hm, dropping words into the legacy internet is ... cheap.
On twetch you must pay some sats, different
think of some sats more and there will be quality / value posts
you can decide now, where you are and how to differ information , entropy , value ....
BTW, the degree of privacy also will differ with that, its correlated. High value info you only get by full known identity
If Twetch proves one thing it's that paying to make posts does NOT improve the quality of its contents. I don t see you trolling over there so - better quality is on Twetch - And: Removing posts there is quite impossible (not here, where my list is growing - proof of fear...)  Well, Twetch user accounts can clearly be deleted ! Regardless of the content remaining 'immutable' on the BSV blockchain ... "No it's much much worse than that.
It actually sets a 'dangerous' precedent against ones freedom of speech, your human rights, your civil liberties etc., i.e. your 'right to be forgotten' ..."- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1250715154003746816... "We indeed pointed it out, not GPDR compliant.
GPDR imposes the data to be erasable or editable if justified."- https://twitter.com/tututpouet/status/1250723332770746373... - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Data_Protection_RegulationDo you understand the problems and ramifications here @hv_ ? Nope, thought not. sure, even the EU has running task to clear that issue, that s open. No, it's cristal clear. You are lying, again. -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149062.1240https://twitter.com/tututpouet/status/1230863284481527808Lol, triggerd babylegal.. There are data, and different data. What level is not yet clear |
|
|
|
hm, dropping words into the legacy internet is ... cheap.
On twetch you must pay some sats, different
think of some sats more and there will be quality / value posts
you can decide now, where you are and how to differ information , entropy , value ....
BTW, the degree of privacy also will differ with that, its correlated. High value info you only get by full known identity
If Twetch proves one thing it's that paying to make posts does NOT improve the quality of its contents. I don t see you trolling over there so - better quality is on Twetch - And: Removing posts there is quite impossible (not here, where my list is growing - proof of fear...) Well, Twetch user accounts can clearly be deleted ! Regardless of the content remaining 'immutable' on the BSV blockchain ... "No it's much much worse than that.
It actually sets a 'dangerous' precedent against ones freedom of speech, your human rights, your civil liberties etc., i.e. your 'right to be forgotten' ..."- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1250715154003746816... "We indeed pointed it out, not GPDR compliant.
GPDR imposes the data to be erasable or editable if justified."- https://twitter.com/tututpouet/status/1250723332770746373... - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Data_Protection_RegulationDo you understand the problems and ramifications here @hv_ ? Nope, thought not. sure, even the EU has running task to clear that issue, that s open. but you know, the internet never forgets, just BSV fixes nasty forgery options. so we could see who really forged the things from Satoshi .... |
|
|
|
I don t see you trolling over there so
That's because I don't own altcoins  . Early BitCoiners own a lot - even overprices SegWitCoin  |
|
|
|
Mach einfach (lol) mal selber eine auf - oder n fintech ala Revolut - mache mit |
|
|
|
hm, dropping words into the legacy internet is ... cheap.
On twetch you must pay some sats, different
think of some sats more and there will be quality / value posts
you can decide now, where you are and how to differ information , entropy , value ....
BTW, the degree of privacy also will differ with that, its correlated. High value info you only get by full known identity
If Twetch proves one thing it's that paying to make posts does NOT improve the quality of its contents. I don t see you trolling over there so - better quality is on Twetch - And: Removing posts there is quite impossible (not here, where my list is growing - proof of fear...) |
|
|
|
Craig Wright on the topic of Hodling or rather hoedeling as he pronounces it. "Hoedeling is probably the most despicable evil thing you can do with bitcoin" Says the the man who claims to control the bitcoins mined by Satoshi that have never been moved.  https://twitter.com/i/status/1250595473368338432UPDATE:  CSW appears to have been banned from Twetch Thanks for this. After a week of being harassed and receiving death threats from BSVers, I could use a good laugh. Update - important memes:   Whether they are joking or not, casting out CSW as de facto leader of BSV is probably the best PR move they could possibly make. haha, did ya know he was banned on bct ? soo much things happened - to Satoshi, to CSW ... nah I hope soon we see the light Do you just type random words or are you actually trying to say something here? You make as much sense as your schizophrenic idol. hm, dropping words into the legacy internet is ... cheap. On twetch you must pay some sats, different think of some sats more and there will be quality / value posts you can decide now, where you are and how to differ information , entropy , value , truth and sources.... BTW, the degree of privacy also will differ with that, its correlated. High value info you only get by full known identity |
|
|
|
Craig Wright on the topic of Hodling or rather hoedeling as he pronounces it. "Hoedeling is probably the most despicable evil thing you can do with bitcoin" Says the the man who claims to control the bitcoins mined by Satoshi that have never been moved. https://twitter.com/i/status/1250595473368338432UPDATE: CSW appears to have been banned from Twetch Thanks for this. After a week of being harassed and receiving death threats from BSVers, I could use a good laugh. Update - important memes: Whether they are joking or not, casting out CSW as de facto leader of BSV is probably the best PR move they could possibly make. haha, did ya know he was banned on bct ? soo much things happened - to Satoshi, to CSW ... nah I hope soon we see the light |
|
|
|
|
BitCoin did quit - with segwit BTC is no longer compliant
There is the scam
Doesnt help to pray BTC is ...
Oh - and BitCoin is not a socialist system - funny
|
|
|
|
Eins ist jedenfalls klar: gut daß wir Crypto haben.
Die Regularien werden ja immer enger und die Instrumente der Behörden zu "ökonomischen Kontrolle" werden immer weitreichender und besser. Das ist besorgniserregend wenn man das Recht auf freies ökonomisches Handeln für wichtig hält.
Ich will den Banken nicht unterstellen daß sie gerne den Handlanger eines übergriffigen Systems spielen, aber es gab mal eine Zeit, da hätte jede renommierte Bank solche Forderungen seitens des (globalen) Gesetzgebers empört an der Wurzel bekämpft und sich damit gegenüber ihren Kunden gerühmt.
Ich denke derzeit ernsthaft über einen totalen Exit aus dem Bankensystem (einfach keine Bankkonten mehr haben) nach. Mir scheint es ist möglich. Nicht immer einfach, aber durchaus zu machen. Fühlt sich bestimmt gut an. Gibt's da einen Thread zu mit Tipps?
Das einzige Problem was in meinen Überlegungen bisher bleibt ist: wie bekomme ich meine Steuerrückzahlungen vom Finanzamt? Weiss jemand ob man das Bar bekommen kann wenn man kein Bankkonto hat?
Die Regulation wird von einer Lobby gemacht, den grossen Banks, alle kleinen leiden darunter.... Begründung ist oft - intransparentes Geschäften. Der richtige Weg ist BitCoin so finanztauglich und ökonomisch zu machen, dass es alle nutzen Müssen. Der Weg ist schwierig, aber der einzige, um nich GEGEN viele etwas zu erreichen, sondert MIT - nur das ist dauerhaft. |
|
|
|
|
fight the clowns
BitCoin wins that
again
|
|
|
|
Unsinn! Niklas Nikolajsen, the founder of Swiss crypto broker Bitcoin Suisse, predicts that Bitcoin (BTC) will move to Proof-of-Stake (PoS) once the Ethereum (ETH) network has proved the algorithm’s success.
Q: So ... who is Niklas Nikolajsen? A: The founder of Swiss crypto broker Bitcoin Suisse. Q: What is Swiss crypto broker Bitcoin Suisse? A: The bitcoin blockchain crypto startup thing founded by Niklas Nikolajsen. Q: Is he a bitcoin core developer? A: Not, as far as I know. Q: Has the Ethereum's (ETH) network proved the algorithm’s (PoS) success? A: No. The algorithm is not finished and hasn't proved anything useful yet. Q: What is the relevance of the article and the mentioned "prediction" then? A: None. Kurz: Er verdient Geld mit der Existenz von ETH, und ist auch seit Anfang an dabei ... Ohne PoS (proof of shit) kann eth nicht mehr scalieren -> nur als zentrale DB ( DBA = Recht kaufen = Stake kaufen) ist also ein Rückschritt in die alte Welt - pre- PoW In dieser Welt Regiert IBM (Hyperledger), Oracle - Corda, ... mit viel besserem Governance - deswegen geht da auch die Industrie lieber rein, als in Vitaligarchie ( leider auch CoreIgarchie). Fragwürdige Governance hält übrigens alles auf - hat schonmal Gavin Andreesen bemängelt. |
|
|
|
They are reporting on a quote from Oct 2019, where the guy also thinks Ethereum is going to POS in a 'few months'. ETH is still not there 6 months later. I wouldn't worry too much about anything in that article happening, *especially* BTC going to POS. Stakeholders earning dividends due to a defined amount they bought the right for = securities. What will regulators, SEC say? |
|
|
|
BitCoin + Bitcoin Script kann alles besser und compliant. Wer braucht eth? |
|
|
|
I was checking the previous posts. A lot have been posted on dirty coins ending up at the decentralized exchanges and mixers. But we all ignore the fact that the majority of these dirty coins end up in mainstream exchanges such as ZB and Gate.io, which are operating 100% legally. Let me take the example of the coins from the PlusToken scam. An unbelievable 50% of the coins laundered so far from this scam ended up at Huobi, with smaller amounts being diverted to exchanges such as Upbit and OkEx. No Huobi must delist Monero scam coin Stop that shit |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Forks Halving Epic Fail: Fork Block Rewards Halved, Barely Anyone Noticed
The halving that matters is a little over a month away. Sometime in mid-May, Bitcoin block rewards paid to miners for discovering new blocks will drop from 12.5 BTC to 6.25 BTC.
This week, Bitcoin Cash (BCH, formerly known as BCHABC) and Bitcoin SV (BSV, formerly known as BCHSV) went through their first halving events.
They both enjoyed momentary bumps in price, by about 11 and 19% respectively. Those gains were fairly immediately wiped out, however, with their reward halvings failing to have a lasting price impact.
In fact, the ABC halving resulted in a dramatic exodus of miners. Block 630,000 triggered the reward halving to 6.25 BCH on Wednesday. It took two hours for block 630,001 to be mined. The speed of BCH is 116 transactions per second. That fell to 1.11 TPS.
The slump in network activity was predicted by Coin Metrics:
“When Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin SV halve their block rewards, this should force miners to direct even more hash power to Bitcoin as it will still have a 12.5 native unit block reward (instead of 6.25) for about a month longer.”
https://magazine.cointelegraph.com/2020/04/11/bitcoin-forks-halving-epic-fail-moon-lambo-nailed-it/Last I checked btc also halves soon - and very 4 years again, but has no on-chain capacity - not even for linear growth COVID 19 shows very hefty what happens if you dont plan for (excess) capacity - going viral epic fail - segwit hail ? |
|
|
|
Your "Leader" is a PROVEN LIAR...
This is your personal subjective opinion.
This is not opinion its FACT... But you cannot win
Win what? it's not a fucking game with levels.. Fool.. Maybe your life with your falling BTC is so pity?
Everything in life is a ZeroSumGame! Including BSV.. but BSV will be at 0 long before anything else will be. Come back and tell us how hot your bag is when NO exchanges allow you to trade your shitcoin... I'm not wasting anymore time on you... Just know your not welcome here.... Thinkin of full bags ends in position talk - stops anything of deeper value like real use cases. The new money for the internet that BitCoin originally was designed to be and was before SegWit split the chains. BSV supportes try to make that better now. No price / position talk. Think of building business on top. BSV is set in stone - freedom for any app dev, strategy consultant and CEO |
|
|
|
There are many project where they take seemingly dishonest team member, but they intentionally do so to better promote their product.
Blockstream? |
|
|
|
@Lucius. I did not quote my own post. It was hv_. I quoted him with my post quoted, however. Edited hehehe.
@stompix. Bisq is closer to the definition of decentralized than the scam decentralized exchanges created on Ethereum. It was mentioned one of them would begin asking for KYC hehehe.
I love anyone who tries to implement a DEX and anyone who knows Bisq or has spoken to them know that they've never claimed to be fully decentralised, but they endeavour to be more and more, as much as possible. I also have a special dislike for DEXs that aren't anything but non-custodial functions but the reality is, there is no such way right now to have a "purely decentralised" exchange, at least not in the beginning. Bisq is as close as it gets for me, without getting too far out of reach for non teccies. DEX , DeFi, ICO, Mixers, all to scam average Joes. It only helps whales, manipulators, scammers, criminals Reminds me on the pets.coms from dot com bubble |
|
|
|
Oh? I did look up that website, and as I type this message, it does show bcash sv as costing more to attack per hour than bcash abc, so $8,326 and $7,433 respectively. https://www.crypto51.app/Note also that as I type this message, bitcoin has a per hour attack cost of $544,550, ethereum $83,770 and litecoin $13,880. The funny thing is, despite (!) it should be such cheap, nothing happens. Where is the logic here? Oh, that got SegWitted |
|
|
|
Ich meinte damit auch nicht unbedingt nur die Käufe der "Großen" (also z.B. Banken), aber Sachen wie z.B. der Import eines Handys aus China. Oder die Zahlung des Urlaubs bei Airbnb und Konsorten. Oder Remittances (Überweisungen von Aus/Einwanderern in die Heimatländer). Das ist ein Preisbereich, für den Bitcoin m.E. sinnvoll ist.
Wenn dank LN sich Bitcoin auch zum Kauf vom Kaffee eignet, gerne - aber ich sehe jetzt so kleine Transaktionen im niedrigen einstelligen Eurobereich nicht als wesentlich für den Erfolg von Bitcoin an. Wichtiger ist es eher, dass eine richtige Zirkulation (also dass viele sowohl BTC annehmen - nicht nur über Payment Processors - als auch ausgeben) entsteht. Das hätte wahrscheinlich dann positive (also dämpfende) Auswirkungen auf die Volatilität. Besonders dann, wenn massiv fixe Preise in BTC genommen würden - dann wäre der Durchbruch wohl geschafft.
Von globalem Durchbruch können wir sprechen, wenn die Effizienz um einiges höher ist, dazu gehört auch minimalst Reibung / Barrierefreiheit bei maximaler Compliance (die ist binär und der strengste Selektor für global Finance! Geringste Kosten / Hürden aber auch Geldwäsche in allen Bereichen und der Bürger muss noch nicht mal merken, dass Bitcoin irgendwie in seinen Services genutzt wird. Vorher sehe ich nur dass alles andere bis zu Hyperledger/Corda/Oracle/Microsoft/IBM das Feld dominieren und cryptos insbs alle ICO coins incl eth,xrp,... verboten werden, weil defi usw nur crime oder regulatory arbitration dient, und nicht dem Average Joe |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
