But Bitcoin continues to chug along, producing blocks, issuing block rewards, confirming transactions, with no dowtime, for years and decades, for multi-generations. If there was a shitcoin that takes its place in market value, it surely NEVER be your shitcoin. Bitcoin is just much more than a btc shitcoin it will replace also eth and any other funny sold to fools thing Satoshi made a great coin - not sure what you have now |
|
|
|
lol good start for self reflection |
|
|
|
You are being drawn in and fooled by hand waving semantics. Satoshi did not foresee the rise of ASICs. But "validating nodes" were the response of the MARKET to combat the centralization caused by ASIC mining. If consensus did not DISCONNECT itself from mining then the Bitcoin Network would have already centralized, and consensus, and validity of all the transactions would be in the hands of a smaller and smaller group, and eventually they would be able to rewrite the rules to suit their own desires. This is EXACTLY what CSW is trying to do! You do realize that CSW is trying to get the COURTS to order the developers to rewrite the code of Bitcoin to release the Satoshi Blocks to him, don't you? The only reason this has not yet happened with BCH and BSV is nobody really uses them. Watch Ethereum, the legacy big blocker chain with actual use. They are centralizing more and more. Changing the rules along the way. And destroying all credibility as they go. I write this not because I believe you can be saved. You are either part of the deception, or too dumb to understand what is really happening. I write it for the ONE PERSON who might read this and finally say AH HA! And stay the fuck away from the scams that these projects ultimately are. Changing the rules AFTER the system and coins are sold to the masses is the biggest scam ever no matter what else tech bubble here and there the rules did say: a miner is a full node, cause does the FULL job and yes, Satoshi did mentioned data centers - but that does not mean P2P eCash works no longer without any centre / middle men, that centre is only getting into P2P with high fees btc / eth just the scam of the space with all that. Changing rules and high fees |
|
|
|
... und was davon fällt nicht unter Poisition Talk / Kursmanipulation by Big Players? ist schon ein Unterschied zu dem Grassroot Forum hier. ... Wer hat eigentlich gestern den Betrifft Bericht über Hacking / Ransomware gesehn? - übel, wenn das schlimmer wird |
|
|
|
... so than go pls GS and work out the legal binding product prospects  |
|
|
|
This news is at least three months old and was already posted in the Legal section of this forum: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5317970.0It is always great to see some of the economic powers taking a more favorable view of the cryptocurrency. And Russia has a very influential role in the cryptocurrency market, because some of the earliest developers and crypto-based businesses originated form there. And from what I have heard, cryptocurrency mining is also booming in Russia, thanks to cheap electricity. Now with the government also being supportive, Russia has the potential to become one of the crypto superpowers. seems from today but hu https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5340128.0 |
|
|
|
Steuern sind erstmal dazu da, Menschen das Leben zu erleichtern wenn sie gerade nicht mal so flüssig sind oder Hilfe brauchen (Sozialabgaben zähle ich auch zu Steuern). Wenn ihr so unzufrieden seid, wandert doch aus. Ihr werdet die Wollmilchsau garantiert nicht finden. Und wenn doch, leiden halt wieder andere.
Was wir hier alles in den Allerwertesten geblasen bekommen....
Und nochmal zu Mezzomix, der von Enteignung bei Regulierung spricht - Afrika ist groß (sprich: Vielleicht bist du gerade zufällig in deinem gewählten Zielland noch nicht betroffen), aber die Enteignung ist dort schon in Planung. z.b. in Südafrika. Die weiße Minderheit wird dort demnächst zur Geschichte gehören.
Entweder wirst du gelyncht oder später enteignet. Ein Leben hinter Stacheldraht ist doch kein Leben. Ich finde den Mix hier in DE einfach OK - auf meine Frage wo es besser ist hab ich übrigens noch keine Antworten erhalten.
... oder PoW: Arbeitet daran, dass es besser hier wird. Wir sind auf einem recht hohen Ross, auf das 99% der Welt drauf will - wer da noch jammert... |
|
|
|
Sure ... they want to earn money with trading - try to create more coins ? How is that good for Bitcoin ?
Regardless of what they want and whether they are going to succeed, of course they are doing good for Bitcoin by calling it a legitimate asset class. It's better to be used as a speculative asset than not used at all. I think, in the long run we basically have two options: either BTC is used by many millions of people or it's dead. Why? Because developers need money to survive. But that's just my opinion, I may be wrong, of course. with 6000 different (but copied) coins live atm and wanting - (your money) yes nice competition for just the same thing: fix the double spending for computers (and devs) who were just used to copy things There can be only on in the end but at scale and generating real new value |
|
|
|
|
Sure ... they want to earn money with trading - try to create more coins ? How is that good for Bitcoin ?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
