When I look at that little dip and your problem with tulips/rabbits/spray I remember my problem with this crazy climate that has completely changed and from 30+ degrees Celsius since a few days ago, tomorrow morning they say it will be close to 0 degrees Celsius and my tulips, all other flowers and vegetables that are not resistant to low temperatures could be destroyed. I tried with certain covers that protect against low temperatures, but the wind is so strong that unfortunately it doesn't make sense. I hope the meteorologists are wrong this time.

If you invest $100 every month, it means that you will have $1200 (in BTC) in one year, and if the price of BTC increases by 100%, it means that you will earn exactly as much as you invested (minus tax if you have to pay it). Considering that you are asking whether you should go "all in", then you probably don't know about the rule that you invest only as much as you are ready to lose.

In addition to the fact that the price of BTC is volatile, take into account other risks such as hacking, phishing, physical robbery and natural disasters. All of the above can result in you losing your investment in the blink of an eye.

Who would forget that event considering that he obviously pissed off aunt Yellen while she was talking about how printing money is the solution to the financial crisis or whatever she was already talking about. I even had that picture as my avatar for a while

---

It doesn't seem to me that the original is identical to what is being sold at the auction. Even then, the original paper was apparently in bad condition (somewhat crumpled), and this current one looks brand new without any signs of use. If I had something like that, I would probably keep it for myself and put it on the wall - but obviously it doesn't go very well for a man if he decides to do something like this.

Approval does not mean automatic trading, and it is known that trading will only start in about 2 weeks, so obviously the news in itself does not (so far) have any positive effect on the price.


Do people still think that China needs cryptocurrencies and wants to compete with the US or anyone else in any way? It is true that people who have been exposed to communist ideas for a long time are a bit lost in space and time, but would the communist party be so stupid as to first ban the trading and mining of cryptocurrencies, and now want to get back into the game?

China's economy is so huge that if 100% BTC mining took place in that country and all CEXs were there, all that profit would be just dust in their annual GDP.

I think that the legitimacy of that service is quite clear, so one thing that could happen to your friend is that they ask for even more money to "unlock" the account. Unfortunately, this is a classic scam where they constantly try to convince you that you should pay more, and when you refuse, they block your account.

Honestly, you don't have an easy choice (if you have one at all), given that you have to choose between a man who is obviously seriously ill (demented) and one who has already tried to cause a coup in which the blood of innocent people was spilled. It seems that the average American no longer wants someone normal in the White House - so even though it is your internal political matter, the problem is that the re-election of Trump will have consequences for the whole world - of course negative.

By the way, the critics say that the film is "brutally good".


Civil War

@Yamane_Keto, strange, I couldn't find anything when I searched by keywords - maybe it's the browser, the search engine, or there is some geo-ban on displaying the results for the same...

However, when I look at the design of the site, it reminds me a lot of some scam exchanges that used a similar template. I hope I'm wrong, although it doesn't look legit to me personally.

The domain check says the following :


https://www.whois.com/whois/muhus.com

I didn't find any trace of it, it seems that someone made sure that wallet disappeared - at least as far as those who won't use some special skills to try to find some trace that is more difficult or impossible to erase. I can only repeat the same question - did your friend get the opportunity to make a backup in the form of a seed word or anything else (private keys)?

I don't know why anyone even thinks of keeping such a large amount in a wallet that is (at least to me) completely unknown and, as we can see, completely unreliable

It is possible that the wallet shows a balance that does not actually exist - it is one of the tricks to deceive the victim that the coins are still there, and it is possible that they have been "moved" a long time ago.

This will probably be good for the price of BTC if the interest in this kind of investing in BTC is approximately the same as in the US - although it is possible that this ETF will be as successful as some others in other parts of the world where investors have not shown much interest in such a way of investing.

What is bad is that China is somehow getting back into the game, and considering its attitudes towards everything that is decentralized, the only question is when it will start attacking Bitcoin again. No matter how you turn it, Bitcoin and communism cannot co-exist together, so in the long term I see only problems in these decisions, of course only if these ETFs are successful in attracting investors.

I'm not questioning the fact that AI has its application in human society, I'm just expressing my opinion about how inappropriate use and abuse can (and probably will) have extremely bad consequences for people. Even those who started the whole thing at one point expressed their concern regarding the mass abuses that have appeared in the online world thanks to the new technology.

If you consider the majority of sci-fi content that has to do with AI, in most cases this very technology has disastrous effects on the human race. Regardless of what anyone thinks, I am of the opinion that the chances that this technology will turn against us at some point is at least 80%, but it is obvious that people have some kind of self-destruction gene that encourages them to dig a hole in which sooner or later they will fall into.

I don't know why it is on the list (still), because @nutildah surely knows that this detector gives false positive results in most cases. Considering that this detector is the last one on the list, how did you come up with the idea of checking posts with it?

Basically, look at the post from @Odohu, which is just one more in a series of confirmations that only small changes can show completely different results.

It's the same in Europe, although again it depends on each country individually - but food has become more expensive and, at least in my case, it's still rising slightly. Considering that I like to keep receipts from stores, I compared my shopping cart in such a way that I took old receipts from stores and went to buy the same products as before, and I found that I paid from 30% to even 55% more compared to the time before inflation started to run rampant.

However, I have to admit that the transition to EUR has a big part in all of this, considering that we changed our national currency a little more than 1 year ago - which resulted in incredible robbery by traders who raised prices hiding them behind the new currency.

What kind of war are you talking about? The drone strikes that these two countries have been playing for years are not a war at all, but just maintaining tensions for some completely different purposes. In addition, Israel cannot fight against a group of people who have not had an army for months, and you expect it to fight with a country that has an organized army?

The fact that some have a very poor understanding of geopolitics and the real forces that can be faced on the ground is unfortunately the true picture of the world. I can only say that weak hands are always welcome, cheap coins will pass into the right hands.


Is that your personal opinion or are you following some gold bug like Peter Schiff?

I'll just say that nothing surprises me when it comes to the obvious malice and envy that some forum members have shown publicly (and probably privately) for years when it comes to mixers. I well remember how they "protested" because the participants in the CM campaign had excessive pay rates, up to how they "celebrated" when it was banned - and I have no doubt that some forum members had their share in this with the reports they sent to everyone they could.

And no, I'm not writing any of this for money (I didn't spend a single satoshi from this campaign), but it's unfortunate that some members of the forum are fighting so fiercely against privacy, and it's been proven that mixers were mostly used for this very purpose, and only a small part related to transactions that are disputed.

It's sad to see that the people who should understand such things best are actually working in favor of a system that has been fighting against Bitcoin since its inception.

I don't know which shitcoins you're talking about when you mention the 33% drop (actually it doesn't even matter), but what's happening now has happened at least 3-4 times since the spot BTC ETF (US) was approved. Bitcoin is down about 5% in the last 24 hours, less than 1% in the last 7 days.


Is it written somewhere that the price of shitcoins should explode due to Bitcoin halving? The halving never had an instant effect on the price of BTC, so it is completely irrelevant whether it will happen in 7 or 77 days.

As if it matters why the correction happened, I already wrote to you that this is nothing important that has not already happened several times this year. Maybe the Chinese are to blame and their spot BTC ETF, which could be approved as early as next week (Hong Kong)?

It is definitely one of the worst AI detectors that I personally had a bad experience with because I accused someone of using AI based on the results of the same. I don't know why it didn't show me the same result yesterday, but that's just another proof that the same detector should not be used.

---

Perhaps the mission of that detector is to convince us all that our thinking is somewhat already managed by AI - but that does not mean that I will change my habits to avoid his bad detection

Personally, I have nothing against someone using such tools for entertainment or educational purposes, such as some forum members using AI to create fun pictures and post them on the forum - but when we communicate with words, they should be a unique product of our mind, not artificial generated garbage.

I think the title of this topic is a bit clumsily worded, because there should be no doubt that cryptocurrency trading belongs to everyone, and that owning Bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency is not limited to only some people. The real question should be "whether all people can/know how to trade?" because statistics say that only about 5% are successful in it, while the rest either lose everything they invested, or end up at positive zero.

My conclusion would be that for the majority it is still more profitable to practice the hold strategy, although everyone can try trading and see how they manage. I cannot say what would have happened if someone had invested $1000 in trading at the beginning of 2017 when 1 BTC was worth exactly that much - but I can say that in the event that he bought 1 BTC and kept it until today, he would have about 70 thousand reasons to be more satisfied than then.

Satoshi supposedly mined that much (although it's just speculation), but unlike everyone else who might be on that list, he didn't do it to get rich, but because he was the one who had to start the whole thing. Therefore, I wouldn't associate it with potential wealth at all, and that's exactly what makes it as unique as Bitcoin itself.

Personally, I'm not fascinated by nor have I ever used any AI tool and I'm glad to be completely out of it. I understand that people have the need to use such tools in order to be more efficient and save time, but most technology has its negative sides and all those who support all these AI innovations must face the fact that sooner or later a lot of negative things will surface, which this technology produced.

Scammers just use what is available to them, but I don't see how someone can scam me with the help of AI if they couldn't do it in a "stupid way", so to speak.