Nie wiem, ale zgadywałbym że gdyby zgłaszali "z automatu" to wtedy pewnie produkowaliby też roczne raporty o uzyskanym przychodzie (informację podatkową), coś w stylu PIT-8C jak to robią giełdy maklerskie. Jeśli takowych nie produkują, to raczej nie zgłaszają.

Ale zawsze można zapytać u źródła, z tego co wiem to mają nawet polską obsługę klienta.

W razie wątpliwości, jak radzi Janusz, chyba lepiej se odpuścić.

This Overview of Bitcoin Casinos could be a good start. It might not be super up-to-date, but still pretty helpful.

Accepted payment type and/or cryptocurrencies depend on each casino individually. When choosing the right one for you, just pay attention to their history, how long have they been operating, see if there are/were any serious scam accusations against them, go to their official threads and get a sense of what are their users' opinions. And then compare house edge, odds rates, verification requirements and check if they offer payment systems that are right for you.

Not sure what kind of games you mean in particular, but, as cliche as it is, if something is too good to be true - it's probably not true.
Any games/apps that promise you high rewards for no effort are lying or outright scams. The only viable and sustainable model for apps to be able to offer regular payments is to share some of their revenue with users. And as most of their revenue would be generated from ads (assuming non-gambling apps), the best you could get is a tiny fraction of what they get paid from advertisers to show you ads, so almost never worth the effort.

I'm guessing it wasn't his first "high stake at high probability" bet and that it paid off on previous occasions to the point of creating the impression of an almost guaranteed win or "free money". I know, I've been there once and learned my lesson. I didn't go broke but lost more than I was willing to and put me in a bad mood for a few days.

High odds - low payout bets are the worst type. The chance of winning in the area of 99% is so good that even a person with high-risk aversion might be tempted to take it. But then you have to bet much more than usual to get any meaningful payout. And then you win a few times and can't believe how easy it was, so you keep doing it until you get badly burnt.

That's why you need to be able to properly assess the risk-to-reward ratio and put emotions aside.

I believe her outfit was meant to symbolise the evolution of El Salvador's currency or something along those lines.

That's a nice and unexpected touch. It's probably the last place I would expect to see any bitcoin references. That being said, I have a mixed feelings about N. Bukele using his position and the taxpayers money to prop up Bitcoin. I'd much rather see it growing from a grass-roots initiatives.

I wonder if that was her choice and does she even understands what Bitcoin is and how it works.

The part highlighted by you refers to relatively safe investment opportunities. For the 17% single dye roll - I honestly don't know, that's essentially why I started this topic. I feel like I'd probably go with ~25% of the amount defined as "amount I can afford to lose" for the purpose of gambling as defined in the post you've quoted, aka 25% of my monthly "fun and entertainment" budget. There's not much math involved in determining that stake size, it just *feels* right, it won't hurt much if I (likely) lose but still gives a sense of taking a proper advantage of the positive EV bet.

The most "logic" approach would be to go with 9.5% calculated by using the Kelly criterion, but it's just seems a bit low.


You two are just posting for the sake of posting, aren't you lol

Disagree. Bitcoin not only IS a cryptocurrency, but it's a "poster boy" for the entire market. Therefore, by all means, it should be placed in the same category.
Just like with the stock market, you have a good stocks, and stocks that you shouldn't touch with 10 foot pole.


Similar here, I don't hold majority of my wealth in BTC, but my exposure is still way higher than that recommended by *experts*. But, in my case, it just happened - as bitcoin appreciated in value, a small percent became significant. I just never bothered to re-balance my portfolio. And I probably won't be doing it now, during what might be the beginning of a new bull run

If it can be proven that they new the venture they were promoting was a scam - then yes, they should be held responsible and face consequences.
Orherwise, the benefit of a doubt should be given, as we cannot expect anyone providing advertising service to know the intentions of their clients.
But it's a good opportunity to remember that celebrity endorsements are meaningless and aren't adding any credibility.


Scams are actually allowed on this forum. Simply because moderators cannot evaluate each case. Plus, it could create an impression that if some posts/threads are not removed by mods, they are legit and not scams.

Some of you guys have a distorted view of legality. For something to be "legal" it doesn't have to be declared legal - it's enough that it's not forbidden by law.
Holding bitcoins was never illegal in Argentina, therefore it cannot be "legalized"
legalisation - the action of making something that was previously illegal permissible by law.


You'd declare it at "Fair Value", i.e. at the market value on at the date the declaration was made.

The problem would be for some of the lesser popular shitcoins with tiny market caps where prices can differ significantly between different exchanges.

Quick Monday poll for the good start of the week.

I've heard a few crypto-friendly financial experts saying that everyone should have at least 10% of their investment portfolio located in crypto. Lets find out how this looks for this forum.

Rules:

• Bitcoin and all other crypto should be considered but excluding fiat-pegged stablecoins.
• Retirement funds and value of residential properties should not be included in equation, but any investment properties should.
• Vote changing allowed

You can lie in the comments, but try to be truthful in the poll, it's anonymous after all

---

Feel free to comment whether you're comfortable with the level of your current crypto holdings, or do you plan to increase/decrease it.

That's not a silver lining at all. Those taxes are not the same. India's 30% is a tax on profit, as high as it is, you only pay that if you made a profit, so you can still enjoy the remaining 70%.
Argentina's tax is way worse, because it's a tax on holdings. Imagine buying BTC at say $60k (with the money you've already paid your income tax on), making 70% loss and than your government reaching for the 1%-2.5% (or even 10%) of whatever's left. And what's worse, it's not said whether it's some sort of one-time charge, so presumably it is a regular tax, which you'd be expected to pay every year. That's pretty sick.

If there's any silver lining - it's the fact that it's only payable by a "high earners" (however is that defined). Standard move to prevent people from raising up and revolt. Rich (but not super-wealthy or influential people) have always been considered a fair game for governments. They don't have enough voting power, they're not numerous enough to riot and general population don't like them too much.

Yup, hitting 5k doesn't happen very often, I've never made it yet, got quite a few of 500 wins though.
Your expectations were set pretty high, with 5k tickets you only had like ~0.025% chance of winning any prize (if my quick calculation is correct).



There are thousands of participants with low amount of tickets every week, so it's no surprise that one or few of them will happen to win something in every round.
And it's not like they've won any life-changing amounts. You can probably earn more in your signature campaign with few posts.

Ps. Does anyone knows if we get email notifications when winning any prize in the lottery?

I'm not a psychic, but judging by the fact that the OP posted this in Gambling section - it's possible he asks for a betting broker, i.e. a website that lists and compares betting odds from number of different gambling sites etc.
If so, I don't use any of such and won't be much of help.

OP - can you do a little better in explaining what exactly is it that you're asking for?

Hey, would you mind explaining how exactly increasing the service fee increases the mixing level?
Is it just a case of: the higher the fee - the more unrelated btc addresses will be used to produce an output? Or is there more to that?
In one of the other mixer threads, a few people (myself included) were a bit confused about how this actually works.

You never know, there's always a chance some whale will use our ref link, so could be worth it
It also provides an extra incentive to keep posting after hitting max 25 posts or to wear the signature even after the campaign ends.

But will this campaign go only for 1 week?

Thanks julerz12.

Quick one - are we allowed to put referral links in our signatures?

@Royse777 - I accepted a spot in another campaign since they offered me a full-paid Legendary position, whereas here I was on a Senior pay-rate.

But thanks again for the opportunity and you can now release my spot.

BitcoinTalk Username: pawel7777
Bitcoin address: bc1q79vqvnghljgu926g7gtuhnncq560kc24cur43t
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 14 (that was earned only in the last 3 weeks as I was inactive for a while).

I was previously accepted to the YoMix campaign which was meant to be managed by you but that didn't happen, so would be great to be accepted to this one (as I only managed to get the Senior spot in the campaign I'm currently enrolled in).

I wouldn't be so pessimistic. Looking at some of the feedback in the trust summary of DuckDice.io it sounds like the community pressure paid off a few times.

OP - you should exhaust all available contact options first, i.e. send PM to DuckDice.io and post in their thread. If no luck, open a Scam Accusation as advised above.

Not really? Are you just playing around with changing definitions?
Strategy - a plan of action designed to achieve a long-term or overall aim.
e.g. Martingale is one of the most popular betting strategies but doesn't have much to do with calculating outcomes.


So if in the set-out scenario there's no defined minimum bet, would you just bet 1 satoshi hoping to earn 11 sats? Why even bother?


You're exaggerating a bit. No one in the developed world would go bankrupt or starve if they happened to lose $50 or $100. It could cause some inconvenience but everyone could manage. That's probably also true even for poor countries.

Average people tend to spend beyond their means (i.e. getting expensive cars on finance, buying low-nutrition junk food, paying for subscriptions they don't use etc), but that's a different story.