Dupa expirarea celor doua saptamani in care a fost activ chestionarul, s-a votat ca tabelul sa nu mai contina coloana comentariilor, acestea urmand sa apara in format "hover" pe coloana "Utilitate". In acelasi timp, votul referitor la nota noua pentru Blockchair a ramas indecis, urmand o noua votare, unde se va decide daca va ramane cu nota 8 sau daca i se va acorda nota noua. Aditional, 1miau a pastrat intr-o postare si vechiul format, intrucat cei care viziteaza topicul folosind telefoanele mobile nu pot beneficia de functia "hover". Ca urmare, voi aplica si eu aceasta idee. Mai jos se regaseste noul format al tabelului. In postarea urmatoare voi adauga si vechiul format, pentru referinta.
| Nume (link) | Suportă Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR)? | Recunoaște adresele SegWit (P2SH)?** | Utilitate (scor subiectiv)  | Funcționează fără JS | Notă acordată de | | ________________________ | ________________________________ | _________________________ | _____________________________ | __________________ | ________________ | | Blockchair.com | Da (09/2019) / Da (05/2022) | Da (09/2019) | 8 / 10 Puncte | Da | 1miau | | Trezor Bitcoin Explorer | Da (11/2019) / Da (05/2022) | Da (11/2019) | 7.5 / 10 Puncte | Parțial*** | Saint-loup | | mempool | Da (10/2020) / Da (05/2022) | Da (10/2020) | 7.5 / 10 Puncte | Nu | SFR10 | | OKLink | Da (08/2022) / Da (08/2022) | Da (08/2022) | ]7.5 / 10 Puncte | Nu | SFR10 | | bitaps.com | Da (09/2019) / Da (05/2022) | Da (09/2019) | 7 / 10 Puncte | Nu | 1miau | | BTC.com | Da (09/2019) / Da (05/2022) | Da (09/2019) | 7 / 10 Puncte | Nu | 1miau | | chainflyer.bitflyer.jp | Da (12/2019) / Da (05/2022) | Da (12/2019) | 7 / 10 Puncte | Nu | Alveus | | BitcoinWho'sWho | Da (09/2022) / Da (09/2022) | Da (09/2022) | 7 / 10 Puncte | Nu | GazetaBitcoin | | BitcoinExplorer | Da (08/2022) / Da (08/2022) | Da (08/2022) | 7 / 10 Puncte | Parțial*** | SFR10 | | bitquery | Da (09/2022) / Da (09/2022) | Da (09/2022) | 7 / 10 Puncte | Nu | Rizzrack | | TokenView | Da (09/2022) / Da (09/2022) | Da (09/2022) | 7 / 10 Puncte | Nu | ajiz138 | | BitInfoCharts | Da (09/2022) / Nu (11/2022) | Nu (09/2022) | 7 / 10 Puncte | Parțial (vezi comentariul) | ajiz138 | | SoChain | Da (09/2019) / Da (05/2022) | Da (09/2019) | 6 / 10 Puncte | Nu | 1miau | | Blockcypher.com | Da (09/2019) / Da (05/2022) | Nu (09/2019) | 6 / 10 Puncte | Parțial*** | 1miau | | cryptoID | Da (12/2019) / Nu (10/2022) | Da (12/2019) | 6 / 10 Points | Nu | SFR10 | | ViaBTC.com | Da (09/2019) / Nu (10/2022) | Nu (09/2019) | 6 / 10 Puncte | Nu | 1miau | | Btcscan | Da (08/2022) / Da (08/2022) | Da (08/2022) | 6 / 10 Puncte | Da | SFR10 | | Blockchain.com | Da (11/2019) / Nu (10/2022) | Da (12/2019) | 5 / 10 Puncte | Parțial*** | 1miau | | Localbitcoinschain.com | Da (12/2019) / Nu (10/2022) | Da (12/2019) | 5 / 10 Puncte | Nu | SFR10 | | BitcoinBlockExplorer | Da (08/2022) / Da (08/2022) | Nu (08/2022) | 5 / 10 Puncte | Nu | SFR10 | | Learnmeabitcoin | Da (10/2022) / Nu (10/2022) | Nu (10/2022) | 5 / 10 Puncte[/abbr] | Nu | ajiz138 | | Atomic | Da (08/2022) / Da (08/2022) | Nu (08/2022) | 4.5 / 10 Puncte | Parțial*** | SFR10 | | CoinCap | Da (10/2020) / Nu (10/2022) | Nu (10/2020) | 4 / 10 Puncte | Nu | SFR10 | | Yogh | Da (10/2022) / Da (10/2022) | Nu (10/2022) | 4 / 10 Puncte | Nu | ajiz138 | | Blockexplorer.one | Da (12/2019) / Da (10/2022) | Nu (12/2019) | 3 / 10 Puncte | Nu | LTU_btc | | Blockpath | Da (12/2019) / Da (05/2022) | Nu (12/2019) | 3 / 10 Puncte | Nu | SFR10 | | Blockstream | Da (11/2019) / Da (05/2022) | Da (11/2019) | 2 / 10 Puncte | ? | pooya87 | | Insight | Da (12/2019) / Da (05/2022) | Nu (12/2019) | 1 / 10 Puncte | Nu | SFR10 | | Wallet Explorer | Da (09/2022) / Da (05/2022) | Nu (09/2019) | 0 / 10 Puncte (de evitat) | Da | 1miau | | Spiral | Da (09/2022) / Da (10/2022) | Nu (09/2022) | x / 10 Puncte | Nu | cygan |
|
|
|
|
But are you sure about updating the old format? I believe it's better to keep it how it is since it is our "old" format, which has been frozen when we added the new design? Ummm... Maybe I did not express well what I meant. Let me rephrase it. So you said you will keep also the old format of the table (actually it's inside your earlier post). This is for those willing to browse from mobile phones. And I suggested the following: (1) there will certainly be changes to the new table from OP (the one which is already changed); (2) since OP will be updated in the future with various suggestions from other users, it would be wise to update also the old table -- the one you kept for users browsing from mobiles. Practically, since you (we) keep also the old table inside a post, I believe that when new sites will be added to / deleted from the new table from OP, this change should reflect also inside the old table, which you posted here. This way, users browsing from mobile phones will also be able to see all new additions to the new table from OP. Does it make sense now?  You are also right here. By getting a DRAW between 8 and 9 votes, it's still an unsolved secret, what to do. Yes, we need to reveal the secret! Reveal the secret we must, young padawan! As you've said, it's not a nice move from me to decide the outcome, so we will have a fair and democratic survey, once again. We need to honor our decisionmaking and be consistent.  I'm planning to start one next weekend and we can run it again for 14 days. Well... I did not say you did a not nice move But it would be great to have a final debate for that website's final mark, thus the ones which voted anything else excepting 8 or 9 can choose between those two "finalist" marks! |
|
|
|
Wikipedia sagt: Eine Revolution ist ein grundlegender und nachhaltiger struktureller Wandel eines oder mehrerer Systeme, der meist abrupt oder in relativ kurzer Zeit erfolgt. Er kann friedlich oder gewaltsam vor sich gehen. [...] Die Darlegung von lassdass kann ich daher zu 100% unterschreiben. Bitcoin ist eine zusätzliche, innovative Option mit Eigenschaften, die es spezifisch durch die Technik vorher so nicht gab. Je nach Gesellschaft ist der Nutzen von Bitcoin sehr unterschiedlich, wenn man z.B. einmal das Anwendungsbeispiel betrachtet, welches Gladstein im obigen Artikel darlegt. Vielleicht trifft es "Innovation" daher besser, wenn man damit Bitcoin beschreiben möchte. Liebe Freunde, ich weiß, dass Sie Deutsche sind und die Deutschen sehr bekannt sind für ihr logisches Denken, ihre Kohärenz im Ausdruck und ihre Gründlichkeit. Vergessen Sie jedoch nicht, dass es in dieser Welt auch etwas Platz für Metaphern, für Literatur und für Worte geben sollte, die Gefühle und Emotionen ausdrücken Und ich habe lateinische Wurzeln, daher können meine Schriften manchmal zu leidenschaftlich für a erscheinen Ursache, die auch viele Metaphern enthält. Tatsächlich hat der Begriff "Revolution" viele Bedeutungen, die sich nicht unbedingt auf Gewalt beziehen. Nehmen wir zum Beispiel die Revolutionsbewegung der Erde – sie hat nichts mit dem Sturz eines politischen Regimes zu tun, mit einer „Revolution“, doch ist dies der Begriff für die Rotation unseres Planeten um die Sonne. Wenn Sie möchten, können Sie mein Schreiben als eine metaphorische Art der Formulierung von Worten betrachten. Ich habe meinen Worten etwas Lyrik hinzugefügt, in der Hoffnung, die Herzen derer zu berühren, die sie lesen |
|
|
|
I'd like to let everybody know that I finished the (whole) Romanian translation of Husna QA & Chikito's very long and useful topic. Hooray! I have a note for all those which translated already part 6 of this topic: after an observation made by PrivacyG, Husna QA updated the chapter about CoinJoin, therefore those which already translated this part (if any) should apply also this recent update. And for those which did not start yet this translation but they intend to and also for those which started the translation but did not finish it: please be aware that this topic is huge, having almost 7000 words. I suggest you to work on it in an organized manner, in order to not exhaust yourselves. The information presented is very complex, it's also very technical, thus it's easy to make mistakes, especially ones determined by fatigue. Therefore I recommend you to translate one part at a time, making sure that the translation is correct. I hope this helps |
|
|
|
Thank you for this update, Husna QA, and also for the fast reply! I understand your point of view: nothing from present changes the past and in the past Wasabi was a pioneer, no matter that it turn rogue now. So the part regarding this wallet being a pioneer of CoinJoin stays, as it's a part of history, and theymos congratulated them for what they were at that moment of the past. However, considering their recent moves, your new added observation is more than welcome. The update is also reflected inside the Romanian translation of your topic. |
|
|
|
Dat fiind ca Husna QA a raspuns in topicul original, si a si efectuat o adaugire, prezint aici actualizarea aplicata capitolului referitor la CoinJoin: Notă: -snip- Wasabi nu mai este prietenul nostru. S-a alăturat forțelor inamice. Așa că sunt de părere că ar trebui eliminat din topic sau adăugată o notă serioasă despre faptul că nu mai susține Intimitatea și Anonimitatea, ci opusul acestora. Este o mișcare foarte dezamăgitoare făcută de Wasabi, care mă dezgustă, dar asta este situația. -snip-
Accesați, de asemenea, și acest link: https://blog.wasabiwallet.io/zksnacks-blacklisting-update. > Încă nu au explicat exact cum va adăuga zkSNACKs Ltd pe lista neagră anumite ieșiri necheltuite, dacă nu monitorizează și nu colectează datele utilizatorilor.
Nu am explicat pentru că este ceva trivial. Prin arhitectura sa, coordonatorul Wasabi nu poate străpunge intimitatea utilizatorilor. Nu înseamnă că acest coordonator alege să nu colecteze date, ci înseamnă că nu o poate face nici dacă ar dori. Coordonatorul cunoaște doar ce ține de UTXO pentru a participa la procesul de CoinJoin – la fel ca publicul – iar aceasta nu este o breșă de intimitate. |
|
|
|
I think it's not so much how willing you are to use a cex but rather how strong your password is whenever you sign up for services that use KYC, and obviously how serious the service you're using is.
[...] So the first source of security is yourself. I don't know how much your password can help you if hackers break the database of the exchange. Remember that the forum also got hacked in the past and hackers obtained many passwords of users' accounts... Indeed, a strong password is useful but it's not all you need for not having your identity stolen. For not having your identity stolen no third party should have your data.
from this case it is really very dangerous to do KYC on an exchange, anything can happen beyond our control, very terrible,
but how can we trade if we don't do kyc on the exchange, even though that's the main part of being able to trade and withdraw funds. As I wrote above, you should use only decentralized exchanges, crypto ATMs and peer-to-peer transfers. You can always search on CoinATMRadar for a cash-in / cash-out crypto ATM in your area. These ATMs are (supposed to be) anonymous, although their fees are not small...
This is one hell of a nightmare, wouldn't be surprised if he quit his driving job with all the humiliation he keeps getting  But why didn't he use his lawyers to sue these convicts for identity theft and all trumour suffered because of their actions..?( If you carefully read OP you'll notice that the first thief was caught and convicted. Then another thief used the victim's identity... He was in an endless loophole... Btw if I were him,would have gone with changing identity, the damage is to much  I doubt this would be a good idea... As bittraffic observed, such move would only draw even more suspicion on you...
The exchanges in question are Binance and kucoin. Now my question is; Is they a way to prove that my details has truly been wiped out from their database after completing all the procedures? No, there is no way to know for sure that your data was actually deleted...
I don't think kyc on reputable exchanges like Binance, kucoin etc will have any data theft. Have you read in OP that Coinbase sold clients' data to third parties? Isn't Coinbase also a reputable exchange? Besides, don't you know that Binance got hacked twice already? Only luck made that Binance clients did not have their personal information stolen as well and hackers were only interested in their deposits... |
|
|
|
I'll add a link below the table to a version of an old version of our table. By doing so, it'll also be possible for people viewing our table from mobile devices. Yup, this is a wise move. We have the old format as reference, those willing to use it can still do it (this also implies that it should be updated each time OP gets updated) and if in the future you will wish (in a democratic way ) to return to old format, the old table will be available. I would apply a "stay" for our 8 points rating since 8 and 9 points have equal votes, so I consider it as a vote for "stay". If my assumption is against a fair decision and people request to have a runoff vote, I can also set up a runoff vote, of course. Awww, you applied a democratic vote for everything, don't punish Blockchair now with a unilateral decision I guess it would be fair for this site to organize one more survey for a final decision regarding its final mark (a vote for 8 or 9). Maybe a one week survey...? Also take into consideration that such a move will also be consistent with earlier changes, meaning it will be a democratic vote |
|
|
|
|
Danke AHOYBRAUSE für die Übersetzung dieses Themas von mir! Du hast wieder einen tollen Job gemacht!
Dieses Thema ist etwas ganz Besonderes für mich, da es mich sehr berührt wenn ich daran denke wie Satoshi es geschafft hat, die ganze Welt zu verändern, und das dabei kein Tropfen Blut jemals von irgendjemandem geflossen ist! Dies ist eher eine philosophische Schrift welche jedoch eine wahre Tatsache darstellt: Wir alle lebten (und leben immer noch) in einer unblutigen Revolution.
Satoshi wollte nie Blut. Er wollte uns nur befreien. Frei von Banken, von unterdrückerischen Regierungen, von jeglichen Dritten die nur darauf aus sind uns irgendwie zu bestehlen. Er bot uns Bitcoin kostenlos an und wir können seit dem Erscheinen von Bitcoin die volle Kontrolle über unser eigenes Geld haben.
Ich hoffe, dass deutsche Nutzer dieses Thema in ihrer Muttersprache lesen werden!
|
|
|
|
After discussions via PM, I have agreed to a suggestion from GazetaBitcoin to select a safe shipping option. Price is 6.12 EUR and I've decided to send GazetaBitcoin an equivalent of 7 USD to cover expenses and effort, which is 0.35 mBTC. I confirm receiving the 0.35 mBTC and I also want to let all involved parties know that the card was shipped today to Chi using safest option presented by Romanian Post. Thank you, 1miau, for that! Please find below the receipt I received from Romanian Post:  I also informed Chi about the shipping and I kindly asked him to make a post here once here receives the card (I hope this will happen before of current month). Thank you, 1miau, for organizing the giveaway for my couch, where RickDeckard won your prize in BTC and the card offered by me; thank you, RickDeckard, for your big heart which determined you to make an auction for helping yahoo62278, offering this nice card as prize; thank you, PowerGlove, for participating inside the auction, for offering greatest bid and for having also a big heart, offering the card you won to someone else; thank you, ChitBitCTY for accepting the prize! (You may find here the rest of the way the card had to go until finally finding its winner ) It's really amazing to see what a long way this card made and, in the end, yahoo62278 could be helped!
Looooooool! Lucky for you, it's not an elephant =))) (Even if it were, I don't know if I was able to ship it. Nor with Romanian Post, anyway. I also don't know if it could fit inside the envelope ) Yes, it's doubtful.  At our next giveaway / raffle I will try to ask a Romanian Post officer the price of shipping an elephant inside a simple envelope. You know, just to have the information |
|
|
|
|
02 - GazetaBitcoin
Thank you, OP!
|
|
|
|
Avem un concurs nou! [FREE RAFFLE] 505th - ฿ECAUSE I AM STILL IN A GOOD MOOD-CYPHER HODL PRINTED COINhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5444625.0Se pot castiga urmatoarele: o moneda Cypher Hodl printata la imprimanta 3D. Organizator: krogothmanhattanPoate participa oricine daca s-a inregistrat anterior datei de 1 februarie. Modalitate de inscriere: se alege un numar de la 00 la 99 (care nu a fost deja rezervat). Transportul: gratuit in SUA; pentru restul lumii se va discuta cu minerjones. Concursul este identic cu cele anterior realizate de OP.
Am asteptat pana a doua zi, sa nu fiu chiar printre primii 2-3 inscrisi [...] Am vazut ca nici tu nu ai participat (inca?). Daca participi, multa bafta! Si eu la fel Merci! |
|
|
|
O singură cerinţă aş avea. Ştiu că întotdeauna menţii articolele în proporţie de 100% identice celor originale. Aş cere o singură dată o modificare. Wasabi nu mai este un susţinător al intimităţii. Nici al anonimităţii. De fapt, acum s-a alăturat opoziţiei şi lucrează cu firmele de Analiză Blockchain pentru a valida sau respinge UTXO-urile înainte să fie incluse în Coin Join. Din cauza asta, mă înnebuneşte să văd Wasabi pus într-o lumină pozitivă într-un articol despre Intimitate şi Anonimitate.
Am să cer întâi ca Husna să facă modificarea, ca să nu te rog să îţi ieşi din fire pentru cerinţa mea. Poate că avem noroc şi adaugă măcar o avertizare pentru cititori. Sunt de acord aici. Chiar mai mult, consider ca si daca creatorul topicului initial nu face corectura, GazetaBitcoin poate linistit sa adauge o nota cat mai vizibila cu informatii actualizate. Va multumesc amandurora pentru idee. Sincer sa fiu, am observat si eu partea aceea in timpul traducerii (si mi-au sangerat un pic ochii ). IntimitateaG are, de asemenea, dreptate, cand spune ca stie ca mentin mereu articolele conform celor originale (aceasta este o forma de respect pentru autorul original). Totodata insa, se pot introduce si note de catre translator, cum a spus NeuroticFish. Planul meu era sa termin de tradus mai intai monstruozitatea de topic (are peste 6000 de cuvinte in total). Dupa cum vedeti, am rezervat unele postari -- acolo vor intra celalalte parti care trebuie traduse (la care lucrez in prezent). Ulterior, dupa ce as fi terminat tot, aveam de gand sa-i scriu si eu autorului, pentru a-l trage de maneca cu privire la Wasabi. IntimitateaG mi-a luat-o inainte * insa Ca urmare, propun sa asteptam sa raspunda autorul. apoi voi opera si eu modificarile. Intre timp o sa continui sa lucrez la restul traducerii. Si, in caz ca autorul nu raspunde sau nu doreste sa opereze nicio modificare (desi ma indoiesc ca ar proceda asa), voi adauga la final o nota cu privire la pericolele asociate cu Wasabi.
Văd că am ajuns şi la rangul de Erou. Ura! În sfârşit. Mai am de ăsta să trec şi ajung şi eu în barca voastră de Legendari. Parcă ia o eternitate! Uraaa! Bravo, IntimitateG, felicitari! Inca un pic ** si ajungi Legendar! Ma bucur foarte mult sa te vad ajungand in aceasta postura speciala! * IntimitateG, vezi ca i-ai scris gresit numele (sa nu se supere omul). **"Un pic" este, poate, un termen prea optimist pentru cele 285-540 zile ramase pana la noul rang, dar sa fim optimisti! |
|
|
|
Very well I'll translate this one into Filipino translation instead. Hey there Asuspawer09 and Agbe! Thank you for all the efforts you make for these translations! Feel free to translate these topics of mine If you need my support, you can always PM me for clarifying everything. I just kindly ask you to not forget to send me a preview before publishing the translations, for a last double check, and also don't forget the template for author and original topic mentioned in OP
Meanwhile, two new translations have been added to OP: I also added these translations as footnotes inside the original threads. Thank you both, AHOYBRAUSE and CoinEraser! Looking forward for future collaborations (Speaking of which, AHOYBRAUSE just informed me that he will also translate in German the topic Bitcoin - a bloodless revolution.) |
|
|
|
|
Vielen Dank CoinEraser für deine Bemühungen bei der Übersetzung des Beitrags von mir. Du hast gute Arbeit geleistet! Und ich freue mich sehr darüber, dass meine Beiträge deutschsprachige Forumsmitglieder erreichen. Smiley
Du hast dich dazu entschieden, einen historischen Beitrag von mir zu übersetzen, der eine wichtige Seite der Geschichte darstellt: Phil Zimmermann und seine Erfindung namens PGP. Seine Kreation ist in dem Kryptobereich so wichtig, da die ganze Kryptografie auf PGP basiert. Phil war ein Genie und ohne ihn könnten wir nicht sagen, wo die Kryptografie heutzutage stehen würde oder wie unsere private Kommunikation funktionieren könnte.
Er ist ein Titan seiner Zeit und jetzt profitieren wir alle von seiner Schöpfung. Aus diesem Grund betrachte ich dieses Essay als Pflichtlektüre für alle Bitcoiner. Wir sollten niemals diejenigen vergessen, die die freie Kryptografie initiiert haben, die Kryptografie, auf die alle Menschen zugreifen und die sie jetzt auch nutzen können!
|
|
|
|
Thank you for the statistics, 1miau! I am very glad to see we did not have contradictory final results (e.g.: having users voting to keep comments and also use "hover" format, as we anticipated it may happen) The hover format will bring an "exotic air" to your topic, as it's a SMF feature only rarely used (to be honest, excepting your topic, I think I only saw icopress using this feature). Most likely, this change will also make the topic more aesthetic. Indeed, it may impact users which will access your topic from mobile phones, yet I don't think their total number represent a significat percentage compared with all the users which will ever access the topic while browsing the forum from desktops or laptops. Besides, the ones browsing from mobiles can always come back to the topic while using a PC. Besides, what do you have in mind regarding the final mark for Blockchair? Will you make a secondary survey, where users will be able to choose between giving it a 8 or a 9? (10 is out of question, as only I gave it a 10, lol.) |
|
|
|
Identity and documents can be stolen anytime if they are sent for any verification, so I would suggest regular people to stay away from CEX like Coinbase, Binance., etc, or at least be aware of the risks and use them sparingly. This is very well said, dkbit98! And I hope that my story will help many users to understand how it really feels to live such drama. I also suggest reading a topic written by 1miau, which is complementary to mine: Why KYC is extremely dangerous – and useless (I believe that Sarah Azhari, quoted below, will be very interested in reading 1miau's topic.)
your story worries me, if I already have KYC, what can I do now? Well, first of all you should inform the ones having your personal information that they do not have your consent anymore for processing your personal information. And according to GDPR, they should agree to delete the information they have about you. However, GDPR is recognized only in Europe, therefore if you will address to a company from the rest of the world, GDPR will be useless. If they won't agree, you will have to sue them. do they really clean up my database KYC if I did cancel my membership or delete my account? It mostly depends on who is "they". If "they" are a honest business, they should delete your personal information upon your request. The problem is that you may never know for sure if they did it... Furthermore, in case you gave your personal information for something which has a financial connection, then your data will be deleted in 3-5 years (if they will ever delete it)... I also do not know how to sue them, because like my experience in past, where the Facebook case "Cambridge Analytic", give my KYC on a third party to a consultant company. Until now I don't know how to sue (1 BTC) Mark Zuckerberg because I've already KYC (taken a picture and sent my ID Card) before. You have to contact a lawyer from your country. I don't know your country laws, nor who you want to sue... But best advice is this: (1) contact the ones having your personal information and let them know that you don't consent to have your data anymore; (2) wait for their answer; (3) if the answer is positive, you can only hope they will actually delete your data; (4) if their answer is negative or if they don't answer at all, then contact a lawyer. You may never know what may happen with your data. And, as you saw in the story from OP, an identity theft is a living hell... If you wish, you can keep us posted with what progress you made. |
|
|
|
einen sehr ähnlichen faden zu identitätsklau hat vor ungefähr 3 jahren 1miau in unserem dt. bereich erstelt Warum KYC keine Lösung, sondern eine Gefahr istdort ist jetzt nicht explizit die wahre geschichte des rumänischen bürgers dargestellt aber in grunde genommen soll der faden über das gleiche thema informieren Ich würde nicht davon ausgehen, dass die Themen dasselbe Thema haben ... 1miau beschreibt die Risiken, die mit KYC verbunden sind, während ich darstelle, wie sich das Leben ändert, wenn Ihre Identität gestohlen wird. Ich würde diese beiden Artikel eher als einander ergänzend betrachten
Danke für die Übersetzung @AHOYBRAUSE und @GazetaBitcoin für die Story. Es freut mich zu hören, dass dir der Artikel gefällt!
Danke für die Übersetzung des Textes von GazetaBitcoin. Und die Geschichte passt ja perfekt in unseren lokalen Forumsbereich, da die im Text betroffene Person seit 8 Jahren in Deutschland lebt. Ich freue mich sehr, dass meine Artikel Ihr lokales Gremium erreichen. Im Ernst, es ist ein tolles Gefühl, die eigenen Worte in verschiedene Sprachen übersetzt zu sehen... Und das Beste daran ist, dass wir alle aus dieser traurigen Geschichte lernen können.
Ich kann dazu mal einen ausführlichen Artikel schreiben fall das jemanden interessiert. Hat auch etwas mit Bitcoin usw zu tun, passt also auch hier ins Forum. Ich würde wirklich gerne deine Geschichte lesen, AHOYBRAUSE. Sie haben meine volle Unterstützung für das Schreiben Ihrer Erfahrung! |
|
|
|
|
Danke AHOYBRAUSE für dein Interesse mein Thema ins Deutsche zu übersetzen! Ich freue mich sehr, dass meine Schriften Menschen aus der ganzen Welt erreichen! Gut gemacht!
Ich hoffe wirklich, dass die in diesem Thread dargestellte Geschichte, die eine sehr traurige Geschichte ist, allen deutschen Nutzern mehr Bewusstsein für die Gefahren bringt, die mit zentralisiertem Börsen verbunden sind. Zu sehen, was jemand leben kann, nachdem sein eigener Name gestohlen wurde, sollte uns alle dazu bringen zweimal darüber nachzudenken, bevor wir unsere persönlichen Daten an Dritte weitergeben.
Und wie ihr sehen könnt, kann euch nicht einmal die Polizei in einer solchen Situation helfen. Was kannst man tun? Selbst die Änderung des eigenen Namens wird das Problem nicht lösen da dies möglicherweise noch mehr Verdacht bei den Behörden erregt. Lohnt es sich mit der Angst zu leben irgendwo verhaftet zu werden? Dies kann jedoch passieren, wenn man zentralisierte Börsen verwendet die jederzeit gehackt werden können. Oder noch schlimmer, sie können deine persönlichen Daten immer verkaufen!
|
|
|
|
16. Circuitul tranzacțiilorînapoi la Cuprins
La Conferința Bitcoin 2013 care a avut loc la San Jose, California, 1, Olivier Coutu, de la Universitatea din Montreal, Canada, a oferit un Circuit al Tranzacțiilor, prezentând o teorie a rețelei pentru a structura tranzacțiile Bitcoin care formează circuite complexe, făcând mai dificilă urmărirea identităților participanților implicați. 2 Există mai multe concepte rețelistice utilizate în circuitul tranzacțiilor, cum ar fi: - Rețeaua Butterfly3 - Rețeaua Beneš4 Sursă: Imagine a Retelei Beneš de pe Wikipedia4Circuitul tranzacțiilor va face o provocare din analizarea identității posesorilor adreselor Bitcoin implicate în aceste tranzacții, întrucât anonimitatea este sporită. 5Totuși, matematica din spate este una complexă, până acum nefiind create implementări ușor de utilizat. 6Protocolul nu are nimic original în particular. La prima vedere, conceptul de circuit al tranzacțiilor este similar cu CoinJoin. Olivier Coutu a prezentat Circuitul Tranzacțiilor (Mixere Descentralizate pentru Bitcoin) la conferința Bitcoin, în mai 2013, în timp ce invenția CoinJoin a lui Gregory Maxwell a apărut în august 2013. Ulterior au apărut și alte concepte mai simple, cum ar fi cele implementate de Taaki și Martin (însă ideea inițială a fost, de asemenea, inseparabilă de conceptul CoinJoin propus de Gregory Maxwell). 6
Referințe:
1. Bitcoin 2013 conference - Olivier Coutu - Decentralized Mixers for Bitcoin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hc8qaR_Fok
2. Olivier Coutu, Privacy in Bitcoin through decentralized mixers
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/151552849.pdf
3. Martin Collier. A systematic analysis of equivalence in multistage networks. Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 20, No. 9, September 2002
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9c3a/5530f8492dc63d200f08080ea93c2f0cd6ac.pdf
4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clos_network
5. Dimaz Ankaa Wijaya, Bitcoin Tingkat Lanjut, pg. 60: Puspantara, 2016
https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=EEFgDQAAQBAJ&hl=en&pg=GBS.PA60
6. Vitalik Buterin, Trustless Bitcoin Anonymity Here at Last, 2013
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/trustless-bitcoin-anonymity-here-at-last-1377737692
- Alte referințe: vezi postarea #1
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
