I dla takich informacji zakładałem ten wątek. super news, dzięki za podzielenie się. Pytanie tylko, czy faktycznie jest to kuloodporne rozwiązanie i czy sieć to przyjmie, ale z tego co rozumiem, to nie musi, bo zmiana ta nie wymaga forka:

"this requires no changes to the network's consensus rules".

Czy alty staną się niepotrzebne? Tylko te od smart kontraktów. Na przykład tokeny giełdowe, albo tokeny wyrażające udział w jakimś przedsięwzięciu swoją wartość utrzymają.

A very positive surprise for me. Not necessarily for the market, because the price did not react. It's been dead at $200 for months. Strange.

There has been a lot of negative news lately and I was afraid that other EU countries would slowly ban binance. But it turns out the problem of banning Binance was temporary and binance is about to solve all issues by creating many platforms for any jurisdiction that causes problems e.g. binance.nl or binance.de or binance.eu and everything will return to normal. The special version of Binance for US customers - binance.us - has been working well for a long time

Nowe miejsce w mojej kampani. Polecam bo to jedna z lepszych.

Manager: Hhampuz
Nazwa kampanii: Roobet.com Signature Campaign
Ile do zarobienia: Full  Members - $40/Week.
Jakie rangi:
1x Full Member

Dodatkowe informacje: min. 15 postów/tyg i liczą się lokale.

it's not that the bank has any problems with the op making money. The point is that banks with low trust do not get along well with others because the banking system operates on trust. So if a large European bank has to send (or receive) a transfer from a small bank in an underdeveloped country with a shitty currency, the fees can be really significant adding to this the currency conversion on a low-liquidity pair.


You receive a bitcoin transfer at a cost of $1 and only what you need for food is converted into the local currency by p2P trade at a small cost because you exchange bitcoins for cash outside the banking system (banknotes hand to hand).
I do bealive that such a solution can reduce costs and make life easier, especially if the local currency has high inflation and low liquidity.

Dla mnie bardzo pozytywne zaskoczenie. Dla rynku niekoniecznie, bo kurs nie zareagował. Leży martwo przy 200$ od miesięcy.

Do rzeczy:

Binance wraca do UK. Po zaledwnie 4 miesiącach binance dogadał się z FCA i startuje z platformą www.binance.com/en-GB przeznaczoną dla klientów z UK zgodną z ich lokalnymi przepisami. Może problem banowania binance był chwilowy i po prostu powstaną jeszcze z 2 platformy np. binance.nl i binance.de albo binance.eu i wszystko wróci do normy. Od dłuższego czasu przecież działa dobrze specjalna wersja binance dla klientów z USA - binance.us

https://www.binance.com/en/blog/ecosystem/binance-launches-uk-domain-in-compliance-with-new-financial-promotions-rules-2903800236178709961

Kucoin is a serious exchange, one of the industry leaders, and the investment in question does not affect shitcoins. From what I see, this is a return for lending capital for marketmaking (providing liquidity) on the main currency pairs (BTC/USDT).

It doesn't look like a scam to me, but as I see it, there is a small catch.

"If daily observation price is higher than the Price Protection and lower than the Auto Take Profit price throughout the product duration, the order will be redeemed as scheduled. You will receive principal + return."
"If daily observation price falls below the Price Protection, the order will be early redeemed. Your principal will be converted into BTC using initial BTC price, and the return over the actual holding period will be converted into BTC using the last daily observation price. You will receive BTC + BTC return."
"If daily observation price is above the Auto Take Profit price, the order will be early redeemed. You will receive principal + return over the actual holding period."
https://www.kucoin.com/wealth/product/ProtectiveEarn-BTC-0001/02-01-0029

If I understand correctly, this is not an investment without currency risk. If the price of bitcoin starts to fall, we will not get our dollars back, only the bitcoins invested at a local top. And it is this additional risk that gives us high APY.

the economy is currently so tangled that it does not matter in which sector a country specializes. It's important that there's $$ in it. As the poker player pointed out. Without oil, there are no combine harvesters in the fields and without natural gas, there are no fertilizers. Without this, no matter how large the fields are, it will still be cheaper to buy grain from a neighboring country with money from the sale of processors than to collect grain by hand and sow new crops without fertilizers.

Właśnie brakowało mi tutaj rozmów czysto o bitcoinie i sieci. Sam nie mam podstaw technicznych, by poprowadzić ten wątek, ale wiem, że jest tu co najmniej dwóch bardzo dobrze obeznani użytkowników. Osobiście jestem ciekaw tego, jaki jeszcze potencjał ma sieć i gdzie możemy być za kilka lat.


Dzięki za link, ale bez dokładnej znajomości kodu i sieci raczej ciężko coś wyciągnąc dla siebie nie?

Proponuję wrzucać tu informacje o nowościach w sieci bitcoin. Nad czym obecnie najpilniej pracują deweloperzy. Co jest blisko dodania do protokołu w postaci forka, a może coś już niedługo będzie działać, co nawet nie wymaga forka.

Still, no big company adds this. Why? Probably because it's more trouble than it's worth considering that currently only 1% of users would use it at most. Most prefer to pay by Visa with $0 customer-side fees.

news that appears out of the blue and changes the fate of the market, called a "black swan", is an unpredictable phenomenon that no one ever includes in statistics because it is unpredictable. The probability you are talking about, which you see in the analyses, relies on statistics (e.g. A falling wedge is a technical analysis pattern with a predictive accuracy of 74%. The pattern can break out up or down but is primarily considered bullish, rising 68% of the time.)

In other words, when someone gives the probability, it is not because he predicts that an unpredictable phenomenon may occur with a 30% probability XD

This looks good, beside Fib, the short-term downward trend that has been going on since June has been broken. It should be noted, however, that the movement is not supported by volume, and there is strong resistance ahead at the levels 28.5k-29k, which may constitute the frame of the H&S formation.

So we have to be careful, but the situation is certainly better than in recent weeks.

Dzięki za tłumaczenie tego wątku. Szkoda, że nie ma moderatora obecnie dostępnego, bo zasługuje on zdecydowanie na przypięcie jako jeden z ważniejszych wątków o bitcoinie. Niesamowita historia.

Dodam jeszcze, że:
1- rozwarstwienie na elity i klasę pracującą sięga neolitycznej rewolucji agrarnej - około 10 000 lat temu
2- świetnie, że wspominasz o Murray Rothbard. W tej tematyce polecam jego książkę "Złoto, banki, ludzie. Krótka historia pieniądza". Krótka, łatwo się czyta, a pokazuje jak elity od tysięcy lat starają się zmonopolizować i kontrolować pieniądz. Jak pod płaszczykiem dawania nam bezpieczeństwa "prywatne mennice mogą was oszukać zaniżając ilość złota/srebra w monecie, my damy wam bezpieczeństwo" a kończyło się tak, że w ciągu 100 lat od 200 do 300 roku naszej ery inflacja wyniosła 15 000% a jak? A tak, że zaczynano od srebrnej monety a kończono na monecie ze srebrem w ilości homeopatycznej, ale uwaga, bo "prywatne mennice mogą was oszukać"
3- od czasów starożytnego rzymu widać jeden trend. Przejęcie całej kontroli nad pieniądzem z CBDC jako wisienka na torcie, by kontrolować nie tylko emisję waluty ale też dystrybucję i to na co jest wydawana

There is huge difference between making business decisions based on solid premises (such as opening a vegetable store in a new neighborhood with no competition, estimated population X, estimated demand Y, and costs Z) versus investing in a token with what they perceive as a "funny name" and a peak valuation of $40 billion. People were literally buying shares in "funny name" at $40B valuation. How else could you call it if not a gambling? I have 2 other names - hot potato or a game or greater fool game.

and trading on something that is doomed to decline by 99% is not wise either. Even if you sometimes succeed, the statistics are against you. In my opinion, trading shib is also not moral because it gives liquidity and capital to people who are destroying the industry.

a large pool is not necessary to run the project successfully. All ICOs during the 2017 ico bubble were without it. The point here is not that it is not worth investing in project without a huge liquidity pool. The point is that it is not worth bragging about a pool that only proves the lack of starting capital and attitude, which shows that the devs clearly think the investor is an idiot.

@Cygan, jednak miałeś rację i wrzesień zamknął się na zielono. Cieszy, bo statystycznie to najgorszy miesiąc dla bitcoina a przed nami zwykle zielony październik, który ogólnie dla rynków finansowych jest ponadprzeciętnie zielonym miesiącem i pierwszym w cyklu najbardziej zielonych miesięcy w skład ktorych wchodzi rajd świętego mikołaja, efekt stycznia, dywidendowe miesiące itp.


https://stockanalysis.com/article/average-monthly-stock-returns/

I vote for "Break out above 28k and stay there". Which seems like the most likely scenario to me. I think that we are not at a stage where we will have the strength to make more than 10% in one month, because it would be one of the better Octobers. And this could be expected at a different stage of the cycle, because currently, in my opinion, we are in "disbelief" and not in "thrill" or "euphoria"


There are few years missing Like 2011 with -35% return. 2014 with -12% or 2018 with -4%

Nie do końca rozumiem jaki problem? Jeśli chodzi ci o zapis "self-verification" to chodzi tu to, że to ty sprawdzasz sam swój balance dlatego,  by nie musieć ufać żadnej instytucji. Brak konieczności zaufania komuś w tym miejscu to raczej coś dobrego? Chyba że ja coś źle rozumiem.
I jak sprawdziłeś siebie? Faktycznie nie budzi tam nic wątpliwości?

It's good that you brought this up. there will be no misunderstandings.
Is it possible for the number of bitcoin users to grow 10x without an increase in the number of asic miners? Theoretically yes. Bitcoin's computing power defends it against attacks, but the number of bitcoin transactions per second does not depend on the computing power of miners. There is no system that would physically stop a new user from joining the network. If you wanted to have the Internet in 2000, you had to wait until they installed cable. If you want to use bitcoin in 2023, just download the application, you don't have to wait for a miner to launch a new mining unit especially for you.

It doesn't impress me. I'm not saying it happened here, but I've seen such strategies in 2017. Super successful ICO, tokens sold out in 1 second. Then the listing and the price cascade down. Reason? The ICO was fraudulent, the buyers were developers themselves, to then spam social media about the huge demand for their tokens.

What happened to the previous project you hyped? "DingDang Bubble" From what I see, it is not listed on CMC and coingecko. is it Dead?