Bitcoin Forum
May 13, 2024, 08:04:59 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 ... 87 »
301  Economy / Reputation / Re: DT-members who have negative feedback (or are banned) on: March 27, 2020, 01:43:27 PM
I am sure you would never like Burying the hatchet and you don't have any other motive than attacking weak here. You are as low as kicking an apology on face.
And who are those weak people?

Stop shitposting you ICO bump account, there are some negative ratings which shouldn't be in trust feedback. You have topic, read it and find them.

I can't defend myself from your biased and selective ratings as you think that everyone should be perfect here and could never change in his deeds although I have not attempted to scam anyone. You even landed me up until getting your buddies interested in my personal info and attempting to threaten me with doxxing. I politely explained my situation to you in PM and even said about it not being repeated by me once I got aware year's back. Yet you still thinking of me as an ICO bump account is an big flaw in your judgement and hence my interpretation of you not really meaning to bury the hatchets here.
302  Other / Meta / Re: Suggestion for reporting posts on: March 27, 2020, 11:20:48 AM
Isn't multiple reports an matrix of getting the post deleted soon or doesn't it even increase the probability of it being handled ?
It should only take 1 moderator to look at the report and decide if they want to take action or leave the post as is. No reason they would need to see something reprted 25 times to finally decide to delete.

Ok, I agree, it would not matter much but atleast give moderator an view of this post really being spammy due to multiple reports on the same.

This even makes sense here and could make the doubt in the OP about marking multiple reporting clear.


I would like to know if I report 1 post two times or a two people report one same post does it comes as a two different cases or one case with 2 reports?

Still no answer to this question, hoping to get some information on how the report system is working so we can be more efficient.
AFAIK If two/three/ten people report a post then they all get credited for a good report if the post/thread has been deleted. If multiple people have reported a post they come up as separate in the report queue. However, if a moderator deletes the post all the users are credited with a good report. If the post is moved, then not all reports are credited with a good report, and quite often if someone hasn't specified something along the lines of "Wrong section, doesn't belong in <section>" then a moderator may think you are reporting it for being in the current section it's been moved too and thus mark it as a bad report.

I'm unsure what happens if an account is banned, but their posts haven't been removed. However, I would think that after someone has been banned the report would still remain in the queue, and you would be marked on it's accuracy. A moderator probably knows if a user has been banned, and might mark your report good without removing it.
303  Other / Meta / Re: Suggestion for reporting posts on: March 27, 2020, 10:39:28 AM
Isn't multiple reports an matrix of getting the post deleted soon or doesn't it even increase the probability of it being handled ?
304  Economy / Reputation / Re: DT-members who have negative feedback (or are banned) on: March 27, 2020, 04:01:22 AM
@LoyceV thanks for this topic, it cleared certain things. I would actually like to call "certain members" to bury hatchet if they are willing to.

I am sure you would never like Burying the hatchet and you don't have any other motive than attacking weak here. You are as low as kicking an apology on face.

305  Other / Meta / Re: Report Malware and Suspicious Links here so Mods can take Action ! on: March 27, 2020, 03:40:15 AM
And this thread [ANN] 🔶🔶🔶 Prizm Cash - SAME SAME, BUT DIFFERENT 🔶🔶🔶 has something Suspicious too !
Will watching it !

Spanish office (the building looks very weird ... searched the address on google maps) and website in EN & RU ... nothing weird here  Cheesy

I am sure they are scam. They are using some cheap ICO temple's worth ~20$ which I could just judge from looking at there website.

https://bestwebcreator.com/cryptocash/demo/index-royal-blue-modern.html#

I can even say this is not the only scam ICO the same individual is running as the above pack comes with more similar ICO temple's.  Grin
306  Other / Meta / Re: Bitcoin Discussion - Corona Virus Spamming on: March 27, 2020, 03:15:56 AM
Let's consider a good effects from the Corona Virus Spamming epidemic on the forum. How I call it as a good thing. Many of them will end with plagiarism and the forum will be cleaner with less spammers.

For the others who don't plagiarise, they will stop it when the pandemic is contained globally. That is not too far from now. Depends on each nation, from epidemic peak, it takes around 1 month to stabilize and next 2 months to bring nearly all things back to normal. I guess about 4 to 6 months from now, the world will become safer and the Coronavirus spam epidemic on the forum will stop. Just my hope.

In the meantime, I am waiting to see more ban appeals from plagiarism.

I think you should check out about new hantaviruse as your hope could blew off !

All you want to know about hantavirus that killed a man in China this week
307  Other / Meta / Re: [BitCoinTalk][COVID-19] Grim Reality on: March 27, 2020, 02:46:38 AM
"Acthar used to cost $40, but Mallinckrodt has raised the price of the drug to over $39,000 per vial."

That was a quote I saw somewhere showing the greed of people during times of need.  :/

Source : https://m.slashdot.org/story/367522

Quote
The city of Marietta, Georgia is suing drug manufacturer Mallinckrodt after Mallinckrodt increased the price of the drug Acthar by 97,500%.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court, claims one city employee needs the drug Acthar, which is used to treat seizures in small children.

"Acthar used to cost $40, but Mallinckrodt has raised the price of the drug to over $39,000 per vial," the city claims in the lawsuit. "This eye-popping 97,500% price increase is the result of unlawful and unfair conduct by Mallinckrondt. The city has expended over $2 million for just one patient covered by the city's self-funded health plan...."

Atlanta pharmacist Ira Katz said Acthar is what's called a "biologic" and they can be classified as specialty drugs. "They put them into the specialty class, and the prices are outrageous, just outrageous," Katz said.


I guess he is worried about his own medical expenses and indicating the same ! I am at max level of sadness though.
308  Other / Meta / Re: Suggestion: allow on-forum altcoin giveaways for established altcoins on: March 26, 2020, 05:39:21 PM
Doesn't this include moderators making decisions about which altcoins are shitty and which are not ? It would make it more like altcoins are moderated which is avoided here from the start.
309  Economy / Reputation / Re: DT-members who have negative feedback (or are banned) on: March 26, 2020, 02:43:16 PM

It even could be an experimental move, it was just for 5 hours. You are going with too much of conspiracy.

Experimenting what smart-ass ? A cure for coronavirus ? Solving the string theory ?


Since he was outed as doing everything to manipulate the trust system and get into DT ,   does my explanation make any sense to you ?


Why is it always that red tagged people , no matter what simply back eachother up , regardless of logic ,   is there a dumbass private club , where you pledge your loyalty to one another ?


Ok, no red tag gang member, you are right at your logic he was making an highly complex move to manipulate the trust system by including you for 5 hours in his trust list. Genius !
310  Economy / Reputation / Re: DT-members who have negative feedback (or are banned) on: March 26, 2020, 02:24:02 PM
snip

I think peloso is one of the 2-3 people here I took the time to add to my distrust list .    What I find "strange" is that he sent me a Pm , once he saw I distrusted him :
why you distrusted me?

And a few minutes later he added me to his trust list ? for around 5 hours ?  Huh         Was that an attempt to make me remove him from my distrust list ? Like scratching eachother's backs ?

It even could be an experimental move, it was just for 5 hours. You are going with too much of conspiracy.
311  Other / Meta / Re: Bitcoin Discussion - Corona Virus Spamming on: March 26, 2020, 02:53:36 AM
It's a global issues, it's everywhere because it's that serious. Even most of the intelligent peoples around the world would be most probably discussing about COVID-19 and it's impact. I don't find any other issues to be more risky for me, not even red tags, so loads of threads are acceptable IMO.
312  Other / Meta / Re: History - Bitcoin Savings and Trust and Pirateat40 on Bitcointalk (PONZI) on: March 25, 2020, 01:10:38 PM
When pirate disappeared I did pay out the insurance claims, but by that point nearly everyone had left my program to deposit directly with pirate, leaving my insurance fund to cover far more of the remaining balances than expected and leaving users ecstatic as they had been also receiving interest for months.
Putting aside the very strong evidence that you straight up stole from investors:

The ~BTC2,600 that were invested a few weeks before the collapse (August) had a BTC65 'reserve', which was eventually paid out to 4 investors when their ~BTC1,000 combined balance was written off.

I estimate you made well over BTC1,000, risk free, by paying out less than half the interest you received from pirateat to your 'investors'.

But yeah, you put BTC65 aside for when it collapsed. While keeping almost 20x that for yourself and at times having more than 60x that invested. Good for you.


No one who invested with OG ever complained about it. Your personal grudges and jealousy from it are pretty transparent in your actions here.

Judging about 1000's of BTC and how they should have been handled LOL !

Atleast check the purpose of the OP before posting.
313  Other / Meta / Re: As many others I'm banned for 7 days on: March 25, 2020, 12:56:57 PM
Next time post something relevant or don't even bother to post your nonsense personal attack, ty.

Really ! clam on dude, he did nothing ! He gave the most vice advice around the world for now.
314  Other / Meta / Re: Does Nick Szabo have an account here ? on: March 25, 2020, 04:56:21 AM
I did spend some time trying to find out on my own and came up empty.  I just enjoy reading old posts from legends in this space, like Hal Finney for example, and have always wondered if Nick was active here at all.

I don't think Nick Szabo ever registered here.

Yet you could read much info about him and his writings from his blogger profile here : https://www.blogger.com/profile/16820399856274245684 Or you can even find intresting disscussion about him from some of the previous threads on Bitcointalk itself. [1]
315  Other / Meta / Re: [BitCoinTalk][COVID-19] Grim Reality on: March 25, 2020, 04:02:57 AM
Can we please have a sensible discussion of this issue and any solutions to identifying UID's that fall silent during this period and are potentially hacked/brought back to life later?

For the purposes of the forum, I don't see how this would differ from business-as-usual handling of the issue. You're making too many assumptions. If there's mass extinction, I guarantee you we'll have more important things to worry about than whether bitcointalk accounts are hacked or not.

I have Glioblastoma, given ~2 months to live. I am currently at Nathan Adelson Hospice in Las Vegas, under quarantine for Coronavirus,

Hope you are fine and get to a better health soon.
 
With LOVE.
Regards,
316  Economy / Reputation / Re: Vod is a liar. on: March 25, 2020, 03:07:41 AM
You ran your own little ponzi, offering an extra 2% to anyone who would leave 500 btc with you.   And this is while you knew it wasn't a legit biz.  When pirate sent you the coins you kept them, and paid out your ponzi with the penny fund.

Now you are using the communities money to buy a Tesla truck.  It's quite clear.

Edited to include the post where OG started his own ponzi, before he says I'm lying again.  

Quote from: OgNasty the scammer!
LOYALTY REWARDS PROGRAM:

In order to reward larger depositors, I am introducing a Loyalty Rewards Program.  Effective immediately, depositors with at least 250 BTC in deposits will automatically be enrolled into the program.  For each completed interest rate period, depositors with 250+ BTC in deposits will be rewarded with a 1% interest rate increase per month.  Depositors with 500+ BTC in deposits will be rewarded with a 2% interest rate increase per month.  See below example.

Example:
250+ BTC deposited in April would receive a base rate interest payment on May 1st, +1% on June 1st, +2% on August 1st, etc.
500+ BTC deposited in April would receive a base rate interest payment on May 1st, +2% on June 1st, +4% on August 1st, etc.

Depositors who fall below the 250 BTC loyalty requirement will forfeit their previously earned rewards.
Depositors who fall below the 500 BTC loyalty requirement will have their previously earned rewards cut in half.

20% maximum monthly interest rate applies.

UPDATE:
Accounts holding 250+ BTC will now receive a flat 2% interest rate reward.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=75843.msg854449#msg854449

All of this was 6 years ago with no victim's as investors. What an childish bullshit ! I can't imagine theymos is still letting this deception in.
317  Economy / Reputation / Re: User creating new accounts just to leave fake negative feedback on: March 24, 2020, 05:33:20 PM
Best advice would be ignoring those baseless feedbacks as they would appear under untrusted feedbacks list to most.
318  Economy / Reputation / Re: What is the real use for neutral feedback? on: March 24, 2020, 04:30:50 AM
Yes. That's literally what it says on the trust page: "Other comments."

Granted a note saying that you're on someone's ignore list seems meaningless without explanation but it's a neutral... who cares.


Mostly, many of them do care about it if it's from someone in default trust network.

You can vote against it with "~".

Thanks for the advice though.
319  Economy / Reputation / Re: What is the real use for neutral feedback? on: March 24, 2020, 04:10:47 AM
Logically, it's not intended to be used as a sticky note and if everyone or mostly DTs use it around as a note than user's trust wall's here would be one of the rarely visited pages due to extrem amount of BS. Also there are more better option to add a note to a person with other 3rd party applications, as anyone assigning or noting it doesn't need to make it that public.


dkbit98 got mad:

Why the f. you tag and quote me, and dig-up this topic?
Did you fill up your chipmixer signature quote.... good for you.
I don't care much about your opinion dude so don't quote me again please.
Thanks

And then used his sticky notes on my trust page.

He seem to be very thin skinned DT and doesn't seem to suit there too. My polite and friendly replies to him were turned into back attacks by him, without even my notice.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5234209.msg54083420#msg54083420
Quote
Go hack yourself please, and cover yourself with a blanket after.
It's embarrassing...

I didn't even got a laughter though.
320  Economy / Reputation / Re: Bitcoin Chaser promotes shady & provably scamming gambling sites on: March 23, 2020, 01:38:22 PM
Now, finally: We have removed 1xBit from our most important page and will start decreasing the visibility of their platform gradually. We have answered every comment and concern and we are actively trying to build trust within this forum.

I am talking off my support from the flag on Bitcoin_chaser due to there active step and hope they act in users intrest further.

It's not that hard of an logic, if you recommend legimate exchanges you would attract legimate crowd. Good Luck !
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 ... 87 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!