WTF ! Are you saying you are able to get money back to all those who lost fund's in Onecoin? It looks more like scam on a scam.

Everyone here know's BSV is nowhere near Bitcoin in it's Vision and Scaling atleast.

But COINGEEK is marketing the in a bit different way. They directly put an BUY BSV tab on the top of the page.



They even say that Bitcoin is reborned as BSV, which is a pretty wrong statement in it self.




I landed up on an page showing it being on number 23 on top Crypto News sites as of 4/17/2018.


Source: https://sludgefeed.com/most-popular-cryptocurrency-news-sites-and-blogs/amp/


If you even observe most of the articles published on COINGEEK they are mostly realted to the promotion of BSV.

Doesn't this looks like a sold out news page ?

I don't think such sold out channels should be anywhere where viewers could get a blind one way flow of news. It harm's the overall environment as per I see.

Doesn't this looks like a sold out news page ?

WOULD LIKE TO ADVICE BEING AWARE OF DEPENDING ON THIS TYPE OF ONE SIDED CRYPTO NEWS CHANNELS.

---

There original account here doesn't seem to be active on bitcointalk either.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=149399

I remember one guy IRL, he told me 1+ year ago about this Onecoin shit and said it is something to be invested upon. He was a person with very less crypto knowledge but got caught up into this Onecoin thing due to the bull run effect I guess, he was suggesting some very catchy but spammy offer which I just ignored debating upon, due to his imaginary price increase and future profits debate's. Was just thinking what he would be doing with those OneCoins he bought, not talked with him from an year or so. I am sure he would be crying at it and at not taking my advice back then, but would see !  

It seems they have accumulated hell lot of money from involving less crypto knowledgeable peoples in promoting them, hopefully I don't have any proves of so, but the above incident could be an indication of many more people around the world getting trapped into such.


I even get how old that meme would be LOL!

If you are trying to witch hunt Eddie because he pointed out your big scam busting brain's judgement faults, I don't think you would achieve anything here.

As for the Eddie's move on announcing the accounts change in hand's looks logical and even his involvement in the project was pretty much long time ago. Just move on.

I don't think so he would be banned for that, just don't support the flags you don't feel right and it will work out itself.

Your suggestions looks pretty much an effective way to curb the data storage related to IP logins to the forum. Theymos had already applied some IP retantion restriction features recently. Another intend of theymos behind it could be reducing the data storage space of the user's who don't want to save there IP locations.

I agree tor exits data recording is of probably no use to the forum and not storing them would benifits in a way.

Surely an low effort post, probably near to copy paste.

What a waste of 7 merits from some level headed user's here.

Nice find. Btw, doesn't look's like that's the only post he has used this rephrasing strategies.

Looks like some dump merit transactions. Not even look's like merit selling.

Even the newbie account was created on February 15, 2017. Looks more like some experiment.

I am smarter than you think ! 


New way to earn 50 merits without doing anything is derived out of this thread.

Anyways we could confirm PN7 being QS ? ( Something Solid ).
I don't know why should TECSHARE act on this if he doesn't know the valid reason behind the connection. He already doesn't trusts QS's judgement according to the trust list.


It doesn't even seem logical that he would deny excluding an alt of an already excluded user if he gets some proofs, as you think.

That indicates Coolcryptovator is not acting like a nanny around and is a stable minded person who judges a situation in more realistic way.



What do you think they have done to split this shit on them and not let them operate here ?

For you kind info, the issue here is already resolved by them.

Sprinkling them on users having longer usernames could be an great idea rather than watching them decay.

BTW, I too don't agree with sending that high amounts of merits at a time as many posts deserving merits go unnoticed everyday around.

YouTube is trying to curb crypto content, but it is targeted mostly to a very small group or newly emerging crypto channels. As many famous peoples on YouTube often take intrest or talk about cryptos due to it's increasing awareness around. According to a recent incident they had to unban some accounts which were banned for crypto graphic contents as it included some of the celebrity personalities which posted there view's and loosing of trust on twitter due to there account getting banned. But YouTube is surely against it.

Anyways, even I experience those bots poping up with that spammy content on telegram often. It's really irritating for an group manager to delete and block the accounts every time.

Yaa, he could just built up his own gambling company in the amounts of funds he lost until. Around 400000+ Euros until.  

Are you serious @btmarketmod ?

If you are doing it just to prove them as scam than it is surely not worth it, there are better ways to prove it.

You have some of your accounts already banned here, getting the trust removed would do nothing as you are going to get banned again for ban envision.

You are just making up things.

He has included me in the trust list pretty much from when mine one was blank, nothing was out of spite.

On the opposite I think you excluded me from your trust list out of spite. The only reason I got until was, that I am a reformed shitposter, still don't expect a better one.

Nice pinging about my shady past. I took your advice already of eating criticism.

Welcome.

Now can you, please lock the thread from bottom left of this page as you got the answer.

I can understand your frustration and concern about that post getting 50+ merit. In real sense the post surely doesn't even deserve a single merit if considered singly, but one could debate that he has sent the merits to all the post's of the user overall. Basically it is not fair to many members who are hanging around there heads by putting efforts in each comment they make and showing best out of them. I personally have never got that amount of merits in single transaction until even after putting good amount of efforts in whatever I put up here, even I feel the same as you by looking at the unusual merit springs from TMAN. But, it's already stated by theymos being Ok and one can't argue on merit sources being active most of the times as they are not paid for it.

I would even push users with huge merits to keep track on some threads which highlights newbies or atleast good poster's around and think TMAN did the same and got the suggestion of meriting that user from here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215097.0.

Many users have complaint sending merits by mistake, as I have seen many such threads. But I don't think theymos has revised merits for such mistakes any time before.

Better create a new one, don't you think Bitcointalk admin is busy ?

You just have 4 posts until, and there are very less chances that theymos would accept your username change request. Just go with another account.