IMO ICOs and all other access to crypto will take the volatility out of crypto. If you like volatility then yes it is cancer.
|
|
|
Plastic feels like plastic. Natural or gtfo.
+1 Not if you spend enough $$$ on them +1000 if you feel them like plastic, you are feeling the wrong ones. glad to be offtopic whatever when they grow older...... no one wants oldass boobs hangin all over the place, but not right where they should hang..... (i prefer NO knee boobs.) Don't swap the part. Get a new one
|
|
|
Plastic feels like plastic. Natural or gtfo.
+1 Not if you spend enough $$$ on them You probably still have fun on bouncy castles I'll choose women who are happy with there selves and fun to be with, over insecure women with big tits any day... [Once you go plastic surgery you end up with Michael Jackson!]
|
|
|
Because of risk you should never go all in or sell something you need to invest in btc
How should I read this 1. Because of risk you should never go all in, or sell something. You need to invest in btc. 2. Because of risk you should never go all in, or sell something you need, to invest in btc.
|
|
|
"1 BTC will reach 500 000$ till the end of 2019" If this is true..... *lost for words* (If it sounds too good to be true it probably is )
|
|
|
Plastic feels like plastic. Natural or gtfo.
+1
|
|
|
*facepalm* - we've heard this before .... many many many times ... every dip people start chanting this shit. It has nothing in common with the Tulip crisis Bitcoin would have died in the first few years. Bitcoin would not have multiple ATH cycles. Bitcoin has corrections. The technology is sound and it was meant as a store of value. Bitcoin has a worldwide ecosystem. Bitcoins cannot be cultivated. Creation requires work, work that gets harder and harder. the current situation is almost similar with what happened in the year 2014 but at different price levels. i'm not sure on which time frame it's been set but take a look at this chart and imagine how the 2014 chart looks like and compare it to its present view. and imagine the current chart that we're in will look the same with the 2014's this is just my opinion but I still think there is a possibility that it will happen in the near future. and by the way, it's still your choice if you would hold or you would sell what you have because you will still surely follow what your mind says. Yes, it is similiar. And also it is similiar to tulip mania chart: And so, what conclusions we can do because of this fact? The funniest thing that I published that chart to prove that past chart of BTC price is not a source of useful information. But you opened my eyes! Bitcoin would have died in the first few years.They said so about tulips! Bitcoin would not have multiple ATH cycles.They said so about tulips too! Just look at the chart! There was 3 ATH! Bitcoin has corrections.Tulips had multiple corrections after ATHs Bitcoin has a worldwide ecosystem.Tulips speeded all over the world. Ask anybody on the planet do they know tulips. And then ask about some “bitcoin”. 2/3 of people never heard of such thing, but everybody know tulips! Bitcoins cannot be cultivated. That’s is very true for tulips. Did you ever try to cultivate flowers? Creation requires work, work that gets harder and harder. Yes, it is a hard work to grow flowers. Ask any farmer. So, now you convinced me. Bitcoins=tulips. And that’s why I’m sure bitcoin will never die. Because tulips survived. They are everywhere and everyone can enjoy them! If you are in flowers business you can even make a deals and trade tulips . But.. they never be as expensive as they were once. They became cheaper to thousands times. Forever. And what about BTC?.. Good point so you are actually saying Bitcoins are overpriced based on the Tulip crisis.... Strange logic....
|
|
|
The boob part is easy to fix.
what concerns me more is the getting rich part...
Getting rich is easy .... buy as much BTC as possible and pray to the gods of crypto Either that or start a webcam channel and prostitute yourself
|
|
|
2341 You can take them all out for the day (fucking & sucking included) on your yacht for a good price in 2021 when we hit $100,000 per bitcoin. To the moon bitches! Okay, okay, hang on... We are rich. Now or in a few years doesn't matter, we can pick and choose. And maybe it's just the pickle in me, but of those? I only want the leftmost one. The others are TOO DAMN FAT on their ass. Looks like a hormonal problem to me. Men get fat in the belly, women get fat in the ass and upper legs. It's just no good. Especially when they don't have boobs to match, like the washboard on the right. And that's science, kids. A yacht in my definition is atleast $50M with 10 people required to run the boat (so $1M per year running cost) I hold quite some BTC but don't have > BTC1000 P.S. I'll take number 3. 2 is a dude. 1 and 4 are too flat
|
|
|
Sounds like a reasonable estimate. We have seen this before. We currently seem to be at or near the bottom. But then again Bitcoin doesn't follow rules
|
|
|
It seems that this only applies for businesses and not (yet) for individuals.
|
|
|
Why do you think that the state of Ohio might create a global bitcoin bull run? Is the state of Ohio as big as Japan or South Korea,or maybe China? It's proven that bitcoin isn't a good for tax payments,due to it's volatility. I think that this news might be fake. Because the USA it the center of the universe
|
|
|
And then there's that, but I highly doubt the state plans to keep any of the bitcoin. They'll probably use a payment processor that converts bitcoin to fiat just like most merchants use. If they don't do that, they're being completely irresponsible with taxpayer funds given the volatility of bitcoin.
I still believe that Bitcoin has more "real" value than the US dollar. Simply due to the fact that you cannot print Bitcoins at will. - Bitcoin is built on crypto. - US dollar is built on faith. (used to be gold) From that standpoint it would be more irresponsible to keep US dollars. If governments are smart and want control of the future they should really start getting ahead of the game by stacking Bitcoin.
|
|
|
Good discussion. I understand a lot about Bitcoin but how the system will work after all Bitcoins have been mined is vague at best.
It is my understanding that.... The difficulty adjusts after 2016 blocks making it easier or harder depending on the hashrate of miners. Mining will be done for the fees. At each block someone gets the fees.
I would believe that the system will wither down to a balance between miners and transactions. Mining pools are the only way to get your piece of the fees.
The only problematic thing is the blockchain getting longer and longer making it impracticle to run a full node.
Anyhow it would be great for a specialist to provide us with a view on the OP's question
|
|
|
Looks quite bullish to me: The fuck am I looking at? Looks kind of like the bullish three line strike reversal pattern... A lot of people buying in the dips.
|
|
|
Market is reeling under pains everyone who are emotionally attached,feeling sad, no other options left except holding the coins.
You can invest and strengthen Bitcoin.... Ultimately investing is what will bring the price back up...
|
|
|
I am still hopping for the Bull market. 2018 was a bad year for crypto. I hope 2019 will be the blessed for crypto. Let's wait and pray.
Me 2 but if god exists I believe there are some other worldly priorities god must attend to first ....
|
|
|
not only are you feeling the disappointment of this accident, the market is bleeding again because of a number of rumors and some news says it is nothing but a hard fork on a bch. and the war between Fakesatosi and Dev Bch. this is what is being talked about and as a result the market is bleeding
Shaking out the weak hands is good for crypto. We don't want the twitchy people.
|
|
|
At this stage simulation theory makes as much sense as any other.
someone wrote (sorry dunno who, science fiction author perhaps?) that we arent in a simulation. main reason being that irrational numbers exist. like pi.. something so universally used in nature that a simulation would waste vast amounts of computing power to model it. so basically, in a simulation, no irrational numbers would exist as it would be a poor design for a simulation to include such things. Unless... that's what they WANT you to think! Maybe, outside in the real world, there are numbers that make what we call irrational numbers look entirely rational. If it was a simulation all the weird shit people do wouldn't be programmed in, I mean really, who would program r0ach in? Someone who wanted to FUCK WITH YOU! There are games out there. And you can do stuff in them. Set conditions, variables. Then sit back and watch the madness unfold. Why wouldn't an Elder God do the same with us, just for teh lulz? and then they program that ONE genius guy to create BTC and save all of the human/finance environment to live happy ever after? With neural networks you allow it to unfold without pre programming Or look at John Conway's game of life.... simple rules make complex behavior.
|
|
|
It's fine for me, but I'm curious how are new exchanges going to attract regular customers and clients and gain trade volumes.
Marketing Any exchange that lags in price will become interesting from an arbitrage point of view.
|
|
|
|