Also Theymos isn't the only one with the ban hammer.
Not true at all! If you look at John K's profile he when from a global mod to Administrator https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=31288 which would mean he can ban people as well! Since Theymos has the same position! Don't Spread lies mod to cover up for other people/your boss! JohnK, Theymos, Badbear, Maged, MoonShadow, and Psy can all ban people. I'm not sure what your point is in quoting that Theymos isn't the only one with the ban hammer, and then telling me John K can as well, when thats exactly what I said. No it sounded like you were pawning off that these people can Ban people without talking to the higher ups, but in theory we have two admins now. So they are really the only people that should be with the IP banning. Am I not correct? |
|
|
|
Also Theymos isn't the only one with the ban hammer.
Not true at all! If you look at John K's profile he when from a global mod to Administrator https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=31288 which would mean he can ban people as well! Since Theymos has the same position! Don't Spread lies mod to cover up for other people/your boss! |
|
|
|
|
No a cap on transactions has nothing to do with the size of the blockchain. It is the amount of transactions that are happening.
|
|
|
|
|
Do we know who is going from the foundation? Why is that even a secret?
|
|
|
|
Yet wallets like inputs.io are still successful..
it will be taken down soon I don't think so. It is safe, and safer than instawallet. LMAO do you have access to the source code? Every piece of code have bugs in it even input.io  Trust me it will be down very soon. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin banks will never work. Also charging to store my money which isn't even stored with your "bank" but on the blockchain. Also you have the private key so this is not secure you can run off with the funds at anytime. Trust me bitcoin banks don't work look at Pirateat40 |
|
|
|
+2 it is one of the best! and keeps getting better! I keep so many coins. Also you want a good OS I would say get a Mac very secure. |
|
|
|
Please don't add me to the list, I am currently not doing escrows anymore as per request from my legal team. Thank you. |
|
|
|
so you can make an executive decision.
Which is exactly what I'm trying to convince him not to get into. Having "executive decision" power sucks. He should just be allowed to give his opinion, as anyone. But this is his program, and since he has no affiliation with the forum wouldn't be a problem. It would be better if he was hands off, but there's no way to prove he doesn't go into the database and change sometimes. So at the end of the day he will have an executive decision. |
|
|
|
Any trading system is "buy low and sell high"  The devil is in details But you just said that your bot didn't do that. I bet you are just using some linear bases and based on that just buying and selling. Do you have any performance graphs or showing it starting with X amount and in a month turned it into X*X amount? |
|
|
|
This is loaded with 25 btc, and you started bidding below that? Or is it not loaded?
|
|
|
|
Hearing about the grants for web wallets didn't exactly make me think they are spending the funds correctly as well.
Grants for web wallets? I missed that news. Can you elaborate of provide a link please? |
|
|
|
|
Can't any bitcoin business where they setting up a seller part and buyer part be considered a money laundering operation?
I was posed this question from someone that I was talking to about bitcoin businesses. It stunned me and I really didn't know how to answer.
Example:
Seller A setups up store at bitcoin business A. Seller A then buys Item A from Seller A. For a very low fees, it would more than likely come from a shared wallet, and could be considered a mixer.
How would you answer this?
|
|
|
|
I'm not a fan of democracy, and this position isn't particularly important, but this election should be pretty interesting. It'll be the first big election in the Bitcoin ecosystem. There should be a lot of nice drama. Don't worry, it's not a democracy when you have to buy in to vote, and you can pay $100k for your own board seat. Oh wait it's modeled on real rather than ideal democracy. Never mind, you're right! The only thing that the candidates are running for is the opportunity to work their asses off. Your comments suggest you have a better idea that doesn't cost money. Do tell. Work their asses off? What board member is working their ass off? None, I have yet to see a board member do more for bitcoins than me or any other bitcoiner. It is a sham, and you are caught in it. |
|
|
|
|
Working hard! Just like I used to get dollars now I get bitcoins.
|
|
|
|
Would a US-based company be able to provide this service without being considered a money transmitter?
http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-law-what-us-businesses-need-to-know/Some aspects of the FinCEN guidance were comforting. Some were troubling. Some were death knells for otherwise successful businesses. Some could only be described as confusing. Here are the highlights: - Individuals who merely exchange bitcoin for goods and services (and vice versa) are merely “users” of a virtual currency, not money transmitters.
- Businesses that accept bitcoin from one person and send it to another are money transmitters, and are not exempt from money transmission regulation simply because they do not deal in fiat currency.
- Individual bitcoin miners who convert their “created” coins to fiat are money transmitters, even though they never act “as a business,” nor accept value from one person to transfer it to a third person.
- Any business that exchanges fiat currency for virtual currency – or even one virtual currency for another – is a money transmitter.
This is exactly why I don't do escrows anymore. My legal team actually told me not to anymore. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
