Some changes in Nexybit campaign payment structure, no 50% bonus (asterisk to be removed). New rates as follows:

In such case I'll take $2,120 (sorry gentlemand, nothing personal).

Do some reading. Then try to get a consultation with IP attorney, often first consultation are offered free of charge (if so, you can approach few to see if advises you get are consistent).

It's always good to get some sort of proof that the idea is your own (especially if that's all you got). Simply writing it down and sending an email to yourself could be helpful.

Good luck.

Could these 3 gentlemen change their calls?:


Any call above Jimbo's $5,780 can't possibly win.

You need to (re)build a community before starting any voting action.
Voted though, even know I hold no DVC.


Where's that? I wouldn't mind getting a little bit if the price was right and if there was any development roadmap.

So you're trying to do what I did but with different price source?




Anyhow, OP said he'll used BitStamp rate, the actual bottom at BitStamp was $5,780, called by djsugar here:


So (unless the min. 10 merits requirement relates to merits actually earned) he has it covered. Any calls above $5,780 can't win. With that in mind, if djsugar's call is valid, I'd like to change mine to $4,777 if possible.

I'm seeing L: 5,780 as per https://www.bitstamp.net/market/tradeview/

First of all, you're talking about the price, I was talking about decentralisation.
Second of all, you're wrong. People, including miners and traders, sell at the loss all the time. It's better to sell at $99 and lose $1 on every 1 ETH mined, than to hold and watch it drop to say $50 (losing $50 per 1 ETH mined).

Rational miner (not gambler or speculator) would just halt his mining operations when price < cost, which in turn reduces difficulty and the cost (forming price/cost equilibrium).

Otherwise, lets all mine BTC with our laptops and watch the price moon to >$1 million, right?

Yup, even feeling BTC may drop below 5k, I figured, strategically, that's the best bet to make. Now lets play a waiting game.

I vaguely recall seeing that with some coin, but that was probably years ago, when I was into trading cryptos.

Currently, there's IOTA, widely traded in millions (MIOTA). From other solutions, on exchange called CoinFalcon, whenever prices get close to 1 sat, they would just increase number of decimal places for bitcoin. i.e. in KIN-BTC pair, BTC has 10 places after decimal. That could also work for DVC.

I'm pretty sure it's not a rocket science to denominate basic unit to "kDVC" (1,000 DVC), it's all down to whether exchange operator is willing to do that.

---

On the subject of new exchanges, have you consider YoBit? If the info on their website is still up-to-date, they charge 0.1 btc for premium listing: https://yobit.net/en/addcoin/

Bitcoin will never go below $5,835 ever again! (24th June as per CMC). So I'm calling this the real bottom.

I've been eyeballing this thread for a while...


Or you could just get the exchange to denominate it to i.e. 1k DVC as a base unit. Should be rather simple and straightforward.

Wrong link? I believe this is the correct one:
https://blockchain.info/tx/dbaa68339d6bd748c2dfc54b18798f36b71879529262bf82178959d63f0cbb4e

^^^ OK. Thanks for clarifying.

---

Another one: settlement date for BTC180629 contracts is coming soon, will all open positions be moved to BTC180928 (with adjusted 'open price') or will you just close all positions?

---

And one more:


Do you count signature campaign payments made directly to Nexybit accounts as qualifying deposits? Will you include such participants in Airdrop draw.
Any more details on the draw? Will there be only 1 winner? Does the chance depend on the amount of the deposit?

Is this even Bitcoin-related in any way?

The only sensible advise is get a consultation with a patent attorney and see whether it's something that can be patented/copyrighted. If so, you could then pitch your idea to established app developers and either sell or licence out your copyrights to them.

Coin doesn't have to be mineable to be decentralised + minable coin can be centralised. PoW algo is by no means a guarantor of decentralisation.

You're a fanboy of ETH, which is to migrate from PoW to PoS (so non-mineable) in rather near future (unless something changed), so there's some serious logic flaw on your part right here.

Don't catch a falling knife. Volume is low. Sub 6k is still very possible.

So BTC current marketcap is already 1.6% of that of gold's (few years back this would be considered a wet dream) and 0.16% of total broad money (if your numbers are correct). I'd say that's already a lot.

It's crazy to assume, that just because there's a lot of money in the world, all the money will flow into Bitcoin for no particular reason.

He's clearly talking about the hypothetical $50k per 1 BTC scenario ($625k/12.5=$50k).

---

I agree there's a common-sense limit on BTC price expectation. I don't see how BTC could reach sustainable ~$50k without making a significant improvement in terms of adoption and usability. So we'd need either: 1) BTC establishing itself as a currency of alternative global economy (where large number of people actively spend & earn in BTC); or 2) some apocalyptic scenario, i.e. global financial system collapse, where people lose faith in fiat currencies altogether.

Of course, BTC could hit even $100k with market manipulation/speculation alone, but I wouldn't expect cryptos surviving for very long being only a speculative assets.

Literally nothing (unless I'm missing something). Forced meme attempt. It's supposed to be special because it starts with "21e8": "21"= 21m total bitcoins supply "e8"= "^8" as in 10^8 (total satoshis per bitcoin) and the following "00" are the 'divider'.

In other words, people are trying to find a meaning in random string of numbers/letters.

Nexybit recently increased their rates, see this post: