But still, it is annoying and should be fixed in a correct way (by broadcasting the checkpoint) as otherwise cryptsy could easily reject the 'application'.
The checkpoint is being broadcasted, the checkpoint was updated on 24/12 I'm thinking this problem happens when the cpu gets overloaded during the sync or if memory drops too low, I am looking into the problem and will let you guys know when if I can narrow it down further! Cool beans, thanks. Yeah it's weird. I can tell you my memory load isn't even near half when this thing fires up or runs, nor are any of my cpu cores. |
|
|
|
Oh, sorry bout that haha.. I'll go edit my review Usually if it's not specified in my reviews, I go with defaults (ie, I don't specify it). For lookup gap, I don't specify it, so cgminer defaults to 2 (which supposedly is most efficient for scrypt). For intensity, I'm balls to the wall baby, 20 all the way. Here's my actual config from the rig running 492kh, with no HW errors, a bajillion accepts and 0.01% rejects: "intensity" : "20", "worksize" : "256", "kernel" : "scrypt", "thread-concurrency" : "24000", "api-port" : "4028", "expiry" : "120", "gpu-engine" : "1145", "gpu-memclock" : "1500", "gpu-powertune" : "20", "temp-overheat":"87", "temp-target":"50", "log" : "5", "no-pool-disable" : true, "queue" : "1", "scan-time" : "60", "scrypt" : true, "shares" : "0", "kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin" As to the meter: http://www.amazon.com/P3-International-P4400-Electricity-Monitor/dp/B00009MDBU/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1389241972&sr=8-1&keywords=kilowatt+meter |
|
|
|
|
I was going to place a large order, and maybe I'll kick myself later for not doing it, but it just didn't jive with me, something didn't fit.
One thing which didn't help, they're ignoring all of their own threads across forums. That's truly odd. Unless they're relying solely on the newsletter pump they've been doing, but still, why ignore forums where you originally were "born" from?
|
|
|
|
I think that from KNC's point of view the Neptune discount pre-order was the opportunity to re-invest. I'm still hopeful they will release some Jupiters because of that statement to keep coins handy.
It's a shame they didn't discount them further for current customers. They're far overpriced, and if it's anything like a Jupiter which costs about $1,000 to make, KNC is definitely doing themselves well. Nothing wrong with that, but just looking at it from the angle of "couldve said a bigger thank you" to their batch 1 customers. |
|
|
|
|
Holy mother, that was like an 18 hour block or something. I found 18225, > 400,000 shares, I'm on giftcoinpool.com.
Retarget on this coin is nuts too high, and blocks are taking far too long. Network hash is too low also.
Also something I've never seen before, there's pretty much no rejects being reported on my end. Out of about 7million "accepts" from cgminer, there are 288 rejects. That seems really odd.
|
|
|
|
|
Engine / Memory / KH / Temp / Watt (all @ 24000 TC, stock cooler)
1030 / 1500 / 445 / 60C / 163w
1080 / 1500 / 467 / 61C / 168w
1115 / 1500 / 480 / 61C / 172w
1130 / 1500 / 485 / 61C / 174w
1145 / 1500 / 492 / 61C / 175w
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's a very stand-up and honorable thing to help out 'toe the way you have, definitely treating him like a mate.
With that said, I wouldn't worry about our pool having a majority hashrate. Remember, there are chinese whales out there with mind-boggling hash. If they want to take the netrate over, they can do it in the flip of a switch. Some of them with nearly a gigahash of power.
|
|
|
|
The way alt coins are heading I'm probaly a dumba ss but i'm going to grab a pile of card and will need some of these.
PM or email me for next buy and can someone link me to a thread for gpu choices?
I'm looking for hash per watt comparisons. So don't just drop the wiki page please.
Check out some of the 270X cards.. here's a brief review I did of one: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=324938.msg4357553#msg4357553I have more inbound. |
|
|
|
Holy shite.... wife just called to tell me I got the gigabyte cards already. I ordered them 26 hours ago. Best Amazon seller ever lol.
-Fuse
<-- Jealous =P Mine won't be here till Monday. |
|
|
|
Bio, if you need a killowatt meter, put one in your amazon wishlist and I'll buy it for you.
Great idea. Thank you for offering to do this for him.  |
|
|
|
Nice setup, but man those cards are hot. Thanks for posting, nice to see these working. |
|
|
|
|
Any personal details on this justin fellow? name, address?
|
|
|
|
|
Keep the updates coming.
Aside from the btc, what's the status of who owns the code/rights to bitbay, the idea, etc?
|
|
|
|
|
Bio, if you need a killowatt meter, put one in your amazon wishlist and I'll buy it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
Speaking of reseller links, feel free to use mine lol. Nobody has so far. In one sense, i can't blame them if they're going to order like 10 or 50 themselves using their own referral code. Was hoping the folks buying individual units would use it. Eventual goal is to provide a good portion of the profits to charities which accept BTC directly, as well as others. If I ever get traction on it, I'll throw up a thread detailing it.
Community giving back to community.
|
|
|
|
|
Broke down and grabbed some VisionTek and Sapphire 270x's to give them a shot. I'll only open one of each and see if I like them, and if not, Amazon will take them all back haha..
Now that I've used most of my available giftcards, with my luck the other cards I've been wanting will come in stock.. hahaha
The goal is to put 5 of these into the ASRock 970EX4 motherboard and reach 2.3-2.5mh using less than 950watts.
|
|
|
|
|
Bigger question is, what else has been compromised? Cubits v3? Scifi coin exchange? What next? Who's taking the lead on BitBay? Sounds like Cassie was the manager/idea person, but her workforce has taken the work and the money.
Further tinfoil speculation: It was all a ruse to begin with to get coins, and everyone played their parts?
|
|
|
|
EDIT - How are you fellows getting your GPU's to run at TC24,000... I cannot get a single card of mine to run at that speed... max is TC22,400 if I am lucky... I am not specifying shaders, work size, lookup gap, nothing... except TC24,000... and every time I get a memory error on every machine and every card... Here is an example of my batch file... cgminer --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://tag.cryptopool.it:3338 -u tagging.1 -p x --thread-concurrency 24000 -I 13 --gpu-fan 75-85 --auto-fan --temp-target 83 --temp-overheat 84 --temp-cutoff 90 --gpu-memclock 1500 --auto-gpu --gpu-engine 350-1040 --gpu-powertune 20 --expiry 1 --scan-time 1 --queue 0 --no-submit-stale -o stratum+tcp://tagmining.com:3333 -u 24Kilo.1 -p xDo I not have enough RAM... 2GB of DDR3 1333... not enough power... 750W - 35A per rail... this even happens with a single card set-up... I am using Windows 7... no idea... cgminer will not even start. I am using auto-gpu to help with overheating... but that does not seem to make a difference... any advice?  System ram doesn't have much to do with scrypt mining, and your PSU is fine. I think I know which memory error you're referring to.. it relates to mapping the GPU memory, which relates to TC. Target TC is usually best determined by multiplying the card's bus width by 64. For most 7950's, the bus width is 384, so that times 64 is 24675. I would try that and then go down by 64 until you find something which works. 24512...24448..24384... etc. Also before testing, I would make a backup copy of all the .bin files cgminer creates and set them aside somewhere, then I would delete them from the cgminer folder. This way cgminer is starting fresh. Next, make a startup config where you specify 0 for engine and memory clocks, let cgminer go with the default clock speeds until you find TC which works. I would also try my scrypt.bin file once more at some point, especially since you're getting rid of all the .bin files in the cgminer folder during this testing. Put mine in there and set your engine to 1130 and memory to 1250 and TC to 24000, and see what it does. Let us know how it all goes. |
|
|
|
Sounds like for the "first time", they're floundering on their word. A month ago they confirmed they would in fact be selling Jupiters by now (actually, by now they should've been shipped). Now they're quiet.
Either they're releasing the Neptune much earlier than anticipated, like next month, or they're simply going to ignore their word.
Where did they confirm that they would be selling Jupiters by now. KNC never made such a statement so you can't hold them to that statement. I'm only going what I kept in my notes, an email someone posted. Might be wrong. Then again, they may have gotten folks' attention away from buying competing hash by doing this, which could've been a side benefit of the statement all along. if KnC sells Jupiters now it would be like a huge ..l.. to everyone that bought a neptune.
Jupiters in 30 days vs Neptune in 90-180 days? No. KNC was just quoted at CES saying they are responsible for 70% of the network right now...
Unless they manufactured 14,000 Jupiters, I'd say that's bullshit. See my math in a previous post. Wasn't their original order book in the 13,000 range for all products? They had a certain number of orders for batch 1 private customers, and a separate batch for corporate/large-number purchasers, didn't they? I remember doing the math on this and that, at the time batch 1 would've been equal to like 30 or 40% of the total hashpower. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
