LOL, congratulations bro !
Looks like criticism against you is disregarded thoughtfully.
Good luck.
|
|
|
You're missing the point, what i ask is the reason people can't download Bitcoin Core using UK IP address. AFAIK the court order doesn't mention Bitcoin Core at all.
Which would bring us to the point where we’re asking Cøbra why he’s done that on the website? If the court haven’t ordered that then why has he done it or approved somebody else to do it? 66,000,000 people in the UK & without a VPN or Tor none of them can now download & run Bitcoin Core. Maybe this is the reason. All this is sounding indigestible to me overall.
|
|
|
cobra only lost his websites case to display it because cobra didnt want to turn up and identify himself
This is like kicking in the ass of anonymity. Even when there was no solid proof from other side to sue Cøbra. But, anyways I admire Cøbra's firmness of not giving a shit. I was just here to confirm if the WhitePaper would still be there on Bitcoin.org.
|
|
|
So did we loose ? What's next ? Remove the WhitePaper or let the dogs bark ?
|
|
|
Another member I remembered is hacker10011001 but sadly he fell into some drama.
Oh yeah, what ever happened to him? I remember him getting into arguments on the forum but not any serious "drama" that would get him banned or necessitate him leaving bitcointalk. LoL , I didn't leave or anything of that sort. I did got my signature ban uplifted ( like shasan ) on 14 May 2021 though.
Pmalek, I have to admit that it's a bit strange that no one understood what the writer really wanted to say - even when the whole thing was clarified LFC_Bitcoin wrote a post like that - even the older members don't seem to read anything but the title and the first post I agree. It's kind of strange.
|
|
|
No way he would answer all this. He doesn't need to.
This might not be entirely accurate. Take it with a grain of salt and relax
|
|
|
There is nothing real to litigate, because everything is made up.
That's the solid core truth, whatever the fuck he says you should not drop down your anonymity for such an fly like Craig Wright from the pile of shit BSV. Bitcoin was always about protecting privacy !
|
|
|
This is like a dream come true ! Buying those shit NFTs at 1000 BTC, I have still have 900 BTC left though. Have a funny April Fools everyone.
|
|
|
Overall issue to be noted here is that JollyGood should be kicked out of the DT network after his noted multiple actions of use of the trust system in incorrect ways and also his cheap attempts to fire up the drama around himself.
this green dick measuring contest
Sounds nice.
|
|
|
~
So... you wanna take over the guild because authority is bad? May I suggest for your first executive order as the new guild president to consider firing the ^^^ plagiarising sockpuppeting shit bumper ^^^ who's been pretending to represent the guild in TECSHARE's absense. The one pretending to represent something here is you ( and your shit ego ) , or else you would have just not opposed the OP from the start.
|
|
|
Anyone in oppose of this threads has an opposite view against the real motives behind Bitcoin of forming an decentralized community in the world.
Don't let some of the great words by the TECSHARE forgotten. Implementation of objective standards is what would make this forum a better place for real development in decentralized technology.
|
|
|
Sorry TECSHARE, I was unable to Thank You for all you have done.
It is an unexplainable pain for the rest of my life you have left me with.
I have no words for now other than, rest is lots of peace TECSHARE. You were an legend !
Edit : @Theymos thank you for the costume title and for honoring someone worth all of it.
|
|
|
Maybe only BitMaxz can confirm what's the correct story here or if he sold or bought those auto banned accounts in the past.
I believe that @BitMaxz created this account @bitcoinboy12 and then sold it in 2016. That doesn't explain why @BitMaxz includes @bitcoinboy12 into his trust list until 2019 if he sold it in 2016.
|
|
|
My understanding was that the connected accounts (or the BitMaxz account) were sold a long time ago, so those connections might not be accurate. I don't think it's right to remove someone simply for being a bought account back when account selling/buying was common and not really frowned upon. I think at one point I even sold accounts myself obtained from defaulted loans.
Definitely could be wrong; someone please correct me if so.
Maybe only BitMaxz can confirm what's the correct story here or if he sold or bought those auto banned accounts in the past. Also, if nobody noticed here @BitMaxz had both crairezx20 and bitcoinboy12 in his trust list until 2019-02-16. That somehow points to some connection until then at least. https://loyce.club/trust/2019-02-16_Sat_13.06h/525056.htmlNote: I just hope BitMaxz has a better explanation to it.
|
|
|
^ I don't think i will be posting in this thread but i will make sure to update and share the full list of accounts i believe are connected to game-protect, hopefully early next week. It's easier to talk/reply to people/accounts when you know who is behind them. wip: profile - profile link - password change gosha@e-coin - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=409314 4/11/2020 Cacingkemi - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=895005 10/31/2020 coin.princess - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=330687 10/5/2020 ongkok87 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=918119 8/9/2020 BitcoinAccepted - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=139132 10/6/2020 yayayo - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=101572 4/12/2020 zidanw - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=919959 8/30/2020 MI6 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=756924 8/10/2020 cutesgirl - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=989206 10/21/2020 gadado - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=228733 4/16/2020 aomakun - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=897809 11/2/2020 nasipadang - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=920708 10/16/2020 qory - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=412318 8/10/2020 RokokGudangGaram - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1056048 8/10/2020 kkaroul4 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=915384 8/16/2020 wildan88 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=373947 8/9/2020 BlackFor3st - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=148841 5/14/2020 BTCGOLD - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=64724 9/28/2020 ufaiz50 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=858014 11/11/2020 codegnome - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=81910 9/24/2020 safari88 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=378112 8/28/2020 Arcas - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=111993 9/4/2020 ronaldo40 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=373301 8/16/2020 imutlinda - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=897892 11/7/2020 sempak - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=520764 8/4/2020 pungopete468 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=194388 8/4/2020
As, @morvillz7z wasn't in a mood to post this here I would go ahead and quote him. I agree with all of the above accounts being GP or atleast casino shills which is shady from the casino's side itself and what makes accusations in the OP falling in line. All the above mentioned account have there password changed in 2020, some of them even wearing signatures from the inactive campaigns, but recently shilling for some common casino's.
|
|
|
2021 looks like a bigger surprise than 2020 ! ( ohh, it's already too much of an excitement )
Anyways, have a great next year QS.
|
|
|
as long as he's not abusing his status I'm fine ignoring him being on it since he'll probably rotate off eventually. Leaving ratings like whiner, dumb hysterical bitch, stupid idiot, fuckhead, raped, bash your head in, piss on your head, is abuse. If you think that is not trust abuse, then you are stupid. Death threats are also against forum rules. Trust is for trading risk, not for name calling and death threats. If Ratimov can't control his anger, then he shouldn't be DT1. Simple. I agree, use of such words in retaliation trust rating's by a DT1 is unethical at most and such users are harm to a drama free trust system.
|
|
|
Luckily for him, he has earned to reputation of a village idiot and is not in DT so most people tend to let it slide. Hehe, I think I'm the first one calling him that name Back on topic now, let's remember though that hacker and andulolika are well known for being imbeciles as well (besides being illiterate, underclassmen, unable to write correctly "OK" etc.) and even though, they were tagged. Their dementia did not save them from having a negative trust score. This medical illness should also not save Timelord. Trading with you @GazetaBitcoin is more risky than anyone you are talking about in the above reply. To say about underclass and illiterate, you are as imbecile as not knowing that your Wisdom Vomiting techniques and Ant size ego are not appreciated anywhere around, also you have no knowledge about how the feedback and flag system works here. Go off to your usual movie watching !
|
|
|
|