonerated him over the multi-million-dollar cash rebate fraud he is likely to end up facing extradition over in the next few years. (And this is ignoring his NSW SC fraudulent cases where he lied in court, filed fake valuations and forged signatures on backdated contracts, made false police reports to the UK police over a hack for which there is no evidence it ever happened and where he lied about ADT UK's data centre having an outage and losing the footage of the 'pineapple' being planted, plus a litany of 'minor' frauds like filing fake backdated company appointments for a dead guy etc.) All in, Craig Wright is finally going to see his multi-year frauds catch up with him and it will be glorious. |
|
|
|
Hi !
I am in contact with Jawad. I just meet him and wanted to know more so I’ve done some research until I found your discussion.
He’s on Club House under the name of Jawad Joya
He seems that he’s not who he’s pretending…
Yeah he's still floating around the internet, no doubt. Sometimes I think he just desperately wants attention, any attention, even ours. Ask him to tell you about his connection to 55 Clive Road on MI5's Palace Barracks in Belfast. That's the real mystery here, the Razormind scam was just another painfully-obvious cash grab from the outset, but that connection is what piqued my interest. |
|
|
|
*Every single 'gotcha' piece of evidence which proves Craig to be a liar and a fraud* CSW: "I was hacked" |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
