|
Flag supported. But as I can see, they have removed 1xBit from there hottest casino recommendation now.
|
|
|
|
He also encouraged others from his local language board to play the race card and started aligning with equally obnoxious users such as hacker1001101001 in order to create a highly divisive atmosphere in this forum.
Come on, what do you do ? Be racist with others and create a very very highly divisive atmosphere on forum aligning with equally evil user's like you with motives of abusing power to show seniority and double standards. As I already said, you are nowhere near a person to be given respect for anything and one is sure to get disrespect, taste of your ego or seniority back at most. Even I sent you a PM, saying I trusted you and even gave you a feedback about your scam busting work before talking anything in personal. But what I got was you screaming scam out at me on forum, even though I was ready to explain you the situation genuinely. The above PM from Vispilio was more gentle than what you vomite in most of the public posts of yours. It purely indicates he was upto something friendly and mutual, but as I said you are driven by others agendas and not a good person to even talk with. Please, you belong nowhere near DT. |
|
|
|
Its still not clear if this 171BTC is legit or not. He admitted he cheated in the past but if his claim right now is a legit win, how should Bitcasino go over this that spectators like us knew who tells the truth?
If I rob a money room at a casino and then go play high stakes roulette or whatever and win big, do you think they'll let me keep the winnings if they found out I robbed them before playing? EDIT; What I'm saying is that none of it matters when the user was found out - and admitted to cheating the system. But it is even important to know that did he won the 171 BTC purely out of lucky ( as per the winner claiming he did ) or through some vulnerability in that specific game. It could even cost millions of dollars worth BTC to future victim casinos if it's a crack in the game. |
|
|
|
|
It surely looks like all of the accounts posting on your thread negatively are alts of the same person, who at the same time is offering installation services for your own script. Looks shady as hell, the guy is surely upto damaging your costumers security through this in a clear manner.
You should try reporting his posts as spam to mod.
|
|
|
|
after Lauda was pushed aside, it seems the next target is @JollyGood. it all seems to me like an already seen witch-hunting scenario.
This clearly show's your biased judgement over various other situations in the past and even your trust list. There are people shouting abuse, financially and emotionally suffering from it and trying to prove it, at the same time you crawl with it being an witch hunt. Looks like a cancer overall. |
|
|
|
Did you graduate from the fake doctor school like Techy?
No. I’m not a doctor. I’m just a guy in Finance wondering why some dipshit failed night security guard is pretending to give financial and programming advice to users on this site. Look at me thinking of you again... lol You are in finance? You are always wrong, he could be in finance and you would never know, as I knew programming still you doubted and never knew. |
|
|
|
LAngel is not as legitimately lucky as would have you believe.
Transaction 1 where 0.483 BTC is moved to 14t9Ff3yUgwcQm5HsAsL5Rq7meBBCDT8g5
68c63caf998c3e84f342caa988d1e439f8cd78174aa389185b3e4a06f0ecf27b
-snip-
Transaction 6 where inputs 1J14KoZVUXrG3P4Rcs6URZQ1dJHY77tVWQ and 1JkAF2owb3QgXG1UN53yREFvogTWeLs1TZ fund a deposit of 0.5 BTC to a players deposit address 38492UnXhifAE4Yag26Lbp6beoxB1cLTDT within Casino Operator 2 52777ed072b6fdd1c3cbb8b14ce7fb37556d302a0e9eaa64e801731c8b92fcb3
The above combination transactions prove that the addresses involved are in possession of a single entity responsible of the deposits to
Bitcasino Account 1, Account 2 and also to Casino Operator 1 and Casino Operator 2.
Collection of the entity’s mentioned addresses:
14t9Ff3yUgwcQm5HsAsL5Rq7meBBCDT8g5
1BCeQTQWvq5gzk8yEBzwGrWuLYjHmvf3P2
1DFQ7ofFWf1yffqwQL1Jdv445ZeYxSuGiD
1J14KoZVUXrG3P4Rcs6URZQ1dJHY77tVWQ
Account 1 Bitcasino deposit address:
3G4r8XMKgvKFq3M29kNuV9RE6kvq7eY5Qh
Account 2 Bitcasino deposit address:
3Bn9pecZA6r3Z1bCYdh4GV5tM3DYXxMhzF
Casino Operator 1 deposit address:
1BnqgnQFVpevz7idhBHpdD2Axy7L9ZC42U
Casino Operator 2 deposit address:
38492UnXhifAE4Yag26Lbp6beoxB1cLTDT
-snip-
Given the 100% match, our fraud team’s extensive findings supported by GameArt’s investigation and the history we have with this user
the account will not be unfrozen and the funds will not be paid out. There is no settlement, this is false information.
How does above info prove that LAngle specifically exploited or cheated the particular game ? Your explanation mergly proves that he had multiple accounts on your casino and was also active on other casino's, nothing much. On the other hand, LAngle is firm that he didn't cheated 'dawn of olympus' game where he won the huge amount.
If GameArt's slots are insecure, why haven't they released a statement regarding this? GameArt slots are quite popular across a lot of different sites so I find it hard to believe their slots had an issue like this.
"No system is 100% secure," I think I've read this on someone's personal text. It was me.  |
|
|
|
From that topic: I am a very approachable person, if someone wants to send a PM and ask me to reconsider or would like me explain various things to me in order to change feedback to include/exclude on my Trust list I am very happy to engage with users. The OP should have sent me a PM Have you tried that gumusi? Ok, so it's expectable for DT1's to slap agendic and illogical feedbacks on users trust wall and demand for an PM to remove it or get it changed to neutral or beg to the DT (who you feel is racist) for reconsideng the feedback. This should go in some DT guide, I guess. OP, is not obligate to send PM, I already had bad experiences with many DTs in PM on such feedback cases, it's doesn't turn right. |
|
|
|
|
I am now 99.9% sure, JollyGood is an mental retard.
|
|
|
|
I didn't deny it, they are just some old transactions between me and other users whom I don't know specifically. That doesn't indicate anything other than @marlboroza not leaving any opportunities to be a dick when it comes with accusation in his witch hunt. ( I would probably prefer not commenting on such false accusations as this thread itself is an clear evidence of mobbing, double standards and harmful witch hunting leading to nothing solid.) |
|
|
|
User UltraElite has found more connected accounts ( here), in addition to my post: Seems user in question is not only fraudulent ICO bump service but loan scammer as well.
Ups, I missed this account found by YOSHIE: ...and more accounts connected by ibminer: I would eat my own shit if I have defaulted any loan here or on Primedice as the above account is accused of. I am even repeating this accounts are not connected to me or were/are in control of me anytime in the past. What an dick move though. |
|
|
|
|
You get an extra gold coin under your profile name. If you notice they are two now rather than one, that's one of the features aside links being allowed and clickable in signature unlike before.
|
|
|
|
That's a mistake from my part and it has been corrected, I'm fun of rotating my custom trust list every now and then (if you monitor my list you'll noticed that). I Have a draft where I copy the name from and paste on my trust settings. If you observed properly, all or most of the newly added users were once on my custom trust list, which were also removed as a result of my list rotation.
Just edited my list to correct that and some of those that were newly added to my custom trust list had been removed then new members will replaced them (from DT1 probably to strengthen my CTL). My selection is made on my personal criteria and not having a custom list of yours isn't part of the criteria. I too was included in the DT list weeks before I even had a custom list.
Thanks for the observation.
I see you've already removed three users:  Just a quick heads up adding and removing then adding (then removing) looks a little odd. It's always good to sweep out the cobwebs, I've done it twice myself (once recently of the trust list, the other a while back of my distrust list). People take great interest in the DT comings and goings. I agree here, being firm and solid at your trust list selections is more humanly and ethical use of the DT system than changing it frequently. Anyways, I don't think CryptopreneurBrainboss indented to game or abuse the trust list though.
There are so many examples of users not using the Trust system in an incorrect manner.
Mirror on your butt. |
|
|
|
As far as I know after a hack in bitcointalk, theymos sent email to everyone to change their password. This belongs to this feature.
Bitcointalk was hacked before? I didnt know that incident, maybe its the first email sent to all users by email. This is what Ive been looking for. Yes, it was indeed hacked in 2015 with theymos sending similar email notification to forum users. And I guess that's one of the major use of such notification system. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
You are receiving this message because your email address is associated
with an account on bitcointalk.org. I regret to have to inform you that
some information about your account was obtained by an attacker who
successfully compromised the bitcointalk.org server. The following
information about your account was likely leaked:
- Email address
- Password hash
- Last-used IP address and registration IP address
- Secret question and a basic (not brute-force-resistant) hash of your
secret answer
- Various settings
You should immediately change your forum password and delete or change
your secret question. To do this, log into the forum, click "profile",
and then go to "account related settings".
If you used the same password on bitcointalk.org as on other sites, then
you should also immediately change your password on those other sites.
Also, if you had a secret question set, then you should assume that the
attacker now knows the answer to your secret question.
Your password was salted and hashed using sha256crypt with 7500 rounds.
This will slow down anyone trying to recover your password, but it will
not completely prevent it unless your password was extremely strong.
While nothing can ever be ruled out in these sorts of situations, I do
not believe that the attacker was able to collect any forum personal
messages.
I apologize for the inconvenience and for any trouble that this may cause.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iF4EAREIAAYFAlVhiGIACgkQxlVWk9q1keeUmgEAhGi8pTghxISo1feeXkUMhW3a
uKxLeOOkTQR5Zh7aGKoBAMEvYsGEBGt3hzInIh+k43XJjGYywSiPAal1KI7Arfs0
=bvuI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
|
|
It's already there, and seem to be his proudest work. |
|
|
|
About the Minephone, the launch is in 1 hour, maybe you can have a look at the details and here upto doesn't mean what others are doing, when we said 2 eth per month, then IT IS 2 eth per month.
Now that's something solid ! I would be waiting for an hour to see a phone mining 2 ETH per month. I would just bang my head on miners at-last if it's true. |
|
|
|
It's happens when i was join their bounty, after i didn't get the payment and extended sales, i lost my faith for this tokens on may since they are still doesn't get investors. Their presentation is good in beginning so i try to join their campaign 😬
I see and understand.  You should not even expect phones mining 2 ETH/month in any sense. What even dragged you to initally supporting this project is unimaginable.
I think many fell for this because an actual mobile provider is behind this, and there were videos showing that phone at some mobile show in Barcelona. And that was enough, people simply switched off their brain and order that phone, without thinking whether something like that is possible. Show in Barcelona is something interesting, yet I don't know from when people got back their faith in Mobile mining, as mostly crypto users know it's not technically possible to profit out of it. |
|
|
|
We are not here to fake and cheat our customers. Customer value is our priority.
If your customer is your priority, your project should have been running better, until now we don't know when your tokens can be sold, from the token sale has been extended repeatedly? With the increasing difficulty of mining, how do you deal with problems on your mobile for ETH mining and are you still sure you can produce 2 ETHs with your phone? You really say "up to 2 ETH", the word "up to" often traps customers in promotions/campaign. Like what happens in e-commerce sales, they say discounts up to 90%, in fact, 90% discounts are only for items that have no value. And maybe your "up to" will have same results, the promotions is up to, but in reality 1 year only 0.00xxxETH can you give an explanation here? You should not even expect phones mining 2 ETH/month in any sense. What even dragged you to initally supporting this project is unimaginable. |
|
|
|
It's really strange to see this amount of posts from unique users in a single thread in just some days ( around 5 ) in reputation board. Smells fishy !  Btw, I know bubbalex, and he seems to be a decent manager in all. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
