I wouldn't donate it unless there is a way to confirm that any of his relatives have access to the funds. It would be a waste if you donate it while knowing that the funds will be lost.
Guess it's already confirmed here that his family has access to the donation address. |
|
|
|
Use "Report to moderator" and report the posts that break the rules. I doubt there was only one plagiarized post.
A wall of text is unlikely to convince moderators to just ban him again for a previously reported issue.
Funny, moderator deletes more on topic posts from genuine people and leaves the ones from trolls from this very thread too. I wonder how effective the report on plagiarism would be. Seems there is on going moderation bias by somebody. Sounds about right from your habbit of being biased even in this thread too by ignoring the fact that the OP is full of shit. |
|
|
|
Sorry for busting your bubble, but I don't think the above message or account is in anyway related to me. |
|
|
|
|
One can't become more naive, workless and mentally effected due to effects of Lockdown and Quarantine more than the OP. Seek doctor's help.
|
|
|
|
Why the fuck are all these ICO bump accounts connected to hacker?
I am repeating my clear explanation to this here. ( Could be my last time ) Yes, I was involved in bumping business and I even had many other users working around me. I am obligate to not reveal anything insider from it and it is even unethical for me to comment about others accounts and there address transactions with one of my address regarding such type of service. But I am not involved in any such type of further activities from this accounts as I don't control any of them. I would also like to assure everyone here that I am not involved in bumping now and not willing to facilitate it in future. Sorry, but I am out of this attacks and repeating my answers again so, I feel I had enough of your dump Questions/Answer sessions. |
|
|
|
What a waste of time using the unIGNORE on him to read this waffle and then to re-add him to my IGNORE list.
Is this the best they can come up with? They think they are insulting or attacking users that are trying to uphold the morals of this forum but they are just a group of misguided attention seeking users that have ulterior motives. [...]
-snip-
[...] Instead of holding hacker0101000101 to account they continue to deflect attention away from him, they harbour and shelter him, like he does them akin to bosom-buddies just because they have personal vendettas against users such as Lauda and marlboroza.
What an dump person you are to waste your time even after knowing you are wasting it at first. You are as dump as not able to utilize the IGNORE feature of the forum in an intended way. Your childish ways of putting it on and off and crawring in every thread with nothing of an matter and vomiting your uncalled wisdom are pretty naive and should be noted by the user's including you in there trust lists and thinking your judgement is vaild ( moderators too should see this deflections ) . BTW, YoBit drama was an nice attention seaker for you with your power hunger. ~JollyGood is the best course of action left for anyone with an right mind as your digging your own hole with flexing your ulterior judgements and motives around the board. |
|
|
|
-snip-
It's your own interpretation of me being at very high risk and harmful to the forum, whatever pentun hunting your doing and calling it as "investigation" is an total witch hunt, same proves an pattern which you and your friends follow to harass the user's and abuse the system to stop real criticism against you. Your cherry picking of comments is an very bad and cheap tactics to hide your ways of attacking users here. I even think many of my legimate attempts of my defense are drilled by many of your buddies. |
|
|
|
Some low rank bounty managers "Newbie or Jr Members" seem dont care about the reputation of their accounts when managing bounty. They allow cheater to occur on bounty they manage, especially on social media campaigns such as "Twitter and Facebook". Lack of manager attention to user registration allows people to cheat in various ways in campaigns. As I got it today Cheater bounty hunters found. I hope we can find a solution for cases like this, and if not, maybe there will be many users who are harmed by fraudsters. POA which is proof that someone joined the original account can still be manipulated by fraudsters by sending other users POA posts when filling out forms. Hiring an experienced manager could be the best solution until. Most of this "Newbie or Jr Members" accounts you are pointing to are somewhat cheating on there own bounty budget mostly by managing the bounties by themself with less experience or with the only motive of marketing without understanding the rules around. |
|
|
|
You have to be really, really bored to troll scammer like that  It's even hard for me to imagine if this guy has scammed anyone from years. He seems to be much naive afterall.
Really an waste of his LIFE !
They wouldn't be doing this if it doesn't "work", people got scammed by even bigger bullshit than this one. I would better vote on last question to the above scammer being how much have you scammed until with this method really ? I have even seen scammers asking help for withdrawing or recovering fund stuck on there exchange. I have BTC an one exchange, but I can not withdraw them, my account was blocked for suspicion of spam, I already wrote in support, they told that I can to transfer my funds to another person (friend), it’s a badly, I haven’t any friends who can help me with this problem, I must to ask in stranger...
Can I transfer to your account in this site my (0.94 BTC), you will withdraw them to wallet and after this you will transfer to my wallet minus 15%? It's like a clash in there scamming ways, while both the scammer could help each other in scamming each other. |
|
|
|
Actually it is about Lauda, because his criticism of Lauda was the impetus behind your peanut hunting expedition. It is all ways the same group of people with big red floppy shoes coming after anyone who does anything but wash the balls of The Clown Pope. This tactic designed to silence criticism is demonstrated by all the same users, over, and over, and over again. Still no one can tell me the imminent threat Hacker1001101001 poses to the community that warrants this kind of continual and endless prostate exam.
My main qualm with hacker1001101001 was his response when I was asking how to report a member for posting an invite to kill another member in the personal message space. (The one found below the avatar.) There isn't any feature to report a personal text on the forum to be a threat and I don't think it should be reportable as it is a users personal advertising space.
I don't even think it is that serious of an threat though, rather just an move out of spite.
Thank goodness that the administrator disagreed and ended up temp banning the offending member. Poo pooing death threats clearly shouldn't be what this board is about. FYI, I was not advocating for death threats to be allowed on the borad, rather the reply was based on the minimal effect of the death threat you mentioned in the OP ( i.e A newbie with an personal text containing death threat ) on anyone around here. I didn't knew it was offensive and would land me up with being on your exclusion list.  |
|
|
|
|
See you on the other side !
Rest in peace Bruno, may you be remembered as an classic page in the book of Crypto and Bitcointalk history..
|
|
|
|
|
It's even hard for me to imagine if this guy has scammed anyone from years. He seems to be much naive afterall.
Really an waste of his LIFE !
|
|
|
|
It seem that type 1 flag is shown in yellow to the newbies who have less than 7 days of login time. Type 2/3 flags are shown in red though.
Are you sure? I just registered an account to test this and its still red. However, it shows yellow on his trust page: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2532772Basically it should show like this as per I know.  But even I can see a red warning as you quoted above for the OP's started threads, don't know how a red warning is triggered even though it's a type 1 flag but it's wired. |
|
|
|
Correct me if am wrong, i thought Type 2 and Type 3 are the ones visible as red flags and thus known by that name.
The type 1 flag is also red. But I prefer and recommend that people call them "flag type 1/2/3" so we can all know what people are talking about.  It seem that type 1 flag is shown in yellow to the newbies who have less than 7 days of login time. Type 2/3 flags are shown in red though. |
|
|
|
More peanuts hunting and you are mentiong the same information again and again[...]
I worked with this type of services back then
Please elaborate my latest discovery and many transaction coming from you to various ICO bump accounts. Did you send ethereum to these accounts for ICO payed bump? Your lastest discovery ! All of that is public and anyone who wants to judge can see I have done business with them and I am not obligate to explain each and every transaction from my wallet ( most of them I don't even remember ) also, that doesn't prove anything more than me paying or receiving funds from them and you repeating the same question again and again like a dump. and flexing it make me look more bad.
You can't look "more bad" than you are looking right now. Maybe bad for you. |
|
|
|
I understand that bump whore accounts are receiving money from bump services, but account hacker has large number of transactions TO such accounts, and, as he is giving his best to deflect this topic I have no other reason than to believe hacker is behind one of such service or he was filling addresses of alt accounts while receiving money from bump service. I am not sure, but I would place my bet on "behind bump".
More peanuts hunting and you are mentiong the same information again and again and flexing it make me look more bad. Yes there are transactions between me and those accounts. Marking it red and violate doesn't indicate anything other than me being in business with them around 600 days ago. I worked with this type of services back then, which I have accepted many times in this exact thread. Atleast tell us what you are hunting for other than shooting those blind arrows in the air.
-snip- I think there was a period when he started adding various people to his trust/distrust list as well as leaving positive and negative feedback all based on political maneuvering which was based solely around the long term target trying to make an income from either signature campaigns and possibly as a campaign manager while under the guise of being a good standing member of this community. That fake persona mask slipped a long time ago. His real characteristics and vindictive nature (at least for this particular user name hacker1001101001) is there for all to see. He knows the reputation of this particular login has been shattered so he cannot use it for the motives he had when he created it therefore expect more of the same low level posts from him. I added him to my IGNORE list long ago so I can skip past his posts unless I read them when they are quoted in replies by others. I could not do anything more than laugh on your assumptions. JollyGood even thinks I created this account out of the above mentioned motives. Really this guy is shown at default trust.  |
|
|
|
I have had some past interactions with you hacker, and surely I have tried to give you the benefit of the doubt on several occasions, but you surely seem to have issues with your personality and your ways of interacting with people, including a kind of bullying that I had specifically experienced... But, hey, an aberration? I am not sure. I do see that you seem to want to whine about things of the past that have even seemingly had been resolved, but you just continue to dig yourself in, for some reason... I am trying not to be too judgmental, though.
I don't rely on the comments or interactions of other members, but sometimes it can be helpful to view the assessments or look into the links provided by various other members in order to attempt to verify what makes sense or does not make sense.
I trying to oppose you here is not just because of your past interactions with me. I don't even think I could show a calming personality if I am being attacked even after accepting and apologizing my mistakes. It's my observation of your merit transactions in the every drama thread around here which turns me to think about your that way. As per my understanding you could never judge a situation neutrally when the above names are involved, and I am afraid you would do the same here. I have no benifit of making enemies here, if you understand it correctly but I have no other choice than making it clear for everyone who is judging the situation also I am the one in need of support so I don't enjoy this attacks and counter attacks. |
|
|
|
Aaaa haaa ! He drives over here to merit double standards and agendic posts similar to which I got a red tag for from Lauda. Check out merit transactions outside of his safe drive zone, you would get it. |
|
|
|
I have answered that already, so stop steering bullshit and acting like a scam buster when you are behind peanuts. More stupid thing about your witch hunt here is that my mistake was done year's back and you are pretending to protect from nothing. To prove you to be more dump and double standard here check your own comment on Lauda's red trust due to the merit transactions. I was tagged once because I have sent merit to post, it is not cool. Good thing is that person who sent me negative removed it.
Why would you merit post where Tec's hare calls lauda scammer and you defend OG when other users call him out and you don't send them merit?
Makes no sense, double standards.
Most of your judgments are double standards here, and in same way you promote abuse. The flag started by Lauda doesn't makes sense or is not warrant. Your move of supporting it makes that more shit.
Nothing hacker1001101001 has done warrants this kind of persistant attention.
I don't know how "persistant" it is but hacker1001101001 sure has done a lot of untrustworthy shit, from plagiarism to ICO bumping to deceptive sockpuppeting and lying about it... if you don't care about that stuff in your guild it doesn't mean that others must not care either. It looks to me like it's pretty much the opposite than what you're saying, as it often is the case with users that you add to your trust list because they talk/act favorably towards you - it's not so much about Lauda but more about your inability to admit that you're a poor judge of character. Poor judge of character...hmmm Are you sure you are right at judging characters here ? Btw, just due to your ability to judge character here, is it Ok to start a type 1 flag if I think someone has an highly evil character in himself and they are even high risk to deal with as "personal information" is not safe with them and you could be blackmailed or harassed with it in the future. I even have a case study to put it as a reference to prove personal information in there hand can posses a high risk. |
|
|
|
This all began the moment hacker1001101001 started being critical of the actions of lauda. You peanut hunters are not slick at all. Everyone knows this is about retribution, not about protecting the forum from scams.
LOL hacker1001101001's unraveling surely couldn't have started when he was caught plagiarizing because that wouldn't fit your narrative. I guess the good news is that your guild is DOA if you need fish for members in the shallow end of the spammer pool. First of all that is a forum rules issue, not a trust system issue. Under the forum administration he was unbanned, so the matter was resolved. The attention really only came once he dared speak nothing but praise to one of the chosen clowns. How odd! No one seemed to give a fuck for 5 months until Lauda's butt was hurt and the peanut hunting crew was dispatched to dig through all the toilet bowls looking for anything they could collect to use as retribution. Still, no one has explained to me the imminent threat this user poses to warrant this amount of attention. This looks exactly like the hate boner for Quickseller all of the same clowns were insistent on having. Lauda has a VERY long history of leaving ratings for nothing more than criticizing them, and manufacturing stupid shit around it to give it the appearance of a valid rating. This case is no different. This is retribution against one of the "plebeians" for daring to think they are free to criticize one of the chosen clowns. To make you more clear and right SIR, it more precisely started here Today I got a navigate trust rating for sending merits to a post I found informative...yes read again sending merits, and it was by someone who has lots of inclusions from well-known members here. Lauda 2019-12-29 Reference Maliciously merits what he/she knows to be a lie in order to propagate it and cause harm to me. Wouldn't trust as far as I could throw them, now should anyone trust a word they say. when I have gave merit to one of your post I liked and felt the information in the post had some logical meaning because of which Lauda got offended with it as far as giving me a red trust and starting a witch hunt around me by abusing both trust and flag system now. And as always there gang members started licking Lauda's word's here as much as they can to be a part of the cult. Objective Standards Guild is way better than the evil cult, could even be out of once understanding. For someone who seriously wants to judge should surely see the reference attached to the above feedback. Lowest level shit and prove of this being nothing more than puenut hunting witch hunt. I guess I could find more bigger ICO scams faster than what time marlboroza has invested here in this thread until, but he doesn't witch hunt accounts randomly. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
