You ever asked yourself why you are always loosing in casinos?
Are you searching for advice on how to get better in gambling?
Obviously, if you are gambling addicted and you want to stop, you should stop.
With gambling comes great risk.
However, if you still want to gamble I can help.
I'm in profit on almost any crypto casino.
This all sounds very controverse but in reality,
its a way to make chances work with you instead against you.
If you want to start winning,
contact telegram @blockxs
And of course you aren't providing any proof. It's actually quite insulting how gullible you think people in here are. And it doesn't sound "very controverse". It sounds like a lie because it's a lie. Alternative to lie is that you are using other illegal exploits on casinos and it's only matter of time when you get caught. But i doubt you would see that effort as you didn't even make any effort for fake proof. For some reason this kind of scamming grind my gears more then all the meme token scams combined. At least memes are fun. This is just blatant lying and exploiting. Other alternative is some money laundering scam, in which people in here are taking a part to a crime and in best case getting their ids to watch lists and ruin all of their accounts by doing that. |
|
|
|
-cut-
As gambler How do you deal with loss?
Difficulty to process that is easier to understand when we realize that we are really unequipped to deal with winnings either. Feeling from winning is obviously easier to handle, but it comes with an expection that we would eventually win anyway, so winning is kind of relief. And when we subconsciously assume that we are going to win, it means that in our head we create this feeling of entitlement or feeling that we are owed to. That's why we aren't really mentally prepared for the loss. It just feels wrong, and many people can't seem to understand why they keep losing. From these people we hear these crazy ideas that we should just play more, or what we should loan money to jump back into profits, because they think it's just a matter of time. It's not. It's a matter of probability, which is very different thing and is usually misconstrued equal to matter of time. Short answer is that my process is that i avoid situations where i would spend so much, that i would have to deal with those feelings, as i don't deal with them well either. But i do process them by acknowledging that those feelings exist and just FEEL them, like mental health experts recommend, so that those feelings don't control me after that. |
|
|
|
One major reason is that RF Kennedy running as independent steals many votes from Biden according to the polls. So there's once again going to be fierce competition in swing states for each candidate to grab electors.
And there's also many working class left-wing voters that feel as if Biden has completely failed them and their families with his promises.
Biden underdelivered on promises of healthcare and student loans which was a huge disappointment to many left wing Americans especially after the Biden campaign had shot Berlie's presidential bid on the foot.
And then there's also issues that are important for many people. For instance Biden underdelivered on environmental issues.
And also Biden grossly underdelivered on humanitarian issues where he continued to allow and promote a genocide to take place in Gaza... This especially has angered people so much that people heckle Biden about it everywhere he goes, in all of his rallies.
So really while Trump got overwhelming support from his Party's members, Biden seems to be losing people from his traditionally left-wing base all around, which is never a good sign. Many people will be voting third party or not be turning up to vote at all. So this is a situation that favors Trump who still maintains a strong base.
I am really amazed if Kennedy are indeed overlapping with biden voters. Considering what that guy is talking about it's really far from any democrat, but i guess i have to trust the analysis of people who have studied this. Personally i can't get my head wrapped around that. And i would believe that voters of Biden would know why that student loan forgiveness fail wasn't really fault of Biden. I totally believe that could be still coming, if they find a waterproof way to deliver that. With Gaza i totally agree with. I can't really defend his actions or lack of actions on that. At least he finally has said something how it should stop, but that was really bad call. But i don't have a clue that for how many people this is a key issue. But i am certain that they won't flip fully for trump either. |
|
|
|
Hi community,
I remember when I was in middle school, we used to play cards almost every day, and our stupidity reached the point where we would skip classes while we were inside school. The method of playing was easy, as the largest number was the winning card. So, some of my friends and I would gather in the middle school bathroom and make bets with the money that we had collected from selling cigarettes.
Of course, this is not something I am proud of and I do not recommend it to everyone, but it's just childhood memories .
-Have you ever bet at the wrong place and the wrong time?
Does strip poker and removing clothes count as crazy? But yeah, i've betted for other weird chores even if that's not counted. We have used poker when we were students as a tool similar to rock paper scissors or shortest straw, when someone needs to do someting. And sometimes we upped the stakes in real game when someone lost their money and they offered to humiliate themselves. Like running naked on the street or similar, or agreeing to do dishes for a month etc. I once got full plastic bag of different fine cheeses from my friend as he offered those when he ran out of money. I also got movies, before they were easy to copy or there was a streaming possibility. And i once i lost my bike for a bet. That one i actually still regret. |
|
|
|
Gambling problem is a serious issue which has affected the millions of gamblers in the world generally. While anyone can develop a problem with gambling, i tend to understand that race has more to contribute to the problems of gambling in the society. Most historical practices and traditional system of gambling practices within the different race has an influence and if a gambler do not take these things into consideration he would face more problems as a gambler.
Africans have little of gambling addict because they have only local gambling shops (lack of economic opportunities to improve the level of gambling). so they rarely reach full addiction. While in some other part of the world like the white, they are more likely to have co-occurring gambling disorders because of depression or anxiety. And other races have high rate of gambling problems due to the presence of casinos on reservations, for example in Asia.
Maybe you should use word "region" instead of "race", since you obviously mean that as you are talking about different parts of the world, local gambling shops and such. And these days we speak of about different cultures rather than race, in context like this. But answer to your question is no. Why would race have anything to do with that? Different genomes can affect into addiction, like in situations where you inherit ADHD from your parents or grand parents etc, but no proof has found of a singular gene that would affect to that. But again, that has nothing to do with race. Region however can affect to it with culture and attitude towards gambling, and obviously laws and regulations can determine how much people are subjected to advertising, what age limits there are, how easy access they have, and if there are any support in these areas for the addicts that are easily available. |
|
|
|
I really hope so many will wake up and see Elon for who he really is. I cringe when people call him the real life Tony Stark (Iron Man). The guys never made a hamburger, let alone a car or a rocket or a payment system..not shit. Is he incredibly good at being a salesmen..one the all time greatest..but I think his ego talked him in to buying twitter, which was not a good investment, the place is still an utter cesspool of bullshit, hatred, racism, bigotry etc etc. He is not the right guy to run that company. I just do not get the appeal in the man one tiny bit.
I doubt that his fans never see him as he is though. I remember when i hadn't done any research about him, and i actually thought he had good pretty good pr. And i totally saw him as an iron man. Like did marvel as well, by putting him into iron man movie. But after he called that diver who was part of a team that saved those kids from a cave a pedo, i started to wonder what kind of man elon actually is. If he had shut up, he still could enjoy that legendary status, but then he opened his mouth more. So i had to look more closely, and to my surprise, all i found was more smoke and mirrors. Man buys companies, and doesn't design anything. If anything he tries to act like steve jobs and order people around telling to cut costs and safety and just do stuff. He wanted to be be known as founder of tesla, even if he really wasn't, and some kind of rocket engineer even when he wasn't. His big ideas seemed to be childish and way he talks about science is just amazingly dumb. I have seen actual scientist explaining stuff and when people know what they are talking about they don't try to evade subjects and speak as vaguely like elon. I had to sell my twitter account because of his bigotry and right now he is just retweeting extreme rightwingers and rumors with texts like "conserning" or "interesting" and no research or sources seem to be needed for the stats he is interested in. |
|
|
|
BTC has been "pumped" massively ever since the spot ETFs were approved in the US a few months ago. The rise has been exponential, making BTC reach a new ATH before the halving. This has never happened before in the history of crypto (AFAIK). Considering that BTC is in a new ATH, I wonder if the halving is already priced in? If that's the case, then market prices will remain relatively the same post-halving. Don't you think? Your input would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.  My experience and pure feeling about markets tells me it's not priced in. I am not reading all predictions from others or TA at this point as i knew it's going to be a bumpy ride. During every huge bull markt there are always some perma bears ready who will jump to push their agenda when ever there's a slightest dip, and they see that as a confirmation for their bias. And of course once in a blue moon they are right, but this is not the time. And this goes both ways, as there are perma bulls as well. Everyone who have seen few actual bull runs should see that we are in the middle of one of them. And they always have bounces because that's how volatility works. I would be really worried if bitcoin would just keep going up without any corrections. |
|
|
|
I greet the house,
I want to share an experience I had today at my work place , so we called for an interview, during the interview an applicant curriculum vitae (CV) was checked and under the column of hobbies the applicant put Forex trading, my question to him was how is forex trading your hobby? He didn't really give a concrete answer to that , so on getting home I made a research on the following
1. A skill was defined as a Special ability or technique acquired by special training in either an intellectual or physical area
2. A hobby was also defined as an activity done regularly in one's leisure time for pleasure
So as a skill forex trading is technical and acquired through special training and then applied to the physical trading market, while as a hobby traders trade regularly mostly when the trader is less busy and also most traders trade for fun,
So considering these points I can say that forex trading is a skill and also an hobby, your opinions are much well welcomed.
I don't get how these to would exclude each other. Why couldn't something require skill and be a hobby, as every hobby i know requires a skill to be good in it. And you can polish your skills with a hobby. In fact it's most likely that you can polish them more with hobby, as hobby is something you are passionate about and keep on getting better naturally, as you are interested about it and studying it in your free time. Training something you can force yourself to do and learn the basics and some nyances without liking it or getting insightful and good at it. But i think you are actually asking if it's considered as work or a hobby. That would be sensible question. If you learn skills trough your hobby, you will be enjoying your work, as you can apply skills you are best at right to it. |
|
|
|
That turd gives a brain injury a bad rep just by associating with it. And yeah, if trump's team is better, let's ask them. I mean people who worked with trump closely how brilliant he is shall we? Those best people he chose to work with? What do you mean they aren't reliable sources? How could that be? What would they even say? Would they say that he is an "idiot”, "unhinged", "dangerous", "sociopath" or a "narcisstic". Or all of them? Trump hired the "best people" so they must be reliable. I wonder why all Biden's closest employees aren't writing similar stuff about him? Or maybe we should just ask opinions from dictators of other countries, because they can be trusted, as it couldn't be in any way their best interest to destabilize USA. Or maybe let's look at the facts and what that rapist been convicted for so far? Or maybe we should focus on currect "best people" he is doing business with? https://thehill.com/business/4570973-trump-social-media-company-sues-co-founders/None of this means that Trump supplied any of the funds that killed something like 600,000 people in Ukraine and the ME. Perhaps he did. But prove it. You jokers are so odd. Anybody and everybody makes mistakes. But you almost totally ignore the hundreds of thousands of people Biden's team helped to die. And you focus on Trump in a negative way... that he is cleaning up the Swamp, starting in his own organization. -cut- Making shit up and demanding others to prove it isn't how real world works. If logic isn't your field, why you try to use that in an argument? Countries are helping Ukraine because, not helping them will lead to chaos in EU. And stability of EU benefits everyone, except countries who benefit from the disorder in EU and their trade allies like USA. But i was talking about Biden's and Trump's teams as you praised Trump's team, and somehow best thing you got from it that Trump is clearing the swamp? You left out that he literally made that swamp by his own hands and keeps on making more of it. So saying no one is perfect is just beyond hilarious at this point. And again, let's hear what his best people are talking, because while Trump might be better than Jesus to you, people close to him doesn't seem to think so. |
|
|
|
On one hand, it may seem that it is impossible to take control over emotions while trading, but at the same time, everything is possible in trading in case of constant learning, seamless practice and pure desire to attain goals in the financial industry. Handling emotions that appear once a trader bears losses or even faces a whole loss streak is a matter of experience. Supposing that one only begins their journey in trading. In that case, emotions are inevitable because the organism, namely the (Amygdala) in your brain, turns on the defensive mechanism, which is revealed via emotions, usually negative ones such as despair, fear, disappointment, anger and others.
Professional traders or, at least, those who have acquired particular experience in trading understand a couple of simple rules that prevent excessive emotional bursts, rules such as:
1. Do not overtrade, always allocate time for relaxing and purifying the mind.
2. Do not abuse leverage.
3. Do not place high hopes on trading, always stay alert.
4. Act wisely and appeal to a rational sense rather than an emotional component.
These are some of the key points about trading that are understood by those who have gained some experience.
In case one faces a loss streak, and there is a need to handle bad emotions that force them to give up trading and leave the market, it is recommended to look at things soberly, turning on analytical thinking. Analyzing mistakes is one of those "pills" that can help to understand that the market is operated by regularities. It means that there is always a chance to conduct analysis correctly, even though it requires a bit more time than usual before opening the position. The prudent approach to analysis includes not only an analysis of made mistakes but also a review of successful deals because they have led to success.
If nothing helps to deal with emotions, one can try different practices that are highly recommended in trading circles, such as meditation, mindfulness exercises, and others. They are aimed at relieving mental pain, suppressing negative thoughts, and gradually substituting them with positive ones. It is also of utmost importance not to approach the market while having anger or irritation because, in this case, actions are driven by emotions, not by rational sense.
These are some methods and practices I think traders could use in controlling their emotions when they lose while trading, you could give your opinions or add more if you got any, also I'm open to corrections so feel free to include some corrections in any statement you feel I'm wrong.
Adding 5: rememeber to set stop losses will help you relax And i have spoken about this before, but i feel i need to repeat myself as those comments get buried after threads die: I wouldn't ever trade angry, and mindfullness etc are good ways to approach dealing with feelings, i agree with that. But some times i see people assuming that handling bad emotions is same thing as suppressing them or ignoring them. Which is the worst way to deal with them. And focusing on rationality is easier said than done, because our brains don't operate without feelings. They are part of the process even when it comes to rational thinking. And being aware of how you feel is really important, as other people who are all in or out of crypto will be feeling same fomo or fear as you would, and that helps you predict their moves. You don't have to act on how you feel, but lots of others will, and more you wait to act, less likely you are in ahead of the pack. |
|
|
|
|
I don't think any exchanges offer that yet,
But i have heard that there's demand for that, as many people see high leverage trading similar to gambling and because casinos already have legal obligation to offer self exclusion option. (At least for some regions). So it would make sense that high leverage crypto exchanges follows that at some point. I see it as a matter of time as it's similarly addicting as gambling and you can also lose everything in a blink of an eye by getting liquidated. With spot trading or with low leverage that's harder to do.
|
|
|
|
Hi,
The development of gambling over the past years has brought with it many connections, as methods and types have evolved with the creation of more games. We can gamble on everything and in everything, and among the well-known things in our current time, especially in sports, is the emergence of individuals and sites specialized in gambling prediction and expectations and majorities rely on them before making their bets, due to the amount of information and recommendations they obtain from the site owners.
If you are interested in gambling on sports, do you rely on prediction betting sites? Why?
What is the most prominent site you rely on?
In long run: No. That doesn't mean i wouldn't have rather long periods when i am making more money from it including big wins. But you can figure it out why doesn't it work just by reasoning: If there would be a certain method, or people what would make money constantly by gambling, at some point they would be so insanely rich, that they would be in top 50 richest people that got there just by constant gambling. There aren't any who get there aren't many areas in life that would offer certain profit, that you could leverage for more profit and rise indefinitely. Also these services would be sold to people, but those would be considered as unregistered securities, as they would promise profit for investment even though. |
|
|
|
what is the point of having high IQ? it is believed that high IQ make you a better person. it is also believed that high IQ get you more score in a test in school. but what does it make you a person after leaving the school. in real life, there is finited of everything resource, what does high IQ help the reality? let me assume, when there is only 100 apple in the town, high IQ person would more likely get more of the apple, yup, high IQ help you get more apple from finited source of apple. thus make you a better breadwinner, high IQ make a better breadwinner than low IQ person. finally: is it economics topic? it is politics isn't it? source, please? why should I believe you? go back to your base let me know how do you think. Your post is quite vague, and in many ways confusing. There's zero evidence that high IQ would make you "better person", even though you don't even specify what you mean by that. Having high IQ measures that people with high IQ people are good at performing IQ tests. If it's Mensa test for example, it measures how you can detect patterns and sequences in these tests, which could indicate that you can most likely apply these skills to real life as well, and apply them to some skills if you have any. Your 100 apple situation isn't a reliable indicator either, because it's usually people without high IQ are the ones that assume, that people with high IQ would always pursue for maximum profit. Poeple with high IQ aren't necessarily selfish or greedy. They can have good people skills and emphathy. Many high IQ people can choose to live moderately. And speaking of that, there are many kinds of fields in intelligence. Many people that would perform well in tests that are measuring general cognitive abilities, are not doing so well with their lives. It can lead to lonely or unproductive life if you have other issues that you need help with, or don't have skills in other areas of intellect.  And here's some source that you asked for: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_multiple_intelligences |
|
|
|
Looking back in history since Bitcoin was created back in 2009 There were a lot of different exchanges like - FTX, November 2022. Bankruptcy Type.
Three Arrows Capital, July 2022. Bankruptcy Type.
BlockFi, November 2022. Bankruptcy Type.
Core Scientific, December 2022. Bankruptcy Type.
Voyager Digital, July 2022. Bankruptcy Type.
Celsius, June 2022.
Babel Finance, June 2022.
Hodlnaut, August 2022.
Cryptopia ,
Bittrex ,
It happen with all and it can happen with Current ones e.g the last one KuCoin like 7 Days ago two of its founders were charged with violating anti-money laundering laws by U.S. Be smart and keep your assets SAFE always use a Cold Wallet Your Keys Your Coins Does this concern you ? You left out 2 of the biggest of at their time. Cryptsy and Mintpal which were both exit scams. Mintpal was famous among whales and cryptsy was basically main altcoin exchange at the time. These days owning your own keys was more reasonable as there were basically only few exchanges that were legit, and many of us weren't sure what those were. People hated regulations and wanted legitimacy at the same time. That's a combination that just doesn't work. But anyway, we have come long way from there and new legit exchanges have born and i have way more trust in them to handle my cryptos then myself handling my own cold wallet keys. I lose house keys, usb sticks, important papers and such all the time so why in the name of god i would be safer storing my own privatekey. Places like kraken, bitfinex and coinbase have my full trust. Or at least i have more trust for them then i have myself. I have however seen binance sketchy, but kucoin was is like imitation of binance, and way more sketchy. I could see kucoin going down any day and i wouldn't be surprised. Binance could go down too, but that i see way more problematic, as that would bring whole market with it. Markets crashing with FTX would be nothing next to it. |
|
|
|
-cut- 2) If bad things happen you lose only 10% of your holdings and can easily give it up when needed... As from someone who has been this scene for a while now. That doesn't quite help. Even if you downplay it and say you own only $4000 worth of it. And you, think back saying that back in the year 2015 at the bottom. What do you think those people thinking now? Even if you actually sold most of it ages ago, you would still have money left, and when ever you accidentally gave impression that you have money, and those people will remember you speaking about it back in day, and they probably think you just got more of it during these years. And then they do the math. And seriously, with hindsight, i was stupid when i bragged about btc back in time. Because why would i even ever need to brag about money? It's tacky, in poor taste and serves only people with low self esteem. |
|
|
|
technical analysis is a useful tool for traders, but we have to consider it's limitations. Technical analysis is basically based on assumption about the past market statistics and data, without putting into consideration other external factors . So traders should not 100 percent rely on technical analysis, they should use it together with other methods of analysis.
Some of its limitations includes
1.it is based on assumptions about past market trends, gotten from the past market price and volume data
2.it is a backward tool subject to interpretation from different traders.
3.Technical analysis will not provide the full details of the market, that is putting economic and global events into consideration,
so traders should put all these factors into consideration before making an investment decisions using technical analysis.
First of all, external market data can be used for technical analysis. People are constantly using them as data points and consider if some rumors for example have already priced in. Or if they will cause a perfect storm and trigger bots and traders to complete some patterns in the chart. And obviously sell the news is something people are waiting of if they know the date when rumor might get official press release. And no trader trusts TA 100 percent certainty pecause accuracy of any TA, no matter what indicators they use is FAR from 100%. Percentage accuracies of it are really hard to measure because different time frames, different markets, different indicators can work very differently. It's far from exact science and i totally get why some people don't trust TA at all. But imho we can't really judge TA as whole field of it consists of a huge spectrum of different techniques. Different traders don't trust different indicators or patterns. And some of them are laughing at meme lines, while they swear by elliot wave. And some are laughing trend lines calling them meme lines, and are perfectly fine using ichimoku cloud or combinantion of indicators and patters themselves, even if they would have so many settings and variables to look for that it would be impossible to measure any kind of accuracy for it. And basically anyone can create an indicator. So if my indicator of solar eclipse cycles vs wick lenghts or something like it doesn't work, does that mean TA in general isn't accurate? Personally i don't even care. I gave up complex indicators long ago as i can't calculate any probability for them. And i am using combination of "feeling" of the markets that comes with experience and combining them with most common patterns that i know people will be reacting to. And mostly looking at the big picture of the chart. |
|
|
|
I was not limited at the point of my tip, I carried on betting for a week after that point by looking at my transaction history.
I don't know how to prove the account is not mine but it's not mine, like they can do an investigation into everything and they will not find any connection.
I have asked my friend to KYC but again none of this is related to me.. if they don't want non-kyc accounts to be tipped, then change that.
From your point of view it isn't related to you, but from their's it is. So if that indeed is your real friend, i am sure kyc is fine with him / her. If not, your friend is costing you money and both of your accounts. Consider making official scam accusation in scam accusations thread. But can you explain this? -cut- Sounds like that person you tipped haven't done any kyc? Maybe if he/she did it, they might believe you are 2 different persons. -cut- Providing KYC will not make a huge difference on his case. The support mention that they will further investigate once other user complete KYC and doesn’t mean everything will be solve. Anyone can use KYC of other person which the casino is already aware. They will still investigate on the intensity of the connection between the 2 account. The user is limited on sports betting for a reason while the connected account received a tip from this user and continue the bet which makes me side to the casino on how they handle this issue. KYC is literally the only thing they are asking for that friend to do next, so why wouldn't it be most important issue here? Only way it wouldn't make huge difference would be if odapoda was double accounting or Shuffle wants to scam him. Refusing to do kyc at this point would just underline suffle's point that he is double accounting and that they were right. So it's the only reasonable step to take And of course they will investigate further, as it's their job to double check everything. Everyone knows that there are ways to fake identities or steal identities, but that can take time, especially when it's about specific country. So not complying instantly is just more suspicious. And there of course are official legal ways to approach this if odapoda and a friend are legit. |
|
|
|
I have not researched enough into it yet I plan to do so later today.
I like scarcity, I hold quite a bit of Quant which has only 14m total supply and that has real use case.
Scarcity only matters when your investment is a currency/SoV. Scarcity literally doesn't matter when talking about equity-like assets. What you should be looking for instead is circulating supply vs total supply and supply held be the VCs, not scarcity. Not every cryptocurrency's goal is to be like gold/money; most of them are pseudo-equity. Cyptex Finance has a total supply of 10m with 5.7m in circulation which is not bad is it. Good luck. It seems to be cheap and while it's most likely nothing special, it doesn't look half bad either, and in this market it's more than enough, which is a good as any reason to buy, at least for short time investment. Risk is high of course but so can be rewards. But it's a misconception that scarcity or total supply would be any kind of indicator by itself, and i don't know why people keep thinking it means something. It's only useful to know if you want to calculate fully diluted marketcap 'which in this case is low = good. Or at least as potential to be profitable.) In fact without enough digits, scarcity can be just impractical for any use case. |
|
|
|
-cut-
- So far Trump has been way better
-cut-
for America; Trump's team has been way better
-cut-
That turd gives a brain injury a bad rep just by associating with it. And yeah, if trump's team is better, let's ask them. I mean people who worked with trump closely how brilliant he is shall we? Those best people he chose to work with? What do you mean they aren't reliable sources? How could that be? What would they even say? Would they say that he is an "idiot”, "unhinged", "dangerous", "sociopath" or a "narcisstic". Or all of them? Trump hired the "best people" so they must be reliable. I wonder why all Biden's closest employees aren't writing similar stuff about him?  Or maybe we should just ask opinions from dictators of other countries, because they can be trusted, as it couldn't be in any way their best interest to destabilize USA. Or maybe let's look at the facts and what that rapist been convicted for so far? Or maybe we should focus on currect "best people" he is doing business with? https://thehill.com/business/4570973-trump-social-media-company-sues-co-founders/ |
|
|
|
Most online casinos are said to be regulated, they claimed to have a license to operate, but experts claimed that it's stupid if there isn't any evidence of them being regulated.
My question to all of you is ...
Have you verified that the online casino you are using now is verified? How can you tell that its verified because there is no proof of verified shown to the public.
Also, in any way, does it bother you if you can't be able to figure it out that the casino is regulated or not?
Do you think that if all online casinos can tender some proof of being licensed all it reduce scams in online gambling?
I usually go with trust and using common sense. If i really am not able to figure out if the casino is legit or not, i rather not use it, but it's not like i will be hunting for proof and contacting the companies that gave the licence and double check via them that they indeed are regulated. If the site looks reputable enough and ToS is making sense, and top of that there are no huge number of users that complain about it in public forums, i risk it and trust them. As i don't see why it would be up to me to have any extra stress by using them while not trusting them. But then again i am not playing with any life changing amounts that would require it. And i have been in this space from 2014 so i am familiar with working without any trust. Any casino these days beats legitimacy of sites from those times. They basically operated on trust, and regulations were frowned on. But if i find anything sketchy from a casino, or if they lack quality and professionality, i'll just stop using them. One place that i left that seemed like a scam just changed their name, probably because of all the bad rep and other one i left is still operating but i am waiting for an exit scam based on some lie at any moment. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
