While I don't personally go out of my way to say negative stuff about street gambling games, I don't think your example is correct, considering you're taking into account that Stake is "rigging" games for profit. Which you might wanna cite some sources before throwing allegations like that lmao.

Street gambling is good and all but it poses risks of security and safety, which I think is far more important than losing out on your games yeah? Most of these live casinos by the streets as you put it are run by shady businessmen with shady businesses that operate on shady measures. You rub them the wrong way and consider yourself a dead man. Are you really going to risk that all because you think "online casinos are stealing money from me hurr durr"? Plus who's to say these games on the street aren't rigged? Are you banking on good faith? LOL then you'll be massively disappointed when I tell you that people are as untrustworthy in person as they are on the internet. If you even think for a second that you could dispute unjust acts against you go back to the shady dealings part of this post, you really think you'd win against them?

Make your choice lmao, street gambling's good and all if you know the people you're playing with but if not then stick to licensed casinos and online gambling sites instead. You're not living in a Utopian society.

Exactly. Show proof first and then we'll believe. You OP are not something special right here (pardon if it sounded rude) as there are countless people here that are like you, who advertised some form of winning strategy, mostly to unsuspecting  and stupid bettors here who are in it for the money and not for the entertainment, only for these people to lose considerably in the process. I suggest you give us something to work with, as a lot of newbies here in the betting parts of the forum fall victim to scams that involve some form of betting edge to give them more wins in exchange for fees.

Plus these games although player skill still has a role, are all in essence games of chance (as Slow Death mentioned) so to find how they lose and then use that information to win games tells me that you're either scamming people out of their betting money, or you're a time traveler in the future hoping to make quick cash out of your apparent clairvoyance given the fact that you lived in the future, seeing all the wins from these games. In which case I'd tell you to either piss off, or to piss off cause what benefit would you get from this?

Hi, I've been a previous commenter in one of your posts (turning 4k into 90k), and I must say you wouldn't get there without having something that most sports bettors don't, cause those are large and monumental wins considering the capital you started with. I've never won that much in my gambling journey, so I couldn't really give you any advice that would strike dead center, but from my experiences of winning considerable amounts of money from small capitals, I figured out the right way to save your wins and diminish losses as much as possible.

That is through effective money management. Let's take your last bet for example.

You won 90k, but now instead of going all in, you take 10% of that prize money, and use that for betting, the rest will be saved into a bank, or over something where you would deposit your money in. Whatever happens to your bet now, you still have a lot of money to play with, maybe even money that you could save and keep to compound and reach that 1,000,000 bucks dream of yours.

You have to get rid of your all-in mentality, it works well when you have a small bankroll but for bigger bankrolls the risks outweigh the benefits. If you're in for the thrill of it and not for the profit then go, do as you like, who am I to tell you how to play your game right? But if you're here asking how to save as much of your winnings as possible, then take my advice, and be smarter with your winnings.

You haven't failed yet OP, failing is when you succumb to the losses and give up on your aspiration, I usually don't advocate for gambling with the prospect of finding profits but since you've done this countless times, you clearly are up to something, so I support you and will watch your development with great interest.

Personally, I'd choose the guarantee over higher profits. Which in this case a hot slot will provide. The fact that it gives you surefire profits or at least increased chances of getting something out of playing with one makes it hundred times better than waiting for the time that you get a jackpot in a cold slot, which I would tell you is a long-ass time considering that it doesn't pay a dime to its winners. There's still the question of enjoyment and whether these slots are fun to play but that's besides the point, in a case of prizes, having some sort of guarantee that you'll get them is still a much better choice than the promise of getting more from something that's not usually giving its players a win. You'd become another hopeful on the latter, and a happy camper in the former.

I think it's a general thing that all gamblers feel when they lose a considerable sum of money. All the "should have and could have" will start playing on your head over and over cause you felt stupid for pushing that bet when your gut feeling tells you not to anymore. It's a normal thing that doesn't just happen to people who lost money they should've spent on something more worthwhile or more important. I myself keep a dedicated bankroll for gambling sometimes and yet I still feel awful every time I tank a huge loss. It's just a normal thing basically.

Now that doesn't mean it's a good thing as well, feeling remorse after gambling basically means that you have went overboard this time which made you lose this bet, listen to this next time and never go for revenge gambling. If you can't win it that time you won't win it next time.

That's literally the bare minimum of what it should do, and I do think Apple got it right but I just don't see people going out of their way to buy stuff like this (I do know that people will buy this) when a macbook does the same thing for less than the regular price of a Vision Pro, without the sucky battery life, the subpar features and benefits, and the price too. And in my opinion (don't ratify me on this) if you're someone who wants to be even more immersed in your gambling session that you'd rather buy this overpriced hunk of plastic and silicon rather than just literally going to your nearest casino and playing whatever similar game is presented on the gambling site, you have a brain problem and you should get yourself checked because that is not a normal way of thinking.

Nothing but an utter cash grab and a blatant way to abuse vulnerable people by feeding off of their delusions. Plus if they really are a "betting consultation agency" with a good rate of winning bettors why in the hell are they catering towards people who're not supposed to be gambling in the first place? Seeing as they all want the profits but want less of the risks that comes with it. So no matter how credible these betting consultants may be, they all just scream scam to me.

Plus how stupid and sad must your life be to build a career out of telling people which to bet and which not to, you're basically a trade-caller, but worse. That's where the problem comes in. These people will build a reputation out of "cheating the system and winning bets they have no business of" and then when shit hits the fan and the client loses their money over a bet they shadowed, they'd throw shit like "sorry, just the risks involved in the world of gambling", so basically you had someone who's probably already down on his luck pay more than he's supposed to, and then ultimately lose the money anyway.

It doesn't have any promising gambling implication, it's a massive disappointment and Apple should realize what they are doing by now. They're a tech company first and a luxury brand second, so they ought to stop releasing trash products like these in the future from now on. Going back to this sorry excuse for a VR headset, first thing's first, it's tacky. The moment you wear that shit around your face you don't look like you're doing work, you'd look like you're watching VR porn through you knockoff google lenses, and besides the fashion part, you're working with an overpriced VR headphone that only gives you 2 hour of playtime. Plus there's not a lot of things you could do on it too, it's mainly usable for work with all these "excel sheets and productivity" mumbo-jumbo they are talking about during its press release.

Apple Vision Pro is a massive disappointment, it's not gonna promise anything besides that dizzying starting price. People are still going to buy it for sure but the stock value of Apple will be the one to decide whether they did something smart or dumb, and upon looking at it, I don't think they revolutionized anything here.

I only ever gamble 1% of my bankroll for ever bet, low risk and all that, but the main reason why I really go for low risk betting strategies is because I wanna prolong my bankroll for that particular session. I'm no longer an daily gambler, and only ever really gamble when the situation allows for it, so whenever it does open the opportunities for gambling, I make sure I savor every moment by playing as slow and steady as possible. Plus in theory, the more you play the more you win right? So with that logic at play, it could be safely said that I have more chances of winning my bets than someone who gambles aggressively, although I don't really know how we can put that in practice. Anyhow, that's my take. I gamble, but I make sure it's at extreme moderation.

Youtube doesn't pay its content creators per ads, if that's the case these influencers will do everything in their power to scrape all the ad on the internet and put it in their video. No, they don't get paid in ads, they get paid in watch time, view count and sub count. Ad-friendly determines if a video could be monetized as in order for your video to get monetized for its view count, and watch time it has to be ad-friendly first. If it's not ad-friendly, it means it couldn't be given ads and thus would not be paid. Plus youtube doesn't necessarily go with clickable ads, although I've seen an annoying and unwelcome uptrend these days in the number of invasive ads on youtube videos. They go for video advertisements, which could be skipped and unskipped.

Barstool's pretty good but they're leaning towards more of a variety content nowadays, most of the time they post memes on their social media channels so I can't really say they're one of the most reliable sports/gambling news source out there anymore, but they're definitely as entertaining as ever. Bleacherreport seems to steer towards the same type of content nowadays, which I think is what works for them revenue-wise cause that's what brings in the money but for diehard gamblers and supporters out there that rely on them for news and updates this is not good as you'd have to scroll from the hundreds of videos they have made for content purposes before getting the video you need.

Inflation rises rvery year, but wages don’t. There’s no catch up happening between the two, so people are forced to pay more for things that they used to pay less for, with wages that are barely livable. Leading to people thinking that money comes hardly these days.

What can we do to stop this?

Inflation can’t be stopped, for a perpetually reproducing supply such as fiat, it’s a common staple. What we can do on the other hand is to venture out for better income sources. Some people go out looking for a second or third job to make ends meet, some look into passive income ventures, some try out investing and entrepreneurship because of the massive returns, and some just look for a high-paying job to support themselves.

For the most part you have a pretty clear picture of what every company does with your information. They sell it to advertising agencies to provide you with targeted ads to make you buy their stuff. It's all just a matter of who's going to take care of your information, and provide you with the targeted ads that you would be able to tolerate. That's why my money's on reliable companies and sites, at the very least you know for sure they're going to take care of your information, and most of them have a "Do not Sell my Data" clause on the privacy statement that you can take them to court with should you find out that they violated such guidelines. Basically you have legal powers over the casino and the information they collect from you when it's a reputable site. You wouldn't really have this amount of certainty on some other gambling site which sets them so far apart.

European Football's the most famous out of every league, so it makes total sense for it to be the public's favorite. You could say they perfected the sport and every other league across the world minor or not are still decades far from ever reaching the level of gameplay and skill that these players make. Singaporean League for example, is one hell of a clown fiesta, so much so that not a lot of people are really looking forward to watching them, basically already closing out on their chance at getting fans and supporters from their very country, although I'm guessing it's because of their relatively small population, not too many athletic specimen that could show massive display of talent and skill per se, but at this point it's just excuses lmao.

Certainly sad, but I don't think he'll be relishing over this loss. He's worked with such a staggering amount in the past and I'm pretty sure he'd have the chance to work with such amount once again in the future. Just easy come easy go as they say. He'll get back the money he lost from this ordeal, and backtracking if he wants to be disillusion himself to cope he can just say "I only lost 4 grand" lmao, cause that 90 grand from the looks of it was never his for the taking in the first place.

Also, you're not a pessimist, you're a realist. Just cause you don't want to risk losing all your money in one go over a single bet doesn't necessarily mean that you're a coward. You're maximizing your chances of making sure you keep the 90 grand, which in my opinion is far better than the promise of a higher pay.

You would be correct if not for the added protection that cryptocurrency casinos offer its users. For most of these casinos, they employ provably fair mechanics that not only say they are fair, but includes references and evidences to support their claim. Every roll generates a traceable seed that will inform the player of the transaction details which includes the game that is played, the results, and the codes that had lead to that result.

As with regular casinos, you don't really see something like this, most of the time you'd just have to believe in good faith that the casino is not screwing you over, not that any of them do, so that air of distrust isn't really gone. Plus you can't really provide irreputable evidence on live gamblers that their machines are working properly and fairly, that would mean they'd have to take every machine apart for each player, and then teaching them what each part does and how it affects their odds of winnings, a pretty tedious task if you'll ask me.

A web3 game layered upon a web2 internet foundation is still a web2 game no matter what they say. Unless a true paradigm shift in the internet technology is made, such that it will usher in the introduction of web3, we can't expect web3 casinos to even come around let alone be playable. Plus, all these things about being open source and better fund handling could easily be made with technologies available in the Web2 layer, this just makes Web3 look more like a gimmick more than something that is necessary and somethign that we are slowly transitioning towards. So no, as much as I want a more fair and more interactive casino introduced by web3, until we solve these issues we're going to have to stick with Web2 solutions.

The Japanese are really proving themselves out here now, with all these young talents cementing their names as one of the best Japanese boxers to wear the gloves. We've also seen a massive decline in the performance of Filipino Boxers lately, Nonito Donaire for example losing out on one of his most important fights which in my opinion he has no business of losing since he's still pretty much got much fight in him.

As for women's boxing, a lot of boxing fans are just not into it because of the fact that there are less action, and it's more about just landing shots and playing for time instead of massive punches being thrown left and right, basically picture every boxer in the men's division playing like Floyd Mayweather, but with less speed and less finesse. That's how women's boxing looks like to people who grew up watching regular boxing.

So uhm, what are you getting on to exactly? I'm not saying all of the casinos that are not on this forum are scams or what, it's just that it's really hard to trust a casino (at least for me) when you don't have channels to reach them out, bitcointalk being one of them. So I refrain from using casinos that do not have announcement channels here. In any case, the point still stands that you should really avoid no-KYC casinos because well, let's just say I'm not gonna side with the greater evil here. Considering you'd have to chose between entrusting your identity to another corporation, or risking yourself from getting scammed by some snotty-nosed kid in North Korea or wherever on God's green earth just to save from being "tracked by the government".

I'm the guy you bet would gamble on obscure and ridiculous sports and championships, This one takes the cake though lmao. I don't see myself betting in this kind of sport as this is obscure, and watching how the games went down is just downright pornography. I'm guessing they have a panel of judges with rubrics to discern how well each players perform, much like regular sports. So it makes sense how they can judge players based on position, creativity, number of orgasms, or whatever. It's a ridiculous sport I know, and I'm not really gonna be betting on it all because it's very explicit, but at the same time I don't think this is the right time to cite religion (unless you're Muslim or whatever) cause well, I've come across countless Christians and people who say they are religious involving themselves in activities that are much more grave than this one, cheating for example, killing, and all that other stuff. So yeah, let the Swedish people have their fun, it's not like they're hurting anyone anyway.