It's easy and can be done if you have your seed. Just create a new wallet and choose the following:
Wallet with two-factor authenticator -> I already have a seed -> Paste your seed -> Disable; Now you can spend your coins without any 2FA code.
|
|
|
No. It's literally impossible to know something like that.
If you believe that someone may have access to your private key, create a brand new wallet in a safe environment and move your coins asap.
|
|
|
Bittrex has (for Bitcoin WITHDRAWALS): 0,00100000. It means that i have to pay fees to transfer from Bittrex to my ledger, for have the safe! If i have 0,05 bitcoins to transfer, that means i must pay $13 of fees to Bittrex?? That's right?? Unfortunately that's right. It's a fixed fee set by Bittrex for every Bitcoin withdraw and there is nothing you can do about it.
|
|
|
What version are you using? And is the big circle at the bottom right part of your wallet green?
Have you tried to manually change the server? Unmark "Select server automatically", right click a random server and choose "Use as server";
If nothing of this works, try to recreate your wallet with the same seed. I also have seen people having this same issue just to magically fix it alone later for no reason.
|
|
|
Did you try to send your Vertcoins to the same Electrum wallet where you store your Bitcoins? Because to receive and send Vertcoins, you need to download the Vertcoin version of Electrum[1] and not the official Electrum wallet (for Bitcoin) found in electrum.org; If that's what happened, try to follow this steps: https://github.com/pooler/electrum-ltc/issues/71[1] https://electrum.vertcoin.org/
|
|
|
Why would there be another way? The SMAS list has nothing to do with the forum itself. It's just a personal list created by a few campaign managers to help them avoid reviewing already known spammers.
Lauda is the only one that may reconsider.
|
|
|
is there any way we can sign in message on coins.ph?
No. You don't own any of your Coins.ph addresses. And that's why you don't use a web/hosted wallet.
|
|
|
EXCEPT... that the "OFFICIAL" twitter account as linked from the "OFFICIAL" bitcoin diamond page ( http://btcd.io/) is " https://twitter.com/BitcoinDiamond_" It doesn't have a bunch of zero's (0) in the twitter name like your FAKE twitter account... honestly, you think we're stupid or something? That is an obvious FAKE twitter promoting an obviously FAKE SCAM wallet... your account and all your posts (and all your alt accounts) have been reported... have a great day! Check followers and don`t be mad. Only one official twitter account is https://twitter.com/BITC0INDIAM0ND . And only one right site for claim BCD by BTC is https://bcdwallet.orgA bunch of fake paid followers doesn't mean shit. For example, the real and official twitter linked by HCP is followed by a few relevant users such as (but not limited to): @CoinMarketCap @bitcoingold @bendavenport (BitGo CTO) While your fake account is followed by a bunch of fake accounts with no activity. After a quick audit guess what I found: 784 Real 51,484 Fake 1% Audit score https://www.twitteraudit.com/BITC0INDIAM0NDDon't get mad scammer
|
|
|
WOW. Three brand new accounts created in a interval of 5 minutes claiming that a (pretty obvious scam) wallet is legit. It must be true, right? And one of them, claiming to get 32 BCD even that when clicking any of the buttons you receive this message: "Because Bitcoin Diamond was not released yet, this option is disabled" At least try a little bit to hide the fact that you are all the same person. That's just cringe. ROFL
|
|
|
And why would you use a hosted wallet instead of your normal and secure desktop wallet anyway? Why do people risk their coins with services that may block your IP/account whenever they want? Are you guys that lazy?
I don't think Electrum would be able to block your IP for "suspicious behavior" or "security measures".
|
|
|
what happened when your transaction gets rejection?
You will be able to spend your coins again. If I would have to wait for more than 2 days then I would prefer for my BTC to be sent back to my blockchain.info wallet.
You can't choose when your transaction will be dropped from the mempool. Which means that your transaction may stay stuck for some time if it doesn't get confirmed soon. Some wallets will even rebroadcast your transaction until it gets confirmed, making it hard to spend your coins to another address or with a higher fee.
|
|
|
Forget paid transaction accelerators. Most are fake (like the one you linked) and the ones that are legit are too much expensive.
5 sat/byte is extremally low for a fee. You probably can't do anything other than wait for a confirmation.
For now, I submitted your transaction in the AntPool's transaction accelerator to (maybe) help you.
|
|
|
I would prefer a more reasonable minimum for small investors, like 0.1. why has it to be 1 BTC? is there a specific reason?
That's probably the reason (lower amounts would give you almost no profit): I don't think 1 BTC would earn you very much and may not be worth your time, but you're welcome to try it out for a week.
|
|
|
1: It seems to me transaction fees for "within 5 blocks" and "within 10 blocks" are very high. What do you think? Are these fees normal & usual these days when sending BTC's?
Those are probably right. Blocks are always full, which means that in most part of the time, you can't save money in fees and have a faster confirmation. 2: How long it will roughly take my BTC to arrive if I choose "within 25 blocks"? Do you think it is safe & reasonable to use it?
If you are not in a hurry to confirm your transaction, you can use the lower fee recommended or even edit your fee manually to a lower than the shown in the slider. I have noticed that when number of sending addresses increase, fees also increase... This explains why fees so high for me.
This happens because fees are calculated in sat/byte. When you put more outputs/inputs, the transaction size increases, also increasing the fee.
|
|
|
On a side note, suppose I lost my Electrum (seed) password, but I could retrive it eventually.
Now, I don't know if someone else could have had access to it, so it must be insecure to keep using that wallet with that seed.
Should I recreate a new one in Electrum and transfer all funds ASAP to this new one?
If you want to make sure your seed wasn't somehow compromised, then there is no problem in doing that. Just make sure to never lose your seed. That's the one thing you need to know.
|
|
|
1) how often i can input a wrong passwort / google-authenticator-code ?
Probably as many times as you want. 2) how can i get an email-address of electrum-company or a telephone-number - electrum is a german-company?
I'm not sure why do you want that. As I said, there is nothing Electrum can do about your issue. And that's what anybody else from the dev team will say. This page lists some place for support: https://electrum.org/#community
|
|
|
bitcoin wallet isn't mine, it's on your site and you have my private key. I trust the profits, I don't trust the site. Who can guarantee me that after I have deposited on your site I won't lose all my bitcoin??. it seems a suspicious site...
You definitely shouldn't trust a website that offers you almost 20% a month just to store your coins. "only you can decrypt your wallet with your passwords", so how the heck can you offer 20% a month for every Bitcoin stored in your wallet? At least most ponzi schemes will say that they use your funds for "trading" or "investments" to justify those gains. But not you. Would you pay me 1 BTC per month for nothing if I deposit 5 BTC in your wallet? ROFL
|
|
|
If you send the 0.1 BTC to some exchange without first splitting the coins, you will send BTC to the exchange, and then your transaction will be replayed on the BCH network, sending your BCH to the exchange as well. The problem is the address used by the exchange will not be set up to receive your BCH and you will not be credited with it.
This won't happen. Bitcoin Cash has replay protection. If you send 0.1 BTC, you will only send 0.1 BTC; If you use a Bitcoin Cash wallet and send 0.1 BCH, you will only send 0.1 BCH. So no, you must split your BCH before attempting to send to a wallet that you don't control (especially an exchange, as they are the least likely to help you if you mess up).
Wrong again. You don't have to split your coins. If you do not confuse things and end up sending BCH to a BTC deposit address (or vise versa), you'll be fine.
OP: The fork already happened. If you had 0.2 BTC before the fork, now you have the same amount in BCH. You can import your wallet in a BCH compatible wallet and send your 0.2 BCH to any BCH address you want, and your 0.2 BTC to any Bitcoin address you want. What you posted above is right (being the Address1 your cold-storage address and the Address2 the one from Kraken).
|
|
|
|