HOAX

sorry, but such a DRM would just be so dumb. I want a quote to see whom to laugh at

Sorry but I do care. As much as I agree with him on the future of bitcoin, I am sick of all that bla bla of "this high will be even bigger than the last high" bullshit.
If you want to express your enthusiasm, tell that it is *your* enthusiasm. If you have proof that some country is switching to bitcoin, tell the news but don't imply to know exactly what the course might be at some date. This article is not a notable source, sorry.

"" looks like you don't mind if I don't change the poll in that aspect.

I must confess I followed the "Never trust any statistic you've not faked for yourself" paradigm in leaving out two vital options: "not attack other pools" and  "not attack alt coins". Your voting indicates that some of you might have set their crosses their.

The nice and funny incidents about a pool operator bragging about his actions of smashing an alt coin by using his pool for it resulted in wild discussions. As far as I understood it, the alt coin fans/users were damaged but the miners at his pool not interested in that particular alt coin were not directly damaged as merged mining comes at no costs.

I see it difficult to talk about morality in bitcoin and see the task as to design it in a way that we don't need morality as greed or dogmatism will always find its way. Still I'm interested in your opinion on the issue. How much of their clearly existing power should pool operators be tolerated to use.

Let me know if I should add further options.

If this attack was carried out, it's done as stupid as can be. Eligius is the pool that I trusted most as the following is not possible:
* Attack a competing pool/chain by throwing your hashing power at them.
* reward your miners with the coins mined/alt-coins mined traded for real coins.

As in Eligius this can not be done unnoticed as the reward does not come from old coins and thus the miners can not be compensated I hope to see a justification from Luke soon.

Isn't that a pleonasm?

How do you do it with pix? I mean people could stream their pron subscription to your site and as long as you don't have such a subscription you would have no way of telling if this is all private pix or owned by someone as long as someone doesn't file a DMCA against you.
Besides it doesn't have to be pron. It could also be private pictures from facebook.
In your best interest you should either go underground yourself or require your users to register and remove all unregistered content.

Did you get a receipt?

Nope.Transaction count should have no effect on the mining speed. Else miners would make most profit with empty blocks.

marketPriceUSD*1Gh/s*24h/avgHashesToSolveBlock*(nBTCMined+totalBTCFees) 

Hi,

I just browsed through the massive amount of charts at http://blockchain.info/charts . Really great

May I suggest one more? "Bitcoin Miners operating margin" sounds interesting but as electricity costs are a very wide range I'd like to see a graph:
"$$ mined per day with a 1Gh rig"
As you know many people switched off their mining. Today less than 70% of the machines that mined before are running today. The graph I suggested helps them decide when to switch back on as they know their costs.

This is great. I'm also interested in why you did it. After all there are several open source bitcoin clients that could need patches for these features. Hope you get and accept the support to push this client to a bright future.

:/ ok, now the order got clipped to the available amount somehow but it was first listed as "not enough funds".

Ok, now I just tried it out and instead of my available €€ I set an order that was rounded up. Result is that I have one order with state "Not enough funds".
I have no idea if you opted in for automated splitting or what but here it does not work that way out of the box.

their ideas are total bullshit! sorry for posting here but the video really gets me mad.

interesting. found this site today and i like it although ...

• initially I may choose 30 days, 100 days and endless but clicking 30 sets it to 3 removing the other options.
• The defaults don't apply here. It always defaults to 7days - I want 30 or 100 days. My "products" are never "new". Also I want to be able to have the auction be instantly visible but end at 10pm some day. Now I set it to start tomorrow 10pm.
• I would like to browse German auctions.

... so now I'm curious if I can sell my Beatles white album

Sorry. Forgot to mention I release my idea under the WTFPL, so you are basically free to do that yourself without any obligations what so ever.

Not really. It could be additional to the pure text based interface just to let you easily see where you have your orders. A personal market depth should not be complicated for a trader that also somehow has to understand the global market depth. Allowing to manipulate the own market depth is only logical.

My main criticism was the case where I want to change an order, so you stick to delete one order, enter a quanity, enter a price and submit.

I'm pretty sure I ran exactly into this problem. They improved a lot since then.

Splitting is definitely new.

Finally I would love to see the market depth in real time, too like on mtgoxlive within the same graph.

I want an easy put and change orders interface. Of course this would not target those API users but rather the small people who want to toy around with BTC.

I don't trade much but as far as I know on Gox it works like this:
I have 100$.
I put in an order 50BTC@2$.
It doesn't get active cause I forgot about the fee.
I do a second order of 49BTC@2$.
Later I place a third order of 30BTC@3$.
It doesn't get active as I don't have money left so I have to cancel the other offer first.
Putting, cancelling, watching the market ... involves different tools. I use my calculator to somehow put in all my coins/$$ etc. (MtGox got better with that respect I guess).

I would rather want to have some drag and drop interface like this:

Red are my buy orders and blue my sell orders.
I can drag these in from outside and out to a recycle bin.
I am allowed to save invalid/inactive orders (C and D).
If I charge my account, these become active (and visible in the order book).
E and F are in contradiction as they sum up to more than the 20BTC that I have (blue BTC line) so the last of these would be inactive, too.
When I add/move a red/blue order, the lower red/blue line ($/BTC remaining) moves accordingly.

While dragging and at Mouse-Over I would see the exact price and amount.
Mouse-Wheel would allow me to zoom in and further adjust the Satoshis/ct.

I can switch my interface to BTC or $. The above image shows the $-view, so my 20BTC offer @ 4.2something is shown as a 84$ offer.

Finally I can set the interface to instant confirmation or to ask me for confirmation when saving my changes (default).