Since we only generate 256 1's or 0's does that mean that there are only 256^2 possibilities? Wow, it should be 2^256  |
|
|
|
noting that the Coinbase tip button is set to be totally shut down by April 1, 2015.
APRIL FOOLS!! No but seriously, coincidence? I think not! Actually, I think so. But still, let's keep these conspiracy theories up. |
|
|
|
So how is the testing of the masternodes going so far? I'm just trying to stay up to date with what is going on  we are currently at 995 active masternodes. We need 1440 total. (so we are close) Nice I am really looking forward to when they get released on the mainnet This type of post is what i'm talking about. Although I probably make the same posts sometimes. :p Unignored. Why is this annoying? One of the best indicators of a coins ability to adapt is the community. We should all be able to talk openly. This shouldn't be a thread about numbers and marketing. We should be able to talk about the coin in any way we want. I just seemed annoying when he was posting a lot before. |
|
|
|
So how is the testing of the masternodes going so far? I'm just trying to stay up to date with what is going on we are currently at 995 active masternodes. We need 1440 total. (so we are close) Nice I am really looking forward to when they get released on the mainnet This type of post is what i'm talking about. Although I probably make the same posts sometimes. :p Unignored. |
|
|
|
I decided to unignore you just to see if you would actually contribute something valuable.
Ignored again.
Who me? You ignored me? Why? What did I do to get ignored? Or unless you were talking about Hippie but if not I'd love to know what I ever did to make you ignore me dude? Because you always ramble on about things that have already been said. I just find it annoying. Sorry. |
|
|
|
3. BINGO on #1.  4. Markets are easily manipulated when the dev owns more than 5% of the coins. They set their bots to buy/sell into their orders, inducing panic buys and sells at will. And all it takes is one panicing noob to make back the 0.25% exhange fees. Hippie I would really love to know what they got you on buddy because to me you seem like a super paranoid schizophrenic guy who believes that the lizard people are going to take over the world and blame everyone else for everything wrong lol So seriously I would love to know what kind of meds or drugs you are on dude That is a genuine serious question too by the way I hope you don't take offense to that lol Because I'm sorry but if you aren't on meds or some kind of psychoactive drugs then maybe you need to be!! Much love bro Also it just seems like you try to cause panic and distraught in threads and I'm still trying to figure out if it's because you want to buy that coin cheaper or if you are just seriously mentally ill like I have stated above. I mean if you are that's okay bro because I also suffer from mental illness of ADHD and Addiction and it's nothing to be ashamed of buddy Anyways hope to see what you have to say to this because I would love to know where you get your ideas and your facts from Cheers NoobKid  I decided to unignore you just to see if you would actually contribute something valuable. Ignored again. |
|
|
|
Sorry I ask every tiem the same question. 3BTC to run a SPR masternode at the current price?
This is testnet. Masternodes don't exist in main net yet. Come again in a few weeks. I understand that, but i'm asking what is the minimum on a MN once it hits mainnet? Look above your post. No, at the current price it would be a minimum of 0.029 btc for 100 spreadcoins. |
|
|
|
Sorry I ask every tiem the same question. 3BTC to run a SPR masternode at the current price?
No, at the current price it would be a minimum of 0.029 btc for 100 spreadcoins. But as more people create masternodes, the more Spreadcoin you'll need to stay on top. We haven't started yet on the main net but when we do, i'm sure it'll cost a lot more than 0.029 btc. |
|
|
|
@ Mr. Spread: You made this post nearly a month ago: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=715435.msg10193497#msg10193497where you said the following thing: Initial masternode implementation will not require you to have a static IP. Instant transactions simply don't require this: someone broadcasts transaction, masternode receive this transactions, sign it and broadcasts this signature, there is no need for anyone to directly connect to masternodes. Nodes will monitor time delays between receiving transactions and confirmations from masternodes and will assign scores for each masternode according to these delays. This score and deposit amount will affect which masternodes will receive payments.
If I understood you correctly here, that it is really the case that the deposit amount of a masternode does affect what masternodes will receive payments, then this is the reason for all the problems we are seeing. If the deposit amount is allowed to affect which masternodes receive payments,then this kills the competition before it has even started. The deposit amount must not have anything to do with who receives payments, or else the system is broken. The deposit amount is only here to decide if your MN is allowed to stay in the game or be kicked out because it is the weakest link. Let only the score affect which masternodes receive payments, AND NOTHING ELSE! Then the competition will really work as intended. Why should the score even affect it? Why not just randomly assign the masternodes? |
|
|
|
Nice. You broke it again.  |
|
|
|
I really like this coin and support it every way I can but honestly, that rex orderbook looks so screwed... Who is running the show?
What's wrong with it? Nothing wrong there, just looks like a one man show to me. What makes you think that? What are you seeing? Not going to tell everything I see, just basic things. I´m sure You know how this game is played. Take away those .000000000 orders. What's left? Someone is also trying to hide where the real floor is. Did you mistype Cex in your first post? Go over to bitt rex and you'll see much more. |
|
|
|
He then takes the MN code and changes that also.
I don't take and change MN code, masternode implementation in SpreadCoin is my own. Your implementation uses transaction locking, block reward for MN? That's basically DRK MN. But, i know you have changed the code allot, and don't consider it yourself to be "taken". The trolls will not agree. I will say this one more time, I didn't change DarkCoin masternode code, I simply do not use it. Current implementation of SpreadCoin masternodes is very different from DarkCoin, athough DarkCoin is moving in the right direction so it will be less different in the future. Which is why we need a name change. If we call it masternodes then it will look identical to DRK, and even appear that we stole from them. Spreadnodes, Smartnodes, Decentralized Masternodes, anything different. Without this it will look like a scam coin. I'd personally be ok with [something] masternodes. I call them "Spreadcoin masternodes". If you want something catchier than that and Mr. Spread agrees to it, fine. But, "masternode" needs to remain in the name. Super masternode Dynamic masternode Spreadcoin masternode Stuff like that is fine. Spreadnode? Nope. I like dynamic masternode. I hate spreadnode. What is the node spreading? nothing. |
|
|
|
Going to place the downvote on smartnode.
Ambiguous connotation, no direct association with prior terms and makes it more confusing.
There is no need for a renaming in my opinion...unless we go with SflarfinNodes!
Masternode is also an ambiguous connotation. It also sounds very centralised. And "node" is an association. |
|
|
|
|
Why don't we call our version of Masternodes Smartnodes. It makes more sense because a masternode isn't really the master of anything. a Smartnode on the other hand is smarter than a normal node because it can do IX and mixing.
Plus, smartnode starts with an S.
What do you think?
Edit: also "Master" sounds centralised unlike "smart"
|
|
|
|
|
Just because there may have been no big bang doesn't mean that god exists.
|
|
|
|
Oh well done ! Next round soon !
"soon" lol But seriously, is there going to be another round? |
|
|
|
You guys keep saying 133.1 coins per block for the first blocks. But it is 1331 coins per block. That is proof you are trying to scam people.
I guess idiot struck again. If I am not wrong, you got 500 VC from dev last year, by that you must be part of it. You are wrong. Also, why don't you use commas instead of decimal points? 1,000 or 1.000 is not the same amount. |
|
|
|
May I please join? Name: e1ghtSpace Bitcoin Address: 1B6GFVUzpRRZ1NvnX8DjxJBc3bB4B4oy1p Post Count: 1954 Current Rank: Sr. Member |
|
|
|
Very nice. Glad I made the front page! edit (20th November 2015): I was just looking through here wishing I saw this when it was released... Then I saw that I was here right on the front page. Haha |
|
|
|
Do you need 13Gb of ram on order to run a wallet (and sync)?
I don't think so - but I'm not sure. Ok. So, have you made any more progress on that 8GB miner? I think the dev said that he would make a hardfork and reduce the GB to 8 if no one made a smaller GB miner. I'm not going to without an incentive. Boring and probably not much gain. Ok. Is it possible to optimise the miner and get a lot more hashes/sec? (just a question) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
