I would be grateful for the help (in marking the involved accounts).Afincoin: Topics is active/Legendary OP
Handled. |
|
|
|
The pill addiction of lauda was based on credible information from a reputable person and was meant to serve as a warning to others in regards to allowing lauda to handle their money.
If by reputable you mean inferior-ego-crazy neanderthal, then sure. You can't win with these slimey tactics. I can't imagine a reputable person who would entrust credible information to you, let alone allow you to make it public.
Say one is a reputable person that has credible information about someone on the forum. Out of all of the forum member's who would they decide to disclose the information to? Surely Quickscammer.  |
|
|
|
Please review me in ½ year again. I am here to learn and improve.
I have excluded you anyways. Wells of positive trust received for pocket change trades are dangerous. |
|
|
|
|
I've tagged all of them. This reeks of cryptohunter && quickscammer tactics. Obviously untrustworthy. I will not censor myself because some rando-first world pajeets think they can win using these pathetic methods.
|
|
|
|
Did you think fattcatt was gonna make the auctions disappear?
The thread was wiped. |
|
|
|
I do not trade here, nor likely will, and tagging accounts is perhaps not something I will feel the urge to do
I think this is a pretty strong argument for someone not to be in DT (1 or 2). If someone does not trade and is not a participant in the trust system, I see little benefit in the person being in the DT network. The drawbacks to someone like this being in the DT network come with the risk the person somehow gets involved in shenanigans in which very inappropriate ratings are left (and go unnoticed). One of the rare times where I have to agree with you. These additions effectively make DT1 more and more worthless. |
|
|
|
If I changed my list today adding every single user that gave me positive rating i.e. started trust farming/abusing my position, I'd be swiftly removed as well.
Blazed did it for years... :/ He did not, no. |
|
|
|
|
You can safely start ignoring DT1 members unless they are abusing the system in one way or another (be it via bad inclusions or exclusions). Clearly.
|
|
|
|
Don't shill the SmartCash shitcoin, the fraudulent Bitcoin.com site, and the bcash shitcoin. Thank you.
bitcoin cash is a top 5 coin with a huge community, think again before you call it a shitcoin. Alright, it is a scam coin. OP should avoid promoting it. |
|
|
|
Such a waste of merit. Nothing Cobra said reflects reality; I presume the users lack Bitcoin tech-related knowledge. I'm more inclined to believe that you are a state-sponsored actor, especially given that you keep repeating provably false claims.
Merit doesn't mean endorsement. I'm personally not interested in Lightning politics in the slightest and not going to send merits based on that so any semblance thereof is purely coincidental. I know that it doesn't, but to the random user it might create a false belief that the information conveyed is correct. Theymos has made a fatal mistake here; I can't do anything about Cobra as he hacked himself way too deep. |
|
|
|
-snip-
Merited by suchmoon (9), bones261 (2), vapourminer (1), ETFbitcoin (1)
Such a waste of merit. Nothing Cobra said reflects reality; I presume the users lack Bitcoin tech-related knowledge. I'm more inclined to believe that you are a state-sponsored actor, especially given that you keep repeating provably false claims. |
|
|
|
The reaction with willi9974 was in my opinion a bit overboard, a notice like "hey you are in DT1, can you please look at what does this mean and update your list accordingly?" should have sufficed.
He's not a special snowflake, he's a random. If I changed my list today adding every single user that gave me positive rating i.e. started trust farming/abusing my position, I'd be swiftly removed as well. Oh come on, I did not ask for special treatment. I did ask that we treat people with some humility.. I dislike treating anyone with humility, that's more for Loyce and actmyname also known as the Switzerland's of BTCT. I'm a witch after all, and a tyrant apparently. ...maybe we should even ask them if they really want to be in DT1.
In this example he was not even aware of the issue, we are humans not robots.
Then he can contact the people that added him and get them to remove him. Simple. |
|
|
|
The reaction with willi9974 was in my opinion a bit overboard, a notice like "hey you are in DT1, can you please look at what does this mean and update your list accordingly?" should have sufficed.
He's not a special snowflake, he's a random. If I changed my list today adding every single user that gave me positive rating i.e. started trust farming/abusing my position, I'd be swiftly removed as well. |
|
|
|
|
Don't shill the SmartCash shitcoin, the fraudulent Bitcoin.com site, and the bcash shitcoin. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Perhaps 10 merits is too low.
Way too low; it's just a matter of time again. All now red-trusted, too.  You were here first.  |
|
|
|
|
What bounties have you "managed" and under which "big labels"?
|
|
|
|
Localbitcoins has only one user name and the real name.
If the user that you've dealt with is honest, they will send you the money to another bank. Talk to them. In Hungary, a financial service provider or bank may only have a public authority order for client money (Police, Public Prosecutor's Office, Administrative Authority, Tax Office)
That's what they tell the laymen. The reality is much much different.  I've written to them, but they haven't been online ever since, they rarely buy on Localbitcoins. Next time don't transact with random inactive traders. Problem solved, don't blame Revolut for govt./big bank policies. |
|
|
|
Localbitcoins has only one user name and the real name.
If the user that you've dealt with is honest, they will send you the money to another bank. Talk to them. In Hungary, a financial service provider or bank may only have a public authority order for client money (Police, Public Prosecutor's Office, Administrative Authority, Tax Office)
That's what they tell the laymen. The reality is much much different. |
|
|
|
Here's the end of the story, I lost 1050 EUR.
-snip-
You did something that you weren't allowed to. Contact the original source. Original Source: Localbitcoins Buyers (No Contact Info) It is excluded that Relovut Limited can transfer customer deposits freely without the customer's consent. If they comply with KYC, AML and other laws touching fiat they can do whatever they are required to do. People seem to forget that Revolut works like a bank, and sending back money without notice is known practice. If you deal with something that someone with power doesn't like, then they can't do anything about it. There were many cases of both exchanges and banks doing this or something similar to this.
How exactly do you not have any contact information on localbitcoin? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
