The departure of Luka Ivanusec, who is mentioned in relation to Burnley, but also to another club from the Spanish Primera, was updated again. According to Transfermarket, the price of EUR 10 million should be much higher in the final agreement, so I have no doubt that Dinamo is ready to sell the entire first team if the price is right.

Regardless of who they bring to the team, it will take time for things to be arranged in the right way, which in translation would mean that the chances of playing in the Champions League next season are significantly reduced.

@CryptoHeadlineNews, didn't you understand anything from your previous thread when it comes to AI? You want to appear smart, but if you can't think for yourself, no AI chat will help you with that...

This is not a hack like you are talking about in your previous posts, but a cheap trick that only the naive will fall for, and not even all the benefits of the hardware wallet will protect them from their own stupidity. That's why I wrote that you're brainwashing yourself by watching videos, and you don't understand the concept of "hacking" you're talking about at all, when in fact it's about simply exploiting human ignorance.

Neither Ledger as a device was hacked, nor their Ledger Live as an interface, nor does it have anything to do with Bitcoin - if you are interested in more, @Pmalek described what exactly it is about -> What are Address Poisoning Scams?

Ledger has an option of 8 numbers in the PIN, although I think a 4-digit PIN can also be used. In the past, I read that the PIN is not something that is too difficult to hack when it comes to HW, although it may have been related to some vulnerability that was subsequently fixed.

I think I read somewhere that there will be a competition for the most incredible story, and given that you have "fantastic fitness experiences", if you tell them that you met a man who knows the world's biggest secrets and who was having lunch with Putler and the Queen of England, I'm sure you'll win. As for the main prize, it will still be a big surprise

Considering the statements that the person in question made yesterday or today, it seems that his company could be looking for a new headquarters, and he is obviously targeting the UK or the EU in that case. But it seems to me that considering everything that is happening in this part of the world, that job would not be worth it, especially in the UK, which in many respects aligns itself with its "brothers" on the other side of the big pond.

Be that as it may, the worst scenario would really be that one CEX that provides services in the US and one of the most famous stops doing business on that market. Not that I care about CEX or its CEO, but the US has centralized Bitcoin too much in every sense, and anything bad that happens there will significantly affect the rest of the world.

If I'm not mistaken, the AI is a bit stupid in this case and anything that has anything to do with anything after the end of 2021, because it has data that only goes back to that period. At the moment when the AI is "online" in the sense that it has all possible data, then it will probably be able to give much more accurate and precise answers.

This could be a problem for bookmakers, because players will have a very good tool for analyzing matches, and thus a greater chance of winning.

Asking such a question shows that you lack elementary knowledge about what Bitcoin is and how to store it safely. It is pointless to compare any CEX with any non-custodial wallet, your private keys in your private possession only give you maximum security, of course if you know how to keep them properly.


You are currently being brainwashed with cheap YT videos that obviously convinced you that someone hacked Ledger in the sense that they hacked Bitcoin, and it is actually about the database of those who bought that device. Stop talking nonsense and spreading panic, you'd better learn some basics before jumping to conclusions that have nothing to do with common sense.

You did not refer to anyone in particular, but as I am one of those who expressed my opinion, I feel called out, so I will answer you. Personally, I consider it an insult that you put us in the same category by citing the example of those people who hate Bitcoin from the bottom of their souls because it does not fit into their business philosophies.

In general, a small percentage of people think that AI has a bad influence on the forum, and if someone wants to read AI generated posts and answers that will be given by the OP bot, I will certainly not interfere in that.

In fact, from today I will no longer clean any board (especially the Bitcoin discussion), so if AI will do it better than us humans, we will obviously have more time for some other activities.

FB is not a bad platform in the full sense, but it has largely contributed to the fact that people spend more time online than they should spend in the real world, which has serious consequences for the psychological development of young people. They are actually easy targets for such ads because their lives are actually online, and they believe everything they see on their screen.

Such advertising should not be possible at all, but all large social networks and internet giants do not care too much about such things as long as they bring them huge profits, and at the same time they are protected by law from liability for displaying such ads. It seems perfect, doesn't it? Of course not for those who click on the ad and lose money, but they are just collateral victims of a system that exploits them because it can and because it is allowed to.

Because of such things, we have a "report to moderator" button, and then such topics will end up in the trash and will not become havens for signature spammers. However, I have nothing against you playing with AI in that way, because it seems that there is no area in which AI has not already intervened.

We can't even talk about 5%, let alone 10% of people, which would be 800 000 million people at this moment. At best, only 2% of people are in some way involved in Bitcoin, and all those who think that some mass adaptation will happen obviously do not think that more than one third of people do not have access to the internet, one part has access that is occasional, and the largest percentage of people who have heard of Bitcoin have a negative attitude towards it, which stems from the attitudes of their governments.

It's obviously a secret and they keep it for a reason, but I have no doubt that you're probably right that the ratio is somewhere around 20 to 80 in favor of altoshitocoins. Realistically, that whole FTX was one big shitcoins factory that literally fell apart when the price of BTC went towards $20k, and the token around which everything revolved became almost worthless.

When you have a CEO like Bankman on top of all that, there is only one possible outcome, and that's exactly what happened. Now we watch the classic Saving Private Ryan.

I believe that there is much more gold than those predictions, but even if the data you present are correct, what about the gold that has been talked about in recent years and is located outside the planet Earth? Of course, that gold is not available today, but the predictions are that in a maximum of 50 years it will be commercially available in quantities that will far exceed the reserves on our planet.


At the moment, no one is seriously talking about increasing the max supply, but it is still something that should not be completely rejected, because who is to say that some new "visionaries" will not decide in 20 or 30 years to change the code a little and add a few million new Bitcoins. People are prone to stupid things, and I wouldn't be surprised if they add another one to their list of stupid things.


I don't need to pay any tax when I buy or sell investment gold, and I think this is a law that applies throughout the EU, although there are probably exceptions from country to country. And regarding the payment of capital gains tax when it comes to Bitcoin, in most regulated countries there are laws that clearly regulate this and the procedure is not significantly different from the payment of capital gains tax from other investments.

In addition, even the EU has several countries where capital gains tax is not paid if you sell Bitcoin 1 or 2 years after purchase.

The only new news is that the man was sentenced to even 1 year in prison, and that's apparently what you get when you steal 50 000 BTC. Everything else is recycling old news, but some still haven't learned the true function of the search engine...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5419807.0 (US Department of Justice announces historical BTC seizure (Silk Road related - 07 November 2022, 18:42:08)

Actually, I meant the total amount that was talked about, and it was specifically mentioned by the OP in this thread, where the link actually comes from. Generally speaking, at the beginning of the year there was talk of about $10 billion, now it is a little more than $7 billion, and I honestly doubt that this is the last amount that will be talked about.


Maybe they would do it if they were able to take such a step, but most people who invest in Bitcoin for one reason or another do not understand it more than a number that shows the current value.

That would really be a positive thing, although it seems to me that the big ones will get their money first, as is usually the case. If nothing else, those small investors got at least some hope that everything is not over, and that certainly has, if nothing else, a positive psychological effect on them.

---

That would be logical, but I think that there are still a large number of those clients who would be ready to trust the same company again in the event that the management structure changes, and if in addition they would receive some extra compensation in the form of a new token. But whatever they plan, they have to do it as soon as possible in order to have any chance of regaining their position on the market. Currently, there is no new competition, and the old players are not doing very well.

It is clear to me that I have to buy tokens for Premium membership, I was just wondering how I get WOF as a Premium user - thanks for the clarification.

---

I played a bit with the "Amount of FUN held" option and 12500 tokens doesn't seem like a bad option, although the starting number of WOF per day is 5 and not 6. Somewhere I saw a topic in which a member calculated how much he needed to return his investment (found it here), maybe even in Micro earnings, I have to search. What I am also interested in is what happens after 1 year of Premium membership, is it automatically extended without additional payment/purchase of extra tokens or? Also, can tokens be bought directly from the balance or only with a deposit?

---

It's gambling in a way, because even though it's true that with a change in the price of BTC, the rewards also decrease, there is still a chance that the price will drop again - and the golden ticket as well as the golden watch and similar rewards are always constant. Maybe some just want to try their luck over a long period of time, not all at once.

I can't say that what you claim is not true, but I have read that sentence too many times and convinced myself otherwise. In case you give a vouch copy for MB, I am ready to try it and write my feedback in this thread.

You can send me a private message in that case, but don't send me the license that way.

He or anyone else has the right to criticize anything and anyone if we live in a democratic society where every individual has the right to express his opinion. What's wrong is that after 10 years of his criticism of Bitcoin, you or anyone else still finds such news worthy of attention.