Can you add anybody to this list?
Nope Didn't think so. In other news, Craig got caught in another lie earlier today. This time lying about Satoshi's birthdate being attached to his vistomail email account. It wasn't. It was the date he used when creating his P2P Foundation profile. https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1247142197323075586 Vistomail, being a privacy-centric email service, doubtfully even had a place to enter your birthday. I registered for an account just now and there was no "birth date" option (granted it has since changed owners). How anybody can be so blind as to continue to support this guy when he gets caught in a new lie every other day is beyond me. trolling the trolls, by feeding with usless details you got caught again - and reacting meh, it even wont help telling ya. in the mean time: BitCoin is ready an scales - as designed Open for enterprise business trolls go different segregated nichy - segwit |
|
|
|
Here are the public figures that still believe Craig is Satoshi:
Calvin Ayre
Jimmy Nguyen
John McAfee
lol - when did you fall in love with twitter 'news' trolls ? Get some DECENT ppl - with DECENT backgrounds - not bagholgers, but why I tell ya Can you add anybody to this list? I know simple trolling is much easier for you as it requires very little brainpower and no research. Nope - name calling is ur business |
|
|
|
Was this information in his account? Where was this information originally taken from?
nothing - u got trolled by op @hv_ You are the 'troll' here. Stop lying to people and spreading misinformation and falsehoods. BSV is NOT Bitcoin and CSW is NOT satoshi. ... @achach Yes the information was presented by the real satoshi (NOT CSW) at: - http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/profile/SatoshiNakamotoThe information on that site has unfortunately been added to in recent times, however the original pages are accessible via the wayback machine ... - https://web.archive.org/web/20110318063527/http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/profile/SatoshiNakamotosnapshot March 18th 2011, when the real satoshi was still around and active both at ning and this forum ... ... The ning website pages are one of the original sources where I discovered and read about Bitcoin (BTC) <2010 ... "Re: Welcome to the new Bitcoin forum!" ... - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.msg188#msg188Unlike Craig Wright, I have Signed and Verified some of my 'old' BTC wallets and addresses, which are clearly related to my own history with Bitcoin and the BitcoinTalk forum ... "Topic: Verifying my (old) zero balance wallet address for blockchain research etc.," ... - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4630066.0Furthermore, I'm still here on BitcoinTalk to this very day ! This is how identity works in Bitcoin (BTC). With Segwit you introduced the troll / virus by yourself  No need to go out and find ppl to smear / name call get over it |
|
|
|
|
never share your private keys - that might be a fishing attack
|
|
|
|
Was this information in his account? Where was this information originally taken from?
nothing - u got trolled by op |
|
|
|
Big thing / diff link https://www.theblockcrypto.com/amp/post/60930/top-crypto-exchanges-token-issuers-named-in-friday-barrage-of-u-s-class-action-lawsuits.... "They separately name Binance, Civic, BProtocol, Status, Block.one, KayDex, Quantstamp, BiBox, TRON Foundation, KuCoin, HDR Global Trading, and many of their principals, including crypto notables such as Brendan Blumer, Dan Larimer, Vinny Lingham, and Binance founder Changpeng ("CZ") Zhao. " How many of them have the funding to pay for good layers and reduce the case into a settlement and a fee payment for the SEC? Such cases can take years if aimed at local companies. When you're suing offshore firms it's going to be a pain for the court to be able to schedule hearings and such and for the prosecutors to go through all the translations. They must be aware that defendants will hide behind their local laws and will keep delaying everything.
This case is just for show IMO, unless they want to keep coming to court for the next couple years.
The main problem of the US and their law is that while all countries believe that if your citizens go somewhere and buy something, they need to check if it's fine with their local law. So if you buy a gun in an online store and your country doesn't allow guns, you will have to take responsibility for it and possibly face a fine and lose the gun.
The US law makes it so that if someone buys a restricted item online, it's the fault of the seller. The seller should have asked where the client is from and be aware of all the US laws and regulations. Tell me this isn't crazy.
The latest case around telegram coin say sth different, it's not enough to just exclude US tax payer However, the developers have declared that they will still turn on their platform and issue the tokens. What can America do? Source https://cointelegraph.com/news/ton-community-no-one-can-prevent-the-launch-of-tona lot - finance - usd - big banks - powers and networks - legals - economy - ... still US is leader here, or do you see that different? |
|
|
|
lol - when did you fall in love with twitter 'news' trolls ? Get some DECENT ppl - with DECENT backgrounds - not bagholgers, but why I tell ya |
|
|
|
Since the great doctor lied to me directly about being satoshi..I figured I'd post this here from another thread.. I listened to Fluffy Pony on the Bad Bitcoin podcast a few days ago and he made a good point I had not considered ( foolishly). He’s so deep in to his web of lies, lies that people have put their faith and money in to believing he’s actually Satoshi , that if he finally fessed up he’d lose all that income /potential income and every particle of his reputation. As I’ve stated before.. it became very obvious to me when he told me he built smart contracts in to the chain from day 1, a direct contradiction to satoshi himself in this thread ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=750.msg8140#msg8140)... Though Satoshi does not mention smart contracts by name., Nick Szabo stated to me that’s exactly what he believes Satoshi ( or maybe himself) was referring to. Craig has posted so many contradictions to Satoshi by now, it's hard to keep count. Read the latest court entries, it's hilarious. Its only contradicting if u love segwit, ano and anarcho - hate rules, gov, banks, real world finance, compliance ... and original unchanged BitCoin / the white paper : tranparent honest money systems - the chain of signature ... so - no public figure with reputation in the real relevant fields can follow you BTC & Segwit, LN - non-compliant code will go: Nowhere - it is th scam that is getting called out - in PUBLIC by REAL WORLD PPL get over it |
|
|
|
Such cases can take years if aimed at local companies. When you're suing offshore firms it's going to be a pain for the court to be able to schedule hearings and such and for the prosecutors to go through all the translations. They must be aware that defendants will hide behind their local laws and will keep delaying everything.
This case is just for show IMO, unless they want to keep coming to court for the next couple years.
The main problem of the US and their law is that while all countries believe that if your citizens go somewhere and buy something, they need to check if it's fine with their local law. So if you buy a gun in an online store and your country doesn't allow guns, you will have to take responsibility for it and possibly face a fine and lose the gun.
The US law makes it so that if someone buys a restricted item online, it's the fault of the seller. The seller should have asked where the client is from and be aware of all the US laws and regulations. Tell me this isn't crazy.
The latest case around telegram coin say sth different, it's not enough to just exclude US tax payer |
|
|
|
Lol, what a bold 'proof'. Holds just on its own, ahhh - the agenda was to smear and name calling ppl Better proof: Segwit is not Bitcoin  |
|
|
|
Big thing / diff link https://www.theblockcrypto.com/amp/post/60930/top-crypto-exchanges-token-issuers-named-in-friday-barrage-of-u-s-class-action-lawsuits.... "They separately name Binance, Civic, BProtocol, Status, Block.one, KayDex, Quantstamp, BiBox, TRON Foundation, KuCoin, HDR Global Trading, and many of their principals, including crypto notables such as Brendan Blumer, Dan Larimer, Vinny Lingham, and Binance founder Changpeng ("CZ") Zhao. " |
|
|
|
She looks a lot like Brooke Adams. One of my biggest teenage crushes. Nice  Terri Garr was mine.  BTW I do not recommending googling what your chilhood dream girl looks like now...you've been warned. I can't un-see it now. Not much more to say here Dito |
|
|
|
Immer eine Frage des Zeitraums, moving frame. Aber gut zu sehen, es IST eine Alternative, doch wenig Volumen-> hohe Fehlerquote/ hohe Vola, keine echte Abdeckung in der relevanten Finanz. |
|
|
|
The solution is to just ignore the guy.
the problem is that we can ignore the scammer but how about everyone else, more specifically the newcomers who may not be fully aware of the nature of his fraud? with all these desperate news sites that will always keep fishing for "hot" news to publish and get some traffic, his nonsense will always remain alive and could fool some people. either everyone has to ignore him or his scams should be fought. Noobs getting scammed into Segwit, so what is the point? Sure, you all want ppl who debunking that marked as scammers. Wtf |
|
|
|
do you need glasses?  REDTUBE and PORNHUB are photoshoped by an amateur. EDIT: seems faked in several ways.  Including the fact he couldn't even spell Treasury correctly  Lol. Hellicoopter mony ? |
|
|
|
|
Hard to stop compliant systems
Easy to see segwit is not-compliant
That's what reasonable ppl & govs do
|
|
|
|
BSV has organic support
 Gigameg blocks go brrrrrr Pay no mind to the fact that its a total sham run by a couple of con artists. Coins with such leaders always fare well. Lol - nuttyboy: Loves Big Postings but small blocks bch is rekt anyway - too much trouble - not compliant like SegWit |
|
|
|
Craig isn't proving anything. He's trying to confuse brainlets like you by using more of his technobabble. Satoshi (I) never posted on Bitcointalk. There were no posts made by Satoshi after Dec 12, 2010. His profile was last active on Dec 13, 2010. Mentioning bitcointalk.org isn't even relevant to the point he's trying to make, since the domain wasn't created until 2011: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3There is nothing stopping the current administrators of Bitcointalk from posting as satoshi, which would prove nothing, because it isn’t my account and it never was. Both Satoshi's current bitcointalk.org page and the bitcoin.org/smf Web Archive page show that Satoshi made 575 posts. There are no indications that anyone made posts from the Satoshi account, besides Satoshi himself: https://web.archive.org/web/20101221234913/http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3 / https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3;sa=showPostsYou see, when you control the database, you can edit what other people have said. There are a couple of posts that have been changed from the original. Very conveniently Craig doesn't mention which posts have been changed from the original. The bitcoin.org/smf archive is available, so you can see the post Satoshi made before the domain was moved to bitcointalk.org. I'd love to hear which posts have been altered: https://web.archive.org/web/20101221174027/http://bitcointalk.org/looks he is always ahead triggereing the ano & anarchos that works - proven |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
