But that's the kind of people you like, right? Back stabbers.
If you believed your country was still a Democracy (and you clearly don't), you'd realise the lunatic you're rooting for is the one betraying all the principles your nation was founded upon. You are mistaken. America is a Republic. The so-called government is the Democracy. The 6th and 7th Amendments to the Constitution allow a 12-person jury of the Republic to strike down any Government law... with relation to the court circumstances to which they allow themselves to be called.  I have told you a million times: youtube is not a credible source of information in general, but those channels that you seen to be following are probably the humour section of some short of outlet. 6th In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence. 7th In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. There absolutely nothing of what you say on this nor any other amendment. A jury cannot fucking "strike down" any law dumbass, much on the contrary, they have to decide on specific questions about the charges following the criteria setforth in the common law. Go to kindergarten dumbass. Thank you for proving my point... well, several of my points. You forgot the part of my quote which says, "... with relation to the court circumstances to which they allow themselves to be called." It's only when a large number of juries strike down a law that SCOTUS will be called to strike down the law for the whole country. Other than that, the law is stricken for the court case to which the jury has been called, and so strikes it. You quoted it right in your quoting of the 7th Amendment, "... and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law." In other words, what the jury decides is the thing that becomes law for the case at hand... even the striking down of a Congressionally mandated law. But that is only for, "... Suits at common law," as the 7th Amendment says. There is no common law trial for criminal cases listed in these two Amendments. So, if Trump wanted to avoid being criminally charged, he should have switched the court over to the Common Law side. The way to do it is to stand as a man, present, and not represented (no attorneys)... and make the statement that any man/woman who has been wronged by him should get on the stand, show the wrong, and "I will compensate him/her." So, it is Trumps fault for not swinging the whole thing into common law, and holding it there. However, Even if he accepts a criminal jury trial, the decisions of the jury cannot be changed except through a proper declaration of mistrial. If the jury decided that Trump was innocent of everything, he would get off, free. It would only apply to him. The next person accused of breaking the same law(s) as Trump, would have to get his own jury, and jury decisions for himself. They might be different than in Trump's case. Now you can see why the judge won't allow Trump a jury trial. Trump is popular enough that many juries might set him completely free. The judge is partially wrong in this. He isn't supposed to dis-allow a trial by jury, even if the defendant agrees to such, or hires attorneys, becoming a ward of the court, thereby. But nobody seems to want to take the judge to task over his failure to obey his own Rules of Court. |
|
|
|
while science and religious views are not fundamentally incompatible, science demands strict standards of falsifiability and empirical evidence to constitute proof. As God is a non-natural concept, its existence inherently lies outside the scope of scientific proof either for or against. Thus personal faith and individual experiences remain the key basis influencing views on God's existence.
One of the strongest religions is the intentional non-use of science to prove that God exists. Simple scientific proof for God is easy. Here is how: Scientific evidence for simple machines is quite evident by the fact that people use simple machines all over the place. In fact, the machines that people make and use ALL have their base in the machinery of the universe. Because of this, the natural machinery of the universe CAN be called 'machine'. Machines have makers, including the universe machine. Any machine like the universe must have a very intelligent, extremely powerful, Being that made it. The definition of such a being would fit the definition of our word 'God'. |
|
|
|
Having trouble thinking clearly, lately? Did you get the Covid vaxx? Maybe the two are linked. Neurosurgeon Unveils COVID Vaccine Shocking Link to Brain Damage & Cancer Risk
https://needtoknow.news/2023/12/neurosurgeon-unveils-covid-vaccine-shocking-link-to-brain-damage-cancer-risk/His presentation titled 'Spike Proteins and Neurodegeneration: Effect of artificial exosomes on the nervous system in the form of an injection' covers the damage the spike protein does to the brain, the elderly, and unborn children, as well as its effect on cancer risk. Dr. Blaylock details a number of ways that the COVID vaccine spike protein stimulates inflammation in the brain that can cause toxicity and even brain damage. Elderly people are especially vulnerable because their immune cells age, don't reproduce themselves, and can become highly inflammatory. The elderly also secrete much lower levels of the reparative neurotrophic compounds, which is why is aging is the number one risk factor for neurodegenerative disorders. Dr. Blaylock explained that unborn children are also very vulnerable as the nano lipid carrier of the COVID vaccine spike protein goes right through the placenta and can affect the development of brain cells. He said that COVID injections are responsible for reduced lymphocytes that help to fight cancer. ...
|
|
|
|
~ The war is not popular in any major country. Do you think the Ukrainian people like it? It wasn't easy for the millions who migrated out of Ukraine just to get away from war. They would have rather stayed home in peace. But just to show everybody where you are, you seem to like the war, just like your buddy Zelensky... along with the ruling elite of the world and their military war machines. Kill off the few Ukrainians that are left, before they simply fail, and Russia is shown to be the good guy by going in and helping them out with reparations. Governments are made ups of supposed leaders. They are not made up of the people/citizens. Most of the citizens don't want war. It's the leaders that want war. Wake up. You are wrong. US presidents often rise in popularity when they wage war. Ruzzia population at several levels were supportive of the war at the beginning. Wake up and try to read some proper information - do you need more confirmation that you are NOT better informed, smarter or more moral than the rest of the users here dumbass? By the way, it seems that quite a few incidents are ongoing with the Ruzzian civil aviation. It seems that they are "patching" here and there the components, so I would not be surprised to see metal raining from the Ruzzia skies. Well, make up your mind. Either you believe Russian news, or you don't. Since you seem to believe it in this post ^^, you should really consider believing that Russia is trying to liberate Ukraine from US domination, like they have said. You can't read either? Where in my post does it say that this information if from Ruzzian sources dumbass? https://aviationsourcenews.com/analysis/11-air-incidents-in-russia-in-eight-days-civilian-crash-inevitable/Following its audit of Russia’s flight safety last September, The International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) issued it with “red flag” status, ranking it alongside Bhutan, The Democratic Republic of Congo, and Liberia as one of the four most dangerous countries to fly in the world.
“Unfortunately, the ICAO red flag status is not just a political gesture as many believe,” one aviation expert told Novaya-Europe, asking to remain anonymous. “It reflects how things really are.” The ICAO is an international organisation that is only about preserving the reputation of the air transportation industry and is quite strict (in general) regarding the safety of flights to make sure people know what they are doing when taking a plane. In general, takes a neutral approach (not always) caring only about following regulations on safety. What is the significant safety concern of ICAO Russia?
Russia's actions, including illegally double-registering aircraft stolen from European leasing companies and operating aircraft on international routes without a valid safety certificate, led to ICAO issuing a Serious Safety Concern (SSC) against Russia, declaring aviation in Russia to be fundamentally unsafe Now, this does mention a Ruzzian source, see the difference? https://www.newsweek.com/russian-plane-malfunctions-2023-tripled-western-sanctions-1850780There have been a vast number of cases in recent months of Russian domestic passenger planes making emergency landings due to technical issues, driven by a lack of spare parts. According to Russian Transport Minister Vitaly Savelyev, the country has lost 76 passenger jets since February 2022, due to Western sanctions. I will not quote the Ukrainian sources that say they hacked the databases and found nearly 200 incidents, etc... I guess sanctions do reach parts of the economy. Well, you had the chance to redeem yourself. Of course, you can do it any time you want... before the war is over. The profiting war machine in Russia is probably making almost as much money of the Ukrainians as the profiting war machine in the US. Also, He's Finished And It's Over - https://rumble.com/v40x0sb-hes-finished-and-its-over.html.Backlash Grows Among Ukrainians In Response To Zelensky's 'Rose-Tinted' Speeches
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/backlash-grows-among-ukrainians-response-zelenskys-rose-tinted-speechesExtreme doubts about Ukraine's ability to fight back Russia, and to sustain enough Western support while doing it, have become increasingly obvious to all. This has led to some rare and significant backlash against the Zelensky administration by some of the Ukrainian populace and even among military officials. As of Tuesday, President Zelensky visited the White House where he stuck by his message of "Ukraine can win". He at one point in a joint press conference with Biden called the idea of ceding territory to the Russians for the sake of achieving peace "insane". But a Ukrainian official interviewed by Financial Times has said the military and the people are ready for more realism. She pointed to the widening rift being created given the Zelensky administration is needlessly painting a 'rosier' picture than everyone knows actually exists on the ground. "In order for society not to build castles in the air, and to take off its rose-tinted glasses... it is necessary to stop being afraid to speak the truth," Iryna Zolotar, adviser and head of communications for Ukraine's former defense minister Oleksii Reznikov, told the publication. She described a situation where "expectations are overstated and do not correspond to the real state of affairs." She complained that the public can no longer be fed a message of Ukraine being always "about to win". FT says multiple other officials said something similar - that while an atmosphere of optimism was crucial toward surviving the opening part of the war, continuing to blindly push inaccuracies about the state of the conflict on the public is blowing back negatively... "But with Ukraine enjoying few military achievements this year and western support faltering, the communications strategy is creating a rift between the presidential administration and military leadership, say officials from the armed forces, former presidential staffers and communication strategists," FT writes. ...
|
|
|
|
^^^ Things are changing. Tucker is moving into the spotlight on his own. Corporate Media is Dead
https://tuckercarlson.com/WHAT IS TCN? (Tucker Carlson Network) Tucker Carlson Network is the new streaming platform that is home to exclusive all-new content from Tucker Carlson. We will regularly be releasing new video content that tells the stories that matter and helps you make sense of the world around you. Why we founded TCN News coverage in the West has become a tool of repression and control. Reporters no longer reveal essential information to the public; they work to hide it. Journalists act as censors on behalf of entrenched power. They have contempt for the public. They hate the truth. Democracy can't function in a society like this. Voters can't know what they're voting for. People do understand they're being manipulated, and they resent it. The population becomes angry and paranoid. Things fall apart. There's only one solution to a propaganda spiral like the one we're living through, and it's telling the truth about the things that matter — clearly and without fear. That's our job. We plan to do it every day, no matter what. JOIN THE MOVEMENT We are the sworn enemies of lying, pomposity, smugness, and groupthink. We believe the corporate media is broken beyond repair, and the only way forward is to build something better. If this sounds like you, too, then join us today. By becoming a member of Team Tucker, you will unlock access to endless hours of exclusive members-only content from Tucker Carlson. Join the movement, and help us tell the truth about the things that matter. A direct line to Tucker and his team Join Now ...
|
|
|
|
~ Good point. Maybe Tucker will get to the Assange story some time if he hasn't already. There is a lot of truth and hidden truth out there. Can't get it all in, in one day. Reporting on Obama simply and his lover shows what the Dem leaders are really like. Many Dem people are honest, average Americans who have been duped by the party. Gotta wake 'em up. I wish Tucker would prove to us if Michelle O. is a man or not, and clear up all the mystery behind it. If she's a he, Obama must have been going that direction for a long time. Obviously, Tucker is getting attention. You, even, are talking about him. Good. Maybe more people will tune in to him more often, thereby finding out that he makes some of the best media sense around. Sure, I am talking about him because I am generally interested in the political happenings going on in the United States, and whether I like him or not, Tucker is part of the political reality of that country. Actually, I have personally watched some of his episodes back when he was in Fox, just for the sake of listening to all the media of the political spectrum. Also, if Michelle Obama was actually a man posing as a woman or something like that, why would the Democrat party or Obama himself would continue to hide it? Keeping in mind in the United States it has become socially acceptable not to identify with one's birth gender? Obama has no longer a chance to become president again and Michelle is unlikely to pursue a political career anyways. So why would they hide it? Why? If we knew the answers to the why everything, there wouldn't be any fun in life. There used to be a bunch of videos on Youtube about this. Unlikely as it may seem, what if it were true? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyXOGZCbV5M&pp=ygUUbWljaGVsbGUgb2JhbWEgYSBtYW4%3D |
|
|
|
Like him or loathe him, Jones sparks debate. He gets people talking about him & no publicity is bad publicity for Elon. He pushed for free speech & no censorship with his revamp of X so Elon is just doing what he said he’d do. Alex Jones will bring attention & interest to Twitter & ultimately that’s what Elon desires.
In the short term, sure. Alex will bring some stuff to talk about Twitter and the fact Elon left him back in. However, in the long term people will not longer focus on the fact he is back and will only talk about the disgusting and completely fabricated stuff Jones will start to push all around Twitter. The worst part is that it will be matter of time before he start to do so, si ce we are entering an electoral year in the United States and Jones won't be able to resist to spread falsehoods to Trump supporters, for the sake of money. Even if he is trying to avoid to pay what he owes to the Sandy Hook families, he won't be able to resist the temptation. Once it starts, mainstream media will continue to trash Twitter as a platform which one serves to spread misinformation, antisemitism, election denial, etc. To me, it will take other platform to actually start to steal percentage of the market from Elon to realize free speech is not the same as leaving a legally convicted person who committed defamation against families of massacred children back in. This that you say is the exact point why speech should be free. Why should anybody suggest that Jones's stuff is fabricated? Many people say it is the truth - with a few mistakes here and there, just like everybody else who talks. If we can't hear it, how can we make the judgment about whether it is fabricated or not? Or why should we not apply the fabrication idea to the speaking of EVERYBODY else at the same time? The sensors in X and every other media outlet should simply make categories according to what they think is the truth, and what they think is falsehood. Let everybody speak. Then, 'censor' them by sticking them in an appropriate category based on 1 - 10 regarding how truthful the media thinks they are. That way people would be able to easily ignore them, or go to see what they say if they want. It's called freedom, both for the speakers, but also for the listeners. The funny thing regarding X is, if they were to enact censors more than they have, even Elon would be censored. |
|
|
|
Guns should be given to those that can control it because anger can cause a man to use his gun and we all know the result which grave.
Consider some of the best people who can control guns the best... the military soldiers. They have been trained to shoot well, to protect each other, and to maintain their firearms better than almost anybody. But every now and again we hear about soldiers being killed by 'friendly fire'. They got killed by their own 'friends in the military by accident. So, who is going to determine who is a good gun controller? If soldiers make mistakes, anybody can. Who is going to enforce gun control, and how? If police try to enforce gun control without guns, they will be shot dead. If they use guns to enforce gun control, they are fighting the thing they are trying to enforce. Could This Supreme Court Case End Government Overreach By Three-Letter Agencies?
https://www.activistpost.com/2023/12/could-this-supreme-court-case-end-government-overreach-by-three-letter-agencies.htmlWhat do fishing, Three Letter Agencies, and gun rights all have in common? Well, thanks to a little-known case called Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, commercial fishing and gun rights are intrinsically tied together. The outcome of this case could change the legal landscape of the entire country when it comes to the ability of three-letter agencies such as ATF to make regulations. To understand the scope and effect of the Raimondo case, we'll need to first look at two different things. The first is the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. The second is a legal principle called Chevron Deference. Let's start with the Fishery Act, as that's the basis for this case. [VIDEO INCLUDED]...
|
|
|
|
But that's the kind of people you like, right? Back stabbers.
If you believed your country was still a Democracy (and you clearly don't), you'd realise the lunatic you're rooting for is the one betraying all the principles your nation was founded upon. You are mistaken. America is a Republic. The so-called government is the Democracy. The 6th and 7th Amendments to the Constitution allow a 12-person jury of the Republic to strike down any Government law... with relation to the court circumstances to which they allow themselves to be called. |
|
|
|
~ The war is not popular in any major country. Do you think the Ukrainian people like it? It wasn't easy for the millions who migrated out of Ukraine just to get away from war. They would have rather stayed home in peace. But just to show everybody where you are, you seem to like the war, just like your buddy Zelensky... along with the ruling elite of the world and their military war machines. Kill off the few Ukrainians that are left, before they simply fail, and Russia is shown to be the good guy by going in and helping them out with reparations. Governments are made ups of supposed leaders. They are not made up of the people/citizens. Most of the citizens don't want war. It's the leaders that want war. Wake up. You are wrong. US presidents often rise in popularity when they wage war. Ruzzia population at several levels were supportive of the war at the beginning. Wake up and try to read some proper information - do you need more confirmation that you are NOT better informed, smarter or more moral than the rest of the users here dumbass? By the way, it seems that quite a few incidents are ongoing with the Ruzzian civil aviation. It seems that they are "patching" here and there the components, so I would not be surprised to see metal raining from the Ruzzia skies. Well, make up your mind. Either you believe Russian news, or you don't. Since you seem to believe it in this post ^^, you should really consider believing that Russia is trying to liberate Ukraine from US domination, like they have said. |
|
|
|
~ Mike Pence is a big one. He is credible in general, he could have played along with the orange-ambition guy so at least he was ... smart enough? afraid enough? ambitious enough? My guess is that he has no future while Trump is around, so he is going to be motivated on this one, while he has to pretend that is just complying with the law. https://edition.cnn.com/2023/12/06/politics/mike-pence-georgia-witness-list/index.htmlPence’s name appearing on the witness list in Georgia, which has not been previously reported, is the first concrete sign that the Fulton County district attorney’s office is preparing to put him on the stand. Pence has already signaled a willingness to testify as a witness in any federal trial. Mike Pence credible? Lol. He turned on his 'boss' and the American people. But that's the kind of people you like, right? Back stabbers. How big of a stabbed-to-death trail would we find in YOUR history if we followed it? |
|
|
|
~ Glad we're at least partially on the same page. Only i don't think journalists have anything to do with the planning or the outcome whatsoever, they're just mostly pushing whichever propaganda and they're usually a good indicator of whats to come as they're typically used to set the mood/pivot the population before official announcements. As for the generals, the pentagon and NATO overall, either not sending enough weapons to win was just a silly coincidence/misunderstanding/miscalculation and only now, after almost two years of war generals have to make a decision as you claim, or that decision has already been made a while ago and those hundreds of generals get their funding from (career) politicians which are mostly interested in keeping the power or enough popularity to get re/elected. For the upside Putin having a sudden heart attack and Russia falling apart is a huge upside, Russia had control of those Ukrainian bases which are "closer to the EU" all the way up to 2014, and no one really cared much, so why not try it. Now that we see that it didn't work, oh well not much of a downside. But keeping this going has a real downside of Europe tearing apart, and politicians just loosing their jobs if they continue to vote for unpopular war that's only becoming even more unpopular how can they send more than before if now only 18% of population believe US is not sending enough. The media push an agenda, which does not necessarily mean is a anti-Ruzzian agenda. I am sure many believe that it would be much better to be cozy with Ruzzia. My view, as said many times, is that Ruzzia wants to get a grip on Europe and it needs to stop somewhere - e.g. right here, right now. Ukrainians are fighting because they believe would be better off without Moscow. The war is not popular in Ruzzia. I saw the statistics recently in the Economist. The ones that support the war are the richest elites, they are making a lot. All the rest of the population would rather not have it. On governments in Europe ... I think Europe is fully convinced of supporting Ukraine. On the US government, we will see, because even if Trump gets an "out of jail" card in March, his "ending the war in 48 hours" means the carrot... but make no mistake: there is also a stick attached to it if Putin finds the offer unacceptable. The war is not popular in any major country. Do you think the Ukrainian people like it? It wasn't easy for the millions who migrated out of Ukraine just to get away from war. They would have rather stayed home in peace. But just to show everybody where you are, you seem to like the war, just like your buddy Zelensky... along with the ruling elite of the world and their military war machines. Kill off the few Ukrainians that are left, before they simply fail, and Russia is shown to be the good guy by going in and helping them out with reparations. Governments are made ups of supposed leaders. They are not made up of the people/citizens. Most of the citizens don't want war. It's the leaders that want war. Wake up. |
|
|
|
~ I just wanted to thank you for respecting me as much as you do. But don't do it. I am just a man like you (or are you a woman?). We all have ideas and opinions and desires. And we talk harshly to each other to maintain our ideals in strength within us. So, it's understandable that we are going to pick on each other at times. However, when one calls God imaginary, God perks up His ears a little, and listens to what that joker is saying. So, don't so it... think of or call God imaginary. God is Almighty. He holds your life in His hands. And He won't put up with your denial of Him. Hope and pray that He wakes you up to His existence gently. But for sure, wakes you up in this life. All people die. At least it seems that way. In the resurrection at the last day, God will provide us all with the knowledge of why He judges us the way He does. It will be based on what we have thought of Him in this life. For those who have denied Him, the punishment will be great. So, if you are truly a God-denier, change, while you have time. Get into the Bible to find out about God, and the basics of right and wrong and salvation... before it's too late. Believe in whatever you want - as humans we do not know many things - but do not think that you have some better reason than others base on a belief, because then is when God becomes "your imaginary friend". It is even immoral. You actually need to prove facts, is just not enough to "believe". For example, I have evidence that you are a dumbass. so I do not need to believe it. Just like Trump need to proof someone scammed him, it is not enough to "believe it". Good points. But they are basic points. If you would follow them, you would be in agreement with me. |
|
|
|
~ Maybe he just wants to be a reporter for truth. I mean, if the truth gets to enough people in the world, they will be able to figure out what to do and how to live. This will make living a lot easier for Tucker, as well. You must be joking. How are we supposed to talk about Tucker Carlson as a person who wants to become a reporter for Truth, if some months ago he had an interview with a person who claimed to be the ex gay lover of president Obama? Did you even take a look at that interview? It was obviously a very low attempt by Tucker to try to catch some attention after being fired from Fox. If we are supposed to say someone is doing a favor to the world by reporting the truth, then we should move on from Tucker and talk about organizations like WikiLeaks. Those are the real entities who risk their life and existence to bring us the facts and the truth governments try to hide from us. Who do you think is doing an important service to all of us, Tucker by talking about Obama's ex gay lover or Julian Assange by exposing the secrets of shady politicians.?  Good point. Maybe Tucker will get to the Assange story some time if he hasn't already. There is a lot of truth and hidden truth out there. Can't get it all in, in one day. Reporting on Obama simply and his lover shows what the Dem leaders are really like. Many Dem people are honest, average Americans who have been duped by the party. Gotta wake 'em up. I wish Tucker would prove to us if Michelle O. is a man or not, and clear up all the mystery behind it. If she's a he, Obama must have been going that direction for a long time. Obviously, Tucker is getting attention. You, even, are talking about him. Good. Maybe more people will tune in to him more often, thereby finding out that he makes some of the best media sense around. |
|
|
|
It depends on what is really what he wants to achieve, if he wanted to fully influence on USA politics, he could go back to cable networks, for now he seems rather focused on getting some money.
being on social media these days get even more coverage than cable networks things travel fast in social media and with platforms as such i’m sure carlson will just have his name around for sure the very fact that we are talking about him means that he is still very much relevant and therefore could still run for politics in the following election Maybe he just wants to be a reporter for truth. I mean, if the truth gets to enough people in the world, they will be able to figure out what to do and how to live. This will make living a lot easier for Tucker, as well. |
|
|
|
According to the history about the Jewish people, they were known to be the people of the book, they study and archive many of the ancient books of history in their library for future references, yet this same people were not only known for ready books alone, they got the mystery of the power to make wealth in them because they know books and understand what business is, this is one of the things we cannot change about nature concerning them than leaving it the way it were.
God chose Abraham, the father of the Jews (Hebrews), because Abraham was humble, a nice guy, a shrewd trader, believed in God, was extremely stubborn... stubborn, especially in his faith in God. Abraham was tested in a fiery furnace... see the Book of Jasher - https://duckduckgo.com/?q=book+of+jasher&ia=web. God promised to make Abraham 's family into possibly the largest family on Earth (if you include all descendants: Christians, Jews, Arabs). God did this because Abraham believed in Him. Even though the Jews of today are mixed up about their Messiah, God still keeps His promise to Abraham. So, it is God behind the Jews, at least to some extent, that is making the Jews successful in many ways. |
|
|
|
There comes a time when employers take too much, and don't give enough to their employees. That's the time the employees need to start working for themselves. Woodman's Market is an employee owned grocery chain. Decades ago the Woodman family wanted to sell out or shut her down. The employees got together and bought it out. What was family pofits in the past are now shared among the employees. A similar thing happened with Yelloh back when it was still called Schwan's Home Delivery. Mr. Schwan passed away, and his family was going to sell off the business. The employees got together and bought it. There are probably many business that are employee owned - https://duckduckgo.com/?q=employee+owned+businesses&ia=web. The point is, when you can't get ahead in your work, work, work, it might be a good idea to get together with others in the same 'poverty' state as you are, and start a business together. You all become the people making the profits that way. |
|
|
|
~
The major problem with your money ideals is, there isn't enough money to buy happiness... or life. Look at George Soros for example. He has $billions. But he isn't happy; you can see it in the way he stresses over world conditions he can't control. And he certainly isn't getting any younger.
The only way a person can have happiness and life is to believe in forgiveness of mistakes made. And the only place that clearly tells about forgiveness is the Bible, and other writings that rely on the Bible for their messages. Why? Because the Bible is the foundation place that shows God's salvation for people through the God-man, Jesus Christ.
Forgiven 'sins' and mistakes brings happiness and the promise of eternal life by the Guy Who doesn't lie... God, Himself, through Jesus Christ, the Messiah promised at the Beginning, to Adam and Eve when they sinned.
If he isn't happy with even billions then ask him to send out 10 million and ask he feels lighter now? No, the billionaire will stop making money even if the value of their assets is in billions and they can't even spend all their money due to the limited availability of life then why still they're making money? And forgiveness, peace, blah blah ideologies are created by incompetent men who can't make such crazy money but convinces themselves by keep repeating bullshit ideologies to others. Forgiveness and peace ideologies are promoted by God through the Bible. There are more copies of the published than any other book... at least twice as many as the next most popular book. Ecclesiastes 5:10 from the Bible: "Whoever loves money never has enough; whoever loves wealth is never satisfied with their income. This too is meaningless" - https://biblehub.com/ecclesiastes/5-10.htm. So, the Bible is practical about money matters. When the people who work for the $billionaire stop working for him, he fails. Why? He doesn't have enough practical experience doing things for himself to know how to do them... because he has had others do the things for him. |
|
|
|
...
You simply conveniently want to forget because, like paxmao, your country would be one that would receive less money from the US if Trump were in control.
Provide proof. Hint: "God (my imaginary friend) told me in my dreams", "Trump said it so it is true", "Those voices that speak to me all the time say so", "Tucker Carlson said so", "the Fox said so", "I read it in the (Bible, Koran, Book of Life, Harry Potter books, a documentary on the Aztec empire,...), "The same people that say that COVId does not exist told me so", "the same people who think that aliens assaulted the capitol told me" are NOT considered proof except in you parallel universe and the state of BAdeckdonia, where superman lives. Go back to kindergarten dumbass. I just wanted to thank you for respecting me as much as you do. But don't do it. I am just a man like you (or are you a woman?). We all have ideas and opinions and desires. And we talk harshly to each other to maintain our ideals in strength within us. So, it's understandable that we are going to pick on each other at times. However, when one calls God imaginary, God perks up His ears a little, and listens to what that joker is saying. So, don't so it... think of or call God imaginary. God is Almighty. He holds your life in His hands. And He won't put up with your denial of Him. Hope and pray that He wakes you up to His existence gently. But for sure, wakes you up in this life. All people die. At least it seems that way. In the resurrection at the last day, God will provide us all with the knowledge of why He judges us the way He does. It will be based on what we have thought of Him in this life. For those who have denied Him, the punishment will be great. So, if you are truly a God-denier, change, while you have time. Get into the Bible to find out about God, and the basics of right and wrong and salvation... before it's too late. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
