Bitcoins, B-I-T-C-O-I-N-S, it's available to you inside the Google.
|
|
|
Since some post were about me, let me clarify some aspects: I can make a decent profit if there's at least 3% difference between two local minimums / maximums, considering a 0.8% (2x 0.4%) commission and adequate volume (which has been a problem lately on Gox). But my biggest problem is catching the peaks and bottoms while I am not sleeping, because guessing the precise values for the peaks and bottoms is bloody difficult for me (to place an order overnight). I moved to Gox from Bitstamp because of the higher volumes, but in the meantime that advantage of Gox has diminished. I also can't do delayed arbitrage anymore (obviously), so I might move back to Bitstamp. It was easy to reach their 0.5% (2x 0.25%) commission, on Gox to reach 0.6% (2x 0.3%) I'd have to almost double my trades, can't do that yet.
Short term trading would be much easier if we didn't need sleep. But in light of the reality of my human form, and the fact I don't want to spend all day on the computer, I trade on longer time frames .
|
|
|
If someone could modify the kernel to somehow be optimized for mining....
The Cryptographic API of the Linux kernel has a sha256 module.... maybe that can be used.
what's an OS kernel to do with mining these days CPU mining is going to make a comeback!
|
|
|
The point here is if you do a normal iTunes backup without encryption enabled, and then move to a new phone with a restored backup all your google auth tokens will be gone for good. Source: happened to me last month.
Actually it was scary easy just to email the services and ask them to remove 2 factor auth so I could login and re-enable. (CampBx, Coinbase, etc)
How they know you are not hacker ? !!!! Don't you know that your email address is the keys to the kingdom in almost all security policies? Don't you know how to write an email with any sender address ? Yes. There are obvious problems with using email as the end game of security, but the reality is that is how it works. Plus, I would assume they would only accept requests from the address on the account. (yes it can be spoofed instead of just blank)
|
|
|
The point here is if you do a normal iTunes backup without encryption enabled, and then move to a new phone with a restored backup all your google auth tokens will be gone for good. Source: happened to me last month.
Actually it was scary easy just to email the services and ask them to remove 2 factor auth so I could login and re-enable. (CampBx, Coinbase, etc)
How they know you are not hacker ? !!!! Don't you know that your email address is the keys to the kingdom in almost all security policies?
|
|
|
Whoever pays 0.6% gox commision isn't really going to cut it yes. But duh! If you manage to trade a $50 million a month and have the lowest fee, you still need a 58% success rate to break even. (Assuming a tight stop, which Gox doesn't provide and that connection issues at times of high volume can fuck up if you have a script to do it for you). The solution is not to mtgox. Bitstamp has similar fees.
|
|
|
Whoever pays 0.6% gox commision isn't really going to cut it yes. But duh! If you manage to trade a $50 million a month and have the lowest fee, you still need a 58% success rate to break even. (Assuming a tight stop, which Gox doesn't provide and that connection issues at times of high volume can fuck up if you have a script to do it for you).
|
|
|
hi.
I reported you to a moderator using the "Report to Moderator" link some time ago. Probably late June/ early July. Didn't like coming to speculation to see a thread with nothing inherently useful for speculation. Just so you know its not only your competitor that dislikes your practices - its your potential customers.
Back to minding my own business. Thanks.
I will try to find a solution with cypherdoc and asked him to have a call with me. Because you are right, this daily bumping creates awareness for new potential customers (even if some people including me hate it as it woes not add value). Hence, it would be good to find an agreement to ideally limit posts that have no real content.The "content" is a notification to subscribers that an update has been sent. Email is not always reliable and having a second channel of notification is beneficial. You do the same thing with your thread, you just send less updates. How hard is it to ignore a thread you know doesn't apply to you? Other people find it useful, and if I were still a cyperdoc subscriber I would be pissed about the new policy. You are acting like a fucking child.
|
|
|
that's all i wanted to see tzupy, something more specific than just "short term indicators are down," because anyone can say that and without providing examples/evidence, it can be misleading to some folks. I'm sorry if you took my reply with too much malice.
Tzupy's just been catching a lot of flak lately because he is always talking about tiny wiggles and most people have a longer term mindset. hehe I never even minded the tiny wiggles. Commissions + risk cost take all the 'profit' out of $2-4 movements that the indicators call out at that time layer. Exactly, he will either figure that out or go broke and disappear. 1.02^100=7.245
Okay, let's take a 2% movement. First, we subtract 0.6% commission from both sides of the trade. Now we have a 0.8% movement. Let's assume for a second he calls 100 right in a row: 1.008^100 = 2.21847 Not bad. Now let's assume he takes a loss on 1/3 of his trades instead of being perfect. 1.008^67*1.008^-33=1.311167 31% is still decent, depending on the time frame. But wait, that is wrong because you don't lose 0.8% when it goes against you. You lose the commission too, so you lose the full 2%. Let's try 1/3 failure again. 1.008^67*1.02^-33=0.88726 Well shit. What if he is 70% successful? 1.008^70*1.02^-30=0.964344249 Damn. Maybe if he is right 3/4 of the time he can turn a profit. 1.008^75*1.02^-25=1.107989421928713 Yay! But can he beat 72% correct that is needed to break even? And what happens if a big move happens in the wrong direction because the short term indicators are still indicating the correction when it ends and the next large major wave up/down happens?
|
|
|
I would only expect this amount to widen as long as Gox has a lag on their FIAT withdrawal methods.
Has anyone even gotten a wire from them and can confirm say a 4 digit wire that has completed?
There is no benefit in removing the fear, uncertainty and doubt in the current situation. Right now, one man's fear is another man's profit. +1 If you could get 4 figures out of Gox, would you blab about it our arbitrage the shit out of it?
|
|
|
that's all i wanted to see tzupy, something more specific than just "short term indicators are down," because anyone can say that and without providing examples/evidence, it can be misleading to some folks. I'm sorry if you took my reply with too much malice.
Tzupy's just been catching a lot of flak lately because he is always talking about tiny wiggles and most people have a longer term mindset.
|
|
|
when i first tried p2pool all i did was point my miner at p2pool.org. After a while my graph was showing hashrate + payout.
now if i try it my graph shows hashrate but never get payout. i never knew about setting up p2pool before hand i just pointed miner at it.
is it even possible to use p2pool that way? or do you HAVE to run bit coin/p2pool aswell?
p2pool.org was on the wrong chain for several weeks, but it's been v13 for at least the last 10 days 1ghash averages a share every 24hrs or so at current hash rate and don't use p2pool.org, go to http://p2pool-nodes.info/ or http://p2pool.hostv.pl/ and find something better why do the graphs never show any payout, even if i left it on for over 24 hours. But the first time i ever used p2pool it was showing payout within a couple of hours ?! Share difficulty has increased dramatically in the last few months. Also, 24 hours for 1gh/s is an average. Variance can potentially widen the window before you hit for you first share to 2 days, but over time it will average out.
|
|
|
Price inflation and price deflation are both bad. But how do you propose prices be stabilized? We have lots of strong evidence central banks can not do it without abusing the power. The benefit of bitcoin is its supply can not be manipulated. Decentralized banking and currency issuance may work (there is some historical evidence to support this claim, particularly in Canada in the 1800s), but currently such a system is outlawed in most of the world.
|
|
|
The news didn't change fundamentals and the market made that clear by burning most of the idiots who sold off.
This idiot actually profited from this. Sure, but only the uberbears who move first benefit. The rest are the sheep you guys lead to slaughter.
|
|
|
Come on, for once there's actual news. The Feds are going to try and fight Bitcoin. If you think they'll fail it's quite bullish don't you think?
Don't underestimate the disdain that TA devotees feel towards anything not based on traditional stock/commodity-market technical analysis. The very idea that news might affect a market (even as new and unprecedented a market as BTC) is heresy, an affront to their existing orthodoxy. Nope, I believe news affect FX markets, but not bitcoin. I guess I'm a bit of a market analysis agnostic. I don't buy into either philosophy wholeheartedly, but try to use both to my advantage. As for news not affecting Bitcoin, how about the news of the Satoshi Dice sale and payment to shareholders in BTC? Almost immediately the price dropped by over $10 and while the expected great selloff never happened, it took a week to recover. I'd say that news affected the Bitcoin market, albeit only temporarily. It wasn't almost immediately... it was 6 hours later after pages of discussion on where cheerleaders made up bullshit reasons why it would drop. Once they had enough people convinced, it happened. It is not the news per se... it is speculators overreacting to news and whipping to forums into a panic. The news didn't change fundamentals and the market made that clear by burning most of the idiots who sold off.
|
|
|
Shouldn't this topic be moved to an offtopic section?
No
|
|
|
AFAIK all QE money supply goes directly to repurchasing US bonds....which then goes into infrastructure etc. just like regular government spending. (The govt gets to spend it the first time into the economy.)
This is how it is "filtered" in, the US govt doesn't just hand it to banks (other than bailout money which is a small amount of QE).
Basically the fed is purchasing around 90%+ of all US Treasury bonds issued...no one else wants them anymore.
Nope, it's going into mortgage backed securities to prop up the housing market.
|
|
|
Wow, thats super legit. Somebody should build a chrome-os type thing off of that for clients. Its made for that type of thing. Problem is youd likely get very bad load times, am I right? Still, I'm sure some people would have a use for it.
Wow, with Whonix & Bitcoin, its possible to practically use the entirity of the internet, payments & all, without any privacy concerns whatsoever. Its good to the point of being disconcerting.
No. Technology can not alleviate all privacy concerns. You still need to engage your brain. Even sentence structure and word choice habits can be used to pinpoint your identity. In any case, wouldn't it be possible to build it right into the browser? I mean, everything in the browser, all plug-ins, etc... would either not work, or would have to go through tor. Thatd be much more convenient than having to completely re-boot into an entirely different OS just to use tor.
Again, no. If you do it all in the browser, you expose yourself to browser exploits. Browsers have pretty much the largest attack surface of any major piece of software. Even with an OS based solution, you are vulnerable to kernel exploits. However, kernels receive much better auditing and have a much smaller attack surface.
|
|
|
So, if I short at bitfinex, can I use the resulting btc to lend out at a profit? Or are you not allowed to lend like that while you're in debt? In any case the depth there is sucking, but I shouldnt complain, if it had been deeper maybe I wouldnt have got that btc back If you short, it will result in a USD position that you can not lend out and a BTC debt. Shorting does not have any "resulting btc". I recommend you steer clear of bitfinex until you do more research on how margin trading works.
|
|
|
|