Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 04:55:04 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 [98] 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 ... 1038 »
1941  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Visa approves Coinbase as Principal Member - big step for mass adoption? on: February 20, 2020, 05:07:18 PM
The deeper crypto companies get into partnerships with conventional finance the less likely the whole thing is to be ravaged by knee jerk laws. That's the best aspect of this news.

Mass adoption? Not really. It feels a bit like merchant adoption. That adds more convenience for existing customers rather than drawing new ones in.
1942  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: $37,000,000 in Bitcoin (BTC) for Sale by US Government on: February 20, 2020, 04:59:43 PM
Sorry if it's a bit off-topic considering the discussions above, but I've been wondering for a while: why does this money get auctioned rather than distributed back to the victims? If it was some illegal business and its profits, then auctioning seems to make sense (although the government could get rid of it on exchanges without making a fuss, right?). But what about the cases when exchanges got hacked or an ICO scams people? As far as I understand, even when the money's recovered by the officials, the people who lost it don't get it back. Is that true? If yes, why so? It does not feel just to me.

All of these US auctions are from the proceeds of crime as far as I can tell.

Gox is the obvious alternative. People will get some money back eventually.

Other than that I've hardly ever heard of a hacked exchange having funds recovered from the person who hacked them, let alone given back to customers.

I seem to remember the UK police attempting to contact people who were on Mintpal to return funds to them but it seems like a pretty rare occurrence and that was straightforward recovery from the piece of shit who ran it.

As for BTC-e/Wex since it's in Russia it's not as if you're going to get any justice or honesty. Some seem to think the FSB helped themselves to that and it's probably impossible to tell which funds are honest and which were laundered anyway.
1943  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: US DOJ Calls Bitcoin Mixing ‘a Crime’ in Arrest of Software Developer on: February 20, 2020, 02:05:24 PM
So if done the other way like coinjoin like you mentioned and using privacy coins like monero, it won't be a crime. That's how I understood it.

I would've thought so. But the gist I get from this, and I might be wrong, is that he created this service for no other reason than working with dark markets. He was also running some sort of drug search engine too.

That's rather different from another centralised service being used by all and sundry.

I expect all centralised mixing to become too hot eventually but this is a specific set of circumstances not repeated elsewhere.
1944  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: $37,000,000 in Bitcoin (BTC) for Sale by US Government on: February 20, 2020, 01:59:10 PM
According to this - https://old.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/f6s07m/lone_bidder_purchased_3991_of_the_4041_btc/

One buyer bought 3991 of the 4041 BTC for sale. I presume the address is known rather than it being a pure guess. It hasn't hit Yobit yet but I'll be watching like a hawk.
1945  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: US DOJ Calls Bitcoin Mixing ‘a Crime’ in Arrest of Software Developer on: February 20, 2020, 01:54:48 PM
"This indictment underscores that seeking to obscure virtual currency transactions in this way is a crime"

That's what stands out to me. He was actively facilitating money laundering. That was his whole raison d'etre. He'd be just as nailed for doing the same thing in any other form.

It's a rather different proposition to some average person doing a Coinjoin type thing.
1946  Economy / Economics / Re: Are crypto hedge funds still a good business? on: February 20, 2020, 12:46:10 PM
Have they ever been a good business?

I'll guess that the 'actively managed' ones have done much worse than the ones that simply sat out the crappy times. Traders rarely beat the market in mature markets, let alone one as deranged as this one.
1947  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: February 20, 2020, 11:05:37 AM
Funny, those are the first things I would skip to not have to spend my bitcoins.

Depends on where you're at in your Bitcoin 'journey'. If he were spending BTC obtained in December 2017 that would be a very different deal to BTC obtained in 2012/13. In that scenario I'd very happily get rid of a portion to make today a more pleasant place and I've done the same myself.

I've spent plenty and have tat and experiences I otherwise would never have had. I'll be a vegetable and then dead soon enough. I'm not going to sit in the dark denying myself everything until some mythical price level.

Some of my spending in the depths of 2015 has been appalling but I have very few regrets about it in the main.
1948  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Banks are killing us! Fund a pilot project (no ICO) completely in BTC??? on: February 20, 2020, 12:53:58 AM
The track record of crypto businesses is genuinely disgusting. No way would I ever, ever, ever, ever put money into a crypto business. Almost every single one has failed or disappeared. If a hardened crypto fan feels that way do not expect any conventional funding route to feel differently.

The few crypto businesses that do make money tend to attract heavyweight funding completely separate from banks or pipsqueak investors.

As mentioned above there's a section here to look into funding. You will get much further offering collateral. There's a lot of money swilling around. Plenty of it will be demanding.

1949  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: Okay. Charge tax on bitcoin. Is this fair policy? on: February 20, 2020, 12:24:05 AM
in my opinion it is not logical and acceptable if any country would make these high value of taxes for traders, 20% of tax is unbelievable to be honest. .

Why?

The chances are that wherever most of us live taxes people who trade in currencies, stocks and other financial thingies at similar rates or higher. Why should crypto get an exemption from that?
1950  Other / Meta / Re: Gangs of BitcoinTalk :) on: February 19, 2020, 10:43:03 PM
Damn there's one big gang missing in the big picture, the bone bitcoin Collectors, those are many, with MJ as a top collector, but he is also a team leader of the The Escrow team.

This is a jolly good call. They lurk together in real life by the sounds of it and have communities elsewhere too. I'd prefer it if they were scarier though. There's not really enough venom on display. One of them needs to do the right thing and do a driveby.
1951  Bitcoin / Mycelium / Re: [UPDATE]Great news for Mycelium App users. It now supports ethereum! on: February 19, 2020, 08:51:55 PM
I found their attempt to add BCH agonising with all sorts of weird talk about downloading modules that turned me off completely. I hope they've done a better job with this implementation.
1952  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Forbes: "USA Is Worried About Bitcoin And It’s Finally Doing Something About It" on: February 19, 2020, 08:14:04 PM
Much of the world would love to get rid of American influence. It hasn't exactly benefited many other countries.

They should be looking at attempts to unseat them with other fiat currencies and if they can't figure out that driving Bitcoin out into other countries could wind up nailing them up the botty too then they're even stupider than they look.
1953  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The transaction trust problem. Reputation ? on: February 19, 2020, 03:34:48 PM
If it were a big ticket item I'd simply show up in person, albeit heavily armed if necessary.

The problem with reputations is that people are patient enough to build them and willing enough to trash them if the payday is big enough.
1954  Other / Meta / Re: Gangs of BitcoinTalk :) on: February 19, 2020, 12:55:31 AM
Is there a requirement for initiation to join a gang? I found this on the web, I listed some of it below.

To enter my gang, which you'll be immediately ejected from, there is one trial that must be passed.

I send a polaroid of myself waving on the toilet.

The initiate has to blast their toilet area with an air conditioner for ten minutes set to the lowest temp possible, and then film themselves getting fully aroused by the polaroid with no manual stimulation at all. It also has to be a 360 degree video so I can be sure there's no other arousing material in the room.
1955  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: $37,000,000 in Bitcoin (BTC) for Sale by US Government on: February 18, 2020, 09:20:48 PM
Anyone who buys bitcoins from such an auction probably does not use yobit. Just a guess. Smiley

That's my carefully engineered comment to reflect on the intellect of the people who write 'Omigod they buying millionz of coins to dump on us. We all gone die.'

There were a shit ton of those threads around the first Silk Road auction. Looks like it's still not a dead idea yet.
1956  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: $37,000,000 in Bitcoin (BTC) for Sale by US Government on: February 18, 2020, 07:27:49 PM
Auction ends in a few minutes. As ever nothing has happened and nothing will happen. We may never find out what was paid either. That's down to the winner to declare it.

I'll be watching Yobit like a hawk in the coming days as I'm sure that's where those psychobear dumps will take place.
1957  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: February 18, 2020, 07:24:45 PM
When I am living Full Monk in a post-apocalyptic flooded world my Bro Yacht will be named Fat Legs in memory of the moment of the tipping point being called. The tender towed behind it shall be named Cankles.
1958  Other / Meta / Re: Gangs of BitcoinTalk :) on: February 18, 2020, 07:05:45 PM
What? No mention of the hat wearing gang ?
Not sure if they have an official name but I hear they have a rather long thread....

They get a mention from Bones261. It's possibly the gang that will prevail long after all the other ones have gone mad and gone down with their seasteads. I can foresee the hats being handed down to their descendants.
1959  Other / Meta / Re: Gangs of BitcoinTalk :) on: February 18, 2020, 05:36:54 PM
Yeah it doesn't work like that. You have now officially enlisted in the gang of no-gangers and other denialists. I believe cryptohunter is the leader of that one.

WHAT?

In that case I'm going to have to start my own.

You're all welcome to join. As soon as you do you'll get a PM from me telling you now I gotta turn my back.

You'll be cast adrift to fend for yourself. Consider it a form of money laundering of the soul.

1960  Other / Meta / Re: Gangs of BitcoinTalk :) on: February 18, 2020, 05:19:36 PM
You'll never catch me in a gang. No, sir.

The most powerful gang of all is the one pitted against each in their interminable trust battles. I've never been able to discover what they actually don't trust each other about as zero business seems to take place between them all.

If one side capitulates I expect them all to go in a Jonestown-esque mass suicide when their purpose in life evaporates.
Pages: « 1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 [98] 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 ... 1038 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!