|
MemoryShock
|
 |
February 12, 2015, 03:43:05 AM |
|
Are we really having the bit/satoshi argument here.
Refer to it as the industry standard reference. No name change necessary.
I am just happy that we have our original thread back. hahaha. See how such discussions keep us entertained and the trolls away? I love it. Everything we say here is just thinking out loud, to be taken with a grain of salt. Ofcourse.  I'll buy that foe a dolla...spit balling is fine. But there is no reason to start implementing a name so that we have to explain everything again. People know what Masternodes are. The Masternodes here provide the same function and people already know what that entails. If anything, refer to them as 'easier Masternodes'. That said, I think that there is no harm in the discussion...I also think that Mr. Spread has the final say. If he continues to use the terminology that he has been using then there it is, perhaps. Of course, there is something to be said about a mildly heated discussion focused on SPR that keeps the trolls at bay...even if it is mildly fallacious...and I loled at the ape analogy. Let's use this as the main selling point when we market SPR in the Bible Belt...  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even if you use Bitcoin through Tor, the way transactions are handled by the network makes anonymity difficult to achieve. Do not expect your transactions to be anonymous unless you really know what you're doing.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
njs811
|
|
February 12, 2015, 03:45:29 AM |
|
Are we really having the bit/satoshi argument here.
Refer to it as the industry standard reference. No name change necessary.
I am just happy that we have our original thread back. hahaha. See how such discussions keep us entertained and the trolls away? I love it. Everything we say here is just thinking out loud, to be taken with a grain of salt. Ofcourse. I'll buy that foe a dolla...spit balling is fine. But there is no reason to start implementing a name so that we have to explain everything again. People know what Masternodes are. The Masternodes here provide the same function and people already know what that entails. If anything, refer to them as 'easier Masternodes'. That said, I think that there is no harm in the discussion...I also think that Mr. Spread has the final say. If he continues to use the terminology that he has been using then there it is, perhaps. Of course, there is something to be said about a mildly heated discussion focused on SPR that keeps the trolls at bay...even if it is mildly fallacious...and I loled at the ape analogy. Let's use this as the main selling point when we market SPR in the Bible Belt... I still don't know why there is no ChristCoin. You know "in God we trust" that kinda thing. I bet it would go BIG. |
|
|
|
|
georgem
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1007
spreadcoin.info
|
|
February 12, 2015, 03:47:09 AM |
|
Are we really having the bit/satoshi argument here.
Refer to it as the industry standard reference. No name change necessary.
I am just happy that we have our original thread back. hahaha. See how such discussions keep us entertained and the trolls away? I love it. Everything we say here is just thinking out loud, to be taken with a grain of salt. Ofcourse. I'll buy that foe a dolla...spit balling is fine. But there is no reason to start implementing a name so that we have to explain everything again. People know what Masternodes are. The Masternodes here provide the same function and people already know what that entails. If anything, refer to them as 'easier Masternodes'. That said, I think that there is no harm in the discussion...I also think that Mr. Spread has the final say. If he continues to use the terminology that he has been using then there it is, perhaps. Of course, there is something to be said about a mildly heated discussion focused on SPR that keeps the trolls at bay...even if it is mildly fallacious...and I loled at the ape analogy. Let's use this as the main selling point when we market SPR in the Bible Belt... I honestly think that we can only keep the trolls away, if we ourselves start acting a little more erratic than usual. This is the jungle called BCT... let's have some fun. If you wanna let it all hang out, that's the place to do it!  |
|
|
|
georgem
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1007
spreadcoin.info
|
|
February 12, 2015, 03:48:20 AM |
|
I still don't know why there is no ChristCoin. You know "in God we trust" that kinda thing. I bet it would go BIG.
I'm sure they are working on it.... but it's probably difficult for them to find good christian mathematicians! |
|
|
|
|
njs811
|
|
February 12, 2015, 03:52:16 AM |
|
I still don't know why there is no ChristCoin. You know "in God we trust" that kinda thing. I bet it would go BIG.
I'm sure they are working on it.... but it's probably difficult for them to find good christian mathematicians! I'm just imagining all of the backwoods republicans who will refused to buy into virtual currency. This would be perfect for them. And let's face it, republicans are great at holding back progress. |
|
|
|
|
|
njs811
|
|
February 12, 2015, 03:58:25 AM |
|
I still don't know why there is no ChristCoin. You know "in God we trust" that kinda thing. I bet it would go BIG.
I'm sure they are working on it.... but it's probably difficult for them to find good christian mathematicians! lol with GodX11 algo and HolyGhostSend ...actually guys this might be infallible. |
|
|
|
|
|
MemoryShock
|
|
February 12, 2015, 03:58:51 AM |
|
I still don't know why there is no ChristCoin. You know "in God we trust" that kinda thing. I bet it would go BIG.
Oh...they tried... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=399681.0I'm still amazed that it didn't go to the moon...but then again, I think people who believe in Jesus don't necessarily believe in the moon...; ) |
|
|
|
|
njs811
|
|
February 12, 2015, 04:01:26 AM |
|
I still don't know why there is no ChristCoin. You know "in God we trust" that kinda thing. I bet it would go BIG.
Oh...they tried... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=399681.0I'm still amazed that it didn't go to the moon...but then again, I think people who believe in Jesus don't necessarily believe in the moon...; ) It looks like someone made a joke coin. I'm serious though this could take off. Think about it. You could rip off any coin and few people would dare calling it a shitcoin. Especially if people thought God was backing it. It could not fail. |
|
|
|
|
|
njs811
|
|
February 12, 2015, 04:07:57 AM |
|
If anyone does make a legit Jesuscoin please let me in on the pre-mine. Also I would prefer sha256, or X11 or both!
Edit: Also it should have a ridiculously low supply. Perhaps 10,000?
YES!
Matthew 7:14
But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MemoryShock
|
|
February 12, 2015, 04:17:01 AM |
|
If anyone does make a legit Jesuscoin please let me in on the pre-mine. Also I would prefer sha256, or X11 or both!
Edit: Also it should have a ridiculously low supply. Perhaps 10,000?
YES!
Matthew 7:14
But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.
Oh goodness...you found a scripture for it. Please stop...for all that is Holy!!! lolz... |
|
|
|
girino
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1170
Advertise Here - PM for more info!
|
|
February 12, 2015, 04:19:23 AM |
|
Proper attribution (especially when it comes to open source attribution) doesn't mean that you need to put the name of the first guy who had that idea on your product...
Well, there is the problem. In my opinion, masternodes are NOT a product. They are a feature from the product, which is SpreadCoin. So while you're looking at naming a product, i'm looking at naming a feature. It makes simply no sense for me to rename a feature, while it makes no sense for you to NOT rename a product. Still, i am unable to see masternodes as a product. The only product i see is "spreadcoin", and everything else are features included in it. |
Advertise Here - PM for more info!
|
|
|
|
MemoryShock
|
|
February 12, 2015, 04:30:21 AM |
|
Proper attribution (especially when it comes to open source attribution) doesn't mean that you need to put the name of the first guy who had that idea on your product...
Well, there is the problem. In my opinion, masternodes are NOT a product. They are a feature from the product, which is SpreadCoin. So while you're looking at naming a product, i'm looking at naming a feature. It makes simply no sense for me to rename a feature, while it makes no sense for you to NOT rename a product. Still, i am unable to see masternodes as a product. The only product i see is "spreadcoin", and everything else are features included in it. Just wanted to say that I think you summed it up quite well. Not disrespecting the debate but I'm rolling with that... |
|
|
|
e1ghtSpace
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1001
Crypto since 2014
|
|
February 12, 2015, 06:13:12 AM |
|
Why don't we call our version of Masternodes Smartnodes. It makes more sense because a masternode isn't really the master of anything. a Smartnode on the other hand is smarter than a normal node because it can do IX and mixing.
Plus, smartnode starts with an S.
What do you think?
Edit: also "Master" sounds centralised unlike "smart"
|
|
|
|
|
|
njs811
|
|
February 12, 2015, 06:18:23 AM |
|
Why don't we call our version of Masternodes Smartnodes. It makes more sense because a masternode isn't really the master of anything. a Smartnode on the other hand is smarter than a normal node because it can do IX and mixing.
Plus, smartnode starts with an S.
What do you think?
Edit: also "Master" sounds centralised unlike "smart"
This is also a great idea. |
|
|
|
|
|
devlin
|
|
February 12, 2015, 07:04:16 AM |
|
Why don't we call our version of Masternodes Smartnodes. It makes more sense because a masternode isn't really the master of anything. a Smartnode on the other hand is smarter than a normal node because it can do IX and mixing.
Plus, smartnode starts with an S.
What do you think?
Edit: also "Master" sounds centralised unlike "smart"
Smartnode is a good name, brilliant ideea to rename MN. |
|
|
|
|
|
MemoryShock
|
|
February 12, 2015, 07:22:54 AM |
|
Going to place the downvote on smartnode.
Ambiguous connotation, no direct association with prior terms and makes it more confusing.
There is no need for a renaming in my opinion...unless we go with SflarfinNodes!
|
|
|
|
sine_fuc
Member
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
|
|
February 12, 2015, 07:25:15 AM |
|
I don't care about what its name is,I care about whether the pool mining issue can be fixed.
There is no issue. The coin was designed to make pool mining a ridiculous idea. If you pool mine then you will lose your coins. Unless you get into a pool that you completely trust. The likelihood of that happening is slim, which means that coins will be greatly decentralized. We may see a few small pools popping up, but they will not let in anyone they don't trust. The coin is working perfectly as planned. If you never mine at nonce-pool,please shut up! I'm sorry, have you mined at nonce-pool? Do you know what is going on here? Perhaps your lost. Yes,I do mine at nonce-pool.It works as well as any other coin with no difference. |
|
|
|
Nthused
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1001
|
|
February 12, 2015, 07:34:11 AM |
|
I don't care about what its name is,I care about whether the pool mining issue can be fixed.
There is no issue. The coin was designed to make pool mining a ridiculous idea. If you pool mine then you will lose your coins. Unless you get into a pool that you completely trust. The likelihood of that happening is slim, which means that coins will be greatly decentralized. We may see a few small pools popping up, but they will not let in anyone they don't trust. The coin is working perfectly as planned. If you never mine at nonce-pool,please shut up! I'm sorry, have you mined at nonce-pool? Do you know what is going on here? Perhaps your lost. Yes,I do mine at nonce-pool.It works as well as any other coin with no difference. But the thing is you have to have 100% trust in the pool and its users as anyone can take the mined coins/blocks thats the difference with this coin and others, it is a Solo only coin which makes it Decentralized yes you could have pools but once all that big hashrate jumps on there will be a lot of greedy people stealing coins, it's as simple as that when you try to understand SPR. |
|
|
|
|
e1ghtSpace
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1001
Crypto since 2014
|
|
February 12, 2015, 07:36:55 AM |
|
Going to place the downvote on smartnode.
Ambiguous connotation, no direct association with prior terms and makes it more confusing.
There is no need for a renaming in my opinion...unless we go with SflarfinNodes!
Masternode is also an ambiguous connotation. It also sounds very centralised. And "node" is an association. |
|
|
|
|
|
njs811
|
|
February 12, 2015, 07:57:46 AM |
|
I don't care about what its name is,I care about whether the pool mining issue can be fixed.
There is no issue. The coin was designed to make pool mining a ridiculous idea. If you pool mine then you will lose your coins. Unless you get into a pool that you completely trust. The likelihood of that happening is slim, which means that coins will be greatly decentralized. We may see a few small pools popping up, but they will not let in anyone they don't trust. The coin is working perfectly as planned. If you never mine at nonce-pool,please shut up! I'm sorry, have you mined at nonce-pool? Do you know what is going on here? Perhaps your lost. Yes,I do mine at nonce-pool.It works as well as any other coin with no difference. Well since the pool function works perfectly go ahead and send me your login credentials. Unless of course your lying, or you realize that I could steal from the other miners. But if neither of these things are true go ahead and send me the log in credentials. Once I take a picture to prove it to the world you can change your password and all will be well again. |
|
|
|
|
|
