This is an old bug that was never fixed. The problem is that characters from right-to-left scripts (such as Arabic) switch the text direction and, if they occur at the end of the subject line, it's never switched back afterwards, which (in at least some browsers, anyway) screws up the rendering of whatever follows.

Sure, just step into my time machine.

The evidence:

My hilariously brilliant take on the entire thing:

---

I don't think anybody interacting with c******unter has such a choice:

Being involuntarily c******unted isn't so bad (it gave me 50% more fucks to give at a time when I was in danger of running out), but I do wish he was more consistent about it:

Sixth week paid.

I'm almost certain that cryptohunter isn't banned, but The-One-Above-All is his alt and wants everyone to think his old account was banned because it supports his narrative of censorship and oppression or whatever.

Mods are absolutely one-sided. They're on the side of enforcing the rules of the forum in a somewhat sane (if unreasonably lenient) manner. Obviously that's not the side you're on, but you can't please everyone.

How embarrassing. I'm never going to live this down, am I?

Wait, how many time we quoted them. Oh, no. That's not good. I'm going to pre-emptively state that quoting someone a lot does not (necessarily) mean that I can't live without them or that I would spend the night with them.

---

Huh, I don't, do I? I never noticed that before. Well, I do now. Just don't expect any tail "friendship" on the first date.

EDIT: Just noticed new local rule. You just had to ruin a vixen's fun, didn't you, suchmoon?

Oh, I forgot about Spoetnik! She also had a thing for me back in the day. Add her to my list.

I assume it's the person who mentioned my name the most frequently, yes? The Pharmacist maybe? It would be cryptohunter, but he loves me so much that he always calls me by pet names.

Jokers are valuable to the community. Where would this forum be without a little humour, after all?

You're making some bold assumptions, aren't you?

So, you don't consider childish behaviour to be a negative trait? I guess not, since you're exhibiting it yourself.

Who's Thomas and why is it up to him?

And did anyone actually offer to remove your negative trust in exchange for a ransom? From your initial post, it seems you're the one making the offer, which makes it a bribe, not a ransom.

I'm not paying you to post; a certain someone might accuse me of shenanigans (more shenanigans than are really going on between us, I mean). Though I suppose I could not pay you to not post and still be respected.

I'm curious about that myself. I know for a fact that the merit arse licking has always been more or less evenly distributed, at least among the invited participants of the merit orgies; I don't know why The-One thinks it's a strictly linear hierarchy.

I didn't realise the gang was so extensive as to include 10% of all (2 million+) users. That's an awful lot of arses to lick.

A simple "yes" would have sufficed.

Would it be optimistic to ask for a list of names, or are you just going to continue ranting vaguely?

That's not what he got negative trust for, which is what he's complaining about (that part's in right the thread title, too).

He did buy this account. He admitted it (in the title of this very thread, no less). Please read at least the title of the thread before spamming in it or kindly fuck off.