Your definition of 'illegal': Illegal – Any use of cryptocurrencies, including purchase and trading, is considered illegal and prosecutions may be applied if discovered.Then you have: China
Status: Illegal
Access to all domestic and foreign cryptocurrency exchanges and ICO websites has been blocked and ICOs are banned. It's a bit weird to say Bitcoin is illegal in China, when majority of hashpower is located in China. They did crack down on exchanges, but, afaik, peer 2 peer and OTC trading is still allowed, just as possession of cryptos is. How about tweaking the definition of illegality to include "heavy restrictions" on usage of cryptos, rather than suggesting that it's outright banned?
|
|
|
Just a heads up, the bridge was named "Dogethereum" but there already is (or was?) currency by the same name (ticker DOGX): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2980293.0Both have nothing to do with each other. As much as DOGX is pretty much dead (not even listed on Coinmarketcap) their website still pops out high in google search, which already causes confusion (as evidenced in linked thread).
|
|
|
Just saw on CoinMarketCal this event added 26th of August : "The Dogethereum crew will livestream a demonstration of the bridge on September 5 at 10AM PDT. " Is this project still alive?? Maybe the devs don't care about answering in this forum I didn't manage to import keys from the doge core wallet as per their guide, so does someone know if any exchange support this?? They also added on the calendar that the fork will be 30th September Those are 2 separate projects and have nothing to do with eachother. There's Dogethereum (DOGX) - the currency (which this thread is for) and there's Dogethereum - a bridge between DOGE and ETH chains (the reason behind the recent DOGE price surge). Easy to get confused. As far as I know, DOGX is pretty much dead.
|
|
|
... "Can you say, have BTC (virtual currency) if it can't be touched or smelled etc? And if it dumps in the future to zero....did it ever 'really' exist or was it just ...
That's a good one especially when you realise that 'bitcoin' as a coin, doesn't even exist in a digital form. There's no string of ones and zeroes you could point out and say "there it is! there's my bitcoin". Only entries in a ledger... Consequently, it's probably more accurate to refer to it as 'imaginary' currency rather than 'digital', although that'd be an awful marketing move...
|
|
|
Thank you. Im looking through that link but its so much information and change of topics within, Is there a simple answer as to the risk involved with BCH because of what the news claim? Thanks!
Don't read the entire thread - just go there and ask for a quick run-down on upcoming forks and associated risks. I'm out of the loop on BCH affairs, so won't be much of a help, but, from what I understand nothing is decided yet so no one can clearly define the risks.
|
|
|
Awesome thanks for your response, I was intrigued to ask because all I see in the news is a hard fork that's coming in November...
mocacinno was referring to a different fork - the fork that created BCH as a separate cryptocurrency. To discuss upcoming BCH fork(s) (Bitcoin ABC, Craig Wright) - go to the relevant thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2040221.0
|
|
|
Anyone having problems with Mycelium wallet today? It was working fine and for the last couple of hours I can't acess it. It's shuting down all the time, can't see the balance or anything else. All other applications on my mobile are working fine. Any idea what is happening?
All good here. Haven't made any tx, but it's responsive, all seems smooth and not crashing. Are you running the latest version (2.11.1.17 for android)? Check for update if not.
|
|
|
I see in the spreadsheet you have few hero/legendary spots available, so applying (for the week 4 onwards): Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=183781Post Count: 4454Merit Count: 1060BTC Address: 12cp7Qurdref35gPVmLLSnvsAZxBQwcSUWTelegram Username: @TheRealCyberFalconI wasn't active on the forum in the last few weeks, but expect to have more time and dive back in. Let me know if accepted. ps. Already joined both telegram channels
|
|
|
Hi. As I'm not very active on btctalk lately and likely to get kicked out due to not making the min. post count for the 2nd week in a row - I thought I'd just leave and make room for someone else.
Thanks for everything, it was fun. I may re-apply later in the future.
|
|
|
Forget about cutting down, nicotine alternatives and other bullshit.
Read "the easy way to stop smoking" by Allen Carr. Worked for me.
If quitting is hard, you're doing it wrong.
|
|
|
Currently there are 5 active topics on the 1st page of 'Scam Accusations' related to yobit (+many more further down).
All you can do is keep spamming their customer service email + social media channels and, most of all, stop sending funds to shady exchanges.
|
|
|
<snip> - A rule on bitcointalk which would only allow bounties to be run by a set of campaign managers should accomplish this.
You mean "trained and licensed bounty managers"? Yeah, that'll never work. All you need is to start banning managers who notoriously ignore spamming among own participants.
|
|
|
Yup it's a poorly designed scam. Their ANN thread is locked now (surprise!). Quick look at it and I see their claiming to already be producing physical locks, which is something rather easy to prove or disprove.
The entire concept would be doomed to fail anyway.
|
|
|
...
More proof there's little correlation between wealth and intelligence.
? Less inteligence --> get scammed --> less wealth Wealth/IQ correlation is holding pretty strong.
|
|
|
It is better to hold your bitcoins for now as the market is constantly in a downturn and we do not know when this building will end so it is preferable that you must not sell your bitcoins as of now
You sir, are an absolute spammer. What was going through your mind necromancing this 1 year old topic and posting completely irrelevant reply? Posting shit in spam mega-treads is not enough these days?
|
|
|
... That's why they calculate it as year-end finals, isn't it? So that they don't get into minor discrepancies about gains and losses along the way. There's no way that they can charge you for every gain and ignore losses. That's just not a sustainable business.
They don't ignore losses. The problem is when you don't make provisions towards tax (you don't put fiat money aside) and you wait till the end of the tax year. You're exposing yourself to crypto/fiat price fluctuation risk. Example (let's assume 20% tax): Early in the year you made profit on crypto-to-crypto trade of 1 btc, worth $20,000 at the time. Later in the year you traded with loss of 0.5 btc, but bitcoin price fell down to $6,000, so you lost $3,000. At the end of the year the rate is 1btc = $8,000. You would think that since your total profit was 0.5 btc x $8,000 = $4,000 - your total tax would be $4,000 x 20% = $800. But taxman is only looking at fiat value at the time of the trades, so: 1st trade profit $20,000 less 2nd trade loss of $3,000 = $17,000 at 20% = $3,400. So, in this case, tax is 85% of your actual profit. ... Unless it falls under gambling?
In the UK day trading that falls under 'speculative' category is treated at par with gambling. You don't pay tax on gains, but you can't deduct losses. Source: https://www.daytrading.com/taxes/uk
|
|
|
I recall seeing 2-3 threads where few senior members were giving merits away - anyone with decent quality and constructive posting history could apply and get rewarded.
Other than that, don't hope to get merited for 1-sentence posts in spam/mega threads. Hardly anyone reads such posts anyway. Try to do something useful. You claim to speak 4 languages, how about posting some useful translation to local boards (ie. forum rules, or explanation of how forum ranks work etc). There should be at least 1 merit source in every local board, so likely you'll get merited.
|
|
|
... What is the reason that they gave for the banning of Crypto currencies? money laundering, corruption, tax violation etc. there are many more reasons but i have plans to overcome these reasons of banning. let's hope for the best. You should highlight major downsides of criminalising cryptos: 1 - Most civilised countries would allow cryptos and have them regulated one way or another. That means your country's gov don't have to re-invent the wheel, just copy laws/solutions from other countries, the ones that fit them the most. 2 - Having cryptos criminalised (while vast majority of the world allows them) make the government look tyrannical in the eyes of the tourists and own citizens. 3 - Due to the nature of the cryptocurrencies, people would still use it, whether legal or not. What banning really does, is just pushing people underground, incentivising the growth of the dark economy, contributes to the general distrust of the government and most of all - it means less control, no tax income and possible outflow of money abroad. If the gov are still hesitant, they could adopt a more cautious approach and allow trial-run for exchanges with some trade/deposit limits per person etc. There are plenty of options, total ban seems the worst (or just the laziest) way to deal with the issue.
|
|
|
|