Card was received yesterday.
Wow, very nice to hear such positive news from you and I hope it'll be an interesting enrichment for your collection. Looks like our safe shipping has been a big success after all. 
I'm sure this is one of the first of many that you'll have the chance to take part into! Do let us know the cost of shipping an elephant if you ever had the chance to find out . It's too expensive, no one even dares to give a number about the price.  |
|
|
|
...
You know what sometimes surprises me? It's seeing some people, who are educated and even work in the IT area, falling into some basic theft schemes. I once saw a person who worked in a computer company, saying how he was deceived in a very basic method on a personal level. Yes, it's really hard to explain. Maybe it's a mixture of greed or curiosity, where they overestimate their abilities. Of course, it's not just scam related. It even happens to some traders where they expect that they have more knowledge that the market and they expect, that they can beat the market. If I were that person's boss, I would have fired them on the spot.
Best option. |
|
|
|
Hello Buchi-88, have you seen my earlier post?
Hello, unfortunately no, I completely oversaw your post. But I will contact miau right away that it was my mistake and I completely overlooked the reservation. Hello, I've received Buchi-88's PM and we have sorted it out. It's a bit unfortunate since Buchi-88 wasn't aware of my reservations here. The topic "12 years later..." is still available and not reserved by me. Topics reserved by me are listed as "reserved by 1miau" in GazetaBitcoin's list: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5379715 I've agreed that Buchi-88 can publish his translation despite my reservation and I've also offered him a proofreading. Sorry for my crappy quoting +links as I'm only online mobile currently. |
|
|
|
Unabhängig von der Chipmixer-Diskussion: Ich finde es auch durchaus interessant, dass generell für Mixer die Summe der Illicit Funds genau ausgewiesen wird. Nur der Wert alleine sagt ja eigentlich erstmal nur, dass gute 90% (also der ganz überwiegende Teil) der Funds die durch einen Mixer laufen eben nicht aus unerlaubten Quellen stammen. Das hat die Studie aber nicht untersucht, die Studie hat lediglich untersucht, dass 10% aller kriminellen Transaktionen an Mixer gehen: In July, we found that almost 10% of all cryptocurrencies held by illicit entities have been laundered through a mixer in 2022. Und diesen Wert verglichen, wie viele Prozent anderer Transaktionen (Glücksspiel) an Mixer gehen. |
|
|
|
Great list, of which every Newbie should be aware of. Scammers are criminal idiots trying to take advantage from uneducated and greedy people. So, education is already an important step to avoid such scams. And your list is a good compilation of common scam attempts. I would also avoid MLM-scams / ponzi scams, see also my topic MLM - a dangerous marketing stratgyMLM is scam in most cases and extremely likely to be unprofitable / a fail in almost (99.9%) all cases.  |
|
|
|
Und 1x Rolle zurück... Bitcoin ist kein gesetzliches Zahlungsmittel mehr in der zentralafrikanischen Republik: Die Zentralafrikanische Republik (CAR) hat ihre Entscheidung, Bitcoin als gesetzliches Zahlungsmittel zu nutzen, revidiert und das entsprechende Gesetz zurückgenommen. Fast ein Jahr, nachdem das arme Land die Kryptowährung Bitcoin zum gesetzlichen Zahlungsmittel erklärt hatte, beschloss die Nationalversammlung, das entsprechende Gesetz zurückzunehmen.
Wie unter anderem centralbanking.com berichtet, wurde der neue Wortlaut des Gesetzes verabschiedet, der nahelegt, dass Bitcoin nun zusammen mit wenigen anderen Kryptowährungen als Referenzwährungen betrachtet wird, die von den Bürgern auf freiwilliger Basis akzeptiert werden können. „Die Nationalversammlung hat soeben per Akklamation den Gesetzentwurf zur Regelung der Kryptowährung in der Zentralafrikanischen Republik angenommen. Der Bitcoin wird nicht mehr als offizielle Währung, sondern als Kryptowährung mit Referenzcharakter betrachtet“, schreibt Gaetan Kongo, ein Experte für politische Kommunikationsberatung. https://www.blocktrainer.de/zentralafrikanische-republik-degradiert-bitcoin-kein-gesetzliches-zahlungsmittel-mehr/Gerade jetzt, wo die Preise wieder ansteigen (und generell 1 Jahr vor dem Halving) ist das vielleicht nicht die beste Idee... Aber dass Bitcoin als "Kryptowährung mit Referenzcharakter" betrachtet wird, ist an sich durchaus positiv. |
|
|
|
Der Bericht von Chainalysis ist auf jeden Fall interessant. Chainalysis dazu schreibt selbst: In July, we found that almost 10% of all cryptocurrencies held by illicit entities have been laundered through a mixer in 2022. Ist dann die Frage, was mit den anderen 90% Coins passiert ist, die sich im Besitz von Kriminellen befinden, weil man sieht ja, dass lediglich um die 10% aus kriminellen Quellen kommen und an Mixer gehen. Das Problem von ChipMixer dürfte gewesen sein, dass dort viele große Hacks drüber gelaufen sind, was den Prozentsatz krimineller Transaktionen dort massiv erhöht hat. Viele kleinere Mixer haben für so große Beträge, wie sie von Kriminellen zuletzt über ChipMixer geleitet wurden, nicht genug Liquidität. Zum Casino: Wenn du 1000€ Bitcoin hast und deren Herkunft nicht nachweisen kannst, könntest du die stückchenweise ins Casino stecken und dann mal einen großen Gewinn auszahlen. Herkunft des Geldes ist ja dann Glücksspiel. Das ist glaube ich der Gedanke dahinter.
Zumindest für großen Mengen an Coins sind Glücksspielseiten nach heutigem Stand ziemlich ungeeignet für Geldwäsche, da praktisch jede Glücksspielseite Mindestanforderungen zum Wettumsatz einer Einzahlung vorgibt. Heißt: in den Nutzungsbedingungen wird man in der Regel einen Absatz dazu finden, dass die Glücksspielseite nicht als Mixer missbraucht werden darf. Also die Glücksspielseite würde die Auszahlung (vermutlich) nicht durchführen, wenn man dort Coins hinsendet, nimmt eine Wette von 1.01 und zahlt dann wieder aus. Der Umsatz dürfte bei mindestens 5 - 10x liegen, kommt aber auf die Glücksspielseite an. |
|
|
|
Super Idee, hier einen neuen Faden zu erstellen und alle Kampagnen zu sammeln, bei denen Rezensionen gefordert sind und gute Rezensionen dann eine Belohnung in BTC bekommen. Die Kampagne von Betnomi wurde ja vor ca. 2 Wochen oder so abgeschlossen und die Belohnungen versendet. Die 100$ für den Mixer Whirlwind sind natürlich sehr hoch aber das ist glaube ich auch die obere Grenze dessen, was für Belohnungen sehr guter Rezensionen ausgegeben wird. Der Durchschnitt wird deutlich weniger sein aber mal sehen, ob es da eine Statistik nach Abschluss der Kampagne gibt. Wenn ich etwas finde, das interessant ist und in die Kategorie passt, werde ich deinen Faden selbstverständlich nutzen. |
|
|
|
My advice? Stay away from any MLM or referral scheme. You'd only save your time, neurons and money.
I can really agree here. MLM should be avoided right away as it's only a scheme to enrich founders (and sometimes early investors, which is never safe of course, should one be trying to be an early investor). It's just not profitable and finally, people will lose money. It's best to avoid MLM and don't participate in it, see also my topic MLM - a dangerous marketing stratgyReferral rewards are too tiny or if they are too good to be true, they are not true (because it's not a vital concept for an operator to spend endless money on referral rewards after all). See point 2 in my topic above (2. MLM causes significant costs) Instead of reflink, MLM and co., there are so many better ways to earn honest money. |
|
|
|
My dear 1miau, I believe this is first time we cross our paths inside Gambling section It is, dear GazetaBitcoin. We even crossed already twice just yesterday. And we are surrounded by shitposts, isn't it romantic?
Well, what do we expect from lazy shitposters? Meaningful / input / analysis / questions? We are of high risk to get disappointed to assume so. Looooooool! Perhaps if he would start talking about analysis he would follow the path opened by mr.relax so we are safe at the moment After all, posting zero-value posts is a smaller bad stuff than misleading users with hopeless hot-to-get-rich schemes You are completely right here, OP is just spamming the forum (which is sad but doesn't do any harm). 
When reading OP, it's also causing a bit confusion for me: what does he want to tell us? Nothing. OP is not trying to say absolutely anything OP is trying to fulfill his weekly post quota*, which is really hard work considering when he has nothing to say. *See below.**
But depositing crypto for sports betting doesn't make it more likely to win a sports bet after all... It's like saying you can maximize your chances by gambling in USD instead of EUR. Logic? Makes none. EUR and USD? Probably not so much. But our intelligent OP asked about crypto. And there we need to say: Sure! We can maximize our money by using BTC on gambling sites instead of USD! Imagine, you'd deposit 100 USD there, if you'd gamble 2 years, double and withdaw it, it's 200 USD. But when you deposit BTC there and you gamble 2 years, double and withdaw it, it might be 1k USD.   We can even make losses from gambling and still have a profit, if we deposit BTC. It's really called miximizing (probably).
OP's "question? suggestion?" is so generic and short and we can barely make any educated guesses what he wanted to tell us / ask us? We don't even know if he wants to tell us something or if he asks a question. ...] To me, OP is completely pointless.  What is even worst is that OP did not even write this topic for filling a signature quota. He actually made this shitpost because he is a true shitposter, lol. (**) Wow, you are right. I didn't notice it.  It's really embarassing to see such an unemployed shitposter.
Have you noticed that OP never intervened in the discussion after starting the topic? Although he was online since then, he never wrote any single word here, inside his very own topic I have, it's so embarassing for OP.  |
|
|
|
I am just curious about how does online casino pay for their promotion on their influencers? Where does their earning comes from? How will you get scammed when you try online casino? How can you tell that online casino is safe?
@OP In case you are really reading replies here: it totally depends on which Gambling site you refer to. Just a few examples: we have many shady Gambling sites, known for scamming like 1xbit ( check 1xbit's trust score) But we have also very legit sites, like Sportsbet.io or Betnomi. You need to do your own research, which site is legit (and which one is not legit). A good start is Bitcointalk: check out each ANN of any Gambling site and you'll be able to review their trust scores.
I think it would be better if mods would just lock the topic as it's a useless one.
I agree here but we would need to close so many topics, especially in Gambling / Gambling discussion that probably 50% of the front page topics will become locked topics. |
|
|
|
However, after reading the title I realized that OP, in fact, did not say anything. He asks "Do you want to maximize your profits while betting on sports but don't know where or how to start?" -- which is a question to which any sane person would say "Yes", right? Then he says "Crypto is rapidly going traction as an investment opportunity, and now you can use digital currency while playing all type of sport betting" -- so what? Okay, you can use cryptocurrencies for betting. So what? How is that going to maximize the profits? Obviously, not the betting payment method is what is maximizing the profits, but the strategy used for betting.
Well, what do we expect from lazy shitposters? Meaningful / input / analysis / questions? We are of high risk to get disappointed to assume so. When reading OP, it's also causing a bit confusion for me: what does he want to tell us? OP's "question? suggestion?" is so generic and short and we can barely make any educated guesses what he wanted to tell us / ask us? We don't even know if he wants to tell us something or if he asks a question. Yes, crypto can also be used for gambling; as we know Bitcointalk is very famous for it's gambling section, where many famous crypto gambling sites are actively offering good promotions. But depositing crypto for sports betting doesn't make it more likely to win a sports bet after all... To me, OP is completely pointless. |
|
|
|
Vielleicht geht es auch nur darum, billig 20 Millionen Euro / bis zu vier Prozent des Jahresumsatzes abzugreifen? Was ich bisher gelesen hab, gab es wohl am 20. März ein Datenverlust und es wurden Nutzergespräche und Zahlungsinformationen von Abonnenten des Dienstes dadurch ungewollt veröffentlicht. Das war wohl der Auslöser zu der ganzen Aktion, schreibt "Welt.de" dazu. Hmm, dann müsste aber auch z.B. Ledger zur Rechenschaft gezogen werden für ihren überaus fahrlässigen Umgang mit personalisierten Kundendaten, Adressen etc., als Ledger im Sommer 2020 groß gehackt wurde. Fände ich nicht schlecht und letztendlich denke ich auch, dass man da eine gute Lösung findet, die die Daten auch schützt. |
|
|
|
Köln vs. Gladbach is probably 50 / 50 chance or we get a draw.
Werder vs. Hoffenheim will be more in favor of Werder but Hoffenheim showed a good performance against Hertha last 2 weeks ago.
As for Köln vs. Gladbach, it seems like a draw was the correct result as the match ended goalless. After Köln was defeated in Dortmund last week 6-1, my hopes were on a weak Köln team but it didn't happen. Gladbach just couldn't score any goal. With regards to Werder vs. Hoffenheim, I agree that Werder may have had the advantage, but Hoffenheim showed a good performance in their match and was able to secure the victory.
Yes, it's quote a surprise to see Werder losing at home against Hoffenheim but looks like Hoffenheim improved recently (2 wins in a row now). You also weren't lucky this time as you predicted a draw for Köln, but you didn't take it into consideration!!  I wish you luck in the next round. Unfortunately, my prediction in Köln vs. Gladbach was Gladbach to win, so I didn't made any points, too (as it ended in a draw) but after such crazy results, I'm taking 7 points. Hovever, I won't win any price as I'm stuck on rank 16, so my hopes are on yellow caps to win a weekly round. Not many rounds left but we'll see. |
|
|
|
What a race, many unexpected red flags and safety cars. Mercedes really looked strong here, even stronger compared to Aston Martin, if Russell doesn't get his engine issue. Very bad luck for him, but it didn't look good for Russell anyways after he got screwed by pitting early and a red flag shortly after it, where everyone changed tyres for free. In general, half of the grid had bad luck today. Russell engine issue, both Alpine and Williams out and Magnussen hitting a wall. Probably the worst weekend for Ferrari (once again): Leclerc gets hit by Stroll in Lap 1, Leclerc is stuck in gravel and later, Sainz crashes into Alonso, Sainz gets a 5 seconds penalty resulting in rank 12 for him, where he gets 0 points. I have changed my prediction
I also changed my prediction Turned out to be a very bad decision to change predictions and lose our EBP. See you next round (Baku / Azerbaijan), everyone.
And the red flag from the final.... absolute shameless. WHY? and we come back to the so called "SAFETY" and you put the drivers in a new standidng start and you know hey are gonna go ALL IN in the first turn, and the chance of chaos are HUGE.
This is pure TV order to get drama not matter a what cost, they destroyed strategies, and in some case the whole race (like Alpine).
I believe, it's a situation similar to Baku 2021, where only few laps were left when Verstappen had a crash. Session red flagged and standing restart (where Hamilton locked up and Perez won ) Today, FIA had basically 2 choices: - Option 1 like in Baku 2021 (Session red flagged and later standing restart) - Option 2 like in Monza 2022 (Safety car finish) Mabye race control decided to go for Option 1 because Magnussen distributed many parts of his car on the track, which needed to be cleaned up. And as it's about safety of Marshalls when tidying it up, race control made a red flag. After red flag, a standing start is done (as in Baku 2021). Of course, it's also about action because after Monza 2022, many people complained to FIA, that the race ended under Safety Car. And yes, final laps destroyed my Alpine both cars points finish bet. It's always a difficult situation for race control because not matter what's decided, someone will be pissed but Gasly made a really stupid move there when he re-joined the track, by going back to racing line immediately and he took out Ocon. |
|
|
|
Nice stats, looks like we have some very talented people here, like karmamiu. And our @Hhampuz also did very well, congrats. Maybe such a high number of collected coins are just from many failed attempts, it's also possible. Or are only coins from successful completions counted in your statistics? Glad to be able to post normally again and without getting labelled as a spammer. |
|
|
|
Sure, almost all of the Saturday games are favorite vs. underdog but it's very likely to see more favorites slip. Maybe we'll see Bayern slip against Dortmund as well. Would be nice for an exciting title game to see it happen. However, in the case of Bayern vs Dortmund, you predicted Bayern to win and they ended up winning 4-2, so they managed to avoid slipping in that match. Yes, I expected Bayern to win but I'm always hesistant of underestimating Dortmund (and considering Bayern to screw up a game against an important opponent) We have seen Bayern slipping against Gladbach and Leverkusen, so slipping against Dortmund wouldn't be a surprise, even a draw would be bad for Bayern. But Bayern won decisively, good for Tuchel. Man City will be a more difficult opponent of course. I don't know if I'm able to achieve accurate results and win the free bet  Good luck, 8 points are already a very good result after so many surprises. Köln vs. Gladbach is probably 50 / 50 chance or we get a draw. Werder vs. Hoffenheim will be more in favor of Werder but Hoffenheim showed a good performance against Hertha last 2 weeks ago. |
|
|
|
Is it worth losing 2 Early Bru Points for being able to replace him in order to try to earn 1 or 2 points at the end? It's very difficult to make a choice.
I have changed my prediction because I believe it's very unlikely for Perez to get a podium (I've predicted him to make a podium previously, now removed him). For Perez, it can also result in getting his car damaged, when he tries to push too much for overtaking. He still has 0 experience how his car will behave, even if all technical issues from FP3 and Qualification are sorted out. Maybe we'll see Perez going straight into gravel again in Sector 1 (as he did in his first Qualifying lap ), taking out few cars. Maybe he can make position 6 or 7 when he's really good and doesn't damage his car, but podium? Very unlikely. I expect Mercedes making a double podium because Aston Martin didn't seem to have high top speed, so it will be very difficult for Alonso to overtake Mercedes, if he can't get one during start. Maybe he'll even get sacked by one Ferrari. If so, it'll be even more difficult for him. Mercedes is not Ferrari, where we can expect tyre degradation. Mercedes is much more stable. So, let's see if my decision was a good idea to discard 2 EBP. 2 points are a lot but I'm hoping for a strong Mercedes performance tomorrow, which can result in 6 points for a correct podium, if it happens. Good luck everyone. |
|
|
|
Die letzten Tage war es im Mempool (in dem die unbestätigten Transaktionen gesammelt werden), so voll wie seit Anfang 2018 nicht mehr. Da Bitcoin sich technisch seitdem sehr verbessert hat, ist der Anstieg der Transaktionen sogar sehr positiv für Bitcoin, denn es ist ein Zeichen, dass es mehr genutzt wird, ganz ohne, dass das Netzwerk überlastet und die Transaktionskosten explodieren. Klar, ein Teil davon wird Ordinals-Spam sein aber trotzdem ist es immer noch möglich, Transaktionen von unter 20 Cent Transaktionsgebühr direkt im nächten Block unterzubringen. Die gleiche Gebühr hätte noch im Zeitraum Januar bis April 2022 ca. 1 Monat gedauert, bis sie bestätigt werden würde und im Zeitraum Dezember 2018 - März 2018 hätte man mit einem Monat Wartezeit das 30-fache im Vergleich zu heute zahlen müssen. Dass man nun, im April 2023 innerhalb von 24 Stunden wohl nicht mehr als 50 Cent bezahlen würde, ist überaus Bullisch für Bitcoin.  https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#BTC,all,weight |
|
|
|
Also bitte, jetzt gebt euch doch ein bisschen Mühe.
zudem muß man immer wieder von neu Anfangen wenn jemand was geschrieben hat in der zeit wo man noch schreibt.
Das finde ich den nervigsten Teil. Da hat man es gelöst, muss man es unnötigerweise noch einmal machen.  Aber sowas könnte erheblich zum Spamschutz beitragen und vor allem gegen die Bots.
Fände ich ebenfalls nicht schlecht, wenn - es ein bisschen einfacher ist (weniger Coins erforderlich sowie breitere Lücken insgesamt) - man nicht immer neu beginnen muss, wenn jemand anderes in der Zwischenzeit einen neuen Kommentar platziert hat. Naja, ich werde es so gut es geht vermeiden, heute weitere Beiträge zu schreiben (und das ist ja auch Ziel der Kampagne). Fände es noch lustig, wenn pro Spambeitrag ein Merit abgezogen wird.
Edit: endlich ist der Spuk vorbei, damit schließe ich den Faden ab.* Danke alle für die Bemühungen. Hier das Archiv, wer alles ein Spammer war: https://archive.is/MZOtZ *Lasse ihn mal noch offen, da theymos Statistiken zu veröffentlicht hat. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
