I don't understand the logic on why the upcoming election in the US will be pivotal in giving Bitcoin another ATH. America with all her shenanigan towards Bitcoin can never be said to aid it. I don't believe it will boost BTC price. What I know is that there's going to be some alts floated to raise money for major front runners in the elections and that's as far as it goes. Those alts can blossom but I don't see that transcending to Bitcoin. It's a coin–cidence that the US election is the same year of Bitcoin halving and that makes it look like it has any impact on it. It doesn't.

The choice of either hodling a stablecoin or fiat is a simple one for me to make, owing to the inflation in my country. With USDT, I'm well covered. I intend to keep hodling it till the situation improves. Those who left money in the bank last year have a better half of their savings lost in devaluation because of the double digits inflation in the country.

Well, that will depend on the time of the season the market is in. It's not always rosy for cryptos. They're times when it becomes obvious not to hodl cryptos that aren't stablecoins. At such a time, it's better hodling fiat than hodling those cryptos that depreciate in value.

Nope, I ain't one of those who believe hodling is better than trading. For me, nothing compares to trading but you've to be good at it to profit from it. Why let your coin lie there when you can afford to trade it and increase its quantity if you know how to trade? Those who scream hodling is better know they can't trade and that's why they choose to play safe by hodling. From whatever angle you look at it – as a project or as an investor, trading increases the value of a project because it subjects it to the market where forces of demand and supply play on it. Hodling doesn't have that ability. Bitcoin was able to attain its value from the 10,000 BTC exchange for two pizzas, remember that famous exchange?

Whether popular or not, you can resell whatever alts you buy provided there's no rugpull on it and liquidity is still there. Again, whenever you're buying alts, especially on Dexs, don't add them using monikers/names. Get their CAs (Contract Addresses) to add them. That way you're extremely sure of what alts you're dealing with.

I had to laugh real hard when I read your submission just now 😂. I don't blame you on that. Anyone from our part of the world would also think the same thing. I did actually when I first heard about that meme a few weeks ago. However, that's not what the project team is saying. Mumu doesn't mean the "Ode" or senselessness/uselessness it portrays in our local parlance. Mumu is the sound cattle make. So, it's talking about the cattle that will bull (bull run).

Anyone investing in the project should be careful anyway and know the chain on which they're buying. There's one on Solana and the other on ETH. Both are completely different. It's not like it's the same project that is floated on different chains. Nope, they're completely different project. Here's Mumu the Bull on Solana Chain, and here's Mumu the Bull on ETH Chain. Compare their prices and you will find out the difference.

I like the part where wallets are asked to be submitted. It gives me the impression that project is seriously cooking something and is likely to go public soon. I just saw this thread now. Has snapshot been taken already? Is it too late to jump in? Thirdly, can it be assed on phone?

That's my guess too. The redundancy of such a topic for discussion would've made it boring to mods who possibly have realized that such topics cause spamming on the forum. To abate spamming, moving such topics to the "Off-Topic" section easily do the magic. That won't be far from mods decision for moving OP's thread. Users in signature campaigns have less allure posting there because posts in Off-Topic don't count towards the weekly quota in signature campaigns.

You can say that again. In all ramifications, this forum is a win-win for all; except scammers because they easily get sniffed out. For genuine users here, they can tell how greatly this forum has impacted them but it doesn't waste time disciplining erring ones breaking rules here. I cut my teeth here and in all modesty I can say my crypto journey has taken a leap better than what it would've been without coming here.

Whatever you do, steer clear of plagiarism and sundry offences of breaking forum rules and you will surely have a smooth ride here, cross fertilizing ideas with others and earning in the process.

Your advice was a good one. It shows you're looking out for your friend, genuinely. The only issue with this is that you've stuck you neck out too long that it can easily get bruised. People easily want to blame others when things go wrong with their lives. This is what will happen if your friend takes your advice and something bad happens to that decision. He will find a way to blame you for that. Hackers and scammers are the bane of this industry, besides government. I hope you told your friend about wallet security and let him know how to take care of all that. Again, endeavour to also tell him about Bitcoin circle and that it's not always rosy for Bitcoin. It has its down moment, and it's a scary one. If I were you, I would just tell him about Bitcoin investment but I won't stick out my neck that much by telling him to throw the company's funds into it. Remember how antagonistic the government is towards Bitcoin. Don't forget that government legislation can turn things 360 degrees overnight.

You think so? I don't. Wait until you interview him and hear how on the contrary he thinks. $4 billion away from that networth leaves him with $29b. That's more than 10% off his worth. It's a hell of cash, except you're equating it with what price to pay for his freedom.

Well, if one's lucky and gets successful that way one can be thought to be smart. If the reverse happens, one is called stupid. For me, I don't think it's a wise decision to sell all and invest in Bitcoin or any other project/asset. There ought to be something set aside in case it goes sour. It surely does most times, trust me. There's a reason that caveat in this industry that no one should invest what they can't afford to lose exists. That's because there's so much uncertainty in this industry.

Why would anyone agree to go into such an arrangement if not that they want to make themselves slaves to their savings. It should be the other way round. Money is supposed to be man's slave. That's the essence of saving up so one can recall one's savings when emergencies arise. Even if I would consider leaving huge amount of cash in a bank, I will never succumb to this arrangement of locking up my savings.

They used to do that in my country a few years ago. I found that out when I cared about what banks were doing with the little cash I had with them. Then it was three months of not making withdrawal on accounts to qualify for the interest. I don't know if banks still do that now or not. This day, the crave for crypto investments has discouraged me (I guess many too) from keeping cash with banks. I'm so much enjoying it. The little I make now goes into investments.

OP, you stylishly left a telegram link so you can get people off here to a place that might end up exposing their safety. Even the other site address you left here is suspect to me. I'm not sure how many users who would want to click or test those random links you put out here. I'm not saying what you're advertising is a scam or not but it's going to very hard getting people to trust you on that and the links you've supplied. I'm not one to experiment with random links from untrusted sources.

It's actually a crazy world. For civility sakes, let's say it's sheer carelessness that makes people do something as irrational as what happened. Otherwise, I would just put it as stupidity too. It's sad that people still get to lose their funds this way when they can easily get burner wallets to try these things out. It doesn't cost much time to create one. Just a few minutes.

Having loads of money doesn't bestow wisdom on people. Being wealthy doesn't also mean one is that smart. They could stumble on wealth through inheritance too. Does that also make them smart and rich? Of course, not.

I don't know if you're a noob in cryptos outside this forum as it's suggestive of your rank here. If you're a newbie and virtually a newcomer to this industry, my advice to you would be to steer clear off unpopular sites. Stick to sites that are popular or you do your research first before committing to them. Scammers are getting wiser. Do all you can to avoid anything that's not clear to you. For me, I'm not one who likes trying new things that involve financial commitment until I know it's genuine. The site you mentioned is a new one to me. I wouldn't send funds to it if I were you. If an exchange isn't rated on popular coin sites, I don't give it a second thought.

This was contrary to what I expected from this government. If anything, the second part of your comment captures what my thought was of this administration. Already, their body language even before getting into office was obvious what their disposition would be towards anything that would give the masses financial emancipation. A government that believed the youth were unruly and daring because they demanded fair treatment and withdrawal of the menacing SARs in a demonstration to #endsars and some of them were brutally murdered at the Lekki tollgate in Lagos. Yes, it could've happened under the watch of the Buhari led-administration but those alleged to have been behind that command to shoot those innocent and armless demonstrators are chiefly in this present administration. They're key players now. So, what do you expect?

To be honest with you, I fear the worse for cryptocurrencies under this government. Maybe what we're experiencing now is just a tip of the iceberg.

This is exactly the point that should be canvassed. It shouldn't necessarily be about a particular wallet. We humans are supposed to be responsible for the safety of our wallets (and other stuff we make use of). Again, I've been using Trust Wallet as far back as first quarters of 2021 and I've had funds in the wallet from then till now without having any issue of hack or breach. 2021 till now is a whole three years and nothing has happened to that particular wallet. The mistake many people make is to expose main wallets they use and make them vulnerable by clicking on links connected to their browser. If anyone has a wallet with funds, it's advisable not to interact directly with DApps on the wallet. Just buy funds with another wallet and move it to the main wallet or simply buy using the project's CA. Don't engage in any other thing on the site so as not to click on phishing links.

I guess many who exchanged their 10 million tokens for a voucher regret doing that as their expectations of a higher price on the market hasn't been met. Though those who first got the vouchers sold into several Toncoins and made a kill out of it. Now, according to what I read online, those who exchanged for vouchers will have to exchange the vouchers to $wNOT and to $NOT back via a Shardify.app. I think those who rushed in first to get vouchers will, in one way or the other, be in loss by the time they take care of the  back and forth requirements to move back through the project.

Nobody keeps secret forever. There's always that one person we find a way to confide in. There's always that person who shares our dreams, foresight and aspiration. However, while talking about our success we should be mindful not to reveal all. Keep your jokers to yourself.

That's the reason we should be mindful of those we share information with. Like you said at the end of your post, don't go babbling.

That makes the two of us 🧐. In fact, someone recently addressed me as a crypto lord simply because he was one of those I told about Bitcoin when I newly got into this industry in my exuberance to introduce them to financial independence. It sounded weird to me because the person he addressed as a crypto lord isn't even a shrimp. I'm less of a crayfish.

It's for these reasons I feel happy I didn't know about Bitcoin then. I'm cocksure one of those would've been my lot too. I know how bad I feel whenever I remember that I bought over 200 BNB in 2017 at less than a dollar per unit but sold off before price could hit even $4. It's either I would've sold too early or the device for saving my Bitcoin would've been impracticable to retrieve it from there.

I believe whoever that's behind the Satoshi persona won't want to push all to the market at once if they decide to make the rumoured wallet said to belong to Satoshi active. It will surely be a quiet and gradual sell off.

Sentimentally, I think LTC should do well considering that it's still way below its ATH. If you allow me to make a prediction here, I think it will do up to $400+. At the moment, the price of LTC is disappointing anyway. I bought a few of it a few days to its current halving around $84 or so in expectation that price would fly like what we've known Bitcoin for. Surprisingly, price dipped after its halving even till date. If it ever has an ETF in the future, it may (just saying) not push price up like a Bitcoin ETF did. I'm still hodling to see what happens to its price this bull season but I won't be hodling that long like you.

Moderators are humans. Humans aren't always right/correct. However, their egos may be on the way of their admission of their wrong.

That's an option OP should seek recourse to. There had been a few instances where such an act of moving back threads succeeded after threads were (wrongly) moved. Though  OP would've stood a better chance at it if they laced that thread with more fact findings and illustrations, exemplifying it as true gambling topic.