Well, every city or surrounding city has a similar area. That's not what I saw when I visited England, mostly London, but been to Amersham as well-nice little city, very green and pleasant. Did not get the obsession about the 200 year old (or older) houses to live in, but I guess that it is a "preservation" spirit.
If you ever see a modern housing estate being built in Britain you will understand. Postage stamp gardens, hardly any parking, paper walls, no amenities, no public transport and they're thrown up as quickly as possible for maximum profit and often delivered with countless faults like overflowing drains and windows with gaping gaps in them. Many of their show homes have special 3/4 scale furniture to make them look bigger inside. I spent the night in a typical one once and you could hear someone scratching their nose at the opposite end of the building. Lord knows how you'd manage your first wank without the whole family asking you how it went at breakfast the following day. There are some good ones. They're rare. We have on average the smallest and no doubt most expensive houses in Europe. Older is almost always better.
|
|
|
You've spent a lot of time on this forum, so you're less exposed to the negative events that could occur on here. New users are the most exposed ones, and they don't know how to tell whether an account deserves its rank/merit or not. Your experience here surely does beat mine and 100% beats a new user's.
I'm not sure, but I think this forum was the first to ever have signature campaigns (might be very wrong here, but I've never heard of another), and REAL new users which aren't alts are not used to them. Once you get the way signature campaign spammy accounts & alts work and all, you get to differentiate users.
As a new and silly user, I used to trust most people & information here thinking this was the core of all legit info about cryptocurrencies.
Agreed. I am in no position to know what it's like now. But I can remember what it was like arriving and I think things have changed quite a bit in terms of the established personalities here. Back then maybe most senior accounts were credible and most of them have since left in disgust. You would've had to have signed up in 2010 or 2011 to be legendary when I arrived which makes you a proper OG. All the same I wasn't inclined to swallow everything they put in front of me. Ultimately I'm just another twat writing rubbish as they all were too, albeit their being rather less rubbishy. But that was the purpose of my post. I was highlighting the fact that with a minute or two of effort you can figure out whose account is certifiable junk and whose might be reasonably worthwhile. Not many will bother though. Click on the profile. Click on the merit. If it's empty then there's your answer.
|
|
|
I thought this had been settled years ago. It's Jaywick of course. Sun, sea, affordable property, 'community spirit' which is important as you get older and all a short hop from London. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fta4ryxh.jpg%3F1&t=664&c=1VN2NnK-o9M35g) The ocean is just over the concrete wall at the end.
|
|
|
To me she's just a gold digger and I don't think this marriage will last long.
I think she's an opportunity digger, not a gold digger. I reckon she'll be the one who winds up making vastly more money but she certainly used him as a springboard. I don't think many foreigners really get the attitude the British public have towards the royals. We expect them to lord it up when the occasion calls for it, but the rest of the time we don't want them rubbing our faces in it or hear what they think about anything. William is the epitome of that. He's done regular jobs and flies coach on his holidays. He also keeps his gob shut. I had a good look over the royal train when it was parked up at my local station once. The decor was from a 1970s doctor's waiting room. Most of the time royals are sat in drab rooms not saying much. Ms. Markle is the polar opposite of that. It's not a bad thing, just a diametrically opposed thing. Watch that - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NrrC3HkJMzM the amount of hair flicking, coy poses and being all modern and stuff would have the queen beating the shit out of you if you recorded that as a working royal. The only thing I find surprising about it is why all parties didn't realise there was a total lack of compatibility that could never be bridged. They should've gone full civilian from the off.
|
|
|
Haha!
I was looking at living costs in The Philippines earlier. I thought about nutildah (no homo) & had a little look.
It’s so fucking cheap.
I refuse to move anywhere sweaty. And though I don't know how sweaty it is there it's certainly close enough to other places filled with people sweating to raise my suspicions to Defcon 1. I could buy a rotating army of small Filipinos to sit in fridges and then run out and press themselves against me until they warm up, but I think I'd rather stay put and incur a bit more expense.
|
|
|
Lol fuck off, your on site gardener will live in a better place than that when you sell ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Hey, I'm a doer upper. And I'm researching floating buildings so I may as well start with one I can crash a few times.
|
|
|
I’m really not happy at the thought of paying 20%, that sucks man. Why should I pay so much money when the majority of my coins were bought for so little.
The government does not deserve to take so much from us.
It is what it is. I priced it in from the off. And it can be much, much worse in other places. Ireland's 33% I think. If I change my mind I have my eyes on this palace - https://www.rightmove.co.uk/overseas-property/property-88276847.html?currencyCode=GBP but need to get my skates on before going abroad results in gammons stoning you to death.
|
|
|
Although we have ranks, merits and everything else, there should be a way to distinguish normal & spammy accounts to those of the more trusted ones. Something like.. the more spam an account makes (which would be counted by number of reports, trust, merit etc the account has received), the redder their name turns. The more trusted it is, the greener it turns.
Merit scores cover that to an extent, but you have to work a little to unearth it. For me at least it's extremely easy to tell whether a more senior account earned it or spammed it. The accounts with airdropped merit and very little earned merit all write the same empty shit that you forget before you've finished the sentence. But yes, it could do with being clearer.
|
|
|
I’d like to see something similar passed in the UK.
Well, we do get a 12 grand or so tax free allowance per year which could be worse and covers some spending. I didn't realise the American rate was zero from the off which is nuts. Capital gains is not one of those taxes that the average voter pays or gives a shit about so I can well imagine it'll rise at some point. It's a pretty soft target. And it would've been 90 billion per cent had Labour gotten in.
|
|
|
This is the only suggestion worth bothering with and the other posts demonstrate exactly why. If you listened to the squit from the headless chickens running around here you'd be fucked most of the time. If you bought like a robot for long enough you would be sitting pretty, and very, very prettily over the long term. If I'd attempted to trade or time the market I am 100% certain I would have vastly less than I do now. Here is the stat that anyone considering getting involved should have in mind and it also applies to many other markets too - ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F6zN8dpJ.jpg%3F1&t=664&c=Fc6HNiGGv-2-QQ) This guy is largely a silly sausage but he nails it here. I have been here long to see hundreds if not thousands of posts from people declaring they've sold all and will not enter until their target low arrives. Then we never hear from them again. And OP, almost all of your posts seem to be about timing the market too. Your guesswork is little different to all the others you've highlighted.
|
|
|
And Mr. Binance has some wonderful advice for all of us - 'Many hardcore crypto ogs advocate storing your own keys. But the truth is, today most people are not able to secure a key even from themselves (losing it). A trusted centralized exchange is #SAFUer for most people. The numbers speak for themselves.' https://twitter.com/cz_binance/status/1218973539207770113All this from the man whose site has been hacked AND wanted to roll back the blockchain to counter it. If you can't secure a wallet then having your funds in a place that can be emptied with a password or two, that's if they don't empty it themselves, is not turning me on.
|
|
|
Gemini is a great example of that, now they are adding insurance company to that and making it even bigger, I hope many many successful business to them because they believed in bitcoin when no other rich person did.
I would love to know whether Gemini has actually made them any money yet. Banking charters, staff, development, legal costs and so on add up to a vast outlay. They're fine of course due to their personal holdings but I wonder what their time frame is for recouping and making actual profit.
|
|
|
I agree with a notion that 2mil is still probably OK in most of US (not in NY, SF, San Diego, San Jose and several more), but $5 mil is solid as a "FU money" (updated to $5mil from $2.5 mil) described here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGC9FY65HBo50 is fuck you money. If you have 3-4-5 decades left then 5 million will provide a reasonable amount above the average income plus a few toys and a decent house if you want it to last the rest of your days. No way could you be having sex with Lambos every night unless you want the classic lottery win outcome of winding up penniless less than 5 years down the line. And if you do nothing about inflation you'll starve to death on 5 million too. What buys a holiday now might not buy lunch by the time you're ready to croak. Luckily there's this Bitcoin thing that might do OK as long you hang on to some.
|
|
|
Do you have ideas how possibility for richest person above 100 person want to make bitcoin become with higher price, I think when 100 richest person want to be as investors with bitcoin and altcoin they can make fantastic time with bitcoin back to unbelivable price because they can make bitcoin touch with higher price and make supply bitcoin increase limited.
Can you repeat that in a known language? If it were used for actual commerce worldwide I can imagine it would lift a considerable number of people from grinding poverty who otherwise wouldn't be able to participate in online economies. But Bitcoin won't change much in terms of the overall distribution of wealth at the extreme of either end. Online economies are lorded over by people at the top who'll keep swelling. There'll always be whales. There'll always be peons. The best we can hope for is a slight softening.
|
|
|
If they're willing to do it in America then a return to Japan isn't inconceivable either. It should worth it though, Japan is a powerful market.
And yet I have hardly ever seen any Bitcoin trader make any mention of the Japanese market or JPY/BTC. Maybe it's hotter on shitcoins but I would've expected somewhere that heavily tamed to be taken more seriously than it is.
|
|
|
It is pointless because you can simply not declare it.
Same goes for many other things. Tax collecting in most places is taken on trust. People cough up for the sake of a quiet life. Unless your opsec has been peerless there's a good chance you could be retrospectively nailed. It's not the cleverest area to be indulging in tax evasion. You leave a trail of permanent droppings wherever you go and the data mining techniques are only going to get better.
|
|
|
You can buy Mastercard balance voucher things inside Bitpay's wallet which I guess is some sort of virtual card but it appears to be in fixed amounts. That's completely separate from their US only debit card. It might depend on what country the wallet senses you're in. I'm in the UK and it lists it as an option. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F4ia1kUo.png%3F1&t=664&c=ROI3pPL26zdi1g) There's another operation that does them too but I can't remember what it's called.
|
|
|
So, when Richard Heart claimed he had no motive of making massive money but wanted to help humanity because he was self-made, why didn't Tone Vays bring up his past? It would not have been unethical or wrong at all - *he* brought up how successful he is. Vays looked so weak in that debate. Heart's past was fair game if he was making claims about his moral standing based on how supposedly clean it was. I mean the guy referenced his past and was trying to portray Vays as the scammer. Anyway, I lost respect for Vays in that debate - he got reamed.
I presume when debating a known crypto personality one assumes by default that they have a criminal or scammy past. It's probably a profound shock when they turn out not to. It's such a grind figuring out what's true and what isn't in cryptoland that unless there are actual convictions someone that slippery could shrug off accusations of that nature.
|
|
|
This topic has been discussed in our local board. Due to the lack of regulations pertaining to tax on cryptocurrencies, some would argue that the absence of the law means they are not subject to tax. While others would also say it is still taxable since it is still an income and all types of income are taxable unless it's stated that they're not.
I tend to agree with the second argument. I also think those who never filed their crypto profits will be required to pay sooner or later with huge penalties.
It's a totally different matter if where you live has uncertain rules. I don't. I don't think that stops people ignoring them 'because it's on the internet and I took the risk so I shouldn't have to pay'. If I were in a place that hadn't clarified anything I'd at least hang something back just in case they ever did. It's a pretty poor show to leave people in the dark completely.
|
|
|
If you make your money trading duck billed Platypus placentas that's taxable. Why on Earth should Bitcoin be any different?
This indignance turns up here so often I suspect there'll be some humongous tax bills arriving on many a doorstep because people thought they were 'special'.
|
|
|
|