Familiar with it and it is sort of a lottery gambling. I've experienced betting on it and I think there's no patterns in order to determine which will be the winning number. It is also in line with sportsbetying because most of the time, the scores are based or are from scores of basketball teams in a match as OP have mentioned, but I've heard other sports are also involved depending on the one who is conducting this activity. I think lottery is more of its counterpart but I'm not sure if lotteries do exist in this crypto gambling industry. Maybe those games involving pure luck will suit this well.

Actually there are government which accepts this technology and governments which are still opposing the adoption. One main reason I think is decentralization. This has been discussed many times in this forum to why there are still countries wherein cryptos are not being widely used. Decentralization simply means transactions won't be taxed unlike in fiat currencies or fiat based digital currencies. But I think regularisation is already in progress through the use of third party networks accepting cryptos as a mode of payment. In such way, taxes will be impose to transactions which will encourage other countries to adopt this technology as well.

The reason behind this, are misconceptions about its market value. This technology left an image to those who are not that knowledgeable, as a gateway to be rich. More of an idea that investing into Bitcoin and other cryptos, will give assurance that profit will be earned. So why is it not still getting that much attention to majority of the people!? because there are also impressions of it as a "scam" or fraud as it is being used in schemes to fool people. Also, the nature of market value of cryptos are unpredictable wherein market prices do suddenly fall, which contradicts the early assumptions of easy profit.

Patterns are not working in this industry. What happened before will not determine what will happen this year. The market price have developed eversince it was introduced to the masses and we could see its progress in all aspects. But the thing here is inconsistencies with regards to its market price. It could either reach a new ATH this year or just have another market price correction. We just never know.

For sure many people who were in doubt before to the potential of Bitcoin are seeing the reality. And  it's price development speaks for this technology in general.

Futuristic approach is applicable since Bitcoin is only linked to gold as an asset or as an investment which gives a tendency for its market value to increase over time. But to why it won't be considered as digital version of gold is due to its usage as well to the nature of its value. Not to mention centralization and de centralization. Maybe, further development will quite sort things out whether these two shares the common ground or not, as an investment. But we just cannot blame those people who are already having expectations into such idea of this technology.

I do get the idea in the analogy but to put it simply, one has the freedom to choose where to invest, perhaps in this case, which is between Gold and Bitcoin. One could also invest to these two at the same time which is true. Coexistence therefore is having a higher tendency to occur among any investment because there's no law stating that there should only one form of investment. Likewise with currencies wherein there are many currencies being used in our daily lives but no one required one specific currency to be used in every transaction.

Second statement quite contradicts your claim on lack of certainty with regards to the market value of cryptos. We don't even have assurance whether its market value will just be continuously increasing in the future or will it someday be stable and be used in daily transactions. I guess as long as its market price is increasing, it won't be used on daily transactions simply because users will have hesitations whether to use or to just hold because it will be profitable in such way and fiat currencies will more likely be used on transactions because there will be no regrets since market prices are far less volatile.

I guess it is not totally a skill-based game. I am not into this game but to how I view this game is a combination of luck and strategies wherein a player will try to bluff their opponents in order to assume what cards they are holding. But I guess not all players would be focusing on the probability of cards to show, because it will require full attention or awareness of the cards being drawn. And I doubt all players will do so especially if the bet is not that big unless a gambler is only aiming for the experience not into profit solely.

Hard to visualize at this moment. It is not a hidden thing that Bangladesh has corrupted government officials and also, cryptocurrencies are banned in this country which makes sense in a way that cryptocurrencies are mostly decentralized giving a government no power at all to impose taxation. Thus, this won't benefit the government on not being able to "milk" their people on every transaction (silly!). But I am not saying there's no chance at all but rather, I vew this as a reason to why this technology is not yet accepted in this area. Maybe things will be adopted once officials are back to their "duties".

There's indeed a possibility for some investors to do so because of fear from what happened before. But I guess there's no need yet to do so especially if there's still a momentum in its market value which could yield to higher market value and profit. Once things stabilises, that would be the time where actions has to be made in my opinion because we have never seen a market value higher than ATH, which gives us no idea or assurance to how high will its market price could be. Ofcourse if you can afford holding no matter what happen next, that would be better.

Probably won't trust this.
It is just weird that a stranger will message you in a sudden offering a service you do not demanded in the first place. Although you won't give payment prior to 'pilot testing' of what he offered, knowing that he is demanding something could be a bit of a problem. Not to be a paranoid about this, but being preventive is better. Also, as to how I view gambling, it depends to one's luck and strategies in any form won't really work in order to come up with the win. But you are free to take his offer of you are really wanting to win in that site since conditions are somewhat fair.

Whether to continue offering bets in any event or not, depends on the gamblers and the casinos or gambling site in the first place. For sure this is not the first time, and that is enough I think to explain that those who bet are aware of the delays. Anything could be means of gambling tool as long as there's a bet. So we really cannot prohibit such kind of "game" because there's no valid reason to do so, and we do have freedom in this industry. As long as there are people who are betting on events of such, this will continue because gambling companies would make use of this opportunity. And when it comes to convenience and inconvenience, that is for the gambling casino and player to work with.

There are other gambling game which has 0 house edge such as Blackjack. It is a good idea that may encourage other gamblers to play because it would somewhat give them an idea that the chances of winning is higher, but reality is not since it will still depend on one's luck if I'm not mistaken.

What would be an excuse to not engage into such game wherein there's 0% House edge? Well, I think it is the kind of game being offered. No matter what game it is, if the players are not into such kind of game, things would be the same. In my case I would still choose other gambling games such as roulette with house edge than this, not to be in contrast of the idea, but simply because that's my preference. There are just players who are more into enjoyment than huge winnings.

Details are simply limited if you would look at wallet conditions ad prod hwabmomenr details which are open to public. So it may display anonymous details about the  investor or user of this technology. As longs as KYC process won't be a requirement, things would still be private expect for one's wallet address perhaps in this case. We'll exchanges requiring the user to do so, is  another part of the story. When it comes to its general acknowledgement, Bitcoin is recognized the most in this industry but for sure identities of their investors will always be on top of other requirements.

There is indeed a possibility but the slightest I think knowing how huge the market price already is. Its market value have developed that much and is far from its market price upon the release in this market. With that being said, knowing that its market price is not falling that much, I think it would be close to impossible for its market value to be close to zero or to be worthless someday. It have established wide range of users in this industry and as long as there are people supporting this technology, demand will always exist and it will always be reflected in its market price.

Maybe that is due to the prohibition in your country, and probably there is. Bitcoin is having wide popularity at this moment because of the impression created from it wherein profit is assumed to be easily earned due to the increase in its market price. Little do they know that the market price is not consistently increasing and there are times of market price downfall resulting to partial profit loss. These assumptions are simply what making this technology popular so if it is not having influence in your country there might be factors affecting the spread of its popularity or influence, more likely prohibitions.

Not a new thing in my opinion. Eversince I started doing bounty campaigns there were already many gambling projects of such circulating in this forum and I have participated to some because most of those campaigns are having wide popularity making the campaign period most of the times, successful. There was also a time wherein I preferred join projects under this category because chances are high that campaigns of such are succeeding with their sale period, giving assurance to the rewards. Nowadays, I do still view such campaigns in the same way because projects under gambling category is continuous.

Probably in line with economics, right? I am actually open with the idea of a revolutionary currency wherein it is a form of investment and a digital currency at the same time which I think is something not in line with the norm. Spreading knowledge regarding this technology would be a huge help since there is a rapid increase with companies making it a requirement for an individual to be knowledgeable with trading.
Quite outdated but recent articles support the claim on the link below:

https://www.glassdoor.com/research/rise-in-bitcoin-jobs/

But I guess this won't be necessary to all professions so pushing further won't be a mandatory.

How did you know? This year still has a month left and things are still having chances in particular with recovery, so what more with another year as an interval for recovery to occur. The problem is lack of assurance and certainty. This simply implies that we cannot conclude whether the market price will be increasing or not on the following months or years. The only thing we can do is to just wait for things to be in reality. Things do happen in an unpredictable manner and speculations won't really do something about natural market volatility.

Probably that's the only way in order for this technology to achieve acceptance across the globe. Not all people are aware of the nature of this technology and one way to push this towards more people is to boost its reliability through government regulation. But I doubt it would be a total regulation. My idea to this is an optional regulation not a mandatory regulation. And this will be made possible through third party networks which will be an alternative to crypto exchanges, for those who are just knowing only the "surface" idea of this technology.