|
no proof that he's actually TPTB_need_war. theymos or badbear (or whoever with similar power) will have to check it. looks kinda obvious though.
|
|
|
|
When did you make those posts? As I see it, you were replying to posts made in February and March. If you reply to a post made months ago, then you aren't trying to help anybody but yourself.  That's the thing, I replied to them within around 48 hours of the previous post! They have nly been deleted recently. That is two-three months late, meaning that the moderators need not delete when it is that much after. that's normal if you considers that the mods are also humans that can't keep track of everything. it's possible that someone else checked your post history and reported them months after you posted. it's also possible that someone reported your posts minutes after you made them, but was ignored by most of the mods because they are unsure if such posts deserves to be deleted. then weeks after, a less-active mod saw the report and handled it. |
|
|
|
Again, I don't understand activity at all and don't understand the 2 week time.
let me give you an example then. you've only posted in 3 activity periods so for you, time = 3. 3*14 = 42 max activity. Could you explain when my activity will rise?
after the next period begins (refer to the spreadshet) AND after you've made at least one post. |
|
|
|
keep the old one. the new still doesn't have the sign message feature plus some people are complaining that they got different address when they imported their private keys to other wallet. I would've urged you to switch to other wallet but judging from your post before this thread I guess it won't happen.  |
|
|
|
|
1st post is just an "echo" post.
I vaguely remember that you posted the 2nd post after I posted mine right below the quoted post saying pretty much the same thing.
not sure about the 3rd post.
|
|
|
|
|
if someone wants XX service they will look for XX threads and not YY ones. so having YY threads on the front page is not really a big deal, right? cmiiw.
|
|
|
|
|
wait for their support to answer. there's not much we can do for you because this is a problem with blockchain.info.
you can however choose to stop using blockchain.info and import all your addresses to bitcoin core, or lighter wallets such as electrum.
|
|
|
|
[size= 11pt][color=blue ]I know it's 60GB it says so in the start I'm not an idiot only I sent some coins from my online wallet to my core wallet address. And I can't spend it at least not till my wallet is 100% synced with network, I wanted to know if there are any way to spend them and since I already downloaded 30GB not going just to drop [/color][/size] download a light-wallet (I recommend electrum) and import/sweep the private key of your bitcoin address. then you'll be able to spend bitcoins without having to download the block chain. |
|
|
|
...it's not there. it's in here and here. |
|
|
|
So Craig Wright may or may not be Satoshi Nakamoto, and that won't be the subject of this topic.
What I want to discuss here is that among all the naysayers, there are folks who seem to just look down on Wright, thinking that he cannot be Satoshi, because he's a middle-aged clean-shaven normal looking white guy (yes, that description also fits me), and that they expected Satoshi to be some kind of a long-haired pot-smoking pale-faced anarcho-punk with tattoos all over.
So he may or may not be, but we should all agree that he has the correct look, age and background to be. Some posts I've read about him are really offensive, and there's no need for that. I'd be happy if Satoshi is a man like M.Wright.
his look and age really doesn't matter. he have history of faking his background (read this). at the very least I would be a little disappointed if it was proven that wright is indeed satoshi. |
|
|
|
LoL what a clown.
Btw, Which university did he get his PhD from? They should open a case about him for speading bullshit. Yeah hide your identity for 8 years and then suddenly, decide to go public for no reason. That's just sounds like a thing Satoshi would do.
according to his long deleted linkedin profile ( archive), he got it from Charles Sturt University. according to CSU, they never awarded wright with any PhD. yep. |
|
|
|
that's quite a trick. to get your account back, follow the steps mentioned on this thread. also try asking for a password reminder from the login page. who knows, maybe they didn't change your email. |
|
|
|
is that real? where did you find that? |
|
|
|
A feel like this award was a bit premature. Somewhat similar to awarding Obama a Nobel Prize at the beginning of his presidency.
Personally I would wait and see how things work out for Open Bazaar, because I can't see it as major force of the market as of now.
yeah it's too early. openbazaar only started running a month ago and there are still some stuff that badly needed improvements. I wonder what's the competitors. |
|
|
|
^^ you can see from my image i tried that first and it was not working
just use the run command (shortcut Win + R). same command unless you installed core on a custom directory. |
|
|
|
Satoshi,
Thank you for creating bitcoin!
Sincerely,
silversmith
FTFY wright has not proved that he's satoshi. |
|
|
|
from this page. only full members and above can use avatars. above "Personal Text" there's "Avatar". I don't think users below full member can see it. |
|
|
|
It would be interesting to know exactly when Gavin first heard of Bitcoin and when he might have possibly mined his first bitcoins.
Assuming this Craig Wright manages to move any early BTC amounts I wouldn't be surprised if those were actually Gavin's coins (maybe that was actually the reason for the meeting in London - so that Gavin could pass Craig some private keys).
that's a plausible explanation. though I'm sure that most bitcoiners are sensible enough to not accept a movement from some random unknown address as proof. |
|
|
|
@--Encrypted--: how many people actually use BTC "not just for trading"? How is LTC fundamentally different from BTC? P.S. Feel free to play my game above, see boldface LTC have much less adoption than BTC so once it gets a bit of a spike, people are likely to sell all their coins to secure profit. same with BTC but because it have more adoption more people will buy bitcoins, and when the price spiked there's not always the need to sell to secure profit because you can buy things with it anyway. just my 2 sats. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
