Bitcoin Forum
May 29, 2024, 09:29:05 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 [668] 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 »
13341  Economy / Lending / Re: Good Collateral on: March 24, 2014, 09:38:01 AM

 Well even tough they sound great , if I have them and I need coins quick , wouldn't I just turn them into Bitcoins?

Not the same thing. You have LTC presumably because you think it is a good investment (going to go up). If you turn it into bitcoins (perhaps because you want to buy mining hardware) you are giving up your position in LTC. If you borrow against your LTC you can keep your position and still buy the miner.

13342  Economy / Exchanges / Re: MtGox withdrawal delays [Gathering] on: March 24, 2014, 07:45:33 AM
Who the hell is going to deposit money to gox?

I've been saying that for a year

13343  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: How can 0% fee pools make money? on: March 24, 2014, 07:06:28 AM
Most so called 0% pools are actually taking some of the mining returns, be it transaction fees, merged mining or both.

The rest are doing some kind of loss leader, either to promote another product, to build their brand, or to build a the personal brand of the operator.

0% fee does not necessarily mean a pool is a good pool to use or that it is a bad pool to use. Don't be hypnotized by that number. It is powerful.



eh, what could a scrypt p2pool 0% fee, 0% donation take?

(The altcoin forum is that way.)

I don't really follow scrypt coins; is there such a thing as merged mining? If not then they're just running a loss leader promoting another product or brand.

Neither a loss leader nor promoting another product or brand means they are doing something intelligent. Might be an ineffective strategy.

They might be skimming (harder in the case of p2pool but not impossible if they are running the node, though they probably get caught at some point, if they're not gone first), but really this could be true of pools with a fee too. Greed is greed.

13344  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: March 24, 2014, 06:59:30 AM
Spoondoodles or whatever their name is has said they don't plan to mine, other than 24 hours of burn in testing which they donate to charity.

Any manufacturer that mines has an inherent conflict of interest with its customers especially when it can delay shipment (and keep mining for itself) without any real consequences.



Let's face facts here.  Conflict or not, every manufacturer mines with their own equipment.  This is no secret.  I'm pretty sure even BitMain has a farm of some sort.

I don't think they've denied it. In fact I think they've been open about it. "Spoondoodles" denies it.

13345  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [185 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: March 24, 2014, 06:16:34 AM
However, I will say that the expected value of the p2pool payout method (if set to zero fees) is higher than the expected value of the eligius payout method for infinite time.
Can you derive this for me? I've just spent a bit of the afternoon on it and I can't see it.

fixed.

No that's backwards. My original post was correct, as explained in my previous post.

This does not (at all) guarantee that you make more in p2pool. Expected value doesn't mean that.

13346  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [185 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: March 24, 2014, 06:05:40 AM
However, I will say that the expected value of the p2pool payout method (if set to zero fees) is higher than the expected value of the eligius payout method for finite time.
Can you derive this for me? I've just spent a bit of the afternoon on it and I can't see it.

First, let's ignore orphans, they affect both more or less equally, though how exactly they affect eligius is complex. It doesn't help refute the argument though.

The expected value of every share on p2pool (PPLNS) is exactly B/D (for some suitable scaling of B and D). This can be derived, and is likely is derived in one of Meni's posts.

The expected value of a share on eligius is (the product of an equivalent B/D and) the sum of an infinite series adding the probabilities that it is paid on this round plus the probability that it is paid on each future round. This series never goes to zero, so the terms beyond any finite time horizon always have a positive sum.

Not formal, but good enough?
13347  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: March 24, 2014, 05:05:19 AM
Spoondoodles or whatever their name is has said they don't plan to mine, other than 24 hours of burn in testing which they donate to charity.

Any manufacturer that mines has an inherent conflict of interest with its customers especially when it can delay shipment (and keep mining for itself) without any real consequences.

13348  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Is this 16-of-16 multisig tx redeemable under current bitcoin implementation? on: March 24, 2014, 04:37:14 AM
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Free_transaction_relay_policy
13349  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: WTB LTC/BTC/DOGE in bulk on: March 24, 2014, 04:24:29 AM
How much doge do you want and why trade here vs. say cryptsy?

13350  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [6600Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB (New Thread) on: March 24, 2014, 04:20:43 AM
"The data on this page is cached and updated periodically, generally about 30 seconds for the short-timeframe hashrate numbers, balances, and rejected shares data; and about 675 seconds for the graphs, longer-timeframe hashrate numbers, and other datas."

BTW, Wiz, its data not datas.

13351  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [185 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: March 24, 2014, 04:18:33 AM
I'd like to get the p2pool entry in organofcorti's pool list corrected to indicate that p2pool does support merged mining. 

Here's what is now:

PPLNS mining pool

Pool : p2Pool
Fee :0%
Pay Tx Reward: Yes
Variable Difficulty: p2Pool
Local Work : Stratum
Pay Orphans: No
Min Withdrawal : Unknown
Merged Mining: No

Here's what I propose to submit (changes in bold). If someone can be more specific about the min payout, or has other suggestions, that might be helpful.

Pool : p2pool
Fee :0%
Pay Tx Reward: Yes
Variable Difficulty: p2pool
Local Work : Stratum
Pay Orphans: No
Min Withdrawal : Unknown
Merged Mining: Yes
13352  Other / Archival / Re: Mining pools list on: March 24, 2014, 04:12:29 AM
Forgive me if this is covered somewhere in 27 pages, but p2pool does support merged mining. It has to be set up separately by the operator of the node and it is solo mining. Whether this is listed as Yes or No on post #1 there should at least be some kind of asterisk on a No. If you set it up you get the same expected return as a pool that does conventional merged mining.

I'm not checking the validity of pool claims - I'm relying on miners to report any discrepancies. So if you would prefer pool2Pool's listing to be different, just post a list request as PublicP2poolNode did just above and I'll change it. To save time, you might want to obtain a consensus opinion from the some of the other frequent p2Pool thread posters before you post.

Will do
13353  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [6600Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB (New Thread) on: March 24, 2014, 03:44:19 AM
You're not bounced out of the queue. What is a bit misleading is that everyone is effectively in the queue, based on their oldest share since they were paid. When they cross their payment threshold, they become visible in the queue.

That's what happened, there are people who haven't been paid since before your last payment, so they are ahead of you in the queue. As you say, you will get paid, but the displayed estimates of how far you are from being paid are usually too optimistic.

Uggghhhh

I entered the payment que last night.
As of a few minutes ago I was in the que to be paid on this super long 6.5 hour block.
But when the luck counter went to 0% then rolled over to 900% without finding the block I also got knocked out of the que "Maintaining your 3 hour hashrate average, this will take at least another a few seconds at current network difficulty"

I know I'll eventually get the payout, but it is kind of disappointing to wait 24 hours for a payout and then get bounced out of the que.
13354  Economy / Speculation / Re: Bitcoin will still go down short term on: March 24, 2014, 03:08:13 AM
I lost some bitcoins on Mt Gox. Do I have to do anything to make a claim?

No information available yet.
13355  Economy / Lending / Re: Looking for Loan of 1 BTC on: March 24, 2014, 03:00:34 AM
If you want to buy an ant miner you can have the same deal I gave to ClutchThese right here. You pay a down payment, I finance the rest, I hold the miner as collateral until the miner is paid off, you pay a reasonable fee (approximately equal to electricity) for hosting. Mining starts immediately.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=521862.msg5849367#msg5849367

If you want a miner and don't have any other collateral this is the way to get it. If not you are wasting your time.
13356  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Advice building Antminer S1 Farm on: March 24, 2014, 02:44:44 AM
I use Corsair AX1200s. I paid around $200 for most of mine, but if you can find them at all now they're usually more expensive than that. 3 ants per PSU, not overclocked.

Yes they are more expensive than server PSUs, but easier to deploy. I've found them to be very reliable. I have one workhorse AX1200 that has been mining for me for three years (started in a BTC GPU rig).

Also, I don't think there is anything wrong with buying S1s rather than pre-order unicorn miners. I've mostly avoided pre-orders and in hindsight been glad I did. On those few occasions I fell for he pre-order scam I regretted it.

13357  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: How can 0% fee pools make money? on: March 24, 2014, 02:41:02 AM
Most so called 0% pools are actually taking some of the mining returns, be it transaction fees, merged mining or both.

The rest are doing some kind of loss leader, either to promote another product, to build their brand, or to build a the personal brand of the operator.

0% fee does not necessarily mean a pool is a good pool to use or that it is a bad pool to use. Don't be hypnotized by that number. It is powerful.

13358  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [185 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: March 24, 2014, 02:36:15 AM
I have read that P2P profits long term are greater, does this still hold true?

Nobody can answer that, since it depends so much on luck and other factors. With the luck taking a very long time to average out, so the other factors a are really hard to measure. Over the past few months p2pool has had fairly bad luck. Very recently luck has been a little better. The future, nobody knows.

However, I will say that the expected value of the p2pool payout method (if set to zero fees) is higher than the expected value of the eligius payout method for finite time. Maybe that is important to you.

Server lists:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=66182.0
http://p2pool-nodes.info/

EDIT: http://p2pools.org/ (thank you CartmanSPC)
13359  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Antminer S1 - Fan Questions on: March 24, 2014, 02:33:42 AM
I haven't found an actual CFM spec on the fans but since they are 38mm fans with a max speed of 3600 it is probably around 200 cfm. Quiet fans won't be close to that. Might still work if the ambient is cool, but then again if the ambient is cool the stock fans slow down and are pretty quiet.

You probably need to relocate the miners, sad to say.
13360  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Mining with an Antminer S1: Difference between Cex.io and BTCGuild on: March 24, 2014, 01:51:10 AM
While this is not going to a long post, we mined with Antminer S1s to BTCGuild for about a month and received around .0215BTC per day per Antminer. With Cex.io, we are generating about 0.026BTC per day. While it is not that much of an increase, the multiple payout addresses and easy in-site trading with CEX.IO has to put it above BTCGuild in our opinion!

How did you account for the change in difficulty?

Pages: « 1 ... 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 [668] 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!