The SEC only attacks binance.us and not all of binance, which has already been mentioned here, but it's worth adding that binance.us has a ridiculously small volume comparing to binance (not even comparing to whole crypto traading volume). See for yourself.
Binance.us today trading volume = $40 mln
Binance.com today spot trading volume = $9 000 mln
binance.com futures trading volume = $46 000 mln

so binance.us is not even a 1% of binance. Binance.us is even 4x smaller than pancakeswap (dex on binance smart chain)

It was not the reason for the dump, because the market was convinced that such a decision of the federation would be made. The CME fedwatch tool showed over 95% probability of FED stopping rate hikes. So the fed's decision did not surprise anyone and it should have been priced in long ago. Proof of this can be the fact that both the SP500 and gold did not record pump/dump, there was only a short period of increased volatility.

Lowering interest rates will affect in similar scenario to 1970 and 1940 - another, even greater wave of inflation, even harder to stop. So should they rise more? I don't think so because real interest rates (CPI adjusted) are positive and above 1% which is the best in like 15 years starting from last financial crysis. There is no need to rise it higher especially that next month CPI  is expected to go below 3.5% bringing real interest rates to around 2% - best in 25 years.
They should stop and wait for 6-12 months not doing anything.

The recent events targets binance.us not binance as whole. Binance.us has only 35 mln daily volume what is a f.king joke compared to binance.com with $5B daily volume on spot and $25B on futures. So the recent FUD relates only to 1% of binance volume. The bigger problem for crypto market is SEC calling altcoins a securities ... but it only affect altcoins (mostly POS after ICO) as bitcoin (POW without ICO) is already clasified as commodity. So all this fud is bullish for bitocoin.

If BTC^2 is going to be devided by 100 000 000 just like bitcoin is than 1 sat of BTC^2 is just 6$. So its not a problem.


x100 leverage is going to rect you after 1% dump. ^2 will not even after 50% dump. So its a complete different type of deal.


I have the same feelling.


So the only mechanism that peg the BTC^2 price to BTC price is the funding mechanism. How are you going to charge those fees from token hodlers? I guess funding gonna be high to compensate wird type of arbitrage. Not many will do that.
How the initial distribution is going to look like?

Is it going to be a trading pair on centralized exchange or token listed on dex with fixed price? Don't you think there won't be much of a liquidity because it's impossible for arbitrage traders to do their job effectively?
If it's just a token... Isn't there an additional risk of devs dumping their coins?

No właśnie totalnie nie. Polecam zobaczyć jak wygląda pit38. Są tam 2 rubryki do wypełnienia - przychód i koszt uzyskania przychodu (i 1 dodatkowa za koszty z lat ubiegłych). Co do zysków z sygnaturek czy prowadzenia sklepu nie mam pewności, ale w przypadku sprzedania bitcoina do pln jest to przychód od którego trzeba zapłacić podatek. Chyba, że możesz wykazać ówczesny koszt uzyskania przychodu (zakup BTC za pln). Urzędu skarbowego nie obchodzi jaki był kurs BTC w momencie kupienia/sprzedania i czy zamieniałeś go na alty w między czasie. Więc jeśli za bitcoina o wartości 1000$ kupiłeś ETH a potem sprzedałeś za 2x więcej bitcoinów, które w między czasie urosły 2x (masz 4000$ w btc), to nie masz zysku według Urzędu Skarbowego. Jeśli kupiłeś 1 BTC za 10 000 $ (koszt uzyskania przychodu) a potem sprzedałeś na x2 pompie ale tylko połowę pozycji (0.5 BTC za 10 000$) to też nie masz zysku od którego należy się podatek. Zysk pojawia się dopiero wtedy jak sprzedajesz BTC do czegoś o realnej wartości (PLN, USD, pralka) i nie możesz wykazać żadnego kosztu uzyskania tego przychodu (wcześniejszych zakupów o tej samej lub większej wartości). W powyższym przykładzie podatek należy zapłacić dopiero przy zamykaniu drugiej połowy pozycji płacąc wtedy 19% z 10 000$. Jest to rozwiązane inaczej niż zyski kapitałowe z akcji. Moim zdaniem o wiele lepiej dla podatnika. Między innymi też dlatego, że nie trzeba się tłumaczyć z każdej pozycji, spisywać cen. Po prostu wszystko co wyjąłeś z krypto minus wszystko co wsadziłeś jest twoim zyskiem w danym roku od którego płacisz podatek. Dzięki temu dość łatwo jest wrzuć takie zyski z sygnaturek w zyski/straty z handlu, bo nikt nie pyta o szczegóły. zwłaszcza jak ktoś sporo handluje używając stablecoinów (co nie generuje zdarzenia podatkowego).



Tak to jest w Polsce. Zdumiewająco wygodnie i prosto dla podatnika. Aż dziwne.

"Przykład
W lipcu doszło do nabycia Ripple za 40.000 zł w czerwcu sprzedano Dash za 100.000 zł. Podatek wyznacza się od 60.000 zł i płaci się go na koniec roku."
Co się stało w między czasie nikt nie pyta.

Co do sklepu/zysków z sygnaturek nie mam pewności ale przy małych sumach (200zł tygodniowo z sygnaturki) wole chyba te zyski wsadzić w pit38, niż otwierać puszkę pandory, bo jeszcze się okaże, że potrzebne jest założenie firmy, umowa B2B z managerem sygnaturek, opłacenie zusu o ile w ogóle można reklamować mixer krypto albo kasyno krypto.

For anyone interested in the offer, I recommend asking yourself why the author of an automatic bot that brings repeatable returns would like to sell his program while sharing the cake (potential profit from  his portfolio). The second question such a person should ask himself is "if it's a good business for the seller, then why are such bots not sold by market leaders, but only shady people from the forum and why via a whatsap account and not a professional website ...
After answering these questions, the potential buyer should probably already know what to do with this offer if not, I'll give you a hint - stay away.

No one is selling working trading bot via whatsapp.

people are often afraid of such unlocks, but history shows that they are mostly unfounded. If the project fundaments are still there and the project is not dead, the unlock shouldn't affect the price significantly. It was the same with ETH and unlocking staking coins. A lot of people were afraid of it, and on the day of unlocking the price increased instead of falling. This was due to the fact that many more people were selling earlier in the hope of buying back cheaper after unlocking. Their demand after unlocking exceeded the supply of unlocked coins. But fundaments must be there and should be stronger than the moment coins were locked.

So in your opinion " a small max supply even less than Bitcoin" is enough to push altcoin to the top? You know the supply is just a number that developer sets at its own will while creating coin? You know that there are coins with supply of 1? 1 coin as a max supply of a project? People trade fractions of this coin just like 1 bitcoin can be devided into 100 000 000 sats.

42-coin has a max supply of 42 and is not on top. Its out of top 1000.
Lint has a supply of 1 coin. Out of top 2000.

@Op and @Rampagoe004 - name one thing that QNT have that can't be stolen, implemented and monetized by market leader using their huge usebase.

After reading books from Harari, Sam harris, David Eagleman and few more about human brain, how it works and how it evolve "from animals into gods" I don't think we are much of a different form AI. Our brain has only basic mechanisms at birth (Sucking Reflex, Babinski Reflex, Grasping Reflex, Moro Reflex) and then it gets a soup of random information from all senses and desperately looks for patterns in it constantly creating new neuromal connections if a pattern is "invented". AI is not much different in this regard. ChatGPT also got a soup of information from OPENAI and looks for patterns in it. The only real difference between us is the length of AI training (length of evolution of this new species) and the amount of information it has. Given the pace of AI development and moors law, AI will probably soon achieve an undisputed advantage over humans in every possible aspect. The only thing that will then differ us from AI will be the "soul given by God", but this is only an element of religion, not science.

Name one thing that makes you better than AI will be in 10 years from now.

You do realize that you are buying startup without use case, without userbase evaluated above $1B? I know it dumped hard from ATH but I think most of altcoin investors don't know how much money is 1 billion.

"Huge partnerships, strong leadership and highly disruptive.
Low token supply, high utility, potentially high demand."
May not be enough to justify 1 billion $ marketcap. The timing might be good. The amount of fud is enormous but it's just one out of 20000 projects listed on CMC. And it's tech is worthless without huge userbase because it's open source and can be copy/paste and implemented into market leaders such as BNB or eth. Just be carrefour. There are high chances for a short term bounce but it can also continue to dump another 99%. Real value is much lower.

Sobota, weekendu początek, 6 rano, wall street śpi pijane/naćpane po imprezie piątkowej, brak jakichkolwiek newsów a tu taki dump. Bitcoin w raptem godzinę spadł o 1000$ z czego większość spadku przypada na okres 5 min testując niebezpiecznie, po raz kolejny, wsparcie.
A mimo wszystko dominacja bitcoina puchnie i wybija najwyższy poziom od 2 lat a powodem tego jest, że altcoiny wyglądają jeszcze gorzej. Z top 100 CMC na zielono są tylko stablecoiny. Spora część najpopularniejszych altów na 20% spadku w ciągu ostatnich 24h.
Jak wasze nastawienie?

But traders and their activies is determined by their predictions made on the basis of the calculus of probability, which again depends on the available data and general knowledge, in analysis of which AI is slowly surpassing us. Currently chatGPT is not good at making accurate price predictions. I agree with you. However, this is a linguistic model powered by human conversations, not a mathematical model powered by the price history of hundreds of thousands of assets in all possible time frames.

Every human body is different and yet ... AI can predict cancer better than human.
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/ai-outperformed-standard-risk-model-for-predicting-breast-cancer

Its only a matter of time.

Moim zdaniem te sumy są za małe by otwierać puszkę pandory. Osobiście traktuję je jako swoje DCA bo jedyny pit dotyczący krypto to pit38 a tam podaje się jedynie "ile krypto sprzedałem do fiatów". A że zyski z sygnaturek płacone są w krypto a ja nie dumpuję tego do fiatów to zdarzenie podatkowe chyba nie powstaje.
Ostatecznie nie ma chyba tego do końca uregulowanego, więc każdy urzędnik uzna według swojego widzi misię a potem, niezależnie od tego co ustalisz i tak orzekną na szkodę podatnika jak przydzielą ci innego urzędnika o innym widzeniu sprawy.

Ja bym albo uznał to za wieloletnie DCA, albo rozliczał w ramach zysków kapitałowych i pitu38 i nie drapał się tam, gdzie mnie nie swędzi.

in the short term, anything is possible. In the long term, only what is profitable is possible. if a pool starts to mess with transactions and its return on the provided computing power from miners starts to decrease, individual miners will start to move to the competition. the same will be done by miners who will not want to take part in the attack.

if tx cost pumps, the network will start to produce fewer transactions (because users will start delaying transfers or using altcoins to transfer value) and thus sooner or later most of the transactions mined by the network will be transactions generated and paid for by the attacker. and it doesn't matter if the miner will mine up his spam transactions and the fee will come back to him (cost 0) or someone else's on which he earns (profit) and his spam transactions will be mined by another miner (loss) it's  net zero.

net zero when it comes to revenue and a great loss, when you add the costs of running the ming rig to the calculations  (electricity and equipment depreciation)

I jak twórca zamierza sobie radzić z wykładniczo rosnącymi kosztami prowadzenia serwisu? Ma jakieś pomysły na monetyzację chociażby w zakresie pokrycia kosztów? Widziałem, że akceptuje datki w bitcoinie ale obawiam się, że może to być za mało.

Yeah it's very inaccurate. The longer i use it the lesser I'm scared when reading articles "AI will kill us all". At least not in near future. The answer is very often stupid or at least wrong and slight changes in prompt generates complete different answers. You have to continue to ask untill answer start to sems plaseble.

Good topic. According to Barry D. Moore CFTe rising wedge has a success rate of 81% which is super decent in TA. Also in crypto trading wedges are very popular andvery accurate (this 81% sounds very likely). One of my best patter.

Speaking of rising wedges, it begs to mention falling wedges. After all, it is exactly the same pattern with the same specifics and principles, but only in the opposite direction. 1 more photo and 2 more sentences and the topic is supplemented with a second pattern.

Check this service. They are dealing with comprehensive marketing in crypto. They have translators, access to influencers, can run a bounty/signature campaign or mediate in the selection of a well-known bounty manager, employees for hire by the hour, developers, head hunters etc. I haven't used them, but my friend did and they delivered what was promised.