Crownfounding opencl (amd) cpu miner
Here is my deal: a soon as there are 0.25 btc sent to this address, i start to make a public opensource gpu miner:
13dw6aBybHmAHFsy1ndUwWembGNzzPSE9s
(all the same, if only someone send the above value, or more ppl)
So, the communinty has the choice if they want now a gpu miner, or wait for someone else makes it later.
Okay, sent. Please use phatk kernel so I can see what I missed. Thanks Well that was fast  I get that itch when you want o find out what you were doing wrong haha  I bet that is worth 0.25BTC by itself Yes I actually just want to know what I did wrong there... Pulling my hair out |
|
|
|
Crownfounding opencl (amd) cpu miner
Here is my deal: a soon as there are 0.25 btc sent to this address, i start to make a public opensource gpu miner:
13dw6aBybHmAHFsy1ndUwWembGNzzPSE9s
(all the same, if only someone send the above value, or more ppl)
So, the communinty has the choice if they want now a gpu miner, or wait for someone else makes it later.
Okay, sent. Please use phatk kernel so I can see what I missed. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
Sorry I had the maturity set wrong on suprnova, it's now set to 250 blocks and you can withdraw as soon as your coins are mature (confirmed)
|
|
|
|
Thank you,
will play around.
Lyra2REv2 is more suitable for nvidias?
There are sha256, scrypt and still quite expensive x11 asics, right?
So X13, X15 are still "GPU friendly"?
Yes and Nope, all X-algos are also already mined on ASIC's, google for Baikal miner. GPU is only ZEC or ETH currently or maybe XMR if you're curious: https://zec.suprnova.cc & https://eth.suprnova.cc & https://xmr.suprnova.cc |
|
|
|
I love you:) No, seriously, thank you. Its been a while I havent been mining and was having hard time to figure out which parameters I got wrong. Any settings you would recommend to add besides the intensity? R480 cards, Win 7, 64bit. setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 sgminer -k lyra2rev2 -o http://127.0.0.1:42018 -u Ma100.1 -p x -I 19 it's lyra2rev2 - not lyra2z
Nope, looks good, however AMD is highly unoptimized, so you only have like 3-4 MH/s on an RX480 while you have around 33-34 (!) MH/s on a 1080 .. I'd recommend to mine a different coin with AMD cards. |
|
|
|
|
it's lyra2rev2 - not lyra2z
|
|
|
|
and I do NOT UNDERSTAND WHY MINE a COIN IF there is NO EXCHANGE!
HERE IS PUMP: !!!! |
|
|
|
LBC is rising we are gonna see 4000k very soon and I feel there will be big news and announcement
I'm not sure if soon but LBRY will have its time to shine, they are working very hard and VC funded, they are not wasting their time here, real investors have money on the line and they will deliver a product. To me this is one of the most unique projects in crypto, however I agree with many here that got burned with distribution. They started they marketing without really warning this could happen. It was obvious for many of us, but many people bought at 80k which is completely crazy. Like it or not, this hurts the project reputation. Also its blockchain can't scale at all because it's just a fork of Bitcoin basically, so it's just stupid to create another one that doesn't add anything special or improve the tech to the industry. Doesn't matter how much they are trying to justify it, it doesn't make sense. Just use Bitcoin blockchain as settlement and transparency and use colored coins or Ethereum tokens for that matter. There's need to be some centralization and leadership, decentralization is ok for plenty of things but for everything it's complete chaos or just an illusion, at some point someone is making decisions. And they are an actual american company, VC funded, with a team and a CEO. That's all centralized so I wouldn't waive that decentralized flag everytime I have a chance... These are my main concerns going forward. Good points however ethereum is/was severely flawed - just think about the DAO hack.. If they would have piggybacked lbry on that chain it would be dead now. Bitcoin obviously has its block size issue and there are a few funny folks out there who want to hardfork it, modify it, segwit it etc so personally I wouldn't build a new project on that chain as well. With a recent bitcoin codebase you have a well working, good tested and long established cryptocoin which you can modify and enhance like you want to when you have decent coders. You have all possibilities here as you don't have to rely (or hope) on other projects and / or devs. I understand Ethereum is experimental but the DAO hack was very particular because of how it was set up. No other project had problems and there are plenty (some much more ambitious than LBRY...). I mentioned Ethereum since at least it has some actual answers to scale in the future. Either way my point was that you don't even need a decentralized currency. Just use an internal credit system or colored coin/token if you want anchored to a popular blockchain (BTC, ETH, whatever) for settlement, that's it. This will solve a lot of technical issues and delays. but crypto is full of nerds who think that the average joe cares about "decentralization". The average joe cares about usability and speed, that's it. You can achieve transparency and security via decentralization too but not in real time, so it's ridiculous to put that as the top priority. The result will be that no one will use your product/service except a bunch or crypto geeks. No one is waiting an extra second to get a coffee just because it's "decentralized". Having 5k blockchains is a complete overkill and ridiculous, that's why I think only a handful will survive. Too many blockchains just won't be able scale and are not really needed. Even Bitcoin has only a laughable number or nodes... You see, thats the cool point about crypto, I think exactly the opposite way I want a coin that IS decentralized, a coin I can mine myself with my rigs and a coin which is directly traded on an exchange like Polo etc I don't like and don't trade or hold colored coins, tokens .. whatever |
|
|
|
I guess I made the phrase too brief for most.
What does the freedom, which bitcoin and the other crypto currencies bring, have to do with the immutable income distribution?
I think we got way too offtopic here this weird thread developed into something, some guy posted some coin code, some guy made the logo, some other guy put up a pool, some third guy set up a block explorer, some forth guy optimised the cpu miner..etc ...and now we come to a point where people are SELLING GPU miners. its just a bit distasteful for a few simple reasons: - this coin is obviously kind of a joke (that might become serious one day, but atm it is...lets face it, this thing probably wont get far?) - other people contributed in the open source spirit, I guess because its a kind of statement against the SQLcoin that has the same name (onecoin ponzi) - the algo is a nothing new, you do not have to devote hours of work to modify the existing open source bitcoin gpu miners making a demand for payment a bit silly and greedy IMHO ...the fifth...some guy will build an exclusive exchange to host ONE coin trades and manipulated all the market too?  Yobit? ;P |
|
|
|
LBC is rising we are gonna see 4000k very soon and I feel there will be big news and announcement
I'm not sure if soon but LBRY will have its time to shine, they are working very hard and VC funded, they are not wasting their time here, real investors have money on the line and they will deliver a product. To me this is one of the most unique projects in crypto, however I agree with many here that got burned with distribution. They started they marketing without really warning this could happen. It was obvious for many of us, but many people bought at 80k which is completely crazy. Like it or not, this hurts the project reputation. Also its blockchain can't scale at all because it's just a fork of Bitcoin basically, so it's just stupid to create another one that doesn't add anything special or improve the tech to the industry. Doesn't matter how much they are trying to justify it, it doesn't make sense. Just use Bitcoin blockchain as settlement and transparency and use colored coins or Ethereum tokens for that matter. There's need to be some centralization and leadership, decentralization is ok for plenty of things but for everything it's complete chaos or just an illusion, at some point someone is making decisions. And they are an actual american company, VC funded, with a team and a CEO. That's all centralized so I wouldn't waive that decentralized flag everytime I have a chance... These are my main concerns going forward. Good points however ethereum is/was severely flawed - just think about the DAO hack.. If they would have piggybacked lbry on that chain it would be dead now. Bitcoin obviously has its block size issue and there are a few funny folks out there who want to hardfork it, modify it, segwit it etc so personally I wouldn't build a new project on that chain as well. With a recent bitcoin codebase you have a well working, good tested and long established cryptocoin which you can modify and enhance like you want to when you have decent coders. You have all possibilities here as you don't have to rely (or hope) on other projects and / or devs. |
|
|
|
I can make you a GPU miner, any bids? ^^
and same here, for amd cards rx480 can 700Mhs in double sha256, so in my calc, it can ~350Mhs for tripple sha256 GTX 1080 = 1 GHs Guess you are not the guy in my post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1801129.msg18073756#msg18073756 or will you shock us all and release the damn thing. I dont need it so we are clear i just want to see if there is any open source spirit in the cryptocoding world left. Jure, that is why some are very rich in and others dont... This is ruled as normal life - 1% very rich, 99% slaves And funny is that some guys are always defending that btc is freedom... you are mistaking freedom for income. C'mon this is not ZCASH or XMR - it's a newly launched coin with just a standard-algo extended to one round.. I agree that miners which are using an all-new algo like equihash should be worth some - but not this "modified" algo here.. |
|
|
|
|
Cgminer won't work, you need sgminer for Lyra2rev2
|
|
|
|
Server not found for me... Try to use Google's DNS server: 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 |
|
|
|
I can make you a GPU miner, any bids? ^^
I can make you a GPU miner, any bids? ^^
and same here, for amd cards rx480 can 700Mhs in double sha256, so in my calc, it can ~350Mhs for tripple sha256 Ah, now we have some vips in here How about a closed source Dev fee miner?  |
|
|
|
420 attack soon? It looks like it Wtf is 420? |
|
|
|
This coin represents the opposite of the onecoin ponzi shceme and to make that message very clear it would be nice if the GPU miner would be made open source. I would share it but I don't have it, sorry. ocminer, if you have the knowledge to put together a working GPU miner you should do it, not just because it would be the nice thing to do, but also the fees you collect on your pool will be worth more if this coin has a good reputation and with that a good price later on. Or if you know the people that could do it, give them a nudge. All the people I contacted are either not responding or not interested. I've had a quick look but due to double Sha256 is already highly optimized in all the old kernels I wasn't able to yet build a kernel which works for triple - probably those optimizations are invalidating my shares. I've already released the working cpu miner though and IMHO we should get a little bit back to the whole idea of open source regarding miners. The development of the last months is alarming. Only closed source dev fee miners or hell slow public miners are available, this way crypto will sooner or later suffer as newbies and new miners will lose interest rapidly.. Which overall hurts everyone.. It's okay to have highly optimized 'special version' with a slight advantage IMHO but this is like David vs Goliath |
|
|
|
I would share it but I don't have it, sorry. You mean you are so honest that you will not use an advantage like this if you have an opportunity? Yes. |
|
|
|
I would share it but I don't have it, sorry. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
