How does Tecshare crying about *neutral* trust feedback on his Trust Feedback Wall equate to "mediating"? Sorry for wrong link, I was pointing to his reply about the flag on you being invalid. This is not what these flags are for. You are free to leave ratings on his profile if you insist, but this is also frowned upon unless the intent is to prevent fraud. This has nothing to do with fraud and is just retribution for a disagreement, righteous or otherwise. You can not use flags like this because it devalues the entire rating system. This is an invalid flag that reflects more poorly on its creator than its target.
|
|
|
|
Archived for future reference: [ 1a], [ 1b] I mediated a dispute between Timelord and some members of the Turkish community, they added me, as a result I ended up back on the default trust list.
No, that's an outright lie - you've never spoken to me via PM AFAIK. Thanks to the person who pointed this lie by TECSHARE out to me, it would have gone unnoticed by me otherwise. Here are my 39 flags https://bpip.org/flaglog.aspx?accuser=Timelord2067 As you can see there is only one Flag that I have withdrawn my original support for - all others remain active with the ones being referenced concerning DT Trust Abuse in conjunction with other extenuating circumstances. At least some are alts that were connected by Yoshi etc in the Known Alts thread. Feel free to view those threads for details. Make no mistake, TECSHARE is lying to you.TECSHARE is probably talking about the geniune and natural comment he made about the dispute here. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5181723.msg52379325#msg52379325Please dude.  |
|
|
|
This is why decentralization is tricky stuff.
People may choose to lie just because truth doesn't suit them anymore. When enough number of people do that, they can rewrite the rules of the system.
That's exactly what the truth' ignoring gang/clown car is doing to maintain authority over the truth. Decentralization is tricky for sure. |
|
|
|
Actually the feedback I left Vod is documented fact. No one disputes Vod doxed OGNasty and claimed to have reported him to the IRS. As far as the comment regarding his mental state, I have repeatedly offered to modify the rating and replace it excluding that part if he feels that would make it a valid rating, but he refuses to respond. Vod avoids a direct response at all costs, because he is well aware his actions are indefensible.
 How is what vod will do in the future a documented fact and not an assumption? Do you have a crystal ball or something? Does vod have access to everyones doxx? I understand he doxxed OG, but that's not proof he will doxx anyone else who criticizes him. He did it. It is a valid reason for a rating, not trust abuse. You enjoy your semantic gymnastics. You are claiming he will do it again. Do you think that's a provable fact or an assumption? Do you have proof he reported OG to government agencies? Or are you assuming that he did that. He did that, and it's documented and self declared by himself. You really should seek doctor's help for your mental disorders. How did you even got in a paid signature campaign ? |
|
|
|
Marlboroza should not be in any sane person's trust list who knows what type of abuse they support and even do as noted in this thread itself. Anyone trusting them is supporting groupism and mobbing here overall and is against neutral and unbiased judgement. Get me out of DT1 ! LoL !  |
|
|
|
|
I don't think using a red flag is right use of the system here, hence opposing. Also the ownership change status can even be indicated by a neutral rating in a way.
|
|
|
|
A separate question: Is there any log of moderator actions that would reveal why BadBear banned Lauda? It is probably not information that should be tossed into a troll feeding frenzy; but that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t look. Lauda has always specifically praised BadBear to me, when it wasn’t even remotely relevant to any current controversy; thus I infer that whatever it was, she must have learned her lesson about it.
Ok, double mouth. Your input is appreciated. |
|
|
|
Royse777 needs to explain the faults he found in the legitimate scam warning regarding a proven scammer that pushed him to try to block that warning or he is a deliberate and willful scammer supporter. End of.
Sorry, I just missed his opposition there, I agree with it being an totally wrong step on it's own. |
|
|
|
|
I think Royse777 should be out of this for the only reason of not impacting the gang in positive way through trust list, rather trying to be neutral with most of the judgements.
I agree that he has made a risky decision of working with a snake while trying to do something good at the end, but that yet should be overlooked is a sense.
|
|
|
|
-snip-
I am a grown up man, able to make my own decisions, this will be very insulting for me, a defeat of my own self - if someone else comes in my life and starts manipulating me. Not happening bud. I am not that weak character. The day I will lose my interest on bitcoin, I will not care about anything in here.
So far you seem to be making your own choices, but I think you underestimate the lengths this person will go to in order to subvert the people and the systems around here to get control. I am not judging your character, simply giving you a friendly warning. Don't give them any opening to exploit you, because they will at the drop of a hat. I totally agree with this advice, they don't bother about anything if it's question of power or authority over others. Lauda can go as far as publishing PMs, making public and private threats, damaging your financial assets and even threatening you with doxxing. |
|
|
|
-snip-
I think you forgot to lick Lauda's ass even though you trust them. Nice try anyways. LOL..Aren't you another one of those butthurt trolls who hate Lauda because your scammy "bumping service" was caught? Go away scammer. Nobody needs you. You are full of shit, I was against this mobbing way before the witch hunt. It's better you go away with your half filled brain you wanker. |
|
|
|
-snip-
I think you forgot to lick Lauda's ass even though you trust them. Nice try anyways. |
|
|
|
Ty Philip, just waiting on one guy now. But he hasn't been on for 3 months lol... not too worried at present
bill gator is/was a fraudulent user and he is not in DT. His rating is therefore irrelevant. You do not have to think about it, there are many outdated old ratings like that. Even if that is the case, I'd still like it removed via an admin. Which should be feasible given that is the case. Edit: Even if BG meant well enough at the time, he most likely would never had placed it if I didn't ask. Do not trust most of the trolls here like Lauda, who are already kicked out of both DT1 by theymos and DT2 by the community. Bill is a pretty nice guy, I think you should try sending bill gator a PM, I am sure he would respond as soon as he checks his account rather than trying to remove it via admin action. |
|
|
|
Hope the domain is transferred to someone with a neutral view around the Bitcoin conspiracies.
IMO people or organization who directly involved in Bitcoin, Cryptocurrency or Blockchain world most likely can't be neutral. I don't get why they can't be, but they should be to boost the community interest in Bitcoin. I even think Cøbra was a neutral guy afterall.
Would/could this be something Bitcointalk can use some of the forum's funds for if it comes to that? Not that I expect Cøbra to sell out like that, but it could be a good use of forum funds in the interest of Bitcoin in general. It's more about the future ownership of the domain in right hands, than the funds involved. Just saying. |
|
|
|
|
It's sad too see a evil winning sometimes. Hope the domain is transferred to someone with a neutral view around the Bitcoin conspiracies.
|
|
|
|
There is no need for you to expose your privacy by publishing your identity. There are other ways of proving that the account never changed hands for example by signing a message from a bitcoin address you used earlier on like this address: 1CwmksPZUfZbEh7efyzpueF8rBnHm99DFa you posted hereI assert that I could not. I bet you know when I used that address Newbie  I guess @marlboroza would agree with you. |
|
|
|
I beg to differ. The only lesson here is that nationalism doesn't work in a place like this.
BTW LoyceV didn't attack a country or a nation or a race, he commented on the actions of some Turkish users here. In return he was subjected to childish personal attacks. This doesn't help whatever point you're trying to make, it just exposes your inability to handle certain topics.
There is already a race attack going on clearly on Turkish members of the forum and from LoyceV's comments it is pretty clear they are trying to boost the same propaganda. There is more behind the story afterall. |
|
|
|
Techy obviously regards his rights as more important than everyone else.
Why isn't this troll given a temp ban for repeatedly posting NSFW images after they are deleted?
The above image is nothing in front of the NSFW things the accounts in the image do here most of the time. It is very much realistic too. |
|
|
|
Sure, "counterbalancing forces." The force you are part of is those who base their trust inclusions on selfish motivations that have nothing to do with insuring proper use of the trust system.
That is your own interpretation of reality, everyone is wrong other than you. |
|
|
|
Happy Halving 2020 ! Sad to see Bitcoin prices didn't doubled overnight ! The Bitcointalk Halving Party was mind-blowing though with full of surprises. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
