Bitcoin Forum
June 19, 2024, 12:36:55 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 [99] 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 ... 548 »
1961  Other / Politics & Society / Re: E-mail spam from the Trumpsteins on: September 01, 2020, 06:37:24 AM

These days it's mostly The President himself who takes time out of his busy day to send me e-mail.  I feel so honored!  Here's my haul from this morning:

Code:
Donald J. Trump		I know you won¿t let me down - I need you, <me>.  		12:47 PM
President Trump and. URGENT - Today is the FINAL day 11:48 AM
DonaldJTrump.com This is your FINAL REMINDER - 800%-MATCH 10:48 AM
Donald J. Trump Let¿s make a HUGE statement - I want to CRUSH our $30 MILLION g 10:32 AM
DonaldJTrump.com THREE HOURS LEFT - We¿re running out of time. 9:17 AM
Donald J. Trump 800%-MATCH: ACTIVATED Don¿t share this. 8:18 AM
Donald J. Trump 800%-MATCH: ACTIVATED Don¿t share this. 8:03 AM
DonaldJTrump.com T-minus 6 hours - We NEED you, <me>. 6:18 AM
President Trump and. URGENT - Today is the FINAL day 6:03 AM
Donald J. Trump We must win - We need to CRUSH Sleepy Joe. 4:47 AM
DonaldJTrump.com We crushed Joe & Kamala AGAIN - Let¿s keep going. 4:05 AM
Donald J. Trump I am counting on YOU - I know you won¿t let me down 2:36 AM
Donald J. Trump They can¿t be allowed to win - We need to CRUSH Sleepy Joe. 2:04 AM
DonaldJTrump.com Just 12 hours left - Our most important goal yet. 12:18 AM
Trump Finance We need to CRUSH our goal - You¿re needed now more than ever. 12:03 AM

One thing we can say for sure about The Donald:  he really really really likes to CRUSH things!

1962  Other / Politics & Society / Re: [POLL] Is bitcointalk (still) very skeptical towards global warming science? on: September 01, 2020, 06:02:39 AM
Your 97% slogan is misleading, if you didn’t know..

It is NOT that 97% of climate scientists agree that humans ARE the cause of climate change..
It IS 97% of climate scientists believe the climate IS warming and that humans MAY HAVE SOME effect on the warming......

So basically it means that they agree that humans may have caused atleast 00.000000001% of the climate change we see..

It absolutely does not mean that 97% believe human released CO2 is the cause, or even a main cause..

And yeah.. If you look at the CO2 vs temp chart for a few million years you will see that it doesn’t correlate for crap..
Actual warming has never kept up with their “models” either..

It’s nonsense..

The '97%' came from a laughable fraudulant 'meta-analysis' were some non-scientist skimmed a bunch of study titles and may (or may not) have bothered to read some of the abstracts from scientific literature and decided that in some measure the authors of the paper thought that human CO2 had at least an infinately small impact on greenhouse gasses.  Of course most people who are active in any sort of academics will 'admit' that 0.00000001 > 0.000000000.

As I recall, the study even counted Dr. Willie Soon as among their '97%' which is funny because, being an outspoken chap who made is (rather meager) living outside of the traditional academic funding sources, became something of a poster-child of the 'climate denier ' scientists.  Freeman Dyson would have been another were he not so famous and well respected that the mud would not stick to him.  The Climate Huckseters learned several decades ago to run-not-walk from a debate on the subject and choose only such battles as they could win.

1963  Other / Politics & Society / Re: [POLL] Is bitcointalk (still) very skeptical towards global warming science? on: August 31, 2020, 11:35:18 AM
... People don't engage with climate skeptics b/c of the sheer amount of data they'd have to provide to refute their points. It's just not something that people want to do when they can quickly just say -- the EARTH IS ROUND AND VACCINES DONT GIVE YOU AUTISM.
...

That's intellectually very lazy at best.  More generally it is a tool custom-made for people who are both lazy and lacking the mental prowess to learn enough about a subject to actually discuss it.  Nobody I know who questions the mainstream narrative on either the 'global climate change' issue or the 'vaccination' issue believes that the earth is flat.

As a matter of fact, someone who puts any 'information' about flat-earth forward is highly suspect to me.  It's a pretty good marker for an individual who is basically participating in a psychological operation of some sort and is to be analyzed as such and obviously not to be trusted.  It is true that there are some weak minded people who probably do fall for the flat-earth psy-op, but I don's see much cross-over between them and the 'climate deniers' or 'anti-vax' crowd both of who are often vastly more knowledgeable about both science and medicine generally then though counterparts, and of a nature who are not averse to challenging authority and orthodoxy.

Back in the day it did seem that bitcointalk.org (formerly 'bitcoin.org forum' a decade ago) were prone to be the type who would challenge orthodoxy and mainstream dogma.  Now, sadly, it seems that the cadre is drawn from a more normie type pool if not skewed toward the pool who are indoctrinated by mainstream scientism more than your average bear.  It seems like a lot of the 'old-timers' who were of the more interesting type moved on.  Presumably to enjoy their new-found life  as multi-millionaires.

1964  Other / Politics & Society / Re: [POLL] Is bitcointalk (still) very skeptical towards global warming science? on: August 31, 2020, 02:01:33 AM
...
Nuclear power is a cleaner alternative to fossil fuels... but reactors take a very long time to build. Given the pace of climate change, we probably don't have time for that, and need to switch our attention to renewables instead, as well as lifestyle changes.

Yup.  Hand FULL control of all aspects of your life over to the oligarchs who thought up the 'global warming' idea as part of an excuse to install the technocracy they'd been funding into existence:

   “The common enemy of humanity is man.
   In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
   with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,
   water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these
   dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through
   changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome.
   The real enemy then, is humanity itself.“
  – Club of Rome,

The ultimate dream I suppose is commercial fusion, but that is always a few decades away...

'Fusion' has been 'a few decades away' for the pretty much all of the 50 years of my life where I understood spoken language.  I've suspected for a long time that it's been accomplished, or at least that the path do accomplishment is well understood and simply in a holding pattern, for quite a long time.  It would be highly 'disruptive' to say the least.

The central characteristic of a technocracy as envisioned by those doing the early work pre-WWII involved a monetary system denominated in  energy units and a surveillance system powerful enough to track 'spending' with precision at an individual level.  The Covid-19 hoax is mostly about emplacing the elements of such a system (both physical and psychological) at a frantic pace, and making the cut-over under what they are now referring to as the 'global reset.'

1965  Other / Politics & Society / Re: [POLL] Is bitcointalk (still) very skeptical towards global warming science? on: August 29, 2020, 02:18:48 AM
I don't remember there every being a strong recognition of the fraudulent nature of the current implementation of the Club-of-Rome's climate scam even back in the earlier day when some of the main threads were more active.  But it seems that the current cohort of bitcointalk.org users are pretty much as likely as the average Joe to fall for whatever globalist-generated 'scienctism scam' is being pushed that day.  Maybe even more-so.

The education systems seems to have successfully pushed the narrative that 'science' means repeating whatever the (often falsely reported) 'consensus' view is according to the mainstream media.  The messaging is that if you believe what the media says scientists say, you are sort of a 'smart'(tm) junior scientist yourself.  Give yourself a social credit bonus!  If you don't, you are an anti-science person...who probably believes in Christianity or some anti-science shit.  Science and spirituality are compatible if and only if the spirituality is kabbalah-based and the church (if there is one) is registered correctly tax-wise.

What passes for 'science' vis-a-vis the climate these days is a LITTERAL doomsday cult replete with high priests, sacrifices, self-destructive rituals, etc.  It is kind of funny, if ominous, to watch.  For now,  But the cult is swelling daily, and more and more it is impacting us non-believers in tangible ways.

1966  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Trump Accomplishments (unmoderated) on: August 26, 2020, 08:09:40 PM
...
It feels like a conundrum trying to figure out what's really going on when it comes to Israel or Muslims in the middle east.
...

It 'feels' pretty straightforward to me:  Zionists are engaged in ethnic cleansing of the 'promised lands' roughly in accordance with the 'Yinon plan'.  Using their various influence in the U.S. they are shaking us down for money and bullet-stoppers in order to do it.

1967  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Trump Accomplishments (unmoderated) on: August 26, 2020, 05:42:40 PM

Free'd up a million N95 masks to send to Israel...by teaching American soldiers how to make masks by folding their tee-shirts in a certain way.


Got a source on that?


Mostly it has been scrubbed as is the common case with today's internet when something is derogatory toward Israel and/or Zionism.  There are some remnants kicking around.  e.g.:

  https://english.alaraby.co.uk/english/news/2020/4/8/did-the-pentagon-give-israel-1-million-face-masks



You can't be serious -- you're giving me a link to a website called ' The New Arab' here's a quote regarding them:

In January 2015, Fadaat launched Al Araby TV Network as a counterweight to Al Jazeera, which is viewed by some to hold a pro-Muslim Brotherhood bias.[3]

I don't think it really makes a lot of sense in regards to credibility of your source to send a clearly biased source regarding Israel. Don't you think that this would come up from another source, or be brought to light during an oversight committee hearing if this was substantiated?

So any source which Zionists cannot clean up is not credible, eh?  I see.

Back when it was more current I read the J-post article, or a screen cap of it.  It's not important enough to me to search a lot more.  This sort of censorship, scrubbing, and re-writing articles is ultra-common now.  I've seen it in real-time on numerous occasions.  And it ALWAYS goes one way; in defense of Zionists and Israel if it involves them at all.

It's to bad for Zionists that Israelis actually are among the most honest and outspoken, and while the media is very well owned/controlled in most of the rest of the world, it is harder to do in Israel interestingly enough.  A fair bit of good information actually can be gleened from reading their press, and one need not read between the lines as much.  You still do need to be Johnny-on-the-spot, though, because there is a fair bit of re-writing and deletion.  Especially when a story gets traction outside of the promised land.

1968  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Trump Accomplishments (unmoderated) on: August 26, 2020, 04:33:21 PM

Free'd up a million N95 masks to send to Israel...by teaching American soldiers how to make masks by folding their tee-shirts in a certain way.


Got a source on that?


Mostly it has been scrubbed as is the common case with today's internet when something is derogatory toward Israel and/or Zionism.  There are some remnants kicking around.  e.g.:

  https://english.alaraby.co.uk/english/news/2020/4/8/did-the-pentagon-give-israel-1-million-face-masks

1969  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Do you think COVID19 is a scam? on: August 26, 2020, 04:24:34 PM
It's obviously not a "scam" and it is very dangerous virus for elderly and people with some health issues.
...

So is any seasonal ailment.  Flu, cold, etc.

The end of many or most people's lives come when their bodies are weakened from old age and something comes along which puts them over the edge.  e.g., chest cold --> pneumonia --> death.  Sad, but that's how it works.  Always has, and always will (...irrespective of the trans-humanist utopian fairytales about uploading you consciousness to the Borg.)

In my English speaking SE Asian country we would anticipate about 300,000 deaths so far this year.  They are claiming the 'covid-19' deaths at 3000, but like everywhere else most of the people who actually died are elderly.  A graph showing the difference between a 'natural' 300,000 against the 'unnatural' 303,000 would show a bump which cannot even be seen.

This thing is a scam.  A 'mind virus' spread by non-stop psychological operations broadcast non-stop over the airwaves by the mainstream media which is owned across the board by the same 0.001% who own the monetary system.  The debt-backed monetary system which is not sustainable in steady-state and needs periodic 'resets'.

The more it becomes clear what sort of a scam this is, the more people close their eyes tight and seek the loving arms of Big Brother.  Something like the plandemic was anticipated by people like moi.  What I did not anticipate was that it would be a hoax, and even more surprising to me is that as obvious evidence of the fraudulent nature becomes crystal clear, people would react by doubling down and following to a tee the increasingly absurd directives (e.g., wear a mask for video conferencing!)  And also that it would be so easy to start people out by a three-week 'flatten the curve' promise then gently guide them to an expectation of years of house arrest and have them buy it.  Never bet against the AI simulations using 'rational agents' fed with data from Google, Facebook, etc.

1970  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Someone who believed virus not real had wife dead to Covid-19 on: August 26, 2020, 07:52:53 AM
...
The full news at
BBC News - Man who believed virus was hoax loses wife to Covid-19
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-53892856
...

Lol!  Same corporation who brought us the news about Saddam's WMDs.  The outfit exists to propagandize in support of corp/gov projects and they are under no obligation to tell the truth about anything.

A person would have to be a pretty lame simpleton to believe anything out of the BBC, or any other mainstream media outlet for that matter.  Especially anything about someone 'dying of covid-19' since the tests are still meaningless even if they wanted to report honestly.

1971  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Trump Accomplishments (unmoderated) on: August 26, 2020, 07:37:16 AM

Free'd up a million N95 masks to send to Israel...by teaching American soldiers how to make masks by folding their tee-shirts in a certain way.


1972  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Do you think COVID19 is a scam? on: August 24, 2020, 03:13:51 PM
It's being oversold to an extent. COVID-19 is dangerous, just not to everybody. If you're 60+, especially with preexisting conditions, this disease is deadly to you and it's worth it to isolate and quarantine

Everything is a threat to someone in that catagory.  In the overall mortality numbers (even WITH the massive fraud which is admitted in mixing 'with covid' with 'of covid' in the statistics) don't indicate that 'SARS-CoV-2' is any more dangrerous that any other flu, and more in line with the common cold.  Which, in fact, is probably what it is.

If the 'authorities are willing to blow the statistics and death records up in order to panic people, it follows that they would be happy to flat-out lie with the vids out of China purporting to show people keeling over dead in the street, with the 'glass lung' horse-shit (which seems pretty identical the the supposed 'vaping' lung in mid 2019) and so on.

The point is though, if you are 20yo with no underlying health conditions, then you can contract the virus and (likely) suffer only very mildly... but crucially you will act as a carrier and can pass the virus on to people who are older and more vulnerable, or who have a compromised immune system. The reason that healthy people have to isolate and quarantine is to protect others rather than just themselves. The fact that people are complaining about this is perhaps more than anything indicative of the selfishness endemic to modern societies.

A healthy 20yo can go out to a party on the weekend, contract Covid-19, and then turn up at their job at a care home on the Monday morning, and kill people.

No more than any of dozens of other ailments including every seasonal cold which has ever gone around. 

The authorities would love to make everything so scary that the peeps need to live in a bubble forever-more.  If they can justify it for the covid-19 nothingburger then they will be able to do so for everything else in the future.  In fact, that sounds like the plan.  Probably it is a scheme to bet everyone reporting for injections multiple times/year just by having some un-named bureaucrat who they label a 'medical professional' claim to find some fake 'next pandemic' viral DNA.

Old or sick people who feel like they are vulnerable can always stay home as they choose, and many of them do.  Just as has been the case for thousands of years without putting everyone under house arrest or making them wear mask and face shields like a bunch of jackasses.  As a matter of fact there have always germaphobe weirdos who compulsively wash everything and never get near people.  Probably some of had a hand in the design the covid-19 psy-op and 'new normal' so they themselves wouldn't be considered such bunch of freaks.

1973  Other / Politics & Society / Re: social distancing ? covid on: August 19, 2020, 04:45:51 PM

"Social distancing" is nothing more than a way of going live with 5G before the technology and infrastructure is ready for higher geospacial resolutions.  That will come with the higher frequencies...the initial implementations are using typical well used frequency ranges currently used for 4G, wi-fi, etc.

This is why 'social distancing' is fiercely enforced in only a handful of large cities where the heavy development is being undertaken.  Social distancing is given lip-service in most places, but most people pay no attention to it and the authorities don't really care that much.  If you are in a place where men with guns help you follow the IMF/WHO distancing guidance then you are probably in an one of the test-bed cities.



5G wasn't enough. They already have 6G in the works... and who-knows-what-else. So far most 5G doesn't extend far beyond the towers.


That's not a bug; it's a feature.  It is the excuse to put cell towers in every light-post.  Power levels drop off with respect to distance as a cubed function.  A light pole out on the street near one's house can achieve the same power levels against a target with a tiny amount of the power necessary for a large tower 500 meters away.

It is also worth understanding distance from a wave generating source (a tower) is really not as important as it was in technology prior to 5G.  What they are doing is trying to get waves from multiple towers to interefere in certain ways at distinct points in space.  By playing with the timings they can move the points in space where the waves happen to resonate with one another.

Certain of the 5G stuff I've read said straight-up that some of the tricks they would like to use are obviated when two target receivers (e.g., cell phones) are too close to one another.  'Too close' was not defined because it was not describing a particular system.  Just a concept that the technology anticipates making use of.  Anyway, having availed myself of some of these concepts, the 'social distancing' really does seem to fit the 5G testing hypothesis better than some flying spit thing.  Especially in light of the observations about how and where it is strongly enforced.

1974  Other / Politics & Society / Re: social distancing ? covid on: August 19, 2020, 01:33:51 PM

"Social distancing" is nothing more than a way of going live with 5G before the technology and infrastructure is ready for higher geospacial resolutions.  That will come with the higher frequencies...the initial implementations are using typical well used frequency ranges currently used for 4G, wi-fi, etc.

This is why 'social distancing' is fiercely enforced in only a handful of large cities where the heavy development is being undertaken.  Social distancing is given lip-service in most places, but most people pay no attention to it and the authorities don't really care that much.  If you are in a place where men with guns help you follow the IMF/WHO distancing guidance then you are probably in an one of the test-bed cities.

1975  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Russia has developed covid-19 vaccine. on: August 18, 2020, 04:34:25 PM

Not correct, vaccination against smallpox began as early as in 17th century. There was neither Big nor Small Pharma at that time. Doctors used variolation -"process by which material from smallpox sores (pustules) was given to people who had never had smallpox". Learn the history.

This and HCG for TB are the only two technologies I agree with after the years of research that I've done.  Part of the equation is that smallpox and tuberculosis are actually serious diseases that a person really does not want to get.  Unlike Chickenpox, mumps, measeles, etc which I would rather have gotten in an age appropriate way and thus achieve life-long immunity than not.

I put some effort into getting my daughter the old-school smallpox but decided that it was impossible.  I had it as a kid, and I probably got some more doeses in the military (along with bubonic plague.)  The reason I wanted to get some protection for my daughter is because smallpox could be what Bill and Melinda have planned for 'the next one.'

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3AEuRV2Ytc

There has been a fair bit of predictive programming about smallpox over the years, but it seems like it's withered on the vine a bit lately.  The U.S. maintains vast stockpiles of smallpox vaccine.  But since we've rolled around to the U.S. being probably up next on the chopping block, that argues against use of smallpox for phase-II.  'They' have hundreds of other equally good options though I'm sure.

1976  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Coronavirus Outbreak on: August 18, 2020, 04:06:32 PM

Actually, no.  It's terrible news.  No vaccine works on the innate immune system and the technology ignores the fact that the system even exists.

Even the ultra-modern mRNA vaccines work by trying to result in as many antibodies as needed (to reach an arbitrarily government set value required for licensing as 'effective' since finding out if they actually stop a person from getting a disease would be 'unethical'.)  The innate immune system (T-cells) are really fucking things up for the vax makers.  Periodic 'boosters' are quickly not working whatsoever in humans who seem to have a notably different immune system in this regard compared to laboratory animals when it comes to dealing with coronavirus specifically.  The mRNA designers are having add things to STOP the innate immune system from working [since it works against the vaccine itself] so that they can get the antibody count up to regulatory levels.  And they don't even know how long these re-programmed cells with damaged innate immunity will live on pumping out designer antigens.  They probably don't even know if the T-cell damaging framework effects only the re-programmed cells (which were successfully invaded with the designer genetic material) or all cells in the area.  I put a vid from from the AstraZeneca developers explaining this little issue a few days ago.

If ever there was a technology which set up to fail spectacularly it is this 'warp speed' mRNA and DNA vaccine...to be administered domestically in the U.S. by the army, and with the president (in red-face) strongly hinting that it will be at gunpoint.

Of course 'fail' means different things to different people.  Giving someone a debilitating chronic disease which requires a lifetime of expensive medication is 'not a bug; but rather a feature' to Big Pharma.  And some of these cretins like Bill Gates are pretty sure that the world has about 10 times more people than it should.  From that standpoint there is a possibility that it will be a great success.  Maybe as great as getting SV40 monkey cancer virus into the polio vaccine and ultimately getting cancer rates up to 25%.  My parents and grandparents who got that injection are batting 5 for 6 on getting cancer.  And the 6th (my dad) was told by the 'medical professionals' that he had cancer but he ignored it and nothing came of it.

First of all, T cells are involved in the adaptive immune system, not innate immune system.


Various kinds of T cells play a role in both systems in current generally accepted theory although it is clear that there are lots and lots of mysteries.

Unfortunately there is no mystery about how to make money n vaccines.  Get Antibodies.  Period.  Even if it means giving the victim a lifetime of autoimmune syndromes in traditional vaccines.

In the case of AstraZeneca's RNA tech (at least) it mean permanently damaging the immune system's ability to use interferon with MERS genetic sequences so it doens't disrupt their designer plasmids.  No one thought to wonder if screwing with this aspect of the immune system, noting that bears primary responsibility for dealing with one's own misbehaving cells (that is to say, cancer) might cause some long term issues.  Or did they?  Doesn't matter since fast-tracking the vaccine to combat this mild cold known as 'covid-19' ensures that there will be no long term safety studies.  As long as the cancer doesn't show up within half a year they are golden.  Almost certainly this is why the pharma companies are demanding (and getting) complete legal immunity from lawsuits against anything they do.


Secondly, clinical trials are when vaccines are tested on humans, and those are not forced. People consent to participate. Whatever response is seen on test animals can be tested to see if the response is mimicked in humans. 


As the AstraZeneca chief scientist says, humans actually respond in a notably different way than do lab animals.  So they added a bit more MERS gene sequences to their so-called vaccine.

In work on a coronavirus vaccine a decade ago the lab animals dropped like flies due to cytokine storms upon re-challenge.  I guess we'll in real life if that happens to humans after the army force=vaccinates everyone in the U.S. (except the wealthy presumably.)

1977  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Coronavirus Outbreak on: August 17, 2020, 05:28:14 PM
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.11.20171843v2

Quote
We found that recovered individuals developed SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG antibody and neutralizing plasma, as well as virus-specific memory B and T cells that not only persisted, but in some cases increased numerically over three months following symptom onset. Furthermore, the SARS-CoV-2-specific memory lymphocytes exhibited characteristics associated with potent antiviral immunity: memory T cells secreted IFN-γ and expanded upon antigen re-encounter, while memory B cells expressed receptors capable of neutralizing virus when expressed as antibodies. These findings demonstrate that mild COVID-19 elicits memory lymphocytes that persist and display functional hallmarks associated with antiviral protective immunity.

Promising news for a vaccine. New study basically suggests you retain antibody immunity after contracting the virus even if you only experienced mild symptoms. You retain these antibodies for an extended period (multiple months is what the study claims).


Actually, no.  It's terrible news.  No vaccine works on the innate immune system and the technology ignores the fact that the system even exists.

Even the ultra-modern mRNA vaccines work by trying to result in as many antibodies as needed (to reach an arbitrarily government set value required for licensing as 'effective' since finding out if they actually stop a person from getting a disease would be 'unethical'.)  The innate immune system (T-cells) are really fucking things up for the vax makers.  Periodic 'boosters' are quickly not working whatsoever in humans who seem to have a notably different immune system in this regard compared to laboratory animals when it comes to dealing with coronavirus specifically.  The mRNA designers are having add things to STOP the innate immune system from working [since it works against the vaccine itself] so that they can get the antibody count up to regulatory levels.  And they don't even know how long these re-programmed cells with damaged innate immunity will live on pumping out designer antigens.  They probably don't even know if the T-cell damaging framework effects only the re-programmed cells (which were successfully invaded with the designer genetic material) or all cells in the area.  I put a vid from from the AstraZeneca developers explaining this little issue a few days ago.

If ever there was a technology which set up to fail spectacularly it is this 'warp speed' mRNA and DNA vaccine...to be administered domestically in the U.S. by the army, and with the president (in red-face) strongly hinting that it will be at gunpoint.

Of course 'fail' means different things to different people.  Giving someone a debilitating chronic disease which requires a lifetime of expensive medication is 'not a bug; but rather a feature' to Big Pharma.  And some of these cretins like Bill Gates are pretty sure that the world has about 10 times more people than it should.  From that standpoint there is a possibility that it will be a great success.  Maybe as great as getting SV40 monkey cancer virus into the polio vaccine and ultimately getting cancer rates up to 25%.  My parents and grandparents who got that injection are batting 5 for 6 on getting cancer.  And the 6th (my dad) was told by the 'medical professionals' that he had cancer but he ignored it and nothing came of it.

1978  Other / Politics & Society / Re: what have we earned from handling epidemics on: August 17, 2020, 04:48:27 PM
What I noticed, people with entrepreneurial mindset will keep things on an even keel whatever the limits the country sets.

In my area (a certain English speaking SE Asian republic) they are having periodic liquor bans implemented on short notice.  If anyone just so happens to be able to predict when the mayor might get a wild hair and announce such a thing, I'm sure they are making bank.

Similarly the stupid fukin' face shields which are now in place.  They even made it necessary to put a plastic shield between a mortorcycle driver and his rider.  I've never seen anything so stupid and if someone told me that in 6 months people would be using such a thing to 'protect against' saliva droplets I would not have thought it possible.

I swear to God that if they said people had to walk on all fours to 'protect against' the bad bad common cold people in the cities would do so without complaint.  I like going out of the city and seeing people without masks and all the rest of the silly bullshit.  It has to be the case that 'they' are using some sort of electromagnetic mind-fuck devices in the so-called 'highly urbanized areas.'  I bought a rural place and am developing it with the hopes of living there permanently.  I don't think that the 'new normal' with all the masks and enforcers and citizen snitching and the rest of the stupidity is going away, and I prefer to be in the presence of people who have not been converted into drooling mind-fucked retards.

1979  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Don't buy facemasks for the coronavirus! on: August 16, 2020, 09:18:13 AM
...
but I just want to provide factual information about what happened in my country, and I don't really know what is happening in other countries. there is a pulmonologist who is very young and has no history of any disease, when he contracted coivd-19 he was not helped and died.
...

I'm sure that is what your read in the news and all, but there is no way to know that it is true.  It is clear that entities who have a lot of control of the mainstream corporate owned media such as the WEF wish to create panic, and the media has been caught a number of times faking stuff to try to make the problems seem worse than they are.

Between the obvious desire for fraud and myriad examples of it, the story make no sense.  Why would a pulmonologist be 'no helped'?  Smell like one more in a long list of hoax stories, and a lot of times doctors, or people who claim to be doctors, are involved in perpetrating the hoax.  The medical/industrial system is as a whole losing money in this thing, but some segments such as the 'covid-19' so-called 'front-liners' are demanding and getting a lot of extra resources.  They have reasons to perpetuate the hoax.

1980  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Coronavirus Outbreak on: August 15, 2020, 06:27:23 PM
I have to warn that this is going to be a deeply divisive post.

Russia has started commercial production of the Sputnik V vaccine, which they claim to be the first vaccine against COVID 19. They claim that trials have shown close to 100% effectiveness. The news is very promising, but the big question is whether we can trust them or not. My personal opinion is that since there is no other option available, we should go with this vaccine.



Cool!  100% is good.  You are totally free to take it of course.  Weekly if you like!

With 100% effectiveness there is no reason for people who don't wish to take it to be forced because it cannot be argued that we 'anti-vaxxers' are going to endanger anyone who doesn't want to take their chances with the scary scary wirus and prefers the safety of the vaccine instead.

Everyone is happy!

Pages: « 1 ... 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 [99] 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 ... 548 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!