Could somebody do us a favour and ask Josh why he told Rishabh that Cantor were about to launch an exchange with BTC and XPY as base trading pairs? I'd love to hear how he intends to spin that one. [edit] Anyone else spot that Stuart Fraser has removed his connections to GAW from his Linkedin? https://www.linkedin.com/in/stuartafraser |
|
|
|
Oh dear, oh deary, deary me. If sending money off to a dodgy credit card company wasn't bad enough, it would appear that badbitcoin's other favourite scam to shill is actually being touted as a great way for them to moon XPY. scrypt.cc doesn't have anything working on its website, the forum link just opens a new tab to the homepage and the 'status' is crapped out, too. But don't let that stop the Muggles from believing it is nothing like the Ponzi scheme they've already been fleeced by, even though it contains the same incitement to 're-invest' your 'profits' and automatically, too! https://hashtalk.ch/topic/37445/v3-0-operation-ouroboros-a-scrypt-cc-snake-that-eats-it-s-own-tailFor this to work optimaly you will have to have auto reinvest option enabled in your scrypt.cc account. I got some bad news for you, Dan187, you ain't gonna get shit from this scheme and at least Garza had some pretty .png's he was selling you for his Ponzi. Scrypt.cc can't even be bothered to pretend like they're not clearly a fucking scam operation. |
|
|
|
|
WTF is with all the god-bothering and general weirdness at the end?
35 mins in and onwards is just bizarre.
|
|
|
|
PonziCoin - Because everybody knows.
Well, to be fair, everyone knew GAW/Hashlets/XPY was a Ponzi right from the start. Other than the poor unfortunates who refused to even consider the plethora of warning signs that were literally everywhere. I consider myself a reasonable person, and there was reason to think that Hashlets of the non-Zen variety were real up until the inbox was leaked. Suchmoon had them nailed back in March of 2014, this is a thread worth reading. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=537912.0EvilPanda was tasked with screaming 'FUD!' at anyone who posted legitimate complaints about GAW. This GAW-approved thread, however, is not worth reading as it mostly contains the sock-puppet fan-boy postings which would appear and drown out any 'difficult' questions: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=529093.0This, however, was surely the nail in the coffin for anyone with half a fucking brain, no? Ponzis are all about minimising on the withdrawals by convincing the muggles to re-invest their 'profits' into new and better schemes. After months of desperately trying to ensure that most muggles who bought miners from them did so under the 'hosted' service, with those who actually demanded a real machine delivered to their door reporting numerous failure-to-deliver-followed-by-generous-'refund'-involving-hosted-miner incidents, it was clearly time to move on to a 'new and better' scheme. Which this product-shuffling post by the Hash King was all about: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=822679.0Hey everyone,
Take a seat. Sit back. Relax.
This is an important moment not just for GAW but for every single early adopter we have.
The time has come.
As many of you have seen by now, Hashlet has completely transformed this industry. Forever. Hashlets hit the market when mining was at its worst and turned everything around.
Every early adopter here knows that well and those of you who invested in the beginning have been reaping enormous rewards ever since.
We’re about to do it all over again.
Introducing HashBase
ZenCloud was only the beginning, the first step!
A whole new platform called HashBase will be be absorbing the entire ZenCloud Platform and it will change the world.
I can’t say much more right now other than HashBase is the ying to Hashlet’s Yang. It’s our most ambitious R&D initiative next to Hashlet and will be available in major stores soon!
HashBase is coming this month!
Hashlet Primes paved the way for targeting multiple algorithms, boosting, and the whole concept of dual pool mining.
All of that was a drop in the bucket for what’s to come. It’s all been to set the stage, leading the way for the insane features that are coming. Now that our new hardware is coming in and datacenters are coming online, we’re going to be ready to launch HashBase which will give Prime Hashlets features in the coming weeks that will blow your mind away.
I’m talking features like mining x11 and even more algorithms.
I’m talking features like dramatically reduced maintenance fees.
I’m talking features like the ability to earn money offering Primes as collateral for loans, while still mining with them!
I’m taking features like mining multiple coins… and perhaps even exclusive access to ASIC proof ones!
Do you see where I’m going?
Hashlet Primes are going to be the single most powerful miners ever conceived and they will merge into HashBase.
HashBase will be our next update, it will have the most powerful HashAmps we release, designed specifically to skyrocket Hashlet ROIs. And Primes will take advantage of every single one of them, free forever!
Not just that, but Prime Hashlets will have exclusive first access to BTC.com. We are even working with one of the largest coin development teams in the world for exclusive access to mine that coin, only available on HashBase.
Hashlet Primes are officially no longer for sale
That’s right. Our ambitious plans for Primes require that they exist in very limited supply relative to all other Hashlets. That’s why we increased the Price of Primes in the first place. We wanted fewer of them to exist in the wild so that we could keep upping their power.
See, we sell enough Solo and Genesis Hashlets to run and expand this company just fine. That’s why we’re doing something special with Primes. We have the ability to make Primes not just the most powerful miners in the world. We have the ability to make them the most powerful miners possible.
So that’s what we’re going to do.
That’s the whole reason we offered to buy Primes back at $40! We know what they’re going to be worth.
So now that we’ve successfully reduced the number of Primes out there, it’s time turn sales off before the number jumps back up.
So from now on, the only way to acquire Hashlet Primes is though the ZenCloud Market
We need Primes to stay rare enough so that we have virtually unlimited flexibility to keep adding power and features to make them the envy of this industry. That means selling new ones is not an option.
So instead, the Primes that currently exist now will be the only ones that ever exist.
So if you want Primes, you’ll have to buy them from a Prime owner willing to part with theirs. But at this point, though, I’m not sure why they would…..
Just to recap…
We introduced Hashlet as the first stage of Project Prime and Prime Hashlets have been the spearhead along that path. It’s been such an overwhelming success that the enormous buying power Hashlet customers have given us has transformed this company forever. Now chip and board manufacturers play by our rules, not the other way around.
You’ve done so much for this company. It’s time for us to return the favor.
From the bottom of my heart, thank you
Goodnight.
Josh, CEO
PS - We’ve learned a lot in the last few weeks about communication and never leaving customers behind. I realize many of you sold your Primes without this knowledge. And since the market price for Primes will likely double what they used to be, I don’t want anyone feeling shorted.
We care about every customer and we want you to maximize your Hashlet Portfolio. So if you used the buy-back feature and regret doing so, we are going to give you a few hours to “reverse” the sale so you can take part of HashBase
You have until tomorrow morning to do so by pressing a button on your “Miners” page. You will see this button show up in a few hours.
Once the Zencloud Market comes back online, you will not longer be able to get those Primes back. It would not be fair to all the Prime buyers trading on the market for much higher prices to prepare for HashBase.
( You may follow on my blog for the next features update )
|
|
|
|
PonziCoin - Because everybody knows.
Well, to be fair, everyone knew GAW/Hashlets/XPY was a Ponzi right from the start. Other than the poor unfortunates who refused to even consider the plethora of warning signs that were literally everywhere. So, no, Series Two will have to be far more flamboyant and entertaining as a coin project if it is to be worthy of our popcorn. I'm thinking the opening episode should involve Homero Garza tracking down Elon Musk and trying to get a selfie with him so he can claim they iz best buds and that Elon is down for anything The King wants to propose as a business idea. |
|
|
|
Would it make sense to fork and start a coin thats truly owned by the people? Where no one person or entity owns more than 5% of the coins (me included)? Where no one person has control and decisions are actually made by the voting up the people? I still have a large group of investors backing me and multiple platforms I could put behind it. As a reboot possible? tell me to shut up if this makes no sense  Follow me on Twitter - @gawceo Yayyyy! Series Two of the BEST.REALITY.SHOW.EVAR!!!!! Go for it you mad narcissistic bastard, make another coin with all the investors you have backing you. It won't work but boy will it be suitably popcorn-worthy! |
|
|
|
"Plus they threaten to kill them if they leave Islam." - It's wrong. They are free to leave. There is no compulsion or punishment for it.
Perhaps that is your version, your interpretation, so that it can sit easier in your mind. But it isn't faithful to Mo's instructions any more than most Xtians are faithful to the BuyBull's instructions on how to keep slaves. See how both cherry-pick what they want from their 'Holy' books? We already saw a thread closed which attempted to claim Islam as the 'true' religion because Muslims asserted there were things in the Koran which could not possibly have been known at the time, which equals a 'miracle' apparently. Unfortunately, however, all these claims made by Muslims about their 'Holy' book containing 'miraculous' text can be, and have been, rapidly shot down as being the nonsense they are, hence the thread closing. The question remains, Muhammed, are you even capable of considering that your belief is simply the result of you being conditioned to believe and that the many religious acts you have to carry out as part of the daily rituals are merely to reinforce that conditioning. That your 'prophet' was just a human being who lived during a time where many people could claim to be prophets or messiahs and not be ridiculed for it, which is exactly what he did, making sure of course to declare himself the final prophet so as not to be usurped by any young pretenders to his throne. Your book isn't special in any way whatsoever and neither is your religion, apart from the fact that its frequent rituals and prayer times each day lead to such fervent belief among some of its followers that they are willing to die in the process of killing those who do not believe in their version of it, in order to impress their magic man in the sky. Name one meaningful difference between your religion and any other. The names and places may change, but the delusion is still the same. |
|
|
|
|
BTW, what's the current status with Cryptsy and their shilling, I mean 'supporting the coin network', of XPY?
Did the subject just get dropped?
|
|
|
|
@rootdude I am relativly literate on SEC proceedings and from my understanding of thier proceedings and US law it is entirely possible that the sec has opened an inquiry[.] there is not any legal action on file which means Gaw is in compliance with what ever the SEC has asked of them. Furthermore I have searched all the court filings in my state which is the Home state of gawminers and there is no legal action pending in my jurrisdiction. This is just from my understanding I am not a lawyer if one would like to charm in and clarify... please provide your Bar ID and state with your post so I can verify your standing as an attorney Seems legit. |
|
|
|
I started this printing company due to loosing my Job, Great, just the world needs, a Garza-quality printing company. |
|
|
|
You're grammar fuck up in the title is really annoying, please fix it Oh dear, Furio. If you're going to criticise somebody for their grammar, it is wise to make sure your own post does not contain such an obvious mistake, too. |
|
|
|
Ohhhh . . .hahahahahahaaa! Well I was going to ask why Jessica Garza felt the need to ask other people to raise $1000 dollars for child brides when she can obviously afford to fund it herself, if not with XPY, then by selling all the crap they ripped out of the house they were renting, but if he really can't be arsed to pay a few BTC to have someone make a bespoke website for his latest round of failed pumps, then that would explain why his wife doesn't give enough of a shit either. |
|
|
|
BTW, is this not a contender for the most asinine reasoning ever?  What's worse is that HippieMiner is thanking Badbitcoin for 'doing what you do'! As far as I can tell, all Badbitcoin does is slag off the competition to the scam operations he is shilling. /OT He is part of the GAW/XPY fraud. |
|
|
|
Also scrypt.cc is shilling hard, I feel an exit scam is coming very very soon.
Absolutely, did you see BadBitcoin giving it large recently over how scrypt.cc is absolutely totally legit because [insert a bunch of shit here that doesn't quite add up].  So which scrypt asic manufacturer is selling miners which ROI? AFAIK there was a brief period for a couple of months during the middle of last year when Innosilicon released the A2 where ROI could be achieved but that's it. Even the scrypt.cc website is entirely absent any discussion about their hardware. As for the excuse that it can't be a Ponzi because it has been running for over a year, one word, GAW. Scrypt.cc only has to pay out when a user withdraws and most of them talking constantly about how they take every satoshi of 'profit' and buy more 'KH' with it. Which is the same business-model that the Hashlets and .png sales were being run under. |
|
|
|
5% annually on a small portion of our allocation to customers isnt enough to get people excited about the payouts they would receive Right, so the fact is that your properly-licensed US-based exchange is holding a Prime Controller solely so you can entice customers. It is absolutely nothing at all to do with 'protecting the network', because a PC does nothing of the sort. The truth is that you aren't doing it 'for the community', you aren't doing it to 'protect the network', you are doing it solely so you can offer your customers an incentive to trade XPY on your exchange which, as has already been acknowledged by Adam Matlack, lends legitimacy to XPY it would otherwise not have. So has Cryptsy done anything about their Prime Controller yet, or at least said what they intend to do? I'm getting the feeling they are hoping that this thread drops the topic and moves on to other things so they can continue with their plan to entice customers into trading XPY on their exchange by way of this incentive of a share of the PC poop-loot. Even if they're intending on pleading ignorance about XPY being a scam should the three letter agencies start knocking heads, I'm sure that their decision to legitimise-by-proxy and play a part in the overall authority and decision-making process of this coin network is going to make it awfully hard to distance themselves from it when feces and fans collide. |
|
|
|
5% annually on a small portion of our allocation to customers isnt enough to get people excited about the payouts they would receive Right, so the fact is that your properly-licensed US-based exchange is holding a Prime Controller solely so you can entice customers. It is absolutely nothing at all to do with 'protecting the network', because a PC does nothing of the sort. The truth is that you aren't doing it 'for the community', you aren't doing it to 'protect the network', you are doing it solely so you can offer your customers an incentive to trade XPY on your exchange which, as has already been acknowledged by Adam Matlack, lends legitimacy to XPY it would otherwise not have. |
|
|
|
Mullick, seeing as BitJohn kept dodging the question, perhaps you can help to explain how your exchange holding a 'Prime Controller' serves to protect the coin network better than a regular wallet. They still stake with the same frequency as a regular wallet, correct? PoS is based on amount being staked plus coin age usually so, again, I can't see how the fact the 'PC' awards a larger return on the stake than a regular wallet is going to make the 'PC' able to better protect the coin network. |
|
|
|
|
Unless mintsy were to be able to be audited in real-time by an independent third-party service to prove they were not operating fractional mining with 'virtual miners', I wouldn't touch their GAWMiner-like 'hashflex, liteflex and xflex' with a bargepole.
|
|
|
|
At this point I feel I have put my best effort forward on the Prime Controller issue, hopefully I answered some questions for you. Apparently you are under the impression that simply repeating how your exchange is doing something good for the XPY community is a good enough response. 1. Why do you think it is the job of your exchange to keep this coin's network 'secure', as opposed to any other coin? If you really think about it exchanges already do this on every other PoS coin in many cases well more than 51%. This is true for Cryptsy on numerous coins, BTC-e and Bittrex probably one or two others do the same. Did I mention we all talk? If you read my post history you will find numerous statements on that topic. That's not answering the actual question though, which was why you think it is the job of your exchange to keep this coin's network 'secure', as opposed to the coin network expected to simply be secure by default. If a coin's network cannot be secure through its own operation then you should not be offering it for trade. 2. What does your exchange owning 1, 2, or even 3 'Prime Controllers' have to do with keeping this coin's network 'secure'? Obviously we have an interest in ensuring the network is stable to avoid "issues". Again, that's not the question I asked. I wanted to know how your exchange holding a 'Prime Controller', as opposed to a regular wallet, contributes to keeping the XPY network secure. There may be a legitimate technical reason for the existence of the coin-pooping controllers other than to poop coins, if there is, by all means enlighten us. 3. Why is it worth more to your fully-licensed and legitimate exchange to associate itself with this altcoin even more at this time, thereby lending it a degree of credibility it does not warrant and risking your entire operation and client funds being seized by an alphabet agency deciding that you're worth investigating further due to your unusual decision to associate with Garza back in October and since? We don't back Garza never have. The selection of XPY is no different than the zillion other coins selection. And finally, again, this isn't what I said. Even Adam Matlack stated that your exchange holding a 'Prime Controller' lends XPY credibility. He actually said that on record. So why would you choose to risk your public image in order to lend this fraudulent coin project crediblity which could lead to people mistakenly believing your involvement in XPY makes it a worthy investment? |
|
|
|
1. Why do you think it is the job of your exchange to keep this coin's network 'secure', as opposed to any other coin? If you really think about it exchanges already do this on every other PoS coin in many cases well more than 51%. This is true for Cryptsy on numerous coins, BTC-e and Bittrex probably one or two others do the same. Did I mention we all talk? If you read my post history you will find numerous statements on that topic. That's not answering the actual question though, which was why you think it is the job of your exchange to keep this coin's network 'secure', as opposed to the coin network expected to simply be secure by default. If a coin's network cannot be secure through its own operation then you should not be offering it for trade. 2. What does your exchange owning 1, 2, or even 3 'Prime Controllers' have to do with keeping this coin's network 'secure'? Obviously we have an interest in ensuring the network is stable to avoid "issues". Again, that's not the question I asked. I wanted to know how your exchange holding a 'Prime Controller', as opposed to a regular wallet, contributes to keeping the XPY network secure. There may be a legitimate technical reason for the existence of the coin-pooping controllers other than to poop coins, if there is, by all means enlighten us. 3. Why is it worth more to your fully-licensed and legitimate exchange to associate itself with this altcoin even more at this time, thereby lending it a degree of credibility it does not warrant and risking your entire operation and client funds being seized by an alphabet agency deciding that you're worth investigating further due to your unusual decision to associate with Garza back in October and since? We don't back Garza never have. The selection of XPY is no different than the zillion other coins selection. And finally, again, this isn't what I said. Even Adam Matlack stated that your exchange holding a 'Prime Controller' lends XPY credibility. He actually said that on record. So why would you choose to risk your public image in order to lend this fraudulent coin project crediblity which could lead to people mistakenly believing your involvement in XPY makes it a worthy investment? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
