Very interesting!  I just started kicked off the tor browser and I see the site *is* up.  Must be something about USA ISPs blocking....

If badbear is back that's great. If badbear stands behind qs' crazy trolling madness on me that'd certainly be surprising but I'm going to wait for him to speak for himself.

If he had removed it, that would explain what he said to me about checking the top of this thread for an example of a time when he removed unwarranted negative trust.  However, it'd be weird that he'd put it back right afterwards....

Down for me too.  


Hopefully all's okay with the site and its owner/operator.  At this point we'll just have to wait for updates here.

FWIW, that comment from newbiew "quickerseller" isn't helping anything either.  The main thing to do at this point is to wait until badbear gets back and take things up with him.  QS doesn't talk to anyone who doesn't suck his dick publically.  You basically have to tell him he's the man and that we all owe him a debt of gratitude to even get him to engage.  It's really pointless and it's why I locked the thread that I had started about his abuse of me.

Shulio, you've been around these boards for a pretty long time (IIRC), I'm surprised you aren't already hero member by now.

@ndnhc, I noticed you guys' ratings went from -/+ to 1,2,3.  But what's the order.  Is A1 the best or A3?  I'm thinking it's fair to assume that 2 is the middle

I think they're equally accessible (even from javascript).  Not sure how one would provide anymore security than another.  If you do happen to know, let me know.

It's a self-signup.  You have to follow the instructions in the OP (put the sig, visit bitmixer.io/signature.html, input your UID on bitcointalk).

But it does seem very risky...still, Micon is a poker pro so I guess he knows something of how to measure risk/reward ratios.

That's pretty fun.  Thanks!

I'm still waiting for one of the info-graphics people to make the poster of bitcoins-per-pizza over time

You're right that the site needs more players.  However, in my experience, it's more each time I try (a few weeks ago it was a ghosttown).  I doubt seriously that SwC will close because of this situation, I'm pretty sure it's why Micon went to Antigua.

I've also had the opposite experience (unable to access on firefox, but fine on chromium/chrome).  However, in my case, i'm pretty sure that it's because I have local storage turned off on firefox.  Eventually I learned that PD keeps your access token in localstorage.  Hey, Stunna (or someone else who knows), why not just use HTTP cookies for the token like most sites?

They certainly stole from me, not much but they did steal.  I have no idea what there is to dig into.  As far as I know they are long gone with the money they stole.

Lol, unless you're out of money, in which case you should probably wait until you have money that you can afford to lose

Responsible gambling is the fun gambling

Note: Quickseller has switched to calling me asshole.  He used to always call me idiot.

With respect to the top of this thread, it looks to me like you're unrelenting on worshiper_-_ (I still see your rating when I click on his trust list) so it's not clear what you're talking about.

Here's the thing man, I'm not on any smear campaign against you.  It's funny that you should use that phrase because it's exactly what you are doing to me.  You know well and good that you don't like it when people disagree with you.  I did so publically on two or three threads and then you you went after me.  You went trolling through my past using two accounts looking for something to try to use against me and the only thing you could turn up was some unsubstantiated claims from a known scammer.

What on earth do you mean "I did the same thing to TF"?  That is silly and clearly untrue.  I did nothing to TF when he gave me negative trust except to ask why and for what and ask the community if there was any recourse.  There was no recourse so I left him alone and he left me alone and eventually he was revealed to be the person he is while I never had any problems with anyone until you came along.

Here you are, a guy on default trust, calling people idiots, calling people asshole, for why?  Because they disagree with you?  Because thedy don't like it when you use many accounts to smear them and slander them?  You and I never had a single trade or interaction aother than me not aggreing with you in public and you going of and caling me an idiot.  


The thing is that there is not one person who knows anything about it other than me and TF.  I know what happened and he knows what happened and everyone else merely listened and said "huh".  Again, if there was some evidence against me, don't you think saltyspitoon or other respected forum members on that thread that you necrobumped with your alt would have put some feedback?  Here's the difference between them and you, they were objectively observing and you were on a vendetta.


This is fine.  I'm surprised you can't think of any other bad words to use here recklessly. In fact I have scammed no one (but I have done a fair share of voluneering and helping on the forums) I have spammed no one (I'm actually involved in several anti-spam campaigns across the internet), if I have trolled anyone it may be you but then again, you started this shitstorm when you couldn't control your ego enough to allow someone to disagree with you without flying off the handle and using multiple accounts to attack them.

I know you're not removing your negative trust against me.  You're like a captain on a sinking ship, you're going to be clinging to that thing as it goes down.

Since all matches to your regex are going to be finite (bitcoin addresses are of finite length) then you could just compile your regex out to a pattern list and use that.  Ie, because of the finiteness constraint, regexes are just syntactic sugar.

While it's not completely irrelevant to the site bitcoinpoker.gg, perhaps a private message to the OP would serve to clue him in (in case he hadn't seen the news).  I think this thread is about the actual site, how it runs, what we'd like to see, etc.

In my case, there wasn't any proof.  Never has been and never will be (because the accusations were false and they weren't even from you and they didn't even have anything to do with you).


Quiickseller, can you give one (1) example of a time when you removed negative trust?

Try to stop with this public masterbation.  Let the facts speak for themselves.  When you conclude every other post with "and that's why I'm so cool" it just looks ridiculous.

^^^Thanks!

Yes, and as you were saying above, in the early moments when those long-block times occurred, the hash-rate was exceptionally low.  That's a situation which is unlikely to happen again (until/unless bitcoin's demise becomes immenent---ie, the reciprocal of when it was starting out).